ThinkProgress Home
ThinkProgress
ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Charter Schools

Alyssa

With ‘Won’t Back Down,’ The Charter School Movement Gets Its’ Oscar Bait

Won’t Back Down is careful not to speak the words in the trailer, but it’s clear from the decisions the characters make and the protest signs they’re waving that these moms are setting up a charter school:

This is the kind of movie that always give me pause about how well popular entertainment, particularly popular entertainment that’ll clock in at under two hours, can lay out policy solutions instead of articulating policy problems. Narrative fiction can be very, very good at the former. The Wire handled Baltimore public schools well over the course of a season. Brooklyn Castle, my favorite documentary from SXSW uses the jeweler’s lens of a competitive middle school chess team to examine New York City public school budget cuts and the city’s high school exam system. But the solutions it presents are all temporary, individual fixes rather than system-wide reforms. One student wins a scholarship through a chess competition, but that means of achieving escape velocity isn’t available to all students. The school manages to do some stop-gap fundraising, but not everyone has the extremely dedicated parent base and an extracurricular program that can be a massive rallying point.

I’ll be curious how much Won’t Back Down presents setting up a charter school as a difficult endeavor, and if and how meaningfully it acknowledges charter schools’ closure rates. Triumphal narratives feel good, and I’m all for movies that push back against stereotypes of poor parents as uninvested in their childrens’ education. But if you actually want to mobilize people, you have to valorize the effort, not just the end result. And promising outcomes that are far from guaranteed is a recipe for disappointment.

Yglesias

Charter School Benefits In The Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District

Research from David J. Deming, Justine S. Hastings, Thomas J. Kane, and Douglas O. Staiger on the impact of charter schools beyond test scores (black market copy here if you don’t have access to NBER papers):

We study the impact of a public school choice lottery in Charlotte-Mecklenburg (CMS) on postsecondary attainment. We match CMS administrative records to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), a nationwide database of college enrollment. Among applicants with low-quality neighborhood schools, lottery winners are more likely than lottery losers to graduate from high school, attend a four-year college, and earn a bachelor’s degree. They are twice as likely to earn a degree from an elite university. The results suggest that school choice can improve students’ longer-term life chances when they gain access to schools that are better on observed dimensions of quality.

Note that this is consistent with charter skeptics’ favorite research finding that, on average, public charter schools are about the same as traditional public schools. Many schools and school districts are above average. If kids with low-quality neighborhood schools are able to attend charter schools that are about as good on average as average public schools, then those kids are going to see huge benefits. By the same token, you wouldn’t expect there to be a ton of interest in launching charter schools in districts whose traditional public schools are of above-average quality.

Alyssa

Intermission

Quick programming note: our Deadwood discussions are going to switch to Tuesdays and Thursdays so we don’t get recap-overloaded on Mondays and Fridays. Otherwise, the bridge is, as always for these posts, yours.

-The charter school lottery process is going to be part of the new Spider-Man comics.

-Is Gloria Steinem just a professional hater now? (Glad she can at least find it in herself to like Lady Gaga.)

-So glad Aziz Ansari rescued himself from business school with comedy.

-It’s not very nice of the Avengers to destroy Cleveland. Cleveland has enough problems!

-This is why ladies can’t have nice things.

Alyssa

Is the New Spider-Man An Education Reformer?

Joe Quesada, the Marvel Comics Chief Creative Officer, says that the creation of Miles Morales, the new mixed-race Ultimate Universe Spider-Man, was informed by debates over education reform:

Miles was starting to take shape. We discussed his family and upbringing at length and slowly you could see how he was becoming his own person and not just a copy of Peter. Now while I don’t want to give too much away, over the years I’ve been really intrigued by the revolutionary work being done by educator Geoffrey Canada, and as we looked deeper into Miles’ character, I suggested to Brian that he watch the documentary, “Waiting For Superman” (ironic, I know!). Bri loved it, and the wheels started turning. Pretty soon he was building a world and cast that would support Miles in some fantastically intriguing ways that were relatable but also different from Peter Parker’s world. I have a sneaky suspicion that Brian is going to make people fall in love with Miles very quickly.

