ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Bob McDonnell

Health

BREAKING: Virginia Board Of Health Passes Regulations Meant To Shut Down Abortion Clinics

The Virginia Board of Health voted 11-2 on Friday “to require abortion clinics to meet strict, hospital-style building codes” that many women’s health advocates say will put abortion providers out of business and prevent women from accessing essential medical services.

Pending final approval by conservative state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) and Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) — which is almost definite — Virginia will join other GOP-led states such as North Dakota, Mississippi, and Alabama in imposing stringent regulations meant to arbitrarily shut down abortion clinics.

The regulations — part of a nationwide anti-choice campaign to adopt so-called Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers, or TRAP, laws — would require clinics that provide abortions to meet the same standards as outpatient hospital facilities, forcing many clinics to choose between expensive and medically unnecessary renovations such as widening halls and doorways or shutting down entirely. While the health board originally wished to grandfather existing clinics from having to comply with the new rules, Cuccinelli threatened to make its members foot the bill for any litigation that resulted from the law.

Friday’s vote represents the latest skirmish in an ongoing conservative war on abortion clinics. In the past three months, states have proposed an astonishing 694 provisions restricting or rolling back women’s reproductive rights. Efforts to shutter local abortion clinics disproportionately impact low-income women and significantly increase the incidence unintended pregnancies.

Health

Virginia Lawmakers Agree: Banning Insurers From Covering Abortion Hurts Low-Income Women

This week, Virginia became the 21st state to restrict coverage for abortion services in the health insurance marketplaces set up under Obamacare. Over the past several years, that’s become an increasingly common tactic to restrict abortion access, as anti-choice lawmakers rush to prevent insurers from being able to cover the cost of the legal medical procedure.

Even though the measure banning abortion coverage — which was an amendment that Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) tacked onto a broader General Assembly bill — ultimately passed the legislature, it still sparked a debate that cut across party lines. Republican and Democratic lawmakers both suggested that preventing women from using their insurance coverage to pay for abortion services is ultimately a class issue, a point confirmed by women’s health advocates:

But members of both parties agree that the measure’s biggest impact will likely fall along class lines, landing hardest on some of the people the federal health-care overhaul was designed to help: working women who barely get by on their incomes.

“Those people that can afford insurance outside of the exchanges will be able to buy whatever they want. People that can’t afford to buy outside of the exchange will have to buy policies that don’t cover these procedures,” said Sen. John C. Watkins (R-Powhatan), who sponsored the bill but opposed the amendment by Gov. Robert F. McDonnell (R). “It just sets up a class situation, in my mind.” [...]

Cianti Stewart-Reid, executive director of Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia, said that the only real effect of the amendment would be to limit access for women who make too much money to qualify for Medicaid but not enough to purchase their insurance on the private market.

“What it means is that women — by and large low-income but working women in Virginia — won’t have access to abortion,” Stewart-Reid said.

Abortion access is, of course, an incredibly important class issue. Of all the women who have abortions in the United States, 42 percent fall below the federal poverty line — partly because low-income women often still struggle to access affordable and reliable contraception. And when women are denied the opportunity to have a legal abortion, that greatly increases their risk of falling into poverty.

And the restrictions that state lawmakers pile on top of women seeking to have an abortion often hit low-income women the hardest. For example, 24-hour waiting periods — which force women to make multiple trips to a clinic — ultimately mean women are paying the costs for the additional transportation, the additional childcare, and the additional lost income during the time off of work. On top of the hundreds of dollars that an abortion procedure can cost out-of-pocket, that quickly adds up to be too much for poor women who are already struggling to pay the bills.

Virginia lawmakers were correct to identify the class dynamics exacerbated by unnecessary restrictions on abortion coverage. Unfortunately for the women in the state, however, their anti-abortion governor is expected to sign the legislation into law.

Health

Virginia Cuts State Employees’ Hours To Avoid Providing Obamacare Coverage

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA)

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA)

As part of his state’s new budget, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) and his administration are trying to force potentially tens of thousands of public sector employees in the state to work fewer hours so that the government can avoid providing them health care.

