ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Yglesias

Meawhile, In Lebanon

In a series of events predicted by virtually nobody allowed access to high-profile media positions, but virtually everyone who knows anything about Lebanon, the upshot of Israel’s military campaign against Hezbollah has been to strengthen Hezbollah’s political position and throw Lebanon’s relatively Israel-friendly into crisis, possibly setting the stage for a return to power of pro-Syrian elements or else for a re-meltdown of the Lebanese state. One wrinkle here that seems to go perennial unmentioned is that had the Cedar Revolution actually brought democracy to Lebanon (as opposed to the takeover of government by an anti-Syrian political coalution) victory for Hezbollah and its allies would be all but assured. The Taif Accords, among other things, implemented an odd electoral system that structurally overrepresents Christians and underrepresents Shiites. That’s not necessary a bad thing, under the circumstances, but a more normal and more democratic system would significantly enhance Hezbollah’s political power.

This seems like as good a time as any to mention George W. Bush’s recent decision to bestow a National Humanities Award on Lebanese emigrĂ© Fouad Ajami. As Martin Peretz points out, Ajami has probably been the single largest influence on American understanding of the Arab world; his books have been very influential and his writings have appeared widely in major publications. The non-Peretzian notion I would interject into this stream of praise is that America’s understanding of the Arab world, as evidenced by years of recent policy fiascos, is . . . extremely bad. Ajami has, in essence, become prominent by being a seemingly credible voice willing to tell American elites what they want to hear, offering an interpretation of Arab affairs that’s significantly more palatable than the analysis provided by the scholarly mainstream.

That some view represents that scholarly consensus is, of course, no guarantee that it’s correct — dissidents are sometimes right. Nevertheless, we’ve been using Ajami and Ajami-ism as our guide to the region for quite some time now and it keeps working out very, very badly.

Joint Chiefs Chairman: Administration Is Pursuing Same Terrorism Policy Bush Trashed In 2004

During the 2004 election, Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) likened the war against terrorist networks to fighting crime, suggesting that both could never be fully defeated but their impact on our lives could be drastically reduced:

“We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance,” Kerry said. “As a former law-enforcement person, I know we’re never going to end prostitution. We’re never going to end illegal gambling. But we’re going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn’t on the rise. It isn’t threatening people’s lives every day, and fundamentally, it’s something that you continue to fight, but it’s not threatening the fabric of your life.”

Kerry was mercilessly attacked for his suggestion that we attempt to reduce terrorism to level where it is a “nuisance.” President Bush said:

[T]hat very attitude is what blinded America to the war being waged against us. And by not seeing the war, our government had no comprehensive strategy to fight it.

Vice President Cheney added:

There never can be a time when terrorism is just a nuisance. Our goal is not to reduce terror to some acceptable level. Our goal is to defeat terror, and with George Bush as President, that’s exactly what we will do.

In an interview with MSNBC, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Gen. Peter Pace, explained that the Bush administration is currently pursuing the same strategy that Kerry advocated in 2004. Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2006/11/pace.320.240.flv]

(HT: DefenseTech)

Transcript: Read more

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up