Right for 27 years: 1981 Hansen study finds warming trend that could raise sea levels

Posted on

"Right for 27 years: 1981 Hansen study finds warming trend that could raise sea levels"

After all, just 20 years ago scientists were worried about the new Ice Age.” This myth is so potent for deniers from Michael Crichton to George Will to Senator James Inhofe that even word guru and strategist Frank “death tax” Luntz made it a recommended line of attack in his super-slimy 2002 memo to conservatives on how best to cast doubt on climate science.

Why do deniers love it so? It makes present global-warming fears seem faddish, saying current climate science is nothing more than finger-in-the-wind guessing. This attack appeals especially to conservatives who want to link their attack on climate scientists to their favorite attack against progressive presidential candidates — that they are flip-floppers.

The myth has been utterly debunked in the scientific literature (see “Another denier talking point — ‘global cooling’ — bites the dust,” RealClimate here and here, “Was an imminent Ice Age predicted in the ’70’s by scientists, in scientific journals? No.” and Skeptical Science).

In fact, 27 years ago Thursday, James Hansen and six other NASA atmospheric physicists, published a seminal article in Science, “Climate Impact of Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.” The paper has a number of caveats, as befits a major projection before modern climate models and modern supercomputers were available, before we had decades of verifying observations, and before we knew just how fast greenhouse gas emissions would rise. But the analysis bears up unbelievably well — any one of us would be delighted if we published something a quarter century ago that was this prescient:

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.

The 1980s warmed, the Northwest passage opened, the drought prone-regions have emerged, and sea level rise is a top worry (even if Greenland has emerged as more troublesome than West Antarctica). I believe the threat of drought and sea level rise remain the to gravest threats that climate change poses.

I dug up the August 22, 1981 New York Times story on the study, “Study finds warming trend that could raise sea levels,” which I reprint here:

A team of Federal scientists says it has detected an overall warming trend in the earth’s atmosphere extending back to the year 1880. They regard this as evidence of the validity of the ”greenhouse” effect, in which increasing amounts of carbon dioxide cause steady temperature increases.

The seven atmospheric scientists predict a global warming of ”almost unprecedented magnitude” in the next century. It might even be sufficient to melt and dislodge the ice cover of West Antarctica, they say, eventually leading to a worldwide rise of 15 to 20 feet in the sea level. In that case, they say, it would ”flood 25 percent of Louisiana and Florida, 10 percent of New Jersey and many other lowlands throughout the world” within a century or less.

Workings of Greenhouse

The forecast, which also envisions widespread disruption of agriculture, is the fruit of analyses and computer simulations conducted by the Institute for Space Studies of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The institute, which is in New York City, is part of the space agency’s Goddard Spaceflight Center in Greenbelt, Md. The forecast is in an article in the Aug. 28 issue of the journal Science.

Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which is primarily a result of mankind’s burning of fuels, is thought to act like the glass of a greenhouse. It absorbs heat radiation from the earth and its atmosphere, heat that otherwise would dissipate into space. Other factors being equal, the more carbon dioxide there is in the atmosphere, the warmer the earth should become, according to the theory.

A century ago the amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 280 to 300 parts per million. It is now 335 to 340 parts per million and it is expected to be at least 600 parts per million in the next century.

The possibility that the greenhouse effect could alter the earth’s temperature has long been debated. Scientists have agreed that carbon dioxide is increasing, but disagree on whether temperatures are also increasing.

The major difficulty in accepting the greenhouse theory ”has been the absence of observed warming coincident with the historic carbon dioxide increase,” the scientists wrote.

Researchers were further confounded by an apparent cooling trend since 1940. As a result, many atmospheric scientists concluded that the climatic effects of increased carbon dioxide might not become detectable for many decades. But the Government scientists say they see clear evidence that carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution has already warmed the climate.

If fuel burning increases at a slow rate with emphasis on other energy sources, the study predicts a global temperature rise in the next century of about 5 degrees Fahrenheit. If fuel use rises rapidly, which some believe may occur as the developing countries industrialize, the predicted rise is from 6 to 9 degrees.

Even the more moderate rise of 5 degrees, the authors say, would result in higher average temperatures than were reached in the period between the last two ice ages. At that time sea levels were 30 feet higher than they are today, probably because West Antarctica was ice free. The climate ”would approach the warmth of the Mesozoic, the age of dinosaurs,” the report says.

The study’s conclusions are likely to be challenged on two counts: their detection of a trend of temperature increase and linking it with a carbon dioxide increase, and their projections of the consequences of the increase.

A leading participant in past carbon dioxide studies has been Dr. Stephen H. Schneider of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. Reached by telephone there, he said the conclusions about the extent of warming and how quickly it will occur would be reasonable if the assumptions on which they are based prove valid, but that many can be challenged.

One of these is the space agency group’s contention that a cooling trend in recent decades was caused by dust from volcanic eruptions high in the atmosphere. If that was not the case, their model might be seriously flawed.

Other assumptions open to challenge include such uncertain factors as population growth rates, energy-consuming trends in the developing world, new developments in solar energy and other alternative energy sources, trends in energy conservation and lack of knowledge regarding the extent to which oceans might remove carbon dioxide from the air.

These uncertainties are, to a large extent, recognized in the new report, signed by Dr. James Hansen and six colleagues at the space studies institute.

In their analysis, the scientists seek to respond to an outspoken skeptic regarding the carbon dioxide threat, Dr. Sherwood B. Idso, a climate specialist with the Federal Department of Agriculture in Phoenix. Last March he circulated an analysis saying that a doubling or tripling of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have little effect except to increase global agricultural productivity by 20 to 50 percent.

Plants grow by converting carbon dioxide and water into carbohydrates and other compounds, aided by solar energy. One proposed strategy to limit the growth of atmospheric carbon dioxide would be to plant extensive forests.

