ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Colorado

Health

Colorado Launches $2 Million Public Education Campaign To Spread The Word About Obamacare

(Credit: Connect For Health Colorado)

Colorado is bringing health care reform to a TV ad near you.

With over 40 percent of Americans still unsure whether or not Obamacare is even the law of the land, and an open enrollment period for its statewide insurance exchanges that begins in less than five months, Colorado is pumping $2 million into an outreach effort aimed at preparing consumers for upcoming changes under the health law. This makes Colorado the first state to mount an aggressive push to raise awareness of one of Obamacare’s most important provisions for uninsured individuals and small businesses — although Oregon and Kentucky aren’t far behind with their own PR campaigns planned for next month.

Colorado is unveiling a state-run website to give residents more detailed information about Obamacare, and help them figure out whether they will qualify for federally subsidized individual or small business coverage once Colorado’s insurance marketplace opens up in October. For the next two months, the state will also run television spots and print, radio, and billboard ads highlighting the insurance marketplaces, where insurers must compete to offer Americans health coverage:

(Credit: Kaiser Health News)

While the vast majority of Americans are already benefiting from Obamacare’s consumer protections and insurance reforms, enrolling the previously uninsured into health plans on the state-level marketplaces will be critical for successful implementation of the law, and integral to reducing America’s uninsurance rate while improving public health. Some 24 million Americans are expected to receive insurance through the marketplaces by 2016.

But not everybody agrees that now is the proper time to begin the outreach efforts. Some federal officials worry that such education campaigns may be premature, and end up confusing consumers by advertising a product that doesn’t even exist yet. “Our research has shown if you go too early, you don’t have anything to offer, and people lose interest. It will be intense, but the timing is important,” Medicare chief Marilyn Tavenner explained to the Washington Post.

Read more

Justice

Marijuana Repeal Effort Dies In Colorado

Hours before a Colorado Senate deadline, marijuana legalization opponents introduced a measure to repeal the newly passed ballot initiative to regulate marijuana like alcohol. The bill’s introduction Monday evening, after having become public just a few days earlier, prompted immediate reaction from the marijuana legalization community, and at 10 p.m., the bill’s sponsors backed down and took the bill off the table in the face of a filibuster threat and defeat in the House. From the Associated Press:

The last-minute maneuver infuriated marijuana legalization supporters, some of whom ran up several flights of stairs to testify against the measure when they got word it would be heard.

“You’re subverting the will of the voters,” argued Joe Megysy, spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project, a major backer of last year’s pot measure.

Even House colleagues seemed taken aback by the late-night maneuver to ask voters again whether retail pot sales should be allowed.

“This has caught all of us a bit off guard,” said Rep. Dan Pabon, sponsor of a marijuana regulation measure in the House. He said the chances of the repeal measure getting the necessary two-thirds margin in House were “.001.”

The bill would have linked repeal to a tax measure that will go before the Colorado legislature this fall. If voters did not approve certain taxes on marijuana, then the repeal would go into effect. The sponsors said its intent was to pressure the marijuana industry to support the taxes, but it also would have pressured voters to choose between accepting taxes they might not support, or lose the ballot initiative they had previously supported. The ballot initiative garnered more votes than President Obama in November.

As the Colorado legislature completed its session, it also considered several other bills related to marijuana regulation. Although several were left in limbo, the legislature did pass a key measure that has failed numerous other times to set driving under the influence limits of 5 nanograms per milliliter. Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) has said he supports the measure. The House also passed a bipartisan resolution asking for direction from the federal government on how to proceed with regulating pot. Attorney General Eric Holder has still not announced any federal policy on the two state laws to legalize recreational marijuana.

Justice

Colorado Legislature Passes Major Voting Rights Expansion Bill

Both houses of the Colorado legislature passed a major overhaul of state election law that would implement same-day registration and voting, automatically send mail-in ballots to every voter, and create a real-time statewide voter database to prevent fraud. Proponents view the bill, written by a bipartisan group of county clerks, as a national model for other states.

