ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Arizona

Immigration

Migrant Death Tracker App May Have Unintended Consequence

(Credit: Mother Jones)

Since 2001, over 2,100 migrants have died trying to cross through the Sonoran Desert in southern Arizona. On Monday, the Pima County medical examiner’s office and the human rights group Humane Borders jointly unveiled “The Arizona OpenGIS Initiative for Deceased Migrants,” which is a virtual system that would allow the geographic tracking of desert migrant deaths. The application serves to help family members know the grim circumstance surrounding missing border-crossing relatives. Once deceased relatives are located and identified, family members can collect the remains.

Because migration patterns change for human “coyotes” who bring migrants into the United States, this application has far-reaching consequences. Updated quarterly every year, the system will guide humanitarian organizations to know where to leave aid packages such as water at established routes.

But at the same time, this tracking system may be used by anti-immigrant citizen vigilantes like the Minutemen seeking to secure weak border points. Mother Jones’ Tim Murphy points out that migrant deaths have doubled since 2011 since more border enforcement resources have forced migrants to rely on smugglers. Preying on desperate migrants, smugglers have seized the opportunity to offer a way around secure border points by using boats and trucks, many times with disastrous results. Unfortunately, this grim measure of border security based on border deaths may simultaneously create more secure borders, but at the cost of having more border deaths.

Health

West Virginia Accepts Medicaid Expansion As Time Runs Out For Other Highly-Uninsured States

Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin (D-WV) (Credit: Raw Story)

West Virginia Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin (D) announced in a press conference on Thursday that his state would take part in Obamacare’s optional Medicaid expansion, calling the decision “the best choice for West Virginia.” But many states still remain up in the air with their decisions, either because they haven’t decided yet or because state executives and legislators are at odds with each other on the issue — and time is running out.

Speaking at St. Francis hospital and flanked by nurses, doctors, and hospital administrators, Tomblin laid out the medical and financial case for expanding Medicaid eligibility — a conclusion that he reached after commissioning a study to examine such a move’s effects on West Virginia. “Expansion will allow us to provide insurance coverage to 91,500 West Virginians,” said Tomblin.

Indeed, West Virginia has much to gain and very little to lose by embracing the Obamacare provision. The state has abysmal health demographics, and over half of West Virginia’s uninsured population lives below 138 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). These poor and vulnerable populations would gain access to health coverage under the Medicaid expansion, leading the Kaiser Family Foundation to conclude that expansion will reduce the number of uninsured West Virginians by a staggering 67 percent.

Those numbers likely led Tomblin to his decision. But the moderate Democrat has an advantage that governors of other conservative — and highly uninsured — states don’t: the almost assured support of his legislature. Democrats hold a supermajority in the state Senate and an eight seat edge in the House of Delegates, and both of West Virginia’s U.S. senators also support expanding Medicaid, making intraparty barriers unlikely.

The same cannot be said of Republican Govs. Jan Brewer (AZ) and Rick Scott (FL), who have been lobbying for Medicaid expansion after intense pressure from hospital associations and advocates for the poor. Their Republican-controlled state legislatures have been bending over backwards to stop it from happening. Although there is no hard deadline for expanding Medicaid under Obamacare, many of these states’ legislative sessions are quickly coming to an end — meaning that if no agreement is reached soon, they won’t receive the additional federal funds and won’t be able to extend coverage to low-income residents for at least the first full year of Obamacare implementation.

Texas and Louisiana face similar issues. Although some GOP lawmakers in those states are contemplating Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe’s (D) alternative “private option” — which would take federal money and use it to help an expanded Medicaid pool buy private insurance — those efforts also remain in limbo, as former and current Republican presidential aspirants Govs. Rick Perry (TX) and Bobby Jindal (LA) have oscillated between flat-out rejecting expansion and being coy about their intentions.

Read more

Justice

New Arizona Law Requires All Buyback Guns To Go Back To Market

Under a new law in Arizona, local officials will be required to put guns that may have been used in crimes back onto the market. On Monday night, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) signed a bill that makes it illegal for Arizona municipalities to destroy the weapons that they collect at gun buybacks — events where people can turn in their firearms, no questions asked, in exchange for money or gift cards. Instead, government officials must resell those weapons.

The law is a brainchild of the National Rifle Association, which tried to garner support for the measure by asserting that the government has a secret agenda of confiscating and destroying citizens’ weapons:

One of the letters in support was from the National Rifle Association, which argued that selling seized or forfeited guns “would maintain their value, and their sale to the public would help recover public funds.” The NRA letter said the bill doesn’t prevent a private group from holding an event and destroying the weapons.

“However, this measure would ensure that taxpayer resources are not utilized to pursue a political agenda of destroying firearms,” according to the letter, sent April 22 and signed by Brent Gardner with the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action.

