ThinkProgress Home
ThinkProgress
ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Charlie Crist

LGBT

Rep. Kendrick Meek Calls Crist The ‘George Wallace’ Of Gay Adoptions

Governor Charlie Crist (I) tried to run away from his support for Florida’s ban against gay adoption during yesterday’s ABC Florida senate debate, portraying himself a social moderate who only supported the ban because it was the law of the state. But during a heated exchange in the last minutes of the three-way debate between Crist, Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-FL) and Marco Rubio (R), Meek likened Crist to former Alabama Governor George Wallace and said that he stood in the way of sensible adoption policies:

CRIST: When I was saying that it wasn’t appropriate to have that adoption, it was because that was the law in the books in our state. I was the Attorney General of Florida. I understand enforcing the law and respecting it….I’m a live and let live kind of guy…I am a fiscal conservative and a social moderate. I really believe in less government and more freedom. I don’t want to impose my will on other people. [...]

MEEK: It’s really mind boggling. It’s beyond an explanation for the governor to stand here and do more than a Potomac two-step. I mean, he is saying that he was the, how do you say, the Governor Wallace when he came down on gay adoptions in the state. For all of the kids in foster care right now that are looking for home, he stood — he said he thought it was inappropriate. When he ran against Jim Davis in ’96 — I mean, ’06, he said that Jim Davis didn’t have the values that he possessed. That’s not, that’s not in the state statute. That’s his opinion.

Watch a compilation:

Indeed, before announcing his independent bid for the Senate, Crist had supported Florida’s ban on gay parent adoption because “children are best raised in a traditional family.” As recently as February 2010, Crist told the Palm Beach Post that he had “respect” for the current law. “I don’t advocate for a change,” he said, adding that he hoped it wouldn’t be overturned by the courts.

LGBT

In Bizarre Interview, Crist Pretends He Never Supported Florida’s Gay Adoption Ban

Before announcing his independent bid for the Senate, Republican Governor Charlie Crist had supported Florida’s ban on gay parent adoption because “children are best raised in a traditional family.” As late as February 2010, Crist told told the Palm Beach Post that he had “respect” for the current law. “I don’t advocate for a change,” he said, adding that he hoped it wouldn’t be overturned by the courts.

Last month, Crist’s Independent campaign issued a new position paper on LGBT issues, in which Crist suddenly declared his opposition to the ban. “We need to take politics out of adoption decisions,” the paper read. “That is why I oppose Florida’s current law that requires Family Law judges to ignore what is right for a child in order to adhere to what Florida law blindly demands.” Crist even proposed dropping an appeal of a lower court ruling that had found the ban unconstitutional, but after Florida’s Court of Appeals for the Third District unanimously upheld the finding, he appeared before the cameras to announce that Florida would stop enforcing the ban.

All that’s last month. Today, speaking before the very same Palm Beach Post editorial board to whom he had preached about the value of the “traditional family” in February, Crist denied saying he “liked” the law and pretended like he never held a personal opinion on the issue:

PBP: You also said you favored the gay adoption ban. And now you don’t.

CRIST: It was a law on the books. I was the former attorney general. I have a sworn duty…

PBP: That didn’t mean you had to like it.

CRIST: I didn’t say I liked it. I said I would enforce it.

PBP: (Cross talk) No, you said you thought that children do best in a home with a mother and a father.

PBP: That’s what you said. With that pen and in that chair. So has that changed?

CRIST: Has that changed?

PBP: Yes

CRIST: No. I think what’s changed is we have a court ruling that says that the law is unconstitutional. That’s what has changed. And I respect the law.

PBP: That ruling was in effect when you were here in February.

PBP: Not the DCA ruling.

CRIST: The DCA ruling…Okay…I’m referring to the DCA ruling.

Watch a compilation:

It’s hard to watch Crist feign consistency in his positions and pretend like he never supported the ban. But with most Floridians opposed to the policy, the governor is moving to the left on social issues to peel away votes from Democratic challenger Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-FL). To do that, he has to ignore his “traditional family” comments.

