Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Maliki Not Saying Whether ‘Trainers’ Would Be Military Or Private Contractors

By Ben Armbruster  

"Maliki Not Saying Whether ‘Trainers’ Would Be Military Or Private Contractors"


google plus icon

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki last week suggested that he could bypass parliamentary approval of a continued American presence by asking the U.S. for “trainers,” not military troops. At the time, his aides said they would be non-military private security contractors. Days later, however, Iraq’s foreign minister said the trainers would be active-duty military, not contractors. Maliki revisited the issue on Saturday. “The existence of the trainers within the context of training doesn’t require voting by parliament but the existence of any soldier outside the agreement … or granting immunities requires their approval,” he said. However, the AP reports that Maliki “avoided saying whether the trainers would be active-duty troops or private contractors.” Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Adm. Mike Mullen said Sunday that Iraq’s indecision on the troops issue is pushing the U.S. “close to the point where a smooth withdrawal will be jeopardized.”


‹ Pam Geller Justifies Breivik’s Terror: Youth Camp Had More ‘Middle Eastern or Mixed’ Races Than ‘Pure Norwegian’

Pam Geller And Robert Spencer Using Links To Norway Terrorist For Fundraising Campaign ›

By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.