ThinkProgress Home
ThinkProgress
ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Carl Levin

Security

Reid Blocks Defense Authorization: Terror Provisions Like Indefinite Detention ‘Are Just Wrong’

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) blocked a vote on this year’s defense budget authorization act because of provisions in the bill that the Obama administration says will tie its hands when dealing with terrorism suspects. Reid explained his impending move on the Senate floor Monday before issuing a letter Tuesday to the Democratic chairman and ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee. On the floor Monday, Reid said:

But I also say, Mr. President, in its present form, I’m going to have some difficulty bringing this bill to the floor. It contains provisions relating to the detention of terrorism suspects that in the words of national security adviser John Brennan would be, and I quote, “disastrous. It would tie the hands of our counterterrorism professionals by eliminating tools and authorities that have been absolutely essential to their success.

To show you how extremely important it is that we do something about these provisions in this bill that are just wrong, both the Judiciary Committee in the Senate and the Intelligence Committee in the Senate have asked for hearings on this provision in this bill.

Watch the video:

In a September speech, Brennan, a deputy national security adviser, decried any “rigid, inflexible approach” to terrorism that would stop the Obama administration from taking its “practical, flexible, results-driven approach that maximizes our intelligence collection and preserves our ability to prosecute dangerous individuals.”

A day after his floor comments, Reid sent a letter the Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) and Ranking Member John McCain (R-AZ) informing them that he didn’t intend to bring the National Defense Authorization Act to the floor until it was stripped of the detention provisions. In the letter, Reid objected to:

[T]he authorization of indefinite detention in section 1031, the requirement for mandatory military custody of terrorism suspects in Section 1032, and the stringent restrictions on transfer of detainees in Section 1033. [...]

I strongly believe that we must maintain the capability and flexibility to effectively apply the full range of tools at our disposal to combat terrorism. This includes the use of our criminal justice system, which has accumulated an impressive record of success in bringing terrorists to justice.

In his floor speech, Reid cited a compromise over last year’s National Defense Authorization Act, which originally included a repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy on gays in the military. Republicans filibustered the authorization and Democrats relented, taking the DADT repeal out of the bill and agreeing to put it forward later as a separate vote. Reid asked that McCain take the same approach to the terrorism detention provisions in this year’s authorization.

LGBT

Sen. Carl Levin: DADT Repeal Is ‘Proof That We Can Deal With Our Mistakes And Correct Them’

Thanks to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network for inviting ThinkProgress to report live from its Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Day Celebration.

As chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) was a leading force for the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. He will continue to play a role in the implementation of repeal as Congress tracks “remnants of discrimination” that take place in the military, but he said he’s optimistic that all the military leaders are on board and will realize this is “a different world, a different generation.” At Tuesday night’s celebration, he lauded DADT repeal as an advance for freedom, openness, and tolerance in America and thinks historians will look back on the repeal process as proof of the United States’ ability to better itself:

LEVIN: This is an amazing country. We’re able — usually — to change and to deal with things that need to change. “Change” has kind of been our middle name here in America. It’s another milestone on a road to a better county and a greater country, but it’s also proof that we can deal with our mistakes and correct them and pull together and be a better country when we do pull together.

Watch it:

NEWS FLASH

McCain Still Not Taking Petraeus’s Advice On ‘Winning’ & ‘Losing’ | Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) attacked Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) today for his call to withdraw at least 15,000 troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year. When asked if Levin’s plan was appropriate, McCain said, “I think if you want to lose, obviously.” Gen. David Petraeus, for whom McCain has previously “thanked God”, said in a recent interview with ABC News: “We’re really loathe to use this very loaded term of winning or losing” when referring to the war in Afghanistan. Petraeus also didn’t like using “winning” and “losing” when referring to the Iraq war. McCain didn’t seem to care about that either.

Yglesias

Carl Levin Open to “Guantanamo North” in Michigan

carl-levin-2

The right-wing’s bizarre NIMBY-based attack on the idea of closing Guantanamo Bay has gotten a surprising amount of support. But some legislators may actually want some new prisoners. Take Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) for example:

Most lawmakers view the prospect of moving prisoners from Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to their districts as a negative proposition. But at least one Democratic senator is open to the idea as a potential economic boost to his struggling state.

Carl Levin , chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said that construction and staffing at a new maximum-security prison in Michigan could help his cash-starved state. [. . .] Former Michigan Gov. John Engler, a Republican, suggested this month that creating a “Guantánamo North” in the Upper Peninsula could net the state upward of $1 billion per year, according to reports.

Now back to basics. As Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michèle Flournoy said yesterday, it would be nice if lawmakers could take a “more strategic” view of this issue. Closing the facility is important to rebuilding America’s international relationships. And given that the country already has a large number of highly secure detention facilities, there’s no compelling reason to build a new one in the Upper Peninsula. But by the same token if for some reason that’s what it takes, then that’s what it takes.

For a quick-but-serious overview of the real issues at stake here, as opposed to the political hype, I would recommend my colleague Ken Gude’s Closing Guantanamo 101 issue brief.

Switch to Mobile