LGBT

Appeals Court Rules Florida’s Gay Adoption Ban Is Still Unconstitutional, Crist Announces Moratorium

Yesterday, the Florida Court of Appeals for the Third District unanimously upheld a lower court’s finding that there is “no rational basis” for Florida’s statutory ban on gay and lesbian people adopting children in the state. “Given a total ban on adoption by homosexual persons, one might expect that this reflected a legislative judgment that homosexual persons are, as a group, unfit to be parents,” the opinion states. “No one in this case has made, or even hinted at, any such argument.”

Gov. Charlie Crist — whose recent conversion on gay rights led him to at one point suggest that the case should be dropped entirely has announced that the state will stop enforcing the 33-year-old ban and will “confer with the adoptive father at the center of the case before deciding whether to appeal. He said, however, that he believes the state Supreme Court wouldn’t overturn the court rulings.” Towelroad has this video of Crist’s remarks:

Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Scott, meanwhile, said he was opposed to what he termed “single sex adoption.” “Children should be raised in a home with a married man and a woman,” Scott said.

Florida, of course, is the only state to explicitly prohibit gays and lesbians from adopting children. The state enacted the ban in 1977 — on the heels of Anita Bryant’s campaign against expanded rights for gay people and two years before the first reported case of an adoption by an openly gay person anywhere in the country. At the time, Bryant and other conservatives claimed that “the recruitment of our children is absolutely necessary for the survival and growth of homosexuality–for since homosexuals cannot reproduce, they must recruit, they must freshen their ranks.”

Back in March, two Florida lawmakers introduced legislation to overturn the state’s gay adoption ban, but were forced to withdraw the measure due to conservative opposition.

During Crist’s 2006 gubernatorial campaign, he issued a position paper which said that “he believes that children are best raised in a traditional family. Accordingly, he does not support repealing the ban on adoption by same-sex couples.”

Justice

FLASHBACK: Crist Was Against Almost All LGBT Equality Measures Before He Was For Them

crist_stimulus_DV_20090209153611Florida’s leading LGBT organization, Equality Florida, has rightfully praised Charlie Crist (I-FL) for suddenly embracing a wide array of LGBT equality measures, but it’s probably worth pointing out that his conversion comes out of political necessity, not any kind of policy realization. In fact when Crist was running for Governor and for Senator as a Republican, he opposed almost every measure he now supports. Consider the following:

CRIST ON FLORIDA’S GAY ADOPTION BAN:

2010: “That is why I oppose Florida’s current law that requires Family Law judges to ignore what is right for a child in order to adhere to what Florida law blindly demands.”

2006: “Charlie Crist also believes that children are best raised in a traditional family. Accordingly, he does not support repealing the ban on adoption by same-sex couples.”

CRIST ON EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION:

2010: “I support strong anti-discrimination laws including ENDA. Employment and advancement should be based on skill and merit, not hindered by prejudice of any kind.

2006: “Charlie Crist does not support including sexual orientation within anti-discrimination laws…Charlie Crist opposes giving sexual orientation status equivalent to those currently covered under existing civil rights laws. “

CRIST ON CIVIL UNIONS:

2010: “I believe civil unions that provide the full range of legal protections should be available to gay couples. That includes access to a loved one in the hospital, inheritance rights, the fundamental things people need to take care of their families.”

2006: “Charlie Crist does not believe that the government or private industry should be required to provide health insurance benefits to same sex partners of employees or contractors.”

2008: Opposed civil unions when he supported The Florida Marriage Amendment, or Proposition 2. It said: “This amendment protects marriage as the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife and provides that no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized.”

CRIST ON DON’T ASK, DONT’ TELL:

2010: “I’m a strong supporter of the men and women of our military. Those willing to risk their lives to defend our country should not be compelled to lie to do so.”

MAY 2010: “I think the current policy has worked pretty well for America. I really do. So I don’t know why there’s any need for change at this time.”

Again, Crist’s progress speaks to the success of LGBT activism in bringing these policies into mainstream and hints to the positions all candidates will have to take in future elections. But the reason for Crist’s evolution should not escape scrutiny. Crist changed his positions to lure moderate and independent voters away from Democratic challenger Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-FL). And now, both men have almost identical positions on LGBT rights, with Crist still hanging on to his support for a state-based same-sex marriage ban. Ideally, of course, Crist’s move to the left would push Meek to embrace full marriage equality — a position that 41% of Floridans already hold (and increase of 15 percentage points from the mid 1990s). But I suspect that LGBT voters will have to wait two if not four more years for that issue to enter the mainstream.

