ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Bill O’Reilly

Security

Right Wing Invents New Bengahzi Conspiracy Theory: Top U.S. Intel Official Is A Liar

The Republicans’ new focus of attack in the faux “Benghazi-gate” scandal is Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, claiming that he lied about the source of changes to talking points on the Benghazi attack given to U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice.

Yesterday, a DNI spokesperson debunked accusations made by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and other Republicans that the White House changed Rice’s Benghazi talking points, saying that it was the intelligence community that made the “substantive” changes to the talking points. Moreover, former CIA head David Petraeus and other top intelligence officials have said there was no politicization of the process and that the talking points were not altered to minimize the role of extremists but to reflect the best intelligence at the time.

McCain appeared to accept the new information but wondered why Clapper and other DNI officials did not provide this information during closed door hearings last week. And now that all their earlier attacks on Rice have fell apart, Republicans and conservative media figures are directing their attacks at Clapper, a George W. Bush appointee:

– BILL O’REILLY: Now it’s James Clapper, President Obama’s national security guy who is saying, “Oh, it’s me. I sent Rice out there and I took out all the al Qaeda stuff.” I’m not buying it. None of this adds up. … All right so there’s a lot of lying going on here.

– CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I’m not buying it because the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said that a week ago in classified testimony that same Clapper said that they had no idea who changed the talking points and now a week later he seems to say he did? That’s kind of strange. I mean I’ve seen amnesia in my day in my clinical days and that one is pretty quick, one week.

– TUCKER CARLSON: I hate to think that the director of National Intelligence lied, is a liar. But I’m not sure I see an alternate explanation. Apparently, he’s contradicting what he testified to just last week. Is there another explanation for this?”

– FOX NEWS’ STEVE DOOCY: They did say it is out of the [DNI] office. It’s not him per se, so we’re supposed to believe that a Clapper aide changed what Petraeus had said? That’s very, very curious.

– REP. TREY GOWDY (R-SC): This is the head of our national intelligence and he changed his mind within the course of 24 hours. So how are you possibly going to have any confidence in what he says?

And while Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) didn’t call Clapper a liar, he told Fox News’ Stuart Varney that he now might be involved in the alleged cover up:

GINGREY: Now have you got someone who basically can trump the CIA, especially if the president says to him — I am not suggesting that he did, but he could have — look, James, we need to kind of clean this up a little bit.. We are doing really well. We’re right about time for the election and we are doing very well on national security and this could blow our cover.

Watch the video compilation of the attacks against Clapper:

The right wing has spent months trying to bring down the Obama administration in politicization the attacks in Benghazi that left four Americans dead and after all of their conspiracy theories and baseless attacks have been debunked, the rabbit hole appears to have led to Clapper and who knows where it will end.

Politics

O’Reilly: Black Voters Don’t Believe In ‘Self Reliance’ Or ‘American Exceptionalism’

Since the night of the election, Bill O’Reilly has been looking for a scapegoat on whom he can blame Mitt Romney’s loss. He seems to have found one in African American, Latino, and female voters.

Before all the votes were even cast on November 6, O’Reilly came out with the theory that “The white establishment is now the minority,” and that women, black, and Latino voters are “non-traditional” voters who “feel that they are entitled to things and which candidate, between the two, is going to give them things?”

On his show last night, O’Reilly responded to comedian Jon Stewart’s criticism that mourning “traditional voters” is latent racism. But in his rebuttal, O’Reilly explained that the mass turnout of voters of color signaled an end to “traditional American voters.” The new voters, he argued, don’t understand “traditional American values”:

If you look at the exit polling, you’ll see that a coalition of voters put the President back into the oval office. That coalition was non-tradition, which means it veered away from things like traditional marriage, robust capitalism, and self reliance. Instead, each constituency that voted for the President — whether it be single women, Hispanic Americans, African Americans, whatever — had very specific reasons for doing so. [...]

Traditional American voters generally want a smaller government in Washington, more local control, some oversight on abortion, and believe in American exceptionalism.

Watch it:

O’Reilly isn’t new to making racially charged comments. Just days before the election, he speculated that Sec. of State Colin Powell cut Obama “a little more slack” in his endorsement of him because they are both black. He’s also claimed that Democrats have made black people “dependent” on the government.