Under Arizona’s law, municipalities must use their profits from the sale of bought back guns to pay for their budgets. It’s not clear what would happen if an illegal weapon — like the missile launcher found in Seattle — turned up at a buyback.

Guns seized in government buybacks have been later traced back to crimes, including the weapon used by the Pentagon Shooter. In that case, Tennessee officials (that state has a law similar to Arizona’s) sold back a gun in 2005 that was later traded to a gun dealer, then used in a crime. Another crime gun used in a Las Vegas Courthouse shooting followed a similar trajectory from government to criminal hands.

Justice

Arizona County Spends Millions To Settle Corruption Allegations Against Infamous Sheriff, Disbarred Gubernatorial Candidate

Sheriff Joe Arpaio

The county that hosts the self-professed “toughest sheriff in America” settled yet another lawsuit for $1.4 million last week. In sum, Arizona’s Maricopa County has now paid at least $4.2 million to settle nine lawsuits alleging corrupt investigations by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and former County Attorney Andrew Thomas. “Those totals do not include millions of dollars more in attorneys’ fees for the plaintiffs and costs to defend the county against the lawsuit,” according to the Arizona Republic.

The settlements arise out of search warrants and criminal charges against city players, including judges, considered “political enemies” of Thomas and Arpaio. Thomas was disbarred in April for abusing his prosecutorial powers, as the disciplinary panel called his collaboration with Arpaio an “unholy alliance.” But Arpaio, known for his flagrant anti-Latino practices and misuse of government funds, remains the county sheriff, in spite of a close election this November, and an ongoing movement to hold a recall election, which may face procedural obstacles. The corruption lawsuits are just one category of litigation launched against Arpaio, whose latest initiatives have included arming deputies with automatic weapons to prevent so-called “illegals” from escaping, and developing an armed “posse” to patrol schools that includes actor Steven Seagal. Others allege denial of an inmate’s medicine that caused her death, racial profiling, and grievous practices against Latinos.

Thomas, meanwhile, announced last week he will run for Governor, committing to protect public safety, ensure border security, and fight corruption. The Phoenix News Times is taking a poll to see who has a better chance of winning: Thomas or Clifford the Big Red Dog.

Health

University Of Arizona Student Tells Women: ‘You Deserve Rape’

courtesy of Ryan Revock and the Arizona Daily Wildcat

A University of Arizona student sparked outrage on Tuesday for preaching against women while holding a sign proclaiming, “You deserve rape.”

Dean Saxton, a junior, is notorious for giving inflammatory sermons in the middle of campus. This time, he argued that women are responsible for their rapes because of the way they dress and act. Saxton’s stunt may have been planned in response to the “Take Back the Night” protest against sexual violence scheduled Tuesday night.

Saxton cut right to the chase, bluntly stating that girls who dress like “a whore” have it coming:

Saxton, a junior studying classics and religious studies, said his sermon was meant to convey that “if you dress like a whore, act like a whore, you’re probably going to get raped.”

“I think that girls that dress and act like it,” Saxton said, “they should realize that they do have partial responsibility, because I believe that they’re pretty much asking for it.”

According to the Daily Wildcat, the Dean of Students received “stacks of written complaints, emails and multiple phone calls regarding Saxton’s sermon about women.” Many students directly confronted Saxton, even trying to pull down his sign. Saxton embraced the attention on his Twitter account, posting a screenshot of an article about the Take Back the Night with the comment, “The whores are out.” In other sermons, Saxton has cursed people who are gay, have pre-marital sex, masturbate or have lustful thoughts. His Twitter account is rife with anti-Muslim sentiment, as well; last month he tweeted, “There will come a time when the sword will be put to the heathen.”

However hateful his speech may be, university attorneys told angry students that Saxton is exercising his right to free speech, and has yet to violate the student code of conduct.

While Saxton’s language is more incendiary than the norm, victim-blaming is very much a mainstream habit. The string of recently publicized rapes of high school and college students have exposed how communities shame victims rather than condemn the perpetrators. Dartmouth College is currently dealing with a similar backlash to anti-sexual violence protesters, who received rape and death threats amid a slew of misogynistic and ignorant comments posted online.

University of Arizona, while hardly condoning Saxton’s extremist display, has struggled with its own rape culture. Last year, fraternity brothers were indicted for sexual abuse, sexual assault and kidnapping of another UA student, but the charges were later dismissed. Many other students have reported abuse — 29 reports of sexual abuse and 53 reports of rape in one year — to the on-campus sexual assault crisis center.

Justice

Arizona Lawmakers Mandate Cities Resell Guns From Buyback Program

The Tucson, Arizona Police Department held a gun buyback on the anniversary of the 2011 Tucson mass shooting, with the intention of melting down the 200-plus firearms they received. But now the National Rifle Association, which vowed to put a stop to it, appears poised to get its wish. The Arizona Senate approved a measure 18-12 that prevents local municipalities from destroying the firearms, following the House’s action earlier this year.