Justice

In Reversal Of Past Positions, Crist To Issue Position Paper Embracing LGBT Rights

Raw Story is reporting that Gov. Charlie Crist (I-FL) will issue a new position paper later this week embracing a host of new LGBT initiatives, while still opposing same-sex marriage:

Civil Unions
I believe that the government should not make it harder for people to take care of their loved ones. I believe civil unions that provide the full range of legal protections should be available to gay couples. That includes access to a loved one in the hospital, inheritance rights, the fundamental things people need to take care of their families.

Repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell
I’m a strong supporter of the men and women of our military. Those willing to risk their lives to defend our country should not be compelled to lie to do so. I support the current efforts by Congress and military leadership to end Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and hold every member of the military to the same standard of professionalism that has made our military the greatest force for good in the world

Federal Safe Schools Improvement Act
As Commissioner of Education I was the first statewide official to support anti-bullying protections that specifically enumerated the most frequent manifestations of bullying in our schools. Everyone who has children or who has worked with students knows that anti-gay taunts are used relentlessly on our campuses. We need to address the epidemic of bullying and create safe learning environments for every single student.

The Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act
I’ve been a consistent supporter of providing legal protections for gay couples. Like most Americans I believe the government should make it easier, not harder, for people to take care of their loved ones.

Uniting American Families Act
Family reunification has been the foundation of U.S. immigration law but U.S. citizens who are gay cannot sponsor their partners for family-based immigration. As a consequence, many same-sex, bi-national couples are kept apart or torn apart sometimes even separating parents from their children. This bill, which I support, humanely addresses a problem that disproportionately impacts Floridians.

Equal Access to COBRA Act
I strongly support this act which mandates that employees, their partners and dependent children be allowed to continue participation in their employer-sponsored health coverage.

Crist has a long and complicated history on gay issues and has at times opposed many of the above measures. As a Republican, Crist supported the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) policy, but as an independent, he now supports its repeal. Crist has also supported efforts to ban gay marriage in Florida, but has said that civil unions between gays are “fine.” In 2007, however, he asked the Republican party to stop spending money promoting “a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Florida” even after he signed a petition “to place an amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage on the 2008 election ballot.” “When asked if he supported civil rights on the basis of sexual orientation, Crist said ‘no.’”

On July 28, 2006, Crist told a radio show that he “haven’t taken a position yet” on the right of gays to adopt, but only days after — in an interview by the Florida Baptist Witness — “Crist answered ‘no’ to repealing the ban on gays’ adopting.” In the draft provided to Raw Story, Crist says he now opposes the adoption ban. “We need to take politics out of adoption decisions,” the governor says in the draft. “That is why I oppose Florida’s current law that requires Family Law judges to ignore what is right for a child in order to adhere to what Florida law blindly demands. There is only one question that matters: What is in the best interest of that child?”

As an independent, Crist probably feels that he has to position himself as more accepting of LGBT issues to bolster his position with moderate voters. This strategic decision — the realization that supporting LGBT issues is mainstream — is in itself a major victory for LGBT activists. As Equality Florida’s Nadine Smith points out, “It’s great to hear a sitting governor take such a strong stand on equality issues. This is the first time in Florida’s history that a sitting governor has taken these public positions on a wide range of LGBT equality issues. It marks a shift in the debate in our state.”

Justice

Charlie Crist Was Against Civil Unions Before He Was For Them

Yesterday, after initially suggesting that he supported a constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage, Florida Governor Charlie Crist issued a clarification statement saying that while he does not support same sex marriage, he opposes a constitutional amendment prohibiting it. He favors civil unions. “I am fully supportive of civil unions and will continue to be as a United States Senator, but believe marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman,” he said. As he put it in June, “If you want to have couples or partners who want to reside together [in civil unions], I don’t have a problem with that…I’ve always supported civil unions, but I think marriage in the traditional sense is what I believe in,” Crist told Time magazine.

But that’s not what he believed in 2008. Back then, Crist had abandoned his “live and let live” attitude and announced his support for The Florida Marriage Amendment, or Proposition 2. That language prohibited not just same-sex marriages; it also outlawed civil unions:

This amendment protects marriage as the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife and provides that no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized.”

