ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Murtha Plans To Deny Bush Funding For Troop Escalation

Murtha and BushPresident Bush is widely expected to announce a plan next week to increase the number of U.S. troops in Iraq by at least 20,000. Congress may not cooperate.

In an interview with Arianna Huffington, Rep. John Murtha (D-PA), the chairman of the House Defense Appropriations Committee, said he intends to block funding for any escalation plan. An excerpt:

When we asked about the likelihood of the president sending additional troops to Iraq, Murtha was adamant. “The only way you can have a troop surge,” he told us, “is to extend the tours of people whose tours have already been extended, or to send back people who have just gotten back home.” He explained at length how our military forces are already stretched to the breaking point, with our strategic reserve so depleted we are unprepared to face any additional threats to the country. So does that mean there will be no surge? Murtha offered us a “with Bush anything is possible” look, then said: “Money is the only way we can stop it for sure.”…

He says he wants to “fence the funding,” denying the president the resources to escalate the war, instead using the money to take care of the soldiers as we bring them home from Iraq “as soon as we can.”

A memo from the Center for American Progress, released December 27, recommends “an amendment on the supplemental funding bill that states that if the administration wants to increase the number of troops in Iraq above 150,000, it must provide a plan for their purpose and require an up or down vote on exceeding that number.”

Digg It!

Yglesias

Incompetence Again

Perhaps people are bored with this question, so I’ll put the main discussion below the fold, but Jacob Weisberg has an article out on the “Incompetence Dodge” issue in which he kindly links to the piece Sam and I wrote on this some time ago. As Weisberg says “What makes this backward-looking conversation more than academic is its implications for American foreign policy beyond Iraq.” He disagrees with my take on this, but it’s not really clear to me from his article why he disagrees with me other than that he seems to think that if he agrees with me that means he must be an “isolationist” and he doesn’t want to be an isolationist.

Read more

Bush Ignores Law, Fails To Appoint Policy Coordinator For North Korea

Since President Bush has been in office, North Korea has developed 10-11 bombs worth of plutonium, suitable for use in nuclear weapons, and conducted its first nuclear weapons test. All of the administration’s efforts to control North Korea’s nuclear program have failed.

Congress decided something had to be done. On Sept. 30, 2006, Congress passed the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act, which required the President to appoint a Coordinator of Policy on North Korea to “provide policy direction and leadership for negotiations with North Korea relating to nuclear weapons.”

Bush signed the act into law on Oct. 17, 2006. The law required Bush to make the appointment within 60 days. Here’s the relevant section:

bill text

The 60 days were up on Dec. 16, 2006, which was 19 days ago. The situation in North Korea continues to deteriorate, but Bush still won’t act.

Digg It!

Yglesias

Unanswered Questions

Brad Plumer reminds that one consequence of Saddam Hussein’s death is that we won’t get a chance to find out his take on the origins of the Gulf War. There are persistent and plausible indications that America’s ambassador to Iraq before the war, April Glaspie, told Saddam that “We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait,” which Saddam understood as an implicit green light to deal with the Kuwait situation however he saw fit, including via invasion. US officials, naturally, deny that this is what happened, since if it is it was a pretty embarrassing screw-up. Still, it’s normally the case that if you take a good hard look at a war you’re going to find that it wouldn’t have happened absent some screw-ups. The Truman administration, famously, did something similar, appearing to leave South Korea outside the realm of American defense commitments and then going to war to preserve South Korean independence.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up