Obviously I can’t pass judgment on how those themes play out until I see it happen, though it would be pretty weird to see a comic book where Morales fights a teachers’ union that’s secretly entirely made up of Skrulls or something. But no matter how it turns out, I’m glad to see this kind of thinking be part of the comic book process. Assuming that getting bitten by radioactive spiders doesn’t induce amnesia, there are factors in Spider-Man’s past other than Uncle Ben’s dying words that influenced him. And while many superhero stories propel newly-made supermen and women into larger worlds, whether it’s from a gated mansion into the slums of Gotham, or from Westchester County to the Blue Area of the Moon, there’s something to be said for superhero stories that take on problems closer to home. It may take a single bug bite from a very special arachnid to make a hero, but it takes a village to raise all the kids who are only lucky enough to get nipped by mosquitoes.

Education

Christie Worked For Firm That Represented For-Profit Schools, Now Pushing For School Privatization

One of the major initiatives of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) has been pushing for is the expansion of for-profit and privately managed schools in K-12 education. As part of this push, Christie has been championing a school voucher expansion that would cost the state $825 million to funnel tax dollars to private schools, while at the same time slashing spending for public education, cutting $820 million last year alone.

Last week, Christie announced a new “public-private school pilot program” which would allow “local school boards [to] hand control of some so-called ‘transformation schools’ to education management organizations, possibly including for-profit firms.” Christie designed the new program with Acting Education Commissioner Christopher Cerf, the “former president of the world’s largest for-profit operator of public schools, Edison Schools Inc.”

The New Jersey Star-Ledger notes that Christie actually has a very strong financial tie to Cerf’s for-profit company. The private law firm at which Christie worked as a lobbyist between 1999 and 2001 actually lobbied New Jersey’s government on behalf of Edison Schools:

From 1999 to 2001, Christie was a registered lobbyist at a law firm that lobbied New Jersey government on behalf of Edison Schools, according to filings with the state Election Law Enforcement Commission. While the firm was representing the multinational education company, Chris Cerf was its general counsel.

The firm, Dughi, Hewit and Palatucci, also represented Mosaica Education, a for-profit charter school operator, and the University of Phoenix, a for-profit online university. At the time, the firm listed two lobbyists, Christie and William Palatucci, a longtime political ally of the governor who is a named partner in the firm.

“Many people support their public schools and they are reacting with anger to the idea they should be privatized,” said state Sen. Dick Codey (D), in response to Christie’s proposed education policies. (HT: BlueJersey)

Education

The Perils Of School Vouchers: Unregulated FL Private School Offers High School Diploma In 8 Days For $399

Last week, Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) — buoyed by legislators who received hundreds of thousands of dollars of special interest cash — signed into law legislation that would dramatically expand access to school vouchers, which funnel taxpayer dollars into private schools. Scott is doing this despite proposing nearly $3 billion in cuts to public education, meaning that he is essentially transfering money from public education to private education.

On the same day that Scott signed into law his latest attack on public education, Gus Garcia-Roberts of the Miami New Times published a story looking at the case of InterAmerican Christian Academy, a private school located in Doral, Florida. Garcia-Roberts amazingly enrolled at the school and earned a diploma after only eight days of schoolwork and $399:

It began with a poster on a streetlight in downtown Miami: “High School Diploma. (305) 716-0909.” I dialed, and a chipper female voice answered, “Hello. High school.” Eight days and $399 in cash later, at the school’s Doral “campus” — a cramped third-floor office next door to US Lubricant LLC and across the hall from a hair extensions company — I was grinning widely, accepting a framed diploma and an official transcript sporting a 3.41 GPA.

