ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Leaving the Cold War Behind

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was widely praised when she announced during her confirmation hearing, “The time for diplomacy is now.

Of course, the time for diplomacy was actually three years ago, and the Bush administration seems set on repeating the errors that plagued its unsuccessful first-term diplomatic efforts.

The Defense Science Board Task Force, a Pentagon advisory group, last year specifically criticized the Bush administration for developing their diplomatic strategy using the prism of the Cold War. As Sydney Blumenthal explained:

The Bush administration, according to the Defense Science Board, has misconceived a war on terrorism in the image of the Cold War — “reflexively” and “without a thought or a care as to whether these were the best responses to a very different strategic situation.” Yet the administration seeks out “Cold War models” to cast this “war” against “totalitarian evil.” However, the struggle is not the West vs. Islam; nor is it “against the tactic of terrorism.” “This is no Cold War,” the report insists.

Which makes it more than a little disturbing that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice briefed State Department employees yesterday on how she plans to model her diplomatic strategy after American policy during the Cold War. She said past diplomatic success was “just a matter of harvesting good decisions” made by Cold War architects like Dean Acheson and George Kennan, and described how “we are now in a similar period.” “That is the basis of our foreign policy,” she said, “it’s a foreign policy based on the heart of who we are.”

We Can’t Drop the Chalabi

Last May, U.S. intelligence officials accused Ahmed Chalabi — the Iraqi darling of the neo-cons — of passing intelligence secrets told to him by Bush administration officials to Iran. It was also revealed that Chalabi “met with a senior Iranian intelligence official described as a ‘nefarious figure’ who has played a direct role in activities against the United States.”

But apparently that wasn’t enough to convince the Bush administration to cut off contacts with Chalabi. Appearing on CNN Late Edition on Sunday, Chalabi said:

I don’t speak to top U.S. officials….Contacts at the low level have started, and I expect them to continue at this rate.

A couple of questions: Which “low level” Bush administration official is talking to Chalabi? What, exactly, do they have to discuss with a suspected informant for the Iranians?

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up