Under Obamacare, employers are required to offer health insurance options for any employee working 30 hours or more per week. So McDonnell and his team have slipped language into the state’s budget bill requiring that any hourly waged workers employed by the state put in no more than 29 hours a week.

The rule applies to a range of state employees, including adjunct college professors:

The 29-hour limit is on its way to becoming state law, thanks to language inserted into the state budget at the request of Gov. Bob McDonnell’s administration. The language appears in both versions of the budget adopted Thursday by the Senate and House of Delegates.[...]

Anticipating legislative approval of the policy, the state Department of Human Resource Management has advised all state agencies to implement it now.

The state has more than 37,000 wage employees. More than 7,000 of them have been working at least 30 hours a week, according to a recent survey taken by the department.

Other public universities have made the same shift to lower hours for employees to avoid providing them with basic health benefits. But the anti-labor practice is more prevalent in the private sector, where a huge number of businesses in the restaurant industry — including Applebee’s, Olive Garden, and Denny’s — seek to pass the cost of health care onto their low-wage employees by limiting their hours. Workers who don’t receive employer-based coverage will be able to find insurance through the public exchanges.

Economy

GOP Governor’s Plan To Pay For Roads By Taxing The Poor Advances

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) has been stumping for his new transportation plan, which would eliminate the state’s gas tax and instead fund transportation via an expanded sales tax. The plan would shift the cost of transportation funding away from those who use the system and onto Virginia’s poorest residents. But so far, it has encountered little resistance:

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell’s controversial transportation bill passed the House of Delegates Finance Committee on Wednesday, moving past its first hurdle in the state’s 2013 General Assembly session.

In a 14-8 vote along party lines, the committee passed McDonnell’s package, which calls for eliminating the state’s 17.5 cents per gallon gas tax and raising the state sales tax from 5 percent to 5.8 percent.

McDonnell’s plan would wallop the poor, while letting the richest Virginian’s (not to mention any out of state drivers passing through) off largely scot-free, as this chart shows:

“Eliminating the gas tax paid by highway users and raising taxes on all other Virginians to pave our roads makes no sense,” said State Sen. Chap Petersen (D). “Indeed, eliminating our traditional road funding because cars are more efficient makes about as much sense as canceling your child’s college fund because tuition keeps rising.”

Economy

Analysis Shows Virginia GOP Governor’s Tax Plan Would Pound The Poor

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R)

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) has been touring his state to promote a plan that would eliminate Virginia’s gas tax and replace it with an expanded sales tax. McDonnell is touting the plan as a way to fix the state’s dysfunctional transportation funding system, but its practical effect would be to make Virginia’s already regressive tax system even worse. As the Commonwealth Institute explained:

Even with the proposed elimination of the tax on gas, the governor’s plan would result in higher taxes for Virginians across the board. However, the proposed tax changes will fall most heavily on lower-income families.
That’s because as a share of their income, low- and moderate- income households spend more than high-income households buying the basic necessities of life like clothing, toiletries, and school supplies, which are subject to the state’s sales and use tax.

For example, a family making less than $21,000 a year, among the lowest 20 percent of the income distribution, would see its taxes rise by about .21 percent under the governor’s plan. But at the other end of the spectrum, households making over $509,000 a year, in the top 1 percent of the income distribution, would see an increase of just .05 percent.

Under Virginia’s current tax system, the richest 1 percent pay a 5.2 percent effective tax rate, while the poorest Virginians (those making less than $19,000) pay 8.8 percent. McDonnell’s plan would raise those rates, but do so in a way that the gap between what the richest and poorest Virginians are paying would expand. In addition, the plan would shift the responsibility for paying for Virginia’s highways from people who most use the roads (including those from outside the state) to poorer residents who can least afford it.

Justice

McDonnell Doesn’t Rule Out Signing GOP’s Secret Redistricting Plan

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA)

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA)

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA) expressed displeasure Monday with the Republican Senate’s sneaky maneuver to subvert majority rule and gerrymander the Senate in such a way that could give themselves a super-majority — but has not yet said whether he would veto the bill. But to live up to his previous promises, he will have to do just that.

