ThinkProgress Logo

Security

NEWS FLASH

U.N. Nuclear Chief Says Iran Not Cooperating On Nuclear Inquiry | In a report given to the U.N. General Assembly, Director of the International Atomic Energy Agency Yukio Amano said that Iran is uncooperative with the Agency’s efforts to investigate the Islamic Republic’s controversial nuclear program. While discussion between the IAEA and Iran has been characterized by a sterner tact this year, Amano says that “no concrete results have been achieved,” though he has hopes that “we can reach agreement without further delay.” The IAEA Director also raised concerns over North Korea’s continued nuclear ambitions, saying their development of new reactors and enrichment activities was “deeply troubling.”

Nate Neimann

REPORT: Israeli Security Officials Say Netanyahu ‘Tried To Steal A War’ With Iran In 2010

In 2010, two top Israeli security chiefs denied Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s request to “have the military ready to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities within hours if necessary.” This new information comes from an Israeli TV documentary airing today that cites sources close to Israel’s former intelligence head Meir Dagan and the Israeli army chief Gabi Ashkenazi as shooting down the order.

The request, delivered to the top seven security officials but not to the full security cabinet, angered Dagan and Ashkenazi, leading Dagan to reportedly say that Netanyahu and Barak “tried to steal a war –- it was as simple as that.” To Dagan, the meeting betrayed standard protocol for launching a war. “You may end up going to war based on an illegal decision. Only the security cabinet is authorized to make such a decision,” he said.

Both Dagan and Askhenazi left their roles shortly after the reported meeting. Ashkenazi reportedly said of the order, “This isn’t the sort of thing that you do unless you’re certain that you’ll end up launching an operation. It’s like an accordion that makes music even if it is merely handled.”

The documentary also contains an interview with Barak who all but confirms the reporting. “A chief of staff must create the operational ability, he needs to tell us [the government] whether we have the operational ability to do something, and he even needs to give his recommendation, but [the government] is free to choose [a course of action] that contradicts his recommendation,” Barak told film’s director Ilana Dayan.

Dagan and Ashkenazi have both repeatedly warned about the consequences of rushing to war with Iran. Dagan said in May that “a strike could accelerate the procurement of the bomb. An attack isn’t enough to stop the project.” He added that, “we would provide them with the legitimacy to achieve nuclear capabilities for military purposes.” Ashkenazi said in August that “there is a sense that someone will pull out a suitcase from some shelf tomorrow morning and we’ll find ourselves with an Iranian atom bomb. I think we’re not at that point yet.”

Last week, Barak told the British newspaper, the Telegraph, that Iran stepped back from pursuing a nuclear weapon this summer, allowing Israel to contemplate “delaying the moment of truth by eight to 10 months.” Barak added that he was “skeptical” that the sanctions implemented by the Obama administration and its European allies would convince the Iranians to “sit together at any point in the foreseeable future and decide to give up their intention to go in the footsteps of Pakistan and North Korea and turn into a military nuclear power.” In the past, the Israeli Defense Minister has said that sanctions implemented by the Obama administration and its European allies were “quite effective.”

Several former high-level Israeli intelligence and military officials pushed back against a rush to war with Iran. Most recently, Efraim Halevy, the former head of the Mossad, Israel’s spy agency, praised the Obama administration for pushing a diplomatic approach, saying: “Obama does think there is still room for negotiations. It’s a very courageous thing to say in this atmosphere.”

McCain Lashes Out At Journalists, Says They Don’t ‘Understand Our Veterans’

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)

This morning on CNN, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) attacked and ridiculed CNN’s Roland Martin and the New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza after Martin and Lizza disagreed with McCain that the attacks in Benghazi, Libya in September won’t have much effect on voters’ decisions in tomorrow’s presidential election.

When asked about a new ad from former military officers offering support for Mitt Romney, McCain said the Libya issue will have “a greater impact” on the election. “I have never seen veterans as angry and upset as they are over Benghazi,” he said, adding in many of his regular talking points attacking Obama on Libya.

But Roland and Lizza were less enthusiastic about the Arizona Republican’s point. Lizza said he agreed with McCain that there needs to be a thorough investigation into what happened in Libya but added, “I doubt out side of the very conservative base of the Republican Party, it’s going to do a lot to move the votes in Romney’s direction.”Martin agreed. “I’ve interviewed a lot of veterans and they’re more outraged … when the U.S. Senate didn’t even pass the veterans jobs bill and they said that’s directly impacting us,” he said.

But McCain didn’t seem to appreciate their disagreement, ridiculing Martin and Lizza for supposedly not knowing anything about veterans:

MCCAIN: I don’t expect Mr. Martin or Mr. Cilizza [sic] to understand our veterans. I know them. I have seen them out there, by the way this was the sixth jobs bill that we have, we have six jobs programs. The point is, veterans do care what happens to other veterans. Veterans are upset. Maybe Mr. Lizza doesn’t understand that and I wouldn’t expect him to to tell you the truth. But the fact is, veterans care about this and there’s been a cover up for 7 weeks we haven’t been able to get an answer out of the President of the United States. Mr. Lizza and Mr. Martin, I respect their views, I don’t think it’s grounded in any experience. I thank you for having me on.

Watch the clip:

“Let me be CLEAR,” Martin said in a tweet at McCain immediately after the segment. “It is an insult for you to suggest that I do not have an appreciation for the veterans of this country.” Martin followed up in another tweet: “u need to understand that u don’t have to serve in the military to fight for veterans. Your dismissive attitude is wrong.”

While McCain and Martin’s surveys of veterans is anecdotal and may not provide an accurate representation of what all veterans think about President Obama’s handling of the situation in Benghazi, Obama is significantly outraising Romney among military donors and polling has indicated strong support for the president among veterans. Perhaps that’s because Obama and the First Lady have made veterans unemployment and other military issues a top priority for the administration while Romney has dredged through the campaign without offering any plan to address veterans issues.

“We haven’t … heard any specific plans yet from Governor Romney or his campaign,” on VFW official said recently.

National Security Brief: Syrian Rebels Make Gains


– The head of the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights Syrian rebels captured an oil field in the country’s east Sunday after three days of fierce fighting with government troops protecting the facility.

– The New York Times reports: Syria’s fractious opposition groups began negotiations in Doha, Qatar, on Sunday to forge a more unified front to reshape the political landscape in the country’s civil war.

– Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu downplayed Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s suggestion that he would give up the so-called “right of return,” a core issue in dispute with Israel. Meanwhile, Israel’s president praised Abbas’s comments as a “brave and important public declaration” by a “real partner for peace.”

– The Wall Street Journal reports: The Afghan government said it is considering expelling the staff of an influential global conflict-resolution think tank over a recent critical report, fueling concerns about Kabul’s tolerance of dissent. In a report released in October, the Brussels-based International Crisis Group outlined the risks of the U.S.-led coalition’s withdrawal and warned that Afghanistan may slide back into civil war if it doesn’t hold free and fair presidential elections in 2014.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up