Bill McKibben and Betsy Taylor on the merger of 350.org and 1Sky
"Bill McKibben and Betsy Taylor on the merger of 350.org and 1Sky"
By Betsy Taylor and Bill McKibben
If you spend a little time as an environmentalist, one thing you’ll hear eventually from friends and family: “I wish there weren’t so many groups. It’s confusing””I don’t know who to volunteer for. Wouldn’t it work better if you all got together?”
This isn’t quite as obvious as it sounds. Different groups have sprung up at different times to fill different niches””you wouldn’t look out at a marsh and say “it would be much nicer if there was just one kind of frog to keep track of.” Diversity has some very real purposes.
But there are moments, and this is one of them, when unity is essential. We’re up against the most sustained assault on the environment ever: in the last few weeks our oldest environmental groups have had to play nonstop defense just to keep Congress from gutting the Clean Air Act. A president elected on the promise of transformational energy change has reverted to opening vast tracts of Wyoming to new coal-mining. A tea-party House has actually voted to deny the science of global warming.
Behind all this is a very unified fossil-fuel industry. Working through the Koch Brothers, the US Chamber of Commerce, and a couple of other fronts they’re busy buying votes and supplying disinformation. And they’re winning. To fight back effectively, we need a much louder voice.
That’s why this week we joined together two of the big mass movements around climate change: 1sky, and 350.org. 1sky has been coordinating efforts on the ground across the United States; 350.org has been at work in 188 countries around the world. We’ll now all operate under the 350 banner, in an effort to bring a unified message on every front.
That message starts with simple science: our foremost researchers, NASA scientists like James Hansen, have shown that 350 parts per million co2 is the most we can safely have in the atmosphere, a level we’ve already exceeded. No matter how the House votes, physics and chemistry still call the tune.
But the message goes beyond science to politics. We have learned over time that you can’t win simply by explaining the crisis to political leaders; they may intellectually understand that they’re facing the end of the world, but what they really fear is the end of their political careers. We need to build a movement that can reward and punish politicians. Since we’ll never have the money to match the fossil fuel front groups, we’re going to need a different currency: bodies, creativity, passion.
It’s possible to rally that passion. Both 1sky and 350.org have shown the ability to find and energize a new generation of environmental supporters, one that crosses all demographic and linguistic boundaries.
Together, as the new 350.org, we’ll be speaking with one voice. Shouting, really””trying to drown out the persuasive talk from dirty money.
– Betsy Taylor has been the chair of 1sky, and Bill McKibben is the chair of 350.org.





FRONT
I’m all about taking this energy around climate and just building distributed renewables… Instead of being policy-heavy, devote an arm to the practical end of getting it done.
@Joy – you need both sides of it and many companies exist to develop distributed renewables. However, we need to show the support that exists for them and develop new support so that it gets made a national priority. We can move a whole lot quicker on an issue when the government is behind it.
Good luck! It seems the insanity of the tea party will unite people into action
Excellent news, ME
Indeed diversity does have its purpose. A mature forest is highly diversified and in balance with nature. Humanity is not and thus immature. Something always corrects the immature in nature to balance things out again. The choice is to self correct more gently toward balance and maturity or allow nature to scour us and our habitat all away.
Every group has something at stake whether they acknowledge it or not. WWF will have no wildlife to fund. The Nature Conservancy will have no habitats to conserve. No whales for Greenpeace to save. No birds for bird watchers to watch. Museums are preserving artifacts for no future art appreciators to see. Even the boon morticians will experience will die down with the populations. Every group will end up with no meaning. Every person alive today has a stake in whether this blue-green marble will scour us and our trees and wildlife, our flowers and pets, all that we find beautiful away.
We may have started young and innocent with our carbon toys but we never had to die for our youthful foolishness. We had a choice. We might still have one.
This is great news. One question: will the new 350.org be capable of directly endorsing/opposing political candidates?
Basically, can it be the environmental equivalent of the NRA?
Andy,
League of Conservation Voters is the environmental equivilent of the NRA: http://www.lcv.org/scorecard/
I would not be opposed to 350 endorsing certian politicians and especially calling out the 17 dirty democrats in the Senate (Klobachar, McKascall, Baucus, Levin, ect.). Honestly right now I would include President Obama as a dirty air democrat as well. Sad. 350 should endorse Kucinich.