The same-day registration provision prompted most of the resistance from Republicans, who largely voted against the bill in both houses. The bill, however, did garner Republican support from county clerks, and former Republican Secretary of State Donetta Davidson. The Denver Post explained:

Those promoting the changes said the bill is uniquely Colorado, and the state could take the lead nationally on making elections more convenient to voters. They are confident other states will follow — because voters like mail voting (74 percent in Colorado last November), while preserving in-person voting at a few early voting centers, and, eventually, saving millions of dollars for counties. [...]

Other clerks, though, said switching to mail will mean buying less equipment to operate and maintain for a ever-shrinking number of people who still vote in person. That could save millions of dollars in some county over a longer period of time. Denver expects to save a total of about $730,000 in next year’s general election alone, director of elections Amber McReyholds said.

Before the bill goes before Gov. John Hickenlooper (D), the Senate must approve a slight amendment to the House bill. If signed into law, the bill is likely to give a significant boost to turnout. In Washington, Colorado and Oregon, the states that now have universal vote-by-mail, turnout rates exceed the national average by at least five percentage points. And studies have found that Election Day Registration laws boost turnout 7 to 14 percentage points.

Since the November election, 195 bills to expand the franchise have been introduced in 45 states, according to a recent Brennan Center for Justice study. Thirty-one states, however, also introduced 80 new bills to roll back the right to vote.

LGBT

Colorado Same-Sex Couples Begin Obtaining Civil Unions

As of 12:01 this morning, civil unions for same-sex couples are now legal in Colorado, having passed in the legislature in March. Denver and Boulder began issuing licenses immediately. The first couple to receive a civil union certificate — at 12:02 — were Fran and Anna Simon, who wore the wedding dresses they wore for their commitment ceremony seven years ago. They were joined by their five-year-old son, Jeremy and Denver Mayor Michael Hancock officiated:

(Credit: One Colorado)

The clerk’s office in Denver remained open until 3 A.M. while Boulder’s closed at 2 A.M., and hundreds of other couples were on hand to get their civil unions as well:

(Credit: One Colorado)

Eight other states currently offer some form of civil union or domestic partnership that is not called a marriage: Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Hawaii, Illinois, Delaware, and Rhode Island. Rhode Island will become the tenth state with marriage equality after a pro forma vote Thursday. Delaware could also pass marriage equality incredibly soon, with the penultimate vote expected to pass the Senate Executive Committee this afternoon.

Watch a news report about the couples who were waiting in line for civil union last night (HT: Towleroad):

Immigration

Colorado Governor Grants In-State Tuition to Undocumented Immigrants

(Credit: Colorado Association of Commerce & Industry)

On Monday, Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper will sign a law that grants undocumented students the ability to pay in-state college tuition rates. This victory comes a decade after six unsuccessful attempts to pass the state Congress. The measure passed with a 23-12 Senate vote and a 40-21 House vote, this time with three House Republicans siding with the House Democrats who voted unanimously.

In the past, undocumented students had to pay the out-of-state tuition rate, which at times is more than three times the cost of in-state tuition. In order to qualify for in-state tuition, students must have either attended high school for three years or attained a GED equivalency, graduated from a high school within Colorado, and sign an affidavit stating that they have or will apply to legalize their status.

Immediately after Governor Hickenlooper signs the law, about five hundred first-time undocumented college students that make up “0.4 percent in the estimated 141,905 in-state students receiving college opportunity fund student stipends” will be able to pay in-state tuition. Around 1,500 undocumented high school students graduate each year in Colorado.

Colorado joins thirteen other states that allow in-state tuition for undocumented students. Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber signed a similar law in early April.

Climate Progress

Colorado Senate Votes To Strengthen State’s Successful Clean Energy Standard

(Credit: Glenn J. Asakawa)

Colorado residents will now be able to enjoy even more clean energy coming out of their outlets, along with cleaner air and less carbon pollution.

After nearly two days of strenuous debate, Colorado’s House of Representatives voted shortly before midnight Friday night to strengthen the state’s successful renewable energy standard (RES). The bill, which has already passed the Senate and is supported by Governor Hickenlooper, will increase the clean energy standard to 25 percent for rural electric cooperatives by 2020 — a 15 percentage point jump from the current 10 percent. This would mean in seven years, rural areas of Colorado will benefit from one-quarter of their energy portfolio being derived from renewable sources.

