ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Connecticut

Justice

Connecticut Governor Compares NRA Vice President To ‘Clown At The Circus’

Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy (D) tore into the National Rifle Association during an appearance on CNN’s State Of The Union on Sunday. The NRA this week introduced its legislative response to the massacre in Malloy’s home state. Its plan focuses on arming school staff.

Malloy specifically called out NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre for his absolute opposition to commonsense gun regulations, including the new gun law just enacted by Connecticut. After watching a clip of LaPierre mocking Connecticut’s new law, Malloy shot back, “Wayne reminds me of the clowns at the circus. They get the most attention”:

MALLOY: That’s what he’s paid to do. But the reality is is that the gun that was used to kill 26 people on December 14th was legally purchased in the state of Connecticut even though we had an Assault Weapons Ban. But there were loopholes in it that you could drive a truck through. This guy is so out of whack, it’s unbelievable. 92% of the american people want universal background checks. I can’t get on a plane as the Governor of the state of Connecticut without somebody running a background check on me. Why should you be able to buy a gun? Or buy armor-piercing munitions? It doesn’t make any sense. He doesn’t make any sense. Thus my reference to the circus.[...]

Bring it back to reality. Why are they against universal background checks when 92% of the American public is in favor of them? If