Alyssa

In ‘Lincoln,’ The House’s Sinners Beat The Saint In The White House

“How the people love my husband. They flock to see him by the thousands,” Mary Todd Lincoln (Sally Field) tells Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (Tommy Lee Jones) midway through Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln after Stevens, who investigated her spending on the White House as Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, arrives there for a reception. “They will never love you as they love my husband. How hard for you to know that. But how important to remember it.” Her opinion of the relative position of the two men guides the film, a tremendous depiction of what it takes to pass epochal legislation marred by lapses into sentiment and Spielbergian self-indulgence.

Lincoln is at its most clear-eyed, and its most-effective, when the movie tackles the question of how to muster votes, and bipartisan votes at that, for the end of slavery, a section of the film dominated by Stevens and Secretary of State William Seward (David Straitharn). The two men begin the movie in very different positions, Stevens as a life-long advocate for the end of slavery and racial equality, Seward unconvinced of the Amendment’s viability or necessity. “Since when has our party unanimously supported anything?” he asks his president, particularly given the prospect of the South suing for peace. “Why tarnish that luster with a battle in the House?” But Lincoln makes himself clear: he will have the Amendment in January of 1865, even if it means buying off lame duck Democrats who need employment when they leave their offices in March. “If procuring votes with jobs is what you intend, I’ll procure from Albany the skulking men who are suited to this shady work,” Seward tells Lincoln, resigned to his task.

Those skulking men are W.N. Bilbo (James Spader) and Robert Latham (John Hawkes), and with their arrival on screen, both Seward and Lincoln are invigorated. After assessing their prospects, Bilbo explains that he and Latham will ignore Democrats of the “Kind that hates Niggers, hates God for making Niggers. We’ve abandoned these 39 to the Devil who possesses them,” and focus instead on rather more craven men like Clay Hutchins (Walton Goggins, capping off a tremendous year). Seward takes it on himself to figure out what each man is worth. “A first-term Congressman who couldn’t earn reelection,” he says of one rather greedy Democrat. “I deemed it unseemly and bargained him down to Postmaster.” Hutchins, standing in for that persuadable Democratic minority, explains the dilemma he faces: the 13th Amendment is being presented as the only way to end the Civil War by weakening the Confederacy, but Lincoln’s case for it is being weakened by rumors of a peace delegation from the South, seeking an accord–but only if they can preserve slavery. “If my neighbors hear I voted yes to Nigger freedom and no to peace, they’ll kill me,” Hutchins says. His view is shared by more sophisticated men like Preston Brooks (Hal Holbrook), who is desperate to avert the arrival of another fighting season. “I went to Richmond to talk to traitors,” he tells Lincoln after his meeting with the Confederates. “To smile at and talk to traitors. Because in two months, it will be spring.”

While Lincoln delays the commissioners and the actual offer of a peace deal to keep the necessity of the 13th Amendment alive in Washington, aided at the last minute on the day of the vote by Bilbo and Latham transversing Washington at a dead sprint, in the House it is up to Stevens to strike the delicate balance to hold his fragile party together. A man of firey temperment–Stevens at one point addresses Democratic leader Fernando Wood as “you perfectly named obstructive object”–Stevens is forced to make a moral compromise, telling the House that, contrary to his lifelong advocacy, “I don’t hold with equality in all things, just equality before the law, nothing more.” It’s a painful moment, that rhetorical scaling back, and a recognition of the rhetorical compromise needed to move legal equality forward, leaving the work of cultural change separate. “Who would have guessed that old nightmare could show such control?” Mrs. Lincoln, watching with her maid Elizabeth Keckley (Gloria Reuben) from the House Gallery. “He might make a politician some day.” After Stevens speech, one of his Radical Republican allies tells Stevens that he betrayed their cause. “You’ve lead the battle for race equality for 30 years…You refused to say that all humans are human.” “I want the Amendment to pass so the Constitution’s first and only mention of slavery is its abolition,” Stevens responds to them. “So no, it seems there’s nothing I won’t say.”
Read more

Justice

Bill O’Reilly: Colin Powell Cut Obama ‘A Little More Slack’ Because They Are Both Black

Last week, Romney campaign co-chair John Sununu suggested that former Secretary of State and retired General Colin Powell endorsed President Obama because both men are African-Americans, and not because the deeply accomplished former cabinet secretary calmly evaluated Obama’s performance and deemed it worthy of reelection. Last night, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly made a very similar claim in a conversation with Fox’s Arthel Neville:

O’REILLY: General Powell has been, in his books, quite candid about him using affirmative action to succeed, alright? And Barack Obama did use affirmative action to, you know, be educated and something like that. Do you think that there’s any racial business here?