These efforts proved successful despite:

  • attacks from the conservative American Tradition Institute, including an ongoing lawsuit that argues the RES is unconstitutional
  • previous attempts from state representatives to pass American Legislative Executive Council (ALEC) “model” bills to fully repeal the standard (documented across the country)
  • sudden opposition to expanding the RES from utility interests like the Colorado Rural Electric Association, an organization that had actually supported a broader RES in 2007 as renewable energy prices dropped

Prior to the vote, Democratic State Representatives made strong arguments about diversifying their energy portfolios and how important it is to decrease carbon pollution. Rep. Max Tyler, author of the 2010 law increasing the standard to 30 percent for utilities, explained how his own utility bill was cheaper than those in rural electric cooperatives because renewable energy prices have dropped steadily. Speaker Pro Tempore Claire Levy reported that the utility Xcel found that increasing its share of renewables was good for its bottom line, and because this bill included a 2 percent rate cap, ratepayers would be protected. Responding to arguments that the bill is an “assault” on rural Colorado, Levy said that instead, the bill would allow rural areas to benefits from the economic activity generated by the higher standards in other areas. In the end, the bill passed the House by voice vote.

In 2004, Coloradans were the first to approve a renewable energy standard by ballot initiative. The Centennial State has already seen the benefits of implementing and expanding a robust RES. In fact, from 2005 to 2010, the clean technology sector grew by 32 percent. This growth has led to the creation of 1,600 clean technology companies that employ over 19,000 workers, which ranks Colorado fourth nationally in clean energy jobs. In fact, the clean technology sector was the only sector in the state to show growth in 2010.

Coloradans also overwhelmingly support the policy, with 72 percent of the state agreeing that “rather than using more coal, we should move toward cleaner sources of energy,” a view held across party lines. Prior to the vote, nearly 4,000 Coloradans signed CREDO Action’s petition in support of the bill, which urged the Colorado representatives to “Please vote yes on SB 252 to ensure that Colorado continues its transition to clean sources of energy.”

Expanding Colorado’s renewable energy standard will not only continue to create clean jobs in Colorado, it will also reduce soot, smog, mercury, and carbon pollution from the state’s electricity sector. This legislation would promote investments in small-scale projects that will allow rural landowners to benefit by leasing land for wind farms — creating an additional income stream, as well as allow additional credits for renewable sources.

In fact, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, wind energy provides 10 times more local tax revenue than a coal-fired power plant in Colorado. If enacted, the legislation would clean up the grid for at least 100,000 Coloradans served by rural cooperatives and bring them closer to the 30 percent renewable target that urban customers enjoy.

Justice

Private Prison Firm Agrees To $600K Payout In Abuse Suit

After years of litigation, private prison operator Corrections Corporation of America has agreed to a $600,000 settlement to compensate inmates at a Colorado facility for alleged prison staff-inflicted injuries that landed 13 inmates in the hospital. The injuries resulted from a six-hour 2004 riot that prison officials had failed to prepare for, even though they were warned it was likely to occur, according to the complaint. The injured inmates said they were not even involved in the riot. CBS Denver reports:

Thirteen inmates were taken to the hospital after the riots at the prison located about 45 miles east of Pueblo. [...]

The rioting began when more than 100 inmates refused to return to their cells. Then the situation escalated as inmates set fires and attacked other prisoners.

Guards used tear gas and rubber bullets to try to get the inmates under control. The riot was limited to prison grounds. No inmates escaped.

Court documents reveal that supervisors at the prison ignored a warning that conditions were ripe for a riot despite those signs coming from both inmates and correctional officers.

The problem was that hundreds of prisoners that were transferred from Washington state were angry about being so far away from home. They were also upset that an 18-year-old transferred inmate was placed into isolation earlier that day.

Inmates said they were cuffed, dragged through water and left to sit in their cells that were then flooded with water.

The inmates said they have been pushing for change in the private prison system.

