Nine Low-Tech Steps For Community Resilience In A Warming Climate

green roof, Washington, DC (via Richard Sebaka)by Kaid Benfield, via NRDC’s Switchboard

Over the past 50 years, our average global temperature has increased at the fastest rate in recorded history.  That is fact, not opinion.  Scientists say that under current trends, average US temperatures could be 3 to 9 degrees higher by the end of the century.

This is not abstract, nor are the effects limited to the developing world.  These changes will have – indeed, are already having – major effects on our cities, suburbs, and towns.  Chicago is becoming warmer.  So is Orlando.  So are Spokane and Dallas.  So are smaller towns such as Louisville, Colorado and suburbs such as Gaithersburg, Maryland.  Everyone has weather, and everyone’s weather is getting warmer.  By fits and starts, to be sure; but, if you don’t believe it, ask a landscaper.  The serious impacts beginning and yet to come are not pretty and, as my colleague Kim Knowlton has reported, even the insurance industry is noticing.

There are many things we can and must do to reduce the warming trajectory.  First among these is reducing emissions of carbon dioxide, the most common and potent greenhouse gas, particularly by transitioning to a clean energy economy.  But turning this ship around is going to take time, even under the best scenarios.

Meanwhile, there are also measures we need to take right now inside our communities so that we are as prepared as possible for the warmer climate ahead.  Some of them are related to technology, of course, perhaps including personal technology.  But that isn’t my personal strength as an environmental observer.  This article focuses on a few things that we can and should do for our cities, suburbs and towns that are low-tech.  What’s below is by no means a definitive or complete list, but it’s a start:

  1. Bring more vegetation into neighborhoods. I’ve written often about the benefits of green infrastructuregreen roofs, roadside plantings, rain gardens, swales, and so forth – to stormwater management, and I’ve applauded the way these practices can bring bits of nature into our neighborhoods.  But they also lower the temperature, compared to hard surfaces, and absorb carbon dioxide from the air.  So do street trees and parks large and small.
  2. Plant city-scaled community gardens. One type of vegetation that is a special case is gardening, including small urban orchards (such as the one incorporated into the plan for Via Verde in the South Bronx).  These, too, can help lower temperature, and growing some of our own food right in our neighborhoods can also reduce the number of errands we need to run, while increasing health and fitness.  Health and convenience are good things in a warming world.  But note my caveat that they must be the right scale, to enhance and complement walkable urban densities, not displace or preclude them.
  3. Use drought-resistant landscaping. It’s going to be not just warmer but also drier in many communities.  We should use native species and xeriscape wherever possible, so that homes, offices and neighborhoods can enjoy the benefits of attractive landscaping without exacerbating water shortages.  In fact, when practiced collectively, drought-resistant planting can help stave off the water shortages likely to come more frequently with warmer temperatures.         drought vulnerability in the US (by: NRDC)
  4. Use light-colored roofing and pavement. Dark surfaces absorb heat, while light-colored surfaces reflect it.  Writing in Clean Technica, Zachary Shahan reports that, on the hottest day of the New York City summer in 2011, a white roof covering was found to be 42°F cooler than the traditional black roof it was being compared to.   That is an amazing difference that not only helps reduce the on-site temperature but also lowers electricity demand for air conditioning, which in turn reduces carbon emissions from power plants.  This finding was part of a study led by scientists at Columbia University and announced by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Earth Science Division.   (Shahan also notes that an earlier study that claimed a net warming effect in the atmosphere globally from white roofs failed to account for the reduced energy demand.)
  5. Get serious about sea level rise and storm surges. It’s making less and less sense to build in low-lying parts of coastal areas.  As my colleague Dan Lashof recently wrote, what used to be a storm of the century is becoming a storm of the decade.  Last week, researchers at Climate Central published studies and released an interactive map that shows increasing flooding risk for the entire US coastline.  Anyone who lives near the coast can enter her zip code and see a localized map of the areas that will flood at various storm surge levels.  Dan examined a map of Virginia Beach, for example, showing that a four-foot storm surge (which has about a one-in-three chance of occurring in the next twenty years as sea levels rise) could flood more than 10,000 homes and affect almost 30,000 people.  We should make sure that flood plain demarcations take account of warming trends, and keep future buildings out of those zones.
  6. Save older buildings. New construction generates heat and disrupts existing vegetation while frequently failing to generate carbon-reduction benefits over older buildings, even with newer and more efficient technology.  Our older buildings also remind us who we are as a community, and tend to knit together existing neighborhoods.
  7. When building new, follow “Original Green” practices. Especially in a warmer climate, it is important that buildings be constructed and sited to take advantage of natural processes.  Bring back real front porches.  Plant deciduous trees on the south side, where they provide shade in summer while allowing sun in the winter.  Plant evergreens on the side that will benefit by protection from winter winds.  Use close-to-the-source materials and naturally insulating design.  Place new buildings in walkable settings with everyday conveniences nearby.
  8. Keep the regional footprint small and well-connected. Sprawl exists, and it will take some time to repair or retrofit it into a more sustainable pattern.  But, in the near term, we absolutely should not add to it.  This means no more leapfrog development, period.  Instead, we should accommodate growth by inclusive revitalization, grayfield and brownfield redevelopment, and the right kind of infill that enhances neighborhoods without overwhelming them.  Internally to our communities, we must make public transit robust and walking and bicycling to common destinations easy.
  9. Update our zoning and building codes to facilitate resilience. As I observed just last month in my article on DC’s current zoning update, in most communities it will take affirmative code amendments to make walkable, diverse neighborhoods legal again.  Let’s do it.