During the campaign for Proposition 2, supporters of the amendment maintained that civil unions should be prohibited alongside marriage, since they grant gay couples all of the rights of marriage. “We believed, during the campaign, that civil unions would very likely be prohibited by the amendment,” Equality Florida’s Brian Winsield told me. He remains hopeful, however, that the measure, which passed with 62% of the vote, would allow for domestic partnerships — arrangements that grant couples only some of the rights of marriage. Crist presumably has two positions on that as well.

Politics

Charlie Crist Flip Flops On Constitutional Amendment Banning Same-Sex Marriage

Just days after flip flopping on his support for the health care law, Gov. Charlie Crist (I-FL) had to clarify his stance on a federal amendment defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Crist has supported efforts to ban gay marriage in the past. And on Sunday, when asked if he is “still in favor of a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage,” Crist signaled that he was:

HENRY: Another big issue, same-sex marriage. Many conservatives like Marco Rubio support a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. But this week, the former Republican Party Chairman Ken Mehlman came out and said he’s gay and he called on conservatives to kind of move to the political center and be more tolerant on this issue. You have previously said in your gubernatorial campaign, you supported a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Now that you’re trying to occupy the political center, are you still in favor of a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage?

CRIST: I feel the same way, yes, because I feel that marriage is a sacred institution, if you will. But I do believe in tolerance. I’m a live and let live kind of guy, and while I feel that way about marriage, I think if partners want to have the opportunity to live together, I don’t have a problem with that. [...]

HENRY: But governor, doesn’t it sounds like you having it both ways by saying live and let live, but I also support a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. If it’s live and let live, why would you ban same-sex marriage?

CRIST: Well, everything is in a matter of degree, Ed, and when it becomes to the institution of marriage, I believe that it is between a man and a woman, it’s just how I feel.

Watch it:

Hours later, Crist clarified his statement, saying that while does not support a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, he still opposes same-sex marriage. Interestingly, this isn’t the first time Crist has changed his position on LGBT issues.

Justice

Charlie Crist Flip Flops On Constitutional Amendment Banning Same-Sex Marriage

Just days after flip flopping on his support for the health care law, Gov. Charlie Crist (I-FL) had to clarify his stance on a federal amendment defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Crist has supported efforts to ban gay marriage in the past and on Sunday, when asked if he is “still in favor of a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage,” Crist signaled that he was:

HENRY: Another big issue, same-sex marriage. Many conservatives like Marco Rubio support a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. But this week, the former Republican Party Chairman Ken Mehlman came out and said he’s gay and he called on conservatives to kind of move to the political center and be more tolerant on this issue. You have previously said in your gubernatorial campaign, you supported a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Now that you’re trying to occupy the political center, are you still in favor of a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage?

CRIST: I feel the same way, yes, because I feel that marriage is a sacred institution, if you will. But I do believe in tolerance. I’m a live and let live kind of guy, and while I feel that way about marriage, I think if partners want to have the opportunity to live together, I don’t have a problem with that. [...]

HENRY: But governor, doesn’t it sounds like you having it both ways by saying live and let live, but I also support a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. If it’s live and let live, why would you ban same-sex marriage?

CRIST: Well, everything is in a matter of degree, Ed, and when it becomes to the institution of marriage, I believe that it is between a man and a woman, it’s just how I feel.

Watch it:

Hours later, Crist clarified his statement, saying that while does not support a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, he still opposes same-sex marriage. “In an interview that aired today, I was not discussing an amendment to the U.S. Constitution banning same-sex marriage, which I do not support, but rather reaffirming my position regarding Florida’s constitutional ban that I articulated while running for Governor,” he said. “In fact, the interviewer’s question reflected just that. I am fully supportive of civil unions and will continue to be as a United States Senator, but believe marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman.”

This isn’t the first time Crist has changed his position on LGBT issues. As a Republican, governor and senatorial candidate Charlie Crist supported the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) policy, but as an independent, he now supports its repeal. Crist has also supported efforts to ban gay marriage in Florida, but has said that civil unions between gays are “fine.” In 2007, however, he asked the Republican party to stop spending money promoting “a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Florida” even after he signed a petition “to place an amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage on the 2008 election ballot.” “When asked if he supported civil rights on the basis of sexual orientation, Crist said ‘no.’”