I would gladly take no money if I knew that CCA was going to be no more, not only in Colorado but everywhere. It really should be up to states to run their own prisons, to supply their own correctional officers and to keep their own inmates in check instead of having someone who has labeled you as a number and is just trying to earn money off of you,” said plaintiff Vance Adams.

 

CCA is the largest U.S. private prison firm, and the settlement comes in the latest allegation of abuse, violations, and abysmal living conditions at CCA and other private prison facilities. Private prisons are incentivized to maximize profit from imprisonment, spending their resources to lobby for more incarceration and garner new contracts, rather than providing the optimum conditions for rehabilitation. Lawmakers who are the beneficiaries of generous private prison contributions, meanwhile, are incentivized to look the other way as troubling conditions persist.

Justice

Conservative Group Photoshops Out Minorities In Mailer Opposing Pro-Voting Legislation

A conservative group connected to Colorado’s Secretary of State has been sending political mailers — including a picture of a darker-skinned woman whose face was digitally removed and replaced with a white woman’s face — in an attempt to oppose a landmark voting bill that may soon become law.

Colorado is currently considering a major piece of legislation to improve the state’s voting laws by implementing Election Day Registration, automatically sending mail ballots to every voter, and creating a real-time voter database to detect and prevent fraud. It passed the House last week and will now be taken up by the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Secretary of State Scott Gessler, a frequent speaker at True The Vote events who uses his perch to warn about the supposed threat of voter fraud, is leading opposition to the bill, which is supported by a number of Republican County Clerks and the Colorado County Clerks Association.

Now, a dark money group named the “Citizens for Free and Fair Elections”, which lists its address as that of Gessler’s former firm, the Hackstaff Law Group, is sending out photoshopped mailers in an attempt to pressure the election clerks into switching their position.

Here is the mailer:

The mailer’s background was taken from the following Getty Images photo:

Except for two key differences. The original photo included a darker-skinned woman in a white hoodie sweatshirt, but the altered version in the mailer took out her face and replaced it with the exact same face of the white woman standing alongside. In addition, a dark-skinned man standing behind her in the photo was removed from the mailer entirely.

ColoradoPols, the first site to catch the photoshop job, shows the two side-by-side:

Gessler, in a statement released Sunday evening, denied involvement in the matter.

Politics

What We’ve Learned In The 14 Years Since The Columbine Shooting


On April 20, 1999, two teenage boys opened fire on their high school in Littleton, Colorado. Using weapons purchased from private dealers at a gun show, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris killed 12 students and one teacher and wounded 21 others. The massacre stood as the most deadly school shooting in U.S. history until Virginia Tech in 2007. Columbine High School became forever marked as a major American trauma — and a moment of reckoning for gun policy.

Then-President Bill Clinton demanded action to prevent future shootings. The Senate narrowly passed an amendment to require background checks on all private dealer sales at gun shows, prompting Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to declare victory over the gun lobby: “It will never be the same again. The vise lock that the NRA has had on the Senate and the House is broken.”

Fourteen years and 31 mass shootings later, Americans are constantly braced for another attack. Like the weapons used in the Columbine shooting, 80 percent of crime guns are still purchased without a background check through private dealers. Even so, new legislation similar to the post-Columbine background check amendment (which failed in the House at the time) could not even muster the filibuster-proof 60 votes to pass the Senate. And the National Rifle Association’s “vise lock” on lawmakers has only tightened in the past decade.

In response to the national horror after Columbine, the NRA claimed they were open to stricter gun regulation, admitting in an ad campaign, “It’s reasonable to provide for instant background checks at gun shows, just like gun stores and pawn shops.” But the organization soon mobilized a massive lobbying effort to kill background checks behind the scenes. The NRA spent $1.5 million in just the two months leading up to the vote, the bulk of which went to mailings that warned of dire consequences if background checks passed. Sure enough, the bill failed.

The gun lobby then turned its sights on Colorado, where residents shell-shocked from the proximity of the attack clamored for tough gun regulation. To combat this momentum, the NRA lavished money — roughly $660,000 — on Colorado lawmakers to kill a slew of state bills:

The National Rifle Association gave thousands of dollars last month to Colorado state legislators in an effort to defeat gun control laws inspired by the Columbine massacre. [...] Only a few token laws, those supported by the NRA, passed. One allows cops to arrest people who buy guns for criminals and children; another re-authorizes a state background check program.

