The politically savvy blogger Steven Clemons makes this fascinating point:
But there is a bigger, more complicated and admittedly cynical dimension to the Gore win.
The rest of the article has some fascinating behind-the-scenes from the Clinton Global Initiative that I had wondered about when I was there — why did Gore get onto a plenary panel when he wasn’t on the agenda?
Previous in TP Climate Progress

Joe,
You might find this a tad unbelieveable, but I actually have some sympathy for your cause; I just have a problem with your tactics and some of your underlying assumptions.
But since I do have some sympathy, I’m actually feeling sorry for you now that Gore “owns the global climate change franchise”. He’s probably the worst possible spokesman and figurehead for the AGW movement.
Things like honesty, integrity, principle, and common sense are traits to be encouraged in ourselves and others. Most people ‘get’ that, and most people get that Al Gore, like most career ‘public servants’, just doesn’t display good examples of those personal traits. And his propaganda campaign has already left a lot of people cold on the whole subject. His tarnished image will further tarnish the image of the whole AGW industry.
Sorry.
But as an amateur pundit, I’ve been saying for years Hillary Clinton was going to be president. Not that I like the idea, but the forces have been in motion a long time. Al Gore’s Nobel Prize might encourage a run, which might make election watching even more fun this time. He might even get cornered into a debate on AGW!