NEVILLE: No. No. No. No.

O’REILLY: And I’m not saying that in a pejorative — I’m not saying that in a negative — but a connection — the general and the president came up the same way. . . . You don’t think shared experience enters into General Powell’s endorsement?

NEVILLE: You’re telling me that if President Obama had not done a good job that Colin Powell — General Powell — would have supported President Obama regardless? Absolutely not true.

O’REILLY: No I’m saying that he might be cutting him a little more slack.

Watch it:

Setting aside the offensiveness of O’Reilly’s comments, Neville, who is black, deserves a great deal of credit for forcefully pushing back against a man who ranks at least a few steps above her in Fox News’ food chain. She repeatedly challenged O’Reilly, pointing out that suggesting black men are unable to look past each other’s race is exactly the same as claiming that former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-AR) must support O’Reilly himself because both men are white. As Neville told O’Reilly, his comments are “disrespectful to General Powell” and “disrespectful to the president.” O’Reilly takes an record of success and accomplishment, and tries to “dilute it to pigmentation.”

LGBT

Bill O’Reilly Defends Hate Group’s Connections Between Homosexuality And Pedophilia

Last night, Bill O’Reilly invited Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center onto his show to refute claims by the Family Research Council that “hate group” labels incite violence. Potok attempted to explain the many lies FRC tells to demonize the LGBT community, such as claims that pedophilia is a “homosexual problem,” but that point essentially derailed the conversation. O’Reilly pushed back, defending FRC’s point that same-sex child abuse is more common than opposite-sex child abuse:

O’REILLY: So they are pointing out that in this area, there is a higher percentage of gay pedophilia, homosexual pedophilia, than heterosexual pedophilia. Are they a hate group for pointing that out?

POTOK: But Bill, they’re not pointing something out that’s true; they’re making a false allegation.

O’REILLY: You say that’s not true, what they said?

POTOK: That’s what I’m saying. They also say that gay people are “fundamentally incapable of being good parents.” That also is false and that has been shown by many studies, conducted not by the Southern Poverty Law Center—

O’REILLY: I think the statistics are that the male-boy pedophilia problem is much more intense than the male-girl pedophilia problem.

Watch it:

O’Reilly simply does not understand pedophilia. There is no such thing as “homosexual pedophilia” or “heterosexual pedophilia,” because an attraction to children has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Girls are more likely to experience sexual abuse than boys, and yet the high-profile reporting on male-boy sexual abuse, such as in the Catholic Church or Boy Scouts, suggests the opposite to be true. In addition, most — if not all, in some cases — of the “homosexual pedophilia” documented in studies FRC cites was committed by heterosexual men. To distort that reality into a “homosexual problem” is to intentionally demonize the gay community, which is exactly why the SPLC labels FRC a “hate group.”

Economy

O’Reilly: Democrats Made African-Americans ‘Dependent’ On The State

During a segment on his Fox News show last night about African-American support for the Republican Party, host Bill O’Reilly asserted that the roughly 85-90 percent of African-Americans who regularly vote for Democrats only do so because Democrats have made them “dependent” on government “entitlements”:

WILLIE BROWN [FORMER SF MAYOR]: [Democrats] moved in and offered programs and policies that allowed African Americans to become incredibly dedicated and the anchor in many Democratic elections.

O’REILLY: Alright, but that’s a nice view if you’re a Democrat. But someone else would say the Democrats moved in and gave them all kinds of entitlements, making them dependent on the Democratic party and the state, which is not a good thing.

Watch it:

O’Reilly assumes that African-Americans receive more government assistance than other Americans and hence that’s what makes them more likely to vote Democratic. But this is flatly false:

White Americans, poor and middle-class alike, receive the vast majority of tax-funded government assistance programs, from monthly assistance to Social Security to food stamps.

TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), the program that provides aid to single mothers, is the most well-known welfare program, but the truth is that Social Security and Medicare are also social welfare services, funded by tax dollars. To that end, nearly 70 percent of all benefits of these programs go to white people. In fact, since African Americans have lower life expectancy, many work and pay into the Social Security and Medicare programs through their tax dollars, only to have white Americans, who have a longer life expectancy, benefit from the income they’ve left behind.