Yesterday, with civil rights legend Sen. Henry Marsh (D) attending the inauguration, Senate Republicans rammed through new maps on a party-lines 20-19 plurality. Republican Lt. Governor Bill Bolling, who can break ties in the Senate, would have voted against the plan had the vote been tied. The maps were not considered in committee nor available for public comment — rather, Sen. John Watkins (R) offered them as a surprise floor amendment to House Bill 259 — and the Republican plurality limited floor debate to just minutes before forcing a vote on final passage. As Blue Virginia notes, it is unclear whether this mid-decade redistricting is even constitutional, as the Virginia constitution calls for new maps only once every decade.

Assuming the measure passes the Republican-controlled House of Delegates, it will be up to Gov. McDonnell to decide whether to sign the bill — setting up a likely court fight — or veto. But just two years ago, he demanded a bipartisan plan and a transparent process.

In January 2011, McDonnell created an Independent Bipartisan Redistricting Committee to suggest and review new district maps, saying:

As Virginia redraws its legislative districts later this year, the process should take place in a manner that is fair and open. Legislative districts should be drawn in a way that reflects commonsense geographic boundaries and communities of interests as required by law. This Bipartisan Redistricting Commission will contribute to public involvement, openness, and fairness in the redistricting process.”

Read more

Justice

GOP-Controlled Virginia House Committee Kills Voting Rights Restoration Proposals

Civil rights restorations application

Convicted felons in must petition to the governor for voting rights clemency

The Virginia House of Delegates subcommittee with jurisdiction over constitutional amendments killed a series of proposals Monday that would have restored the civil rights of persons convicted of a felony who have completed their sentences. This move come days after Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA) endorsed changing the Virginia constitution to automatically allow non-violent felons to regain their voting rights after serving their time.

Virginia is one of a handful of states that prohibits all citizens convicted of felonies from voting, even after they serve their terms, unless they are granted clemency by the governor. A series of proposals by Democrats and Republican members of the Virginia House of Delegates were rejected, en mass, by the Constitutional Amendments Subcommittee of the House Privileges and Elections Committee. The subcommittee’s four Republicans unanimously voted to kill all of the proposals, Democrats Algie Howell (D) and Johnny Joannou (D) were the only votes in favor of any of the measures.

Both McDonnell’s Secretary of the Commonwealth Janet Vestal Kelly and Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II (R) attended the hearing to speak in support automatic restorations. Had any of the bills passed through the Virginia General Assembly this year and again next year, it would have gone to a statewide referendum.

Deputy House Majority Leader C. Todd Gilbert (R), a former prosecutor who does not sit on the committee, told the Richmond Times-Dispatch that he opposed automatic restoration because felons already get off too easy. “These are not people we ask of much … All we ask them is to show a little personal responsibility and fill out a simple application [for rights restoration].” Far from just simple procedural act, applying for clemency is no guarantee that whoever is governor will grant the clemency request.

Economy

Virginia Governor Promotes ‘New, Innovative’ Plan To Tax The Poor To Pay For Roads

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA)

Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell (R) was on Fox News today to discuss his new plan to shift the cost of highway construction from drivers to the poor, which he will accomplish by eliminating his state’s gas tax and replacing it with an expanded and increased sales tax. McDonnell called the idea a “new, innovative” way for his state to address its transportation shortfall:

Some have suggested that is why the gasoline tax is good, because people buy less gas and then the air is clean. That’s not the policy reason. You tax things to raise revenue to provide government services, and so that’s is the purpose of it, not to create those kinds of policies. But Neil, the whole goal here is to create a way to have a sustainable method of funding our roads and bridges and other transportation assets for the future so we can create more jobs, so that businesses will come and locate here, so entrepreneurs will start up here, so families can spend more time with their children, parents. That is the whole goal and do it in a way consistent with conservative principles. Look, it’s a different idea. We shouldn’t be afraid of new innovative ideas.

Watch it:

McDonnell’s plan will result in the cost of highways being borne by low-income Virginians — as the sales tax disproportionately affects those at the bottom of the income scale who are more likely to spend all or most of their income — and by those who use mass transit, walk or bike. It lets out-of-state drivers who use Virginia’s roads off without paying a single cent. As the Washington Post’s Robert McCartney wrote, “the gas tax is a nearly ideal way to fund highways. It’s borne by the people who use highways. It penalizes fossil fuel use and thus is environmentally friendly. Out-of-state drivers, rather than Virginians, pay a sizable chunk of it.”