State Sen. Rick Murphy (R) said gun buybacks “accomplish nothing other than make people feel good,” and the measure is about “protecting taxpayers.” NRA board member and lobbyist Todd Rathner made a similar claim in January that local government must sell seized or abandoned property according to state law.

Sen. Judy Burges’s (R) concern is that gun buybacks create more “predators”:

“Unfortunately, murder, violence and insanity are built in to the human condition and likely always will be,” she said.

Limiting weapons ignores another fact, she said: “There are two types of animals: predators and prey. “When we take away individuals’ right to defend themselves, we create more predators.”

Meanwhile, one gun group, the Armed Citizen Project, has offered to “take back” the city by handing out free shot guns and ammunition to Tucson residents.

Justice

Arizona Bans Locking Students In Padded ‘Seclusion Rooms’ Without Parental Consent

The state of Arizona has just passed a law to update their policy on the use of so-called “seclusion rooms” in schools, padded rooms where students, often special education students with behavioral issues, are sent to “cool down.”

Late last year, an Arizona family sued their local elementary school for locking their seven-year-old son in a 5-by-5 padded room for hours at a time, one time for so long that the boy wet himself. Their story brought national attention to the issue, and likely prompted the new Arizona law, which will require parental permission to use the rooms:

With the new law, Arizona will join more than 30 other states that impose rules on the restraint of students in public schools.

The use of tiny, windowless seclusion or isolation rooms in American classrooms was one focus of an ABC News investigation that aired on “Nightline” and “World News With Diane Sawyer” in November. The report found that seclusion was one of a range of harsh techniques being used in some American schools to restrain unruly students suffering from autism or other disabilities. [...]

The new Arizona law prohibits schools from using confinement on children unless their parents specifically consent to that form of discipline. [Arizona Governor Jan] Brewer called the measure “a starting point” in helping insure children are not harmed in school.

Until now, Arizona was one of six states (PDF) that had absolutely no laws on the books regarding seclusion. The others are Idaho, Mississippi, North Dakota, New Jersey, and South Dakota.

But even in states that do have some laws about seclusion, the practice can still be incredibly detrimental to a child’s mental health(PDF). In Ohio, there are some regulations on seclusion, but reports have surfaced that children were being put into closets to try to quell disruptive behavior, even when parents forbade it. A report from NPR State Impacts found that one in every 25 disabled students in Ohio was forced into seclusion.

LGBT

Arizona Lawmaker Is Afraid Girls Will See A Transgender Woman’s Penis In The Locker Room

Arizona state Rep. John Kavanagh (R) believes that transgender people’s bodies are traumatizing, and that’s why he’s pushing a bill to legalize discrimination based on gender identity. This is considered a “softening” from his first effort to criminalize transgender people’s use of restrooms, but not by much. Kavanagh explained why he’s trying to overturn the city of Phoenix’s nondiscrimination protections in an extended interview with Michelangelo Signorile on Wednesday:

KAVANAGH: First of all, the bathroom wasn’t the major issue. The real purpose of my bill was for showers. What Phoenix did was allow someone who is biologically male who thinks they’re female to go into a gym or a swimming pool shower or a locker room where people undress completely and this could be a woman or a girl or a young girl. I’ve had a number of parents say that they would be outraged if a man, a person who is biologically male, is in the locker room. [...]

Anybody who is concerned about a black person in a restaurant is sick, but a parent who is concerned about a young child in a locker room in this situation is a good parent in my opinion. What we have here essentially is a balancing of rights. The right not to be exposed. I think there’s psychological harm to a young girl exposed to the genitalia of the opposite sex. I think there’s some trauma there for some young girls. I don’t think it’s appropriate in that environment.

Listen to the full interview:

Amazingly, the word “penis” was avoided during the entire conversation, but its looming presence bespeaks how offensive Kavanagh’s position is. Transgender people are too often reduced to their bodies such that they cannot be seen as real people. It’s absurd to conclude that all girls would experience psychological harm by simply seeing another person’s body, and such an assertion suggests that trans people’s bodies are somehow dangerous to others. Kavanagh tried to obfuscate responsibility for his position by referring to a case at Evergreen College where a trans woman’s use of the locker room raised concern with a young girl’s family.  He neglected to mention that it’s the very anti-LGBT Alliance Defending Freedom that is responsible for raising the controversy in the first place.