The actual historical explanation for African-American support for Democrats, by contrast, doesn’t require parsing budgets: Democrats became, around 1964, the lead proponents of civil rights for African-Americans, while the Republican policy record is decidedly more mixed.

If O’Reilly wants the GOP to start attracting black voters, he should tell the party to start with a hard look in the mirror. One of the  leading Presidential hopefuls called President Obama “the food stamp President.” The flagship right-wing publication National Review published outright racists for years before finally catching on. O’Reilly himself has described a famous soul-food restaurant as “like any other restaurant…even though it’s run by blacks” and told an African-American professor that he “kinda” looks like a cocaine dealer.

NEWS FLASH

Bill O’Reilly Apologizes ‘For Being An Idiot’ | Bill O’Reilly predicted the Supreme Court would strike down the Obamacare mandate and, if they didn’t, he’d “apologize for being an idiot.” Tonight, O’Reilly said he wasn’t “really sorry,” but did come through with an apology anyway.

Watch the video, via Media Matters:

LGBT

Bill O’Reilly Worries ‘Glee’ Encourages Teens To Experiment With Alternative Lifestyles

The introduction of a trans teen on this week’s episode of Glee has the Fox News gang in a tizzy again, concerned that LGBT identities are “wild” and not part of “nice family” programming because they might encourage young viewers to experiment with these “alternative lifestyles.” In a discussion Bill O’Reilly hosted, Gretchen Carlson complained she might have to explain diversity to her 8-year-old:

CARLSON: Here we go again, pandering to .3% of the American population that considers themselves transgender. Now I get to explain this to my 8-year-old, if i want her to see a nice family show with some nice music.

O’Reilly then added that by including unique characters and controversies in the show, it encourages teens to “experiment” with “alternative lifestyles”:

O’REILLY: If children hear it, unsupervised children who don’t have parents watching, they might go out and experiment with this stuff… When I was a teenager and I saw James Dean smoking, it made me want to smoke…

CARLSON: I don’t think that watching Glee is going to suddenly make kids transgender, but experimentation… I wholeheartedly believe in today’s society that kids are experimenting with homosexuality. [...]

O’REILLY: A lot of these dopey kids are confused about who they are. They’re confused.

To her credit, Jeanine Pirro defended LGBT teens, saying “you can’t parent sexuality.” Watch it:

By trying to “protect” young people from understanding gender and sexual orientation, the Fox News crew is ensuring that those topics remain taboo and that people who identify as LGBT continue to be stigmatized. As Pirro pointed out, students who identify with Glee characters are empowered by that visibility, a positive message Carlson shouldn’t have to explain to her daughter.

NEWS FLASH

Bill O’Reilly Sticks Up For Transgender Miss Universe Contestant | Conservative Fox News host Bill O’Reilly seemed supportive of a transgender woman’s right to compete in the Miss Universe competition during his show on Friday. During a segment about Miss Universe’s decision to prohibit Jenna Talackova from participating in the pageant because she is trans, O’Reilly asked, “What right does the Miss Universe pageant have to violate this lady’s right to be a woman? They are basically saying because you weren’t born a woman you don’t have a right to be a woman..[I]t doesn’t sound right to me.” The comments represent a significant evolution for O’Reilly, who in 2010 compared transgender people to Ewoks. Watch the segment:

Media

O’Reilly Defends Geraldo Rivera On Hoodie

On Friday, Fox News contributor Geraldo Rivera sparked a backlash when he seemingly blamed Trayvon Martin for his own death, saying the Florida teen should not have gone outside wearing a hoodie. “I think the hoodie is as much responsible for Trayvon Martin’s death as George Zimmerman was,” he said.

Few came to Rivera’s defense, including his own son, who was ashamed of his father, according to Rivera himself. But on Friday night, Rivera finally found someone in his corner — Fox host Bill O’Reilly.

Appearing on The Factor that night, O’Reilly said he agreed with Rivera, explaining that he faced a similar public outcry over a separate event in which people thought the host was blaming the victim. Saying they were both simply offering “a cautionary tale,” O’Reilly said he and Rivera were doing the “exact same thing” and that “your advice was good advice, my advice was good advice.” “If you dress like a wannabe gangster, some knucklehead is going to take you at your word,” Rivera added. Watch it:

But perhaps not all cautionary tales are meant to be followed, even by those who tell them, as Rivera and O’Reilly were photographed wearing hoodies together at a Yankees game:

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up