The diplomas that the school is offering are actually getting students admitted to local colleges. The paper found that at “least 88 graduates have used its diplomas and bogus transcripts to gain admittance to Miami Dade College, according to that institution’s registrar.” Remarkably, the state’s Departmenf of Education (DOE), when asked about the school, said that it is powerless to stop it from rewarding diplomas. “If a school like that exists,” said Cherry Etters of the Florida Doe, “we might know about it, but we can’t really do anything.”

As Garcia-Roberts concludes, “There’s no telling how many of Florida’s 1,713 private schools — which educate a third of a million students — are run like InterAmerican. Even as Gov. Rick Scott leads a charge to privatize education on a historic scale, our state’s private schools are among the least regulated in the nation.” Indeed, Florida currently leads the country in “school choice” programs that include tax credits for private schools, voucher programs, and privately managed charter schools. The case of InterAmerican Christian Academy provides a cautionary tale about some of the pitfalls of the proliferation of lightly-regulated or unregulated private schools.

Education

Instead Of Pushing For Education Reforms, McDonnell Quits Race To The Top

In March, two states — Delaware and Tennessee — won the first round of the Obama administration’s Race to the Top program, an initiative in the stimulus package that awards competitive grants to states that put together ambitious education reform efforts. Now that the competition is moving into its second round, states that didn’t win are retooling their education laws, in an attempt to better their applications.

For instance, New Jersey’s teacher’s union, “after several days of marathon negotiations,” reached an accord with Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ) to support the state’s application, complete with reforms to “merit pay, teacher seniority, evaluations and tenure.” New York City officials and the State Assembly have also reached a tentative deal “to more than double the number of charter schools,” to bolster that state’s Race to the Top chances. This week, Maryland’s State Board of Education “endorsed a proposal for common academic standards in math and English” that’s been drafted by the National Governor’s Association, which “could help Maryland win points on its application.”

However, Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA) decided that he’d rather quit:

Gov. Robert F. McDonnell pulled Virginia out of President Obama’s Race to the Top school reform derby Wednesday, a turnabout after he had pushed hard for the state to get a share of the $4 billion in federal funding…“The problem is that the way they have structured this program to mandate that we adopt a common core of standards to replace the Standards of Learning is unacceptable,” McDonnell told reporters in Richmond. [...]

Our standards are much superior. They’re well accepted. They’re validated. All the education leaders have a comfort level with those. So once again, a federal mandate to adopt a federal common core standard is just not something I can accept, nor can most of the education leaders in Virginia, nor can most of the legislators.”

From the beginning, it’s been no secret that adopting the governors association’s common standards would provide a boost to applicants. And Virginia had no problem with the rules when it applied for money in the first round. “Of course I think we’re deserving of any funding,” said state Superintendent of Public Instruction Patricia Wright at the time. Virginia’s application didn’t garner much support, however, as the state came in 31st out of 41 applicants.

While McDonnell claims that Virginia’s standards are “much superior,” the truth is that they leave a lot to be desired, particularly in math. According to the Fordham Institute, “in the upper grades, progress in algebra is slow, with students not introduced to the concept of slope by the end of eighth grade,” and “there are serious deficiencies in the Algebra I and II and Geometry requirements, especially in the latter’s development of mathematical reasoning.”

Virginia’s charter school law is also lackluster, as it only allows local school boards to act as authorizers, which has severely limited the number of charters in the state. This year there were only 4 charter schools operating in Virginia, serving 250 students. And instead of addressing these problems — and attempting to receive federal money to push reform along — McDonnell is simply taking his ball and going home.