Virginia already has a regressive tax system, with the richest 1 percent paying a 5.2 percent effective tax rate, while the poorest Virginians (those making less than $19,000) pay 8.8 percent, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. Increasing the sales tax is only going to make that disparity worse, while making those who don’t use the state’s highways pay more for their upkeep.

Justice

Republican Virginia Governor Backs Automatic Restoration Of Voting Rights For Non-Violent Felons

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA)

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA)

In his State of the Commonwealth address Wednesday, Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA) endorsed the automatic the restoration of civil rights for non-violent felons who have completed their sentences. Virginia is one of a handful of states that prohibits all citizens convicted of felonies from voting, even after they serve their terms, unless they are granted clemency by the governor.

The conservative McDonnell, who has earned praise from progressive leaders for using his clemency power to restore voting rights to a record number of Virginians, used his final State of the Commonwealth speech to endorse legislative efforts to amend the Virginia Constitution to restore voting rights automatically. While a variety of proposals have been filed, McDonnell mentioned by name two: one which would make restoration automatic for all felons after completing their sentences and one which would change the system for only non-violent felons.

McDonnell told the General Assembly:

While we have significantly improved and fast-tracked the restoration of civil rights process, it’s still an executive process. As a nation that believes in redemption and second chances, we must provide a clear path for willing individuals to be productive members of society once they have served their sentences and paid their fines and restitution. It is time for Virginia to join most of the other states and make the restoration of civil rights an automatic process for non-violent offenders.

This session, Delegates Greg Habeeb and Peter Farrell have introduced bills to address this issue, and I urge you to support legislation for the automatic restoration of rights for non-violent felons.

Habeeb and Farrell are both Republicans. Last year, Habeeb’s bill attracted 14 Democratic co-patrons but no other Republicans and was killed on a 3-2 vote in subcommittee.

Economy

Virginia Governor Wants To Shift The Cost Of Highways Onto The Poor And Bikers

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R), seeking to address a looming shortfall in his state’s transportation funds, has proposed a plan to boost transportation funding by repealing the state’s gas tax and replacing it with increased sales taxes and a surcharge on alternative-fuel vehicles, the Washington Post reports:

Gov. Robert F. McDonnell proposed Tuesday an ambitious overhaul of how Virginia pays for roads, rail and transit, including eliminating the gas tax and replacing it with an increase in the sales tax.

The overall plan, which would raise an estimated $3.1 billion over five years, also would increase vehicle-registration fees and add an annual $100 charge for drivers of alternative-fuel cars. McDonnell’s proposal calls for a increase in the state’s sales tax from 5 percent to 5.8 percent and projects using $1 billion in Internet sales tax revenue from legislation pending in Congress.

While McDonnell’s plan would raise revenues, it would do so in an assortment of wrong-headed ways. It would shift more of the tax burden to low-income Virginians, since sales taxes are inherently regressive (low- and middle-income earners spend a larger portion of their incomes than do the wealthy). The sales tax would still exempt gasoline while being applied to groceries. And McDonnell can’t count internet sales tax as a definite, since it’s still unclear whether that authority will be granted by Congress.

The shift would also mean that visitors who stop to fill up their gas tanks in the state would still get the benefit of using the roads without paying taxes that support them. It also incentivizes the highway system, a perverse goal considering the bulk of the state’s transportation costs come from Northern Virginia, where there is already a public transportation system that would better serve Virginians if it was made even more robust. And it shifts costs to walkers, bikers, and public transportation users, who would be just as responsible for paying for roads as drivers.

If McDonnell is already willing to abandon his no-tax pledge to fund transportation, there are better ways to do it. He could raise the gas tax, which is currently bringing in less money per gallon of gas than at any time in its history. Or he could close corporate tax loopholes, which drain $12.5 billion a year — four times the amount of revenue his plan raises — from the state’s coffers.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up