On July 28, 2006, Crist told a radio show that he “haven’t taken a position yet” on the right of gays to adopt, but only days after — in an interview by the Florida Baptist Witness — “Crist answered ‘no’ to repealing the ban on gays’ adopting.”

Politics

Rubio ‘Veers From Tea Party’s Script,’ Softening Rhetoric To Attract Independent Voters

tdancerubio2 For the past year, Florida GOP Senate candidate Marco Rubio has been the model tea party candidate, receiving one of the first endorsements from Sen. Jim DeMint’s (R-SC) Senate Conservatives Fund (DeMint has called Rubio “the most impressive conservative leader I have met in a long time.”) Rubio has raised more money from the movement than any of his fellow tea party-backed candidates. But after his challenger, Florida Gov. Charlie Crist (I), decided to run as an independent instead of as a Republican, Rubio has been “breaking with some Tea Party orthodoxy” in order to win over moderate voters that might now side with Crist, the New York Times reports. In an interview, Rubio’s rhetoric was noticeably tamer than in the past:

The solution isn’t just to paralyze government,” Mr. Rubio said in an interview as he traveled the state last week from here in the Panhandle to Miami. “Vote for us because you couldn’t possibly vote for them? That’s not enough. It may win some seats, but it won’t take you where you want to be.” [...]

I am not running for the United States Senate because I want to be the opposition to Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid,” he replied in a measured tone. “I’m running for Senate because I want to create an alternative.” [...]

Does anything impress him about President Obama?

Yeah, there’s a lot,” Mr. Rubio said. “Obviously his personal story of someone who didn’t come from wealth is a testament not just to his tenacity, but to America. I just strongly disagree with him on public policy.”

Rubio also “did not agree with flashpoints Republican candidates elsewhere have seized on.” He said he doesn’t “want Arizona to serve as a model for other states” when it comes to immigration, and said advocating for changing the 14th Amendment, as many Republicans have, “is frankly is not the highest and best use of our political attention.” When asked for his own views on immigration, Rubio broke with his party’s absolutist sloganeering on the issue, saying his position “doesn’t fit on a bumper sticker so bear with me,” before launching into an eight-minute explanation.

Politics

Marco Rubio ‘doesn’t support changes’ to the 14th amendment.

Marco RubioAs the debate over whether the 14th amendment should be changed to deny the American-born children of undocumented immigrants citizenship has dragged on over the past few weeks, Florida senatorial candidate and tea party darling, Marco Rubio (R), has remained curiously silent — until today. Mike Thomas of the Orlando Sentinel reports that he received an email from Rubio’s campaign aide, Alex Burgos, confirming Rubio’s opposition to changing the 14th amendment:

I noted that this is putting Senate candidate Marco Rubio in a pickle. The crusade against illegal immigration is interpreted by many Hispanics as a crusade against Hispanics. It has resulted in a shift of Hispanic voters to the Democratic Party. Here is a story about the impact in Florida. The press has been pressing Rubio to come out with a position since last week, particularly since Charlie Crist came out strongly against tinkering with the amendment. I wrote that Rubio’s failure to come out against changes could let Crist outflank him with Hispanic voters.

Rubio’s campaign aide, Alex Burgos, has sent me an e-mail saying Rubio also does not favor altering the amendment. But there is no press release or official statement. So it’s not like Rubio is shouting it from the rooftops. “He simply doesn’t support changes and believes we should focus on securing the border and enforcing existing laws,” Burgo said.

As Thomas notes, Rubio — the son of Cuban immigrants — hasn’t exactly taken a strong position against the GOP’s attack on the 14th amendment. His opponents, however, have. According to Florida senatorial candidate Jeff Greene (D), “if you’re born here, you’re a citizen.” Democratic candidate Kendrick Meek similarly stated, “Yes, you could definitely say I’m opposed” to changing the 14th amendment. Rubio’s biggest foe, current Gov. Charlie Crist (I), has been firm in his opposition, stating “That would be unconscionable to me. [...] The 14th Amendment ought to stay the way it is. If someone is born in the United States of America, you are an American. That is a tradition of our country. That’s the way it should always be, that’s the way it’s always been. And that’s what America is all about.”

Older

Switch to Mobile