Speaking before a backdrop of luxurious yachts, GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney called on the United States to apprehend the “Lockerbie Bomber” in Libya and bring him back to the United States for trial. Talking to Fox News host Neil Cavuto to explain his position, Romney said that the “United States would be my first choice” for the location of a trial for the bomber:

CAVUTO: If Muammar Qaddafi goes down do you think the new government should hand him over to who?

ROMNEY: The United States of America would be my first choice. We would try him here and see that justice is done. This is a person responsible for the deaths of hundreds of people. This is an individual who was convicted in Scotland but set free on a humanitarian basis and two years later still alive and receives a hero’s welcome. That is unacceptable indeed if he does not face justice.

Watch it:

Yet during the last Republican presidential primary, Romney decried trying terror suspects in American courts, saying that we should actually “double” the size of the Guantanamo Bay prison camp and keep suspects there instead. Watch it:

Romney also praised the Obama adminstration’s decision to not try alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a civilian trial in New York City. It now appears that Romney may once again believe in the American system of justice and its ability to bring terrorists to justice while preserving American ideals of civil liberties.

Republican presidential hopefuls have been offering their reactions to the fall of Qaddafi’s regime, giving praise for many involved save for — perhaps predictably — President Obama, who many of them attacked for endorsing the NATO intervention earlier this year.

Rick Santorum: “Ridding the world of the likes of Gadhafi is a good thing, but this indecisive President had little to do with this triumph.”

It’s hard to see how that statement bears any resemblance to reality, considering that many in Santorum’s own party attacked Obama for doing too much in Libya. In fact, Santorum himself accused Obama of “dithering” and”do[ing] nothing” in Libya in April, saying Obama “really missed an opportunity.”

Mitt Romney: “The world is about to be rid of Muammar el-Qaddafi, the brutal tyrant who terrorized the Libyan people. It is my hope that Libya will now move toward a representative form of government that supports freedom, human rights, and the rule of law. As a first step, I call on this new government to arrest and extradite the mastermind behind the bombing of Pan Am 103, Abdelbaset Mohmed Ali al-Megrahi, so justice can finally be done.”

In March, Romney accused Obama of being “weak” with the Libya intervention, suggesting Obama’s foreign policy “can’t prevail.” “He calls for the removal of Moammar Qaddafi but then conditions our action on the directions we get from the Arab League and United Nations,” Romney added. In a blog post for National Review in April, Romney warned of “mission creep” and approvingly quoted former U.N. ambassador John Bolton, who Romney said “rightly notes that Obama has set himself up for ‘massive strategic failure’ by demanding Qaddafi’s ouster.” Of course, Obama’s approach did “prevail.”

Rick Perry: “The crumbling of Muammar Ghadafi’s reign, a violent, repressive dictatorship with a history of terrorism, is cause for cautious celebration. The lasting impact of events in Libya will depend on ensuring rebel factions form a unified, civil government that guarantees personal freedoms, and builds a new relationship with the West where we are allies instead of adversaries.”

Perry didn’t speak publicly about the Libya intervention specifically, but has repeatedly attacked Obama’s foreign policy, saying in his presidential campaign announcement, “[Obama] is an abject failure in his constitutional duty” to protect America. “His foreign policy seems to be based on the alienation of traditional allies,” Perry added. Of course, it was the traditional American allies of the U.K. and France with whom U.S. primarily conducted the Libya intervention.

Much as with the killing of Bin Laden, the GOP candidates seem to be unwilling to give even a modicum of congratulations to their political opponent, even on a matter of national security that seemingly every politician in the U.S. should support. Instead, Romney and others are already pivoting to demanding the extradition of the Lockerbee bomber, which would appear to be a means to put Obama back on the defensive when he should riding high, even it means threatening Libya’s fragile transitional regime with outside pressure.

Just six months and one week since the first anti-government protests broke out in Libya, the rebels there appear to have effectively ousted Col. Muammar Qaddafi after more than four decades in power.

All civil wars are of course different, but half a year does not constitute a long conflict aimed at unseating an entrenched regime. Think of the long guerilla war in South Africa that, along with international pressure, brought down the South African apartheid regime. Or the fourteen year long struggle that removed the Communist government from power in Afghanistan.

Here’s a timeline of how things developed in Libya, from the initial protests to the outbreak of civil war and the NATO-led military intervention on behalf of the rebels, with key points of commentary from U.S. politicos included.

Feb. 15/16 – The arrest of a human rights activist sparks demonstrations that devolve into riots in the Western city of Benghazi.

Feb. 17 – Demonstrators declare a national Day of Rage.

Feb. 23 – A day after the first high-level diplomatic defections at the U.N., the Qaddafi regime loses power in Benghazi, long a hot-seat of opposition, and rebels begin to form an opposition council.

Feb. 24 – President Barack Obama issued a statement on Libya, saying: “The suffering and bloodshed is outrageous and unacceptable. These actions violate international norms and common decency. It must stop. We strongly support the universal rights of the Libyan people.”

Feb. 26 – The U.N. Security Council imposes sanctions on the Qaddafi regime for its crackdown on demonstrators. Two days later, the E.U. follows suit.

Mar. 8 – Former Speaker Newt Gingrich predicts that “NATO…won’t bring much to the fight,” and disregards the importance of U.N. support for U.S. airstrikes in Libya.

Mar. 11 – Soon-to-be GOP presidential candidate (now out of the race) Tim Pawlenty dismisses international coalition building, saying he’s “not overly concerned about our popularity ratings in Europe or the Middle East.”

Mar. 17 – The U.N. Security Council approves a no fly zone over Libya that calls for any necessary means to protect innocent civilians from being slaughtered.