Kavanagh’s description of a trans person as someone “who is biologically male who thinks they’re female” suggests his understanding of how his bill might actually impact trans people is limited. Consider the lived experience of the transgender woman, who identifies, presents, and lives as a woman in every aspect of her life. She may have undergone hormone therapy, electrolysis/laser hair removal, and other procedures to bring her body and gender into alignment, but she may have elected not to undergo surgery on her genitals — a costly, invasive procedure that would likely permanently sterilize her, depriving her of her reproductive rights. If she were to enter a men’s restroom or locker room, she would look entirely out of place, and as Signorile pointed out, would face a heightened risk for violence and harassment. The women’s room is the correct room for her to use. According to Kavanagh, however, the mere fact that she might still happen to have a penis that another girl in the locker room might just happen to see is such a safety risk to the girl that discrimination against all trans people is thus justified. It’s absurd, belittling, and just plain bigoted.

The “bathroom safety” myth is a way to make transgender people seem scary in a way that dehumanizes them such that discrimination seems like an important precaution to protect children. While there is no evidence to suggest trans people threaten children’s safety, there is ample evidence that discrimination threatens trans people’s safety. In the end, this is just a bigoted politician’s sugarcoated way of saying, “Eww.”

LGBT

Civil Unions Are Now Legal In Bisbee, Arizona

The city council in Bisbee, Arizona voted 5-2 Tuesday to approve civil unions for same-sex couples. Bisbee is a former mining town that has now become an artist’s haven of about 5,600  people. Same-sex couples there will now be able to go to City Hall, pay $76 (the same cost of a marriage license in the outlying county), and receive a civil union.

Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne has said the ordinance would be unconstitutional, promising his office would challenge it in court. However, the courts would have an interesting precedent with which to make that decision. In 2006, Arizona voters rejected Proposition 107, which would have banned same-sex marriage, civil unions, and domestic partnerships. Though they did pass Proposition 102 two years later, that provision only banned marriage and made no mention of civil unions. A court could easily conclude that civil unions are thus meant to be protected by the constitution.

Moreover, Bisbee City Attorney John MacKinnon made it clear the civil unions would only apply to policies within the city’s control, such as personnel policies and the city cemetery.

Health

Abortion Opponents Jeopardize Arizona’s Medicaid Expansion By Pushing To Defund Planned Parenthood

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, a vocal opponent of President Obama’s health reform law, surprised her Republican colleagues when she announced her support for Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion at the beginning of this year. Since then, Brewer has been attempting to broker a deal with the legislators in her state, who will ultimately need to approve the legislation to expand the public health insurance program.

And as negotiations over Arizona’s Medicaid expansion plan go back and forth, some of the state’s powerful lobbyists are attempting to attach amendments to the proposal to suit their own interests — including a totally unrelated attack on Planned Parenthood, which has become a symbol in the GOP’s ongoing crusade against women’s health.

Obamacare proponents warn that additional amendments could threaten to derail the whole expansion process altogether, since Democratic lawmakers may not be willing to pass a bill with unrelated riders. Nonetheless, one of the state’s most powerful lobbying groups is jumping on the opportunity to target Planned Parenthood, regardless of the potential consequences for Arizona’s low-income residents who may be forced to go without health care if the expansion doesn’t go through:

The Center for Arizona Policy is using an opinion from the Arizona-based Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal-defense organization, to argue that the draft Medicaid legislation should be amended to disqualify the non-profit women’s health provider Planned Parenthood from receiving public money. [...]

[Cathi Herrod, the center’s president] said her organization, a conservative Christian-based group that wields influence with GOP lawmakers, is not taking a position on Medicaid expansion and wouldn’t comment on the possibility that such an amendment could sink the plan.

“Our request is to include language guaranteeing that no funding to an abortion provider results from Medicaid expansion,” Herrod said. “Any dollar that goes to an abortion provider for any service frees up another dollar to subsidize abortion.”

Planned Parenthood gets a fraction of its funding from Medicaid but could pick up more patients if the state broadens eligibility. Although Herrod argues that funding to the clinics indirectly supports abortion, Planned Parenthood officials say they lose money on every Medicaid patient because of reimbursement levels.

The proposed amendment to Arizona’s Medicaid expansion is very similar to a measure that Brewer signed into law last year, which also sought to prevent federal Medicaid dollars from going to Planned Parenthood. Last month, a federal judge blocked that law from taking effect — since state-level Medicaid programs cannot exclude qualified providers from providing essential heath care to the low-income Americans who need it, Arizona is not permitted to target Planned Parenthood simply because the national organization performs abortions.

But even Arizona’s failed record won’t deter the abortion opponents in the state from continuing to go after Planned Parenthood. Bryan Howard, the president of Planned Parenthood Arizona, sharply criticized the Center for Arizona Policy and Herrod for pursuing a “failed legislative strategy” that could jeopardize the state’s Medicaid expansion. “She has to know that she is putting health-care access for 400,000 people at risk,” Howard told the Arizona Republic.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up