ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Murtha Two Years Ago Today: Bush’s Iraq Course Is ‘Flawed Policy Wrapped In Illusion’

murthaToday marks two years from the day that Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) boldly called for a timetable for redeployment of U.S. forces out of Iraq. “The war in Iraq is not going as advertised. It is a flawed policy wrapped in illusion,” Murtha said, adding that his call for withdrawal was motivated by deep concern for the state of the military:

This war needs to be personalized. As I said before I have visited with the severely wounded of this war. They are suffering. Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our obligation to speak out for them. That’s why I am speaking out.

Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. It is time to bring them home.

The right-wing assailed Murtha as a “senileHitler sympathizer. The White House attacked him for “surrendering” to terrorists, and Rep. Jean Schmidt called him a “coward” on the House floor.

On Nov. 17, 2005, House Republicans hastily forced a vote to bring the troops home, sensing a political opportunity to isolate Murtha. The measure to begin immediate withdrawal was rejected 403-3. But events in Iraq over the past two years have vindicated Murtha’s wisdom. Just this week, a majority of the House voted to pass a bill that largely reflects Murtha’s original call for redeployment.

The Gavel offers some metrics to assess how the situation in Iraq has changed in the past two years:

war

Digg It!

Yglesias

Pricey

Tyler Cowen explains why the real costs of war with Iraq are even higher than they seem. I’m not so sure about this, though:

The American public simply does not have the stomach for fighting a costly, potentially futile war every few years. U.S. voters have already lost patience with the pace of reconstruction in Iraq, and that frustration will linger; remember, it took the country 15 years or more to “get over” Vietnam. The projection of American power and influence in the future requires that an impatient public feel good about American muscle-flexing in the past.

I dunno. If there were some unusually large attack against US forces in Iraq tomorrow, and the administration was able to adduce evidence that some of the explosive material came from Iran, and announced limited air strikes against facilities of the officially designated IRGC’s Quds Force would people really rise up indignantly?

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up