While this article focuses on strengthening communities in the face of climate change, these steps also provide other kinds of resilience.  Since fuel prices will continue to rise, for example, reducing demand for electricity and gasoline through smart building and growth management conserves financial resources.  So does obviating the construction of infrastructure expansion to accommodate sprawl and employing green techniques to manage stormwater instead of building larger concrete sewer and drainage pipes.

As I wrote at the outset, this isn’t meant to be a definitive list.  Nor is it intended as an antidote to global warming.  Rather, it’s meant to start a conversation about the reality of a warming climate and what we can do with our built environment to respond to it in the most realistic and sustainable way.  What would you add to the list?

Kaid Benfield writes (almost) daily about community, development, and the environment.  For more posts, see his blog’s home page.

5 Responses to Nine Low-Tech Steps For Community Resilience In A Warming Climate

  1. Dr. Ed Mazria has been saying similar things for years. He gets about as much media attention as a losing college basketball team.

    As long as media managers consider climate change as an old story that they have done before, the Koch Bros. win the battle and we will vote for the lowest gasoline prices in the coming US presidential election.

    We must not rely on Jeff Masters and Joe Romm to make carry the load. Write to your local paper and ask what your community leaders are doing. For my most recent city council election I polled the candidates regarding climate change and then published the results along with my recommendations on voting.

    Talk to local clergy to ask what they are doing to protect their God’s creation. The list is endless and if we don’t do them, then we giving up. We must not do that.

  2. Gail Zawacki says:

    I’m all for planting gardens and trees, but it isn’t going to do any good if we continue to emit precursors to tropospheric ozone. The constant background level even in remote areas is in many places above the threshold that scientists have determined is harmful to vegetation. Annual crops are diminished in yield and quality by significant percentages, and trees are dying at an accelerated rate. Ozone renders plantlife more vulnerable to insects, disease, and fungus. Roots shrivel even before injury is visible on foliage meaning that the impact from droughts is far more severe than it would otherwise be.

    So plant trees and gardens – and fight with everything you’ve got to transition industrial society to a simpler, localized economy that doesn’t rely on massive amounts of burning fuel and petrochemical fertilizers. Profit-driven capitalism and a healthy ecosystem are incompatible. We can do something about it ourselves or just wait, and let Mother Nature will bring us back to sustainability with her pitchfork.

  3. SecularAnimist says:

    I appreciate the discussion of urban gardens — but why no mention of SUBURBAN gardens?

    Huge areas of America’s sprawling suburbs could easily be converted from lawns and other purely decorative purposes to organic gardens, and could produce vast amounts of food — with no more (and probably less) work, time, energy and resources than suburbanites already devote to maintaining their lawns and shrubbery.

    The suburbs were once “green belts” around cities, which produced much of the food supply for the city they surrounded. During World War II, home “victory gardens” produced TWO THIRDS of all the produce consumed in America! With today’s more advanced organic gardening techniques, we could do even better.

    Re-agriculturizing the suburbs is a key strategy for both reducing the CO2 impact of our food supply, AND creating more resilient communities that will be better able to ride out disruptions to the commercial factory-farmed food supply.

  4. Lazarus says:

    No sure how ‘green roofs’ and ‘light coloured roofs’ are compatible.

  5. J4zonian says:

    1. Many of us have been saying these things for decades, for larger-than-climate cataclysmic reasons. While it’s good to bring others up to speed, the discussion we should be having is how to make them happen. This should have been going on in a major way, publicly, for a long time now; that it’s still at the simple level it is is distressing, to say the least.

    2. to answer Lazarus: A combination of solar panels, water collection and storage, food and fiber gardens and albedo agents can be formulated for each roof (and parking lot, and many roadways), in the context of its neighborhood and regional needs and resources.

    I would think the completely compatible collection of solar energy and water would be first priority everywhere it’s possible (ie, sunny).

    A combination of water collection/storage and food production would be second, as there are many foods that can be grown in partial or light shade. (Many of these need moist or wet soil or standing water; there are few food plants who like dry shade.) Some food and fiber crops could be grown on roofs using both onsite and offsite resources–rabbits, birds (pigeons, quail, chickens, ducks, geese), even dairy goats and dairy/wool sheep on larger roofs. Some of these could be under the solar/water collection systems. All parking lots should be covered with solar panel arrays where it works, food production gardens where it doesn’t; it’s inexcusable to so recklessly waste and ruin the land used for those as we do now. Roadways could all be made somewhat more reflective and turned into PV collectors; parking lots and other roadways could percolate water or collect and direct it (cleaned) for landscape use. Electric cars and emphasis on rail and non-private, multi-passenger vehicles, and stringent regulation of all vehicles would keep the water falling on roads cleaner.

    We need regional and community comprehensive plans to design, construct, teach, implement, use and maintain these complex (but partly self-running and sustaining) systems now. (A national plan would be nice too when the Denialican Party decides to rejoin reality.) Each of us needs to think about how to help make them happen in the meantime.

    Some excellent resources to start with:

    Gaia’s Garden by Toby Hemenway;
    Food Not Lawns, Heather Flores
    Edible Forest Gardens, Jacke and Toensmeier
    Introduction to Permaculture, Bill Mollison

    and The Integral Urban House, and Home Food Systems, both out of print but still around.