Current Global Warming Is Unprecedented Compared to Climate of the Last 20,000 years, Study Finds

A common argument against global warming is that the climate has always varied. Temperatures rise sometimes and this is perfectly natural is the usual line.

However, Svante Björck, a climate researcher at Lund University in Sweden, has now shown that global warming, i.e. simultaneous warming events in the northern and southern hemispheres, have not occurred in the past 20,000 years, which is as far back as it is possible to analyse with sufficient precision to compare with modern developments. Svante Björck’s study thus goes 14,000 years further back in time than previous studies have done. “What is happening today is unique from a historical geological perspective,” he says.

So begins the news release for a recent study, “Current global warming appears anomalous in relation to the climate of the last 20,000 years.”  That study finds clear evidence recent human-caused global warming is unprecedented in the past 20 millennia:

… considering that climate trends during the last millennia in different parts of the world have, in the last century or so, changed direction into a globally warming trend, we ought to regard the ongoing changes as anomalies, triggered by anthropogenically forced alterations of the carbon cycle in the general global environment.

we have no past analogues to a situation with abruptly rising GHGs more than 10,000 yr into an interglacial period. We should therefore be cautious about how and to what degree we contaminate our environment and both directly and indirectly influence natural climate processes: the dangers of crossing climate thresholds in a greenhouse world have been pointed out by many scientists.

Multiple, independent analyses confirm recent warming is unprecedented in magnitude and speed and cause for the past 1600 to 2000 years (see links below).  Now an analysis finds that the kind of global warming we are seeing now hasn’t been seen for at least 20,000 years.

Climatologist Michael Mann, one of the world’s leading experts on paleoclimate reconstructions, emails me:

This looks like yet another solid study which emphasizes the distinction between pre-historical temperature swings, where the globe often cooled in one region while it warmed in another, with modern warming–which is essentially ubiquitous and, unlike past temperature changes, driven primarily by human activity.

Here are more details on the Lund University study:

Svante Björck has gone through the global climate archives, which are presented in a large number of research publications, and looked for evidence that any of the climate events that have occurred since the end of the last Ice Age 20 000 years ago could have generated similar effects on both the northern and southern hemispheres simultaneously. It has not, however, been possible to verify this. Instead, he has found that when, for example, the temperature rises in one hemisphere, it falls or remains unchanged in the other.

“My study shows that, apart from the larger-scale developments, such as the general change into warm periods and ice ages, climate change has previously only produced similar effects on local or regional level”, says Svante Björck.

As an example, let us take the last clear climate change, which took place between the years 1600 and 1900 and which many know as the Little Ice Age. Europe experienced some of its coldest centuries. While the extreme cold had serious consequences for agriculture, state economies and transport in the north, there is no evidence of corresponding simultaneous temperature changes and effects in the southern hemisphere. The climate archives, in the form of core samples taken from marine and lake sediments and glacier ice, serve as a record of how temperature, precipitation and concentration of atmospheric gases and particles have varied over the course of history, and are full of similar examples.

Instead it is during ‘calmer’ climatic periods, when the climate system is influenced by external processes, that the researchers can see that the climate signals in the archives show similar trends in both the northern and southern hemispheres.
“This could be, for example, at the time of a meteorite crash, when an asteroid hits the earth or after a violent volcanic eruption when ash is spread across the globe. In these cases we can see similar effects around the world simultaneously”, says Svante Björck.

Professor Björck draws parallels to today’s situation. The levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are currently changing very rapidly. At the same time, global warming is occurring.

“As long as we don’t find any evidence for earlier climate changes leading to similar simultaneous effects on a global scale, we must see today’s global warming as an exception caused by human influence on the earth’s carbon cycle”, says Svante Björck, continuing: “this is a good example of how geological knowledge can be used to understand our world. It offers perspectives on how the earth functions without our direct influence and thus how and to what extent human activity affects the system.”

Here are other recent studies demonstrating that recent global warming is unprecedented in magnitude and speed and cause:

  1. Science (2011): Temperatures of North Atlantic “are unprecedented over the past 2000 years and are presumably linked to the Arctic amplification of global warming.”
  2. GRL (2010):  “We conclude that the 20th century warming of the incoming intermediate North Atlantic water has had no equivalent during the last thousand years.“
  3. JGR (2010):  “The last decades of the past millennium are characterized again by warm temperatures that seem to be unprecedented in the context of the last 1600 years.”
  4. Unprecedented warming in Lake Tanganyika and its impact on humanity (2010)
  5. Human-caused Arctic warming overtakes 2,000 years of natural cooling, “seminal” study finds (2009)


13 Responses to Current Global Warming Is Unprecedented Compared to Climate of the Last 20,000 years, Study Finds

  1. Steve Funk says:

    It is puzzling that Bjorck does not even mention the Younger Dryas, a cold period between 12800 and 11,500 years BP. The graphs here
    show a comparable cooling in both Greenland and the antarctic

  2. Peter Mizla says:

    20k Years ago sends us back to the last glacial. No?

    I thought the global temperatures NOW where the warmest in the Holocene- which is now the Anthropocene(?)

  3. Rabid Doomsayer says:

    You aint seen nuffin yet.

    There us no analog in the last 800,000 years for the climate we are already committed to. There is no analog ever for how fast we will get there.

    The Milankovitch Cycles are really gentle in the rate of change, yet the climate response was rapid at times. We are not gentle.

  4. John says:

    Did You read the wikipedia article notably the section on global effects?

  5. Johnny Quest says:

    Reading that article, it’s clear that the Southern Hemisphere temperature change preceded the Northern change by ~1,000 years. So again, the world-wide rapid temperature increase we’re seeing now is unprecedented. So that is WHY Bjorck didn’t mention this event…he knew it wasn’t relevant. There is no ‘cover up’ as your post implies.

  6. David B. Benson says:

    Interesting about Antarctica during Younger Dryas; I hadn’t known that.

  7. David B. Benson says:

    I think the author is attempting to state that the last time the temperatures of both hemispheres were in phase, as opposed to a more typical out-of-phase, started with the big thaw at the end of LGM.

  8. Mulga Mumblebrain says:

    I think Rabid that the climate has changed more rapidly, at times in the past, but only when we have been struck by large meteorites or comets or when super-volcanoes went off. It’s the seven billion living people that make this current calamity so much worse-billions are going to die prematurely and the geo-political chaos will result in war, which will probably provide the coup de grace.

  9. Dr.A.Jagadeesh says:

    The findings of the study are alarming on Global Warming and consequent Climate Change.

    Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India

  10. Jon Flatley says:

    I’ve never seen this angle on global warming. Very interesting.

  11. Jon Flatley says:

    The change became rapid once a tipping point was reached, or “feed back” cycle. When it gets colder, more snow falls, reflecting more solar energy to space, leading to colder conditions, more snow, more solar reflection, etc. Before you know it, the changes are happening relatively quicly. There is active research going on to better understand climate “tipping points”.

  12. You really should read the articles you link to: “Huybers has argued that there is fair confidence in the absence of the Younger Dryas in Antarctica, New Zealand and parts of Oceania”… In other words it was a regional climate event mainly restricted to the Atlantic region and the northern hemisphere, as the Little Ice Age was, and as was the earilier warming period…

  13. Yes… The last mass extinction event (65 myr)was probably because of a large volcanic event combined with mass releases of deep ocean calthrates… Exactly as we are doing now with CO2 and ocean warming…