Early this morning, the conference committee reconciling the House and Senate versions of financial regulatory reform approved final language for the legislation on a party-line vote following a marathon 20-hour negotiating session. A flurry of changes were made to the legislation last night, including the addition of an exemption to the Volcker rule and a weakening of Sen. Blanche Lincoln’s (D-AR) provision requiring banks to spin-off their derivatives trading desks. Below is a comparison of the House and Senate versions of the bill, as well as what ultimately ended up in the conference report:
| Provision | Senate Bill | House Bill | Reconciled Bill |
| Derivatives Exchanges and Clearing | Forced almost all derivatives trading onto exchanges and through clearinghouses, with narrow exemptions for non-financial end users. | Forced derivatives trading onto exchanges and through clearinghouses, but with wide exemptions for end-users, including financial companies. | Senate version |
| Derivatives Spin-Off | Forced banks to spin-off their derivatives trading desks into a separately capitalized entity. | Did not include a spin-off provision. | Forces banks to spin-off some derivatives trading activity (commodities, energy, metals, agriculture, equities and below-investment-grade credit default swaps) but keep trading related to interest rate swaps, foreign exchange swaps, credit, gold and silver, investment-grade credit default swaps and “any transaction used to hedge risk.” |
| Volcker Rule | Directed regulators to study and then implement a ban on proprietary trading. | Allowed regulators to ban proprietary trading at systemically risky firms. | Implements a stronger ban proposed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR), but with an exemption sought by Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) that allows banks to invest up to three percent of their Tier 1 capital in risky hedge funds and private equity firms. |
| Consumer Protection Agency | Included a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, housed within the Federal Reserve, with an independent director and rule-writing authority. It could be overruled by a majority vote of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which is composed of bank regulators. | Included a stand-alone Consumer Financial Protection Agency with an independent director and rule-writing authority. | Senate version |
| Auto Dealer Exemption | Did not exempt auto dealers from oversight by the new consumer regulator, but the Senate did pass a “motion to instruct” encouraging conferees to approve the House language. | Exempted auto dealers from oversight by the new consumer regulator. | House version |
| Resolution Fund | Included resolution authority funded by an after-the-fact assessment on large financial institutions. Any extra money needed to unwind a firm can be fronted by the Treasury Departent. | Included resolution authority pre-funded by an assessment on institutions with more than $10 billion assets. The fund could grow no larger than $150 billion. | Senate version |

Previous in TP Politics


By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.