Most of the other proposals were shot down. Among other things, these laws required background checks at gun shows, safe storage of guns at home and an increase in the age for buying a handgun from 18 to 21. [...]

However, documents show the NRA gave the legislators ample help deciding. The association sent Colorado lawmakers more money in the month before the gun debate — $16,950 — than in the previous three years.

While every effective gun regulation introduced in response to Columbine failed to become law, the massacre did transform another area of policy: school security. Schools dramatically beefed up their use of security cameras, metal detectors, and guards after the Columbine shooting, even though a Secret Service report conducted a few years after the massacre found that these measures were “unlikely to be helpful” in preventing violence. Indeed, more school security guards have done little to combat violence, but student arrests for minor infractions shot up with the increased presence of these guards after Columbine.

The push for federal gun reform revived by the Newtown massacre may once again be stalled by the gun lobby. However, Coloradans who remember the horror of Columbine and, more vividly, the Aurora theater shooting last year, have finally prevailed. Thirteen years after the defeat of their last effort at gun reform, the state has approved one of the most progressive gun violence prevention packages in the country, including universal background checks, a ban on high capacity magazines, and a ban on gun purchases by people convicted of domestic violence. The site of two of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history could now serve as a blueprint as the rest of the country finds its way to make meaningful gun reform a reality.

Justice

Major Pro-Voting Rights Bill Advances In Colorado

Colorado is one step closer to a major overhaul of its election laws after a House committee advanced a bill to make voting significantly easier and more accessible in the Centennial State.

The Voter Access and Modernized Elections Act passed through the House State, Veterans and Military Affairs Committee easily on Monday by a 7-4 vote. If enacted, the legislation would take three important steps: implement Election Day Registration (whereby citizens can both register and vote on Election Day), automatically send mail ballots to every voter, and create a real-time statewide voter database to prevent fraud.

The Denver Post has more:

The bill cleared its first legislative hurdle Monday evening when it passed the House’s State, Veterans and Military Affairs Committee by a 7-4 party line vote, after more than seven and a half hours of testimony from dozens of public officials and otherwise private individuals on each side. it now moves to the House appropriations committee. [...]

Those promoting the changes said the bill is uniquely Colorado, and the state could take the lead nationally on making elections more convenient to voters. They are confident other states will follow — because voters like mail voting (74 percent in Colorado last November), while preserving in-person voting at a few early voting centers, and, eventually, saving millions of dollars for counties. [...]

Other clerks, though, said switching to mail will mean buying less equipment to operate and maintain for a ever-shrinking number of people who still vote in person. That could save millions of dollars in some county over a longer period of time. Denver expects to save a total of about $730,000 in next year’s general election alone, director of elections Amber McReyholds said.

These reforms could provide a sharp boost to turnout in Colorado. Two states, Washington and Oregon, currently employ universal vote-by-mail. (Colorado’s proposal differs slightly in that it preserves in-person voting centers for those who prefer that to mailing in their ballot.) Their turnout rates exceed the national average by more than five percentage points.

In addition, Election Day Registration provides a significant boon to a state’s participation rate. Academic studies have found that EDR boosts turnout by 7 to 14 percentage points. As a result, it’s a reform that’s grown in popularity of late, with 11 states currently allowing EDR, most recently California and Connecticut.

The Colorado bill enjoys some bipartisan support. One of its main proponents is former Republican Secretary of State Donetta Davidson, and a number of Republican county clerks back the move. Current Secretary of State Scott Gessler (R) opposes the legislation. It now moves on to the House Appropriations Committee, where passage is expected. Democrats currently control both legislative chambers, as well as the governorship.

After spending two years on defense over voting rights, progressives are beginning to go on offense. A number of other states are considering sweeping reforms in addition to Colorado. Oregon has proposed automatically registering its residents to vote, making the process far cheaper and easier for voters, Hawaii is weighing an EDR bill, the New Jersey legislature passed early voting, and Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) has been forced to backtrack and support extending early voting.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up