Dr. Hansen and his colleagues cite the observed surface temperatures of Mars and, particularly, Venus as support for their predicted greenhouse effect. The surface of Venus, with an atmosphere formed largely of carbon dioxide, is at about 900 degrees Fahrenheit.

Their conclusion that the climate has warmed by almost one degree in the last century is based on a re-analysis of global observations, paying special attention to the Southern Hemisphere. ‘‘The common misconception that the world is cooling,” they say, ”is based on Northern Hemisphere experience to 1970.”

As ”an appropriate strategy,” the report proposes emphasis on energy conservation and development of alternative energy sources while using fossil fuels ”as necessary” in the coming decades.

Kudos to Hansen for being so right for so long, and for continuing to be the nation’s scientific conscience when t comes to our self-destructive refusal to take action to preventa catastrophe he has so long warned about.

Related Posts:

Tags:

« »

10 Responses to Right for 27 years: 1981 Hansen study finds warming trend that could raise sea levels

  1. Earl Killian says:

    Joe worte, “even if Greenland has emerged as more troublesome than West Antarctica“.

    It might help to mention one of the reasons why for folks. It turns out the ozone hole over Antarctica affects the wind patterns in a way that prevents warmer air from reaching the polar regions there. Thus the ozone hole, which we hope to repair someday, is actually helping to keep the Antarctic frozen.

  2. Mauri Pelto says:

    Great article. I remember well being at a conference at Northwestern in 1983 where Steve Schneider and others convinced me of what must come. And I decided then and there to pursue a research program to monitor glaciers across an ice clad mountain range, 25 years later I still am.
    I would disagree, with you Joe, that Greenland is becoming more troublesome than Antarctica. True there have been changes in the behavior of more marine terminating outlet glaciers, and the melt season has intensified more.

    However, the recent collapse of Wordie Ice Shelf, Mueller Ice Shelf, Jones Ice Shelf, Larsen-A and Larsen-B Ice Shelf and Wilkins Ice Shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula has made us aware of how dynamic ice shelve systems are. After their loss the reduced buttressing of feeder glaciers has allowed the expected speed-up of inland ice masses after shelf ice break-up. Pine Island and Thwaites Glacier accelerations have indicated some of the impact occurring on the main West Antarctic Ice Sheet. The potential is larger and this ice sheet can respond faster than the GIS.

    Ice shelves have long been recognized as keys in buttressing Antarctic Ice Sheets. In turn ice shelves rely on pinning points for buttressing. The pinning point are where the floating ice shelf meets solid ground, either at lateral margins or a subglacial rise meets the bottom of the ice shelf causing an ice rise on the shelf surface.We have lost a gmuch greater are of ice in Antarctica than in Greenland in the last decade, but it is true that a greater portion of this was already afloat.

  3. David B. Benson says:

    “The seven atmospheric scientists predict a global warming of ‘almost unprecedented magnitude’ in the next century.”

    Drop the word ‘almost’. :-(

  4. John Hollenberg says:

    I assume you are talking about this James Titus:

    http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/index.php/csw/details/epa-titus/

    I googled and found 12,000 references, so it’s a bit difficult to be sure :-)

  5. rpauli says:

    We might regard denialist speech as similar to antisemitic, racist or sexist speech. It is wrong and hurtful and based on learned ignorance or deliberate greed (more likely). This language directly delays the safety of our future. Increases our workload for common protection.

    Our personal responses might be similar: a mild public rebuke, refusal to tolerate that language in civil discourse. It need not be a huge engagement, just a quick statement and move on.

    I feel that I am doing harm by remaining silent.

  6. Barry Brook says:

    Nice find Joe, and also Eli. Retrospective reflections on climate prognostications should be more readily cited to the denialosphere, because they are indisputably compelling. Similar predictions were made for an observed lag in CO2/CH4 methane feedbacks following post-glacial solar forcing.

    Although the melt of the GIS is alarming, I agree with Maurie that the WAIS is still the biggest concern, because of the potential for abrupt change due to subsurface melting of ice on the pinning points, leading to break off of some rather large chunks of land-based ice.

  7. Timo Hämeranta says:

    Re rpauli:

    History is filled with wars to solve problems (debates, conflicts) for good.

    They have always followed the same pattern:

    Escalation.

    To win the war the escalation of any kind has gone and will go as follows:

    – first you try to disprove opposition’s arguments

    – then you try to prove opposition is unethical

    – then you criminalise opposition

    – then you kill opposition.

    When you are convinced stakes a high enough you’ll go through all these stages with a clear conscience.

    In climate change debates we are now at the stage “it is unethical to pollute atmosphere by CO2 and even more to suspect the man-induced disastrous climate change for future CO2 emissions”.

    Examples we have, worldwide, not only in public coverage but in academic world, too.

    Suggestions and instigations to criminalise and even kill polluters and dissidents have already been publicly presented.

    In History the final solution to end conflicts has been:

    “Let’s kill all the dissidents!”

    If current trend continues our societies will escalate to the final stages presented here.

  8. geciktirici says:

    In their analysis, the scientists seek to respond to an outspoken skeptic regarding the carbon dioxide threat, Dr. Sherwood B. Idso, a climate specialist with the Federal Department of Agriculture in Phoenix. Last March he circulated an analysis saying that a doubling or tripling of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have little effect except to increase global agricultural productivity by 20 to 50 percent.

  9. sikiş says:

    Nice find Joe, and also Eli. Retrospective reflections on climate prognostications should be more readily cited to the denialosphere, because they are indisputably compelling. Similar predictions were made for an observed lag in CO2/CH4 methane feedbacks following post-glacial solar forcing.