Mar. 19 – The first international airstrikes against Qaddafi’s forces halt their advance on the opposition stronghold of Benghazi.

Mar. 21 – Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking member Dick Lugar criticizes the U.S.’s involvement in Libya: “I do not understand the mission because as far as I can tell in the United States there is no mission and there are no guidelines for success.”

Mar. 28 – Bryan Fischer of The American Family Association, former Speaker Newt Gingrich, Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN), and Islamophobic blogger Pamela Geller all parrot Qaddafi’s talking point that Al Qaeda is behind the Libyan rebel uprising.

Apr. 3 – Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) calls for the Obama administration to arm Libyan rebels and predicts that the current policy would “lead to a stalemate.”

Apr. 22 – GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney criticized Obama for “mission creep and mission muddle” in Libya for extending the NATO humanitarian mission to support for the Libyan rebel aim of ousting Qaddafi, echoing John Bolton that the move would incur a “massive strategic failure.”

Apr. 24 – Bill Kristol complains that “we’re bombing from 25,000 feet…it’s ridiculous,” and criticized Obama for not utilizing slower, lower flying aircraft that are easier to shoot down. “You can’t get involved in a military action like this though and be totally driven by fear of one American pilot getting shot down. It’s just wrong, in my opinion,” said Kristol.

Apr. 25 – A New Yorker article quotes an Obama aide saying the president is “leading from behind” on Libya. Despite the quote’s provenance with iconic South African president Nelson Mandela, it becomes a top talking point for neoconservative attacks on U.S. policy.

Apr. 26 – Sarah Palin criticizes Obama through a Facebook wall post: “Simply put, what are we doing there? You’ve put us in a strategic no man’s land.”

Apr. 30 – A NATO missile strike kills one of Qaddafi’s sons.

May 8 – Former vice president Dick Cheney tells Fox News that “the policy of the administration has been to hope for Qaddafi’s departure but not be prepared to do enough to make sure it happens.” He adds: “It’s not clear to me that this administration is up to the task” of taking out Qaddafi.

May 10 – GOP presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty says he would have “[told] Qaddafi he’s got X number of days to get his affairs in order and go of we’re going to go get him,” instead of limiting U.S. involvement to airstrikes.

June 20 – The Bill Kristol-led Foreign Policy Initiative calls for House Republicans to push Obama to expand U.S. involvement in Libya, writing that Obama “has done too little to achieve the goal of removing Qaddafi from power.”

June 24 – Spearheaded by the House GOP, a bill passes the lower chamber limiting funds for U.S. military action in LIbya. House Speaker John Boehner’s spokesperson said the bill would “restrict funds for the remainder of the fiscal year but in a responsible way.”

June 27 – Based on a U.N. Security Council recommendation, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issues an arrest warrant for Qaddafi and key members of his regime.

July 15 – The U.S. recognizes the Transitional National Council (TNC) rebel alliance as the government of Libya.

July 27 – The United Kingdom recognizes the rebel government and ousts three remaining Qaddafi diplomats in London.

Aug. 14 – Days after taking the oil town of Brega, crippling another source of funds for Qaddafi, rebels seize Zawiyah, another Qaddafi stronghold near Tripoli.

Aug. 21 – Rebels move into Tripoli, Qaddafi’s remaining stronghold, arresting two of his sons. They are greeted there by celebrations in the capital’s central Martyr’s Square (Green Square’s pre-Qaddafi name).

Today, Qaddafi remains at large but his rule over Libya appears to have come to an end. While the difficult road lays ahead of the North African nation shouldn’t be underestimated, the ouster of a brutal dictator marks a historic day for the people of Libya. (Some dates were drawn from a Reuters timeline.)

At the main square in Benghazi, people have been gathering to celebrate the end of the rule of Muammar Qaddafi. As euphoric Libyan rebels advanced into Tripoli on Sunday, there were scenes of jubilation in the rebels’ de facto capital where thousands celebrated in the streets. One large sign in the middle of the square in Benghazi features a picture of the “Fantastic 4” (from right to left): Obama, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, British Prime Minister David Cameron, and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice. The text on the sign reads: “God Bless You All. Thanks For All.” The signs were photographed by the AP’s Alexandre Meneghini:

Now that Libya’s NATO-backed rebels have taken the capital of Tripoli, political gadfly Donald Trump wants the insurgents to repay the West for its help by turning over the country’s oil. “You know, in the old days, when you won a war, to the victor go the spoils,” Trump said, “why don’t we take the oil?” “All those rebels are going to be richer than the people of this country because they’re going to take all the oil!” Trump warned. Watch it:

Recall, earlier this year, Trump advocated a similar policy proposal for Iraq. “We should just stay there and take the oil,” he said bluntly, adding that if we didn’t, our soldiers “would have died in vain.”

Trump would be delighted to know that BP is already eyeing a return to Libya after it evacuated all of its expatriate personnel in February when the anti-Gaddafi upraising began. “We intend to resume our activities and return to the country when conditions allow,” a BP spokesman told AFP. Other foreign oil companies seem to be more cautious, saying they want to wait until a new government is formed to return and that it could take “years” to get oil fields back to full capacity.

BP struck a controversial deal with the Gaddafi regime in 2007 that allowed it to drill in the Gulf of Sirte. Many allege that BP leaned on the Scottish and U.K. governments to release Lockerbie bomber Abdel Basset al-Megrahim to Libya in order help the company gain access the country’s offshore drilling rights. And as BP was privately lobbying for the terrorist’s release, it was also publicly trying to improve the country’s image and extolling the benefits to the U.K of a relationship between Libya and BP in its company magazine. It’s unclear whether the new regime with hold the company’s ties to Gaddafi against them.