Yesterday, the Defense Department announced that it will transfer Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, who is accused of leaking thousands of classified documents to the open government website WikiLeaks, to a facility at Ft. Leavenworth, KS from a detention facility in Quantico, VA. Human rights groups and even members of Congress have criticized the Pentagon for holding Manning in inhumane conditions, reportedly forcing him to sleep naked and holding him in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day.

State Department spokesman PJ Crowley recently resigned after he publicly criticized DOD for Manning’s treatment, calling it “ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid.” Referring to the White House, Crowley told Politico, “I knew I had lost their trust and confidence and in that circumstance I knew that I had to resign.”

Over at the American Prospect, Adam Serwer noted that Pentagon officials said yesterday that “the decision to move Manning to Fort Leavenworth was at least in part based on mental-health reasons” and wondered if the move vindicated Crowley. And today on Fox News, Crowley again stood by his criticism of DOD and himself suggested that it had been vindicated by DOD’s decision to move Manning:

CROWLEY: I think yesterday the Pentagon without saying as much affirmed that the situation at Quantico had become unsustainable. The level of solatary confinement and arduous nature of his treatment was inconsistent with how we normally handle soldiers or inmates in a pretrial situation. They’ve now corrected that with his movement to Kansas. So it’s the right step to take. [...]

For us to lead around the world in the future, we have to take aggressive action and to make sure that action is consistent with our laws and our values and in this particular case, we’ve corrected what I thought was a mistake at Quantico.

“I started off in a mlitary career during the Vietnam era where there was a gap between what we said and what people saw on television from the reporting from Vietnam,” Crowley said, explaining part of his motivation for criticizing Manning’s treatment while a State Department official. “I always was determined that in my government career we would keep that gap as narrow as possible,” he said. Watch it:

“The Pentagon admitted yesterday, sort of,” Crowley said on Twitter today, “that Bradley Manning spent more months in severe confinement at Quantico than was appropriate.”

Last night on Fox News, war hawk and potential 2012 GOP presidential candidate John Bolton said that America’s debt and deficit is a national security concern because it prevents the United States from adequately funding the Defense Department:

BOLTON: This dead weight of the debt inhibits economic growth. And you can’t have real national security, you can’t spend the kind of money you must spend on defense unless the economy can sustain it.

While some might argue (correctly) that the soaring debt and deficit is percisely why the U.S. should rein in its bloated defense spending, Bolton isn’t necessarily the first to make this point. Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Adm. Mike Mullen said last year that “the most significant threat to our national security is our debt…because the ability for our country to resource our military.” But later in the segment, Bolton took this line of thinking a bit further, saying that in order to deal with the debt, and thus increase military spending, the U.S. should cut back spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid:

BOLTON: What I would do [to address the debt] would be to turn very sharply against the domestic spending levels that we have. … And I think we’ve got to have an adult conversation with the American people about not just Medicare and Medicaid, but Social Security, too. I reject the idea that many Democrats believe in that the American people are not smart enough to understand that we cannot continue to fund Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid the way we have.

Watch it:

To recap: America needs to get out of debt in order to spend more on defense, and in order to do that, America has to gut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Bolton’s plan is basically a reverse Robin Hood scheme: robbing the poor to pay the rich, or really, the Military Industrial Complex on steroids.

Thankfully, if Bolton does decide to run for president, it doesn’t seem like he’d get very far because his ideas aren’t particularly popular. A recent Reuters poll found that Americans would rather cut defense spending than raid social services in order to solve the debt and deficit problems. And a Washington Post/ABC News poll just out today had similar results. Only 21 and 30 percent favor cutting Medicare and Medicaid respectively to reduce the deficit, while 42 percent support cutting military spending.