Yglesias

Building Public Schools That Work

steve_barr_headshot

It’s been out already for a while, but I highly recommend Doug McGray’s recent New Yorker profile of Steve Barr. Barr runs Green Dot, a public charter school consortium that’s a bit different from most charters in that it’s teachers are unionized and it has somewhat more of a militant, community-organizer spirit. But from a strict policy point of view, the most important issue that McGray discusses is probably the fact that Barr’s latest undertaking is a very large high school:

Old-timers and union loyalists who left Locke after the takeover insisted that Green Dot would find a way to weed out problem kids. Others, such as Cubias, worried that uniforms and the promise of tougher discipline would simply keep bad kids away. But teachers and administrators went out into the neighborhood to visit hundreds of parents and students and encourage them to reënroll. Eighty-five per cent of Locke students returned. (In a normal year, only seventy per cent would come back from summer break.) That meant hundreds more than either Green Dot or the city had projected. [...]

And, for the first time at a Green Dot school, there is no lottery process for admission. There is no waiting list. Locke is serving every kid in the neighborhood, including ones whose parents, in another neighborhood, would never research alternatives to the big traditional school. “Every child who is in his other schools is there because they have an advocate,” Cortines said. “Not so at Locke. They took the whole population.”

This is the accusation that tends to dog successful charter school experiments—that they’re skimming kids with the most education-oriented parents and this skews their results upward. Charter proponents have a range of replies to that accusation, noting that most of the major charters held up as models do in fact make extremely active recruitment efforts and also that successful charters show year-to-year improvements in student performance. But still, this air of suspicion isn’t going to be really cleared until there are examples of charters working as comprehensive providers. And that’s what the new, Green Dot-ified Locke High School will be—the high school that kids in a broad swathe of Watts attend. So if Barr can show even modest improvements, that will be an important signal to other large LA high schools.

On the merits the fact that different cities get substantially different results with demographically similar students ought to do enough to convince people that what happens in the classroom matters. But realistically, an example from the next neighborhood over is going to have more impact on LAUSD than will examples from Boston.

Yglesias

School Choice in Sweden

Conservative voucher fans sometimes tout school choice, as practiced in Sweden, as a good model for the United States to follow. And they’re right, there’s something to be said for the Swedish system. But as Dana Goldstein points out, what they do in Sweden is much closer to what we call charter schools in the United States than to a system of “vouchers.” Swedish independent schools “remain completely government-financed and are not allowed to charge tuition fees.” So, yes, this is a good model, but it’s basically the model that most progressives are already embracing. Meanwhile, people who want to eliminate public education in the United States are already largely looking past the voucher step and moving straight to education tax credits. Of course these people tend to work at the same institutions that have lately taken to arguing that refundable tax credits aren’t “really” tax cuts at all, so the larger trajectory is to move away from a system of taxpayer financed universal education to something where the well-off get a tax subsidy to educate their kids and poor children work as chimney-sweeps or something.

I, for one, will be sticking with the charter schools.

Yglesias

The Administration and DC Schools

2008_0219_michellerhee.jpg

Fred Hiatt did a column on Monday urging Barack Obama to do his utmost to help the school reform efforts in DC being spearheaded by Adrian Fenty and Michelle Rhee. I’d like to see that, too, but I think Hiatt overlooked one particular concrete way in which the administration will be involved. That’s via the DC Public Charter School Board which authorizes new charter schools (and revokes the charters from schools that are no good) and whose members are appointed by the mayor from a list of candidates drawn up by the Secretary of Education.

The system is a bit odd on a theoretical level, but it’s worked well throughout its lifetime. Several secretaries of education in a row have made responsible nominations, and the system has managed to insulate the board from the vagaries of municipal politics. It’s crucially important that the board not become an extension of patronage politics or be captured by the stakeholders in the status quo rather than preserving the charters as alternatives to DCPS. At the same time, it’s also important that the appointments be made with a real focus on the interests of DC and DC’s school students rather than suffering from total inattention. One assumes the Obama transition team isn’t going to get around to staffing the Department of Education for a while (top priority will rightly be on the White House staff, Treasury, Defense, and State) but this will be critically important to the city’s future when the time comes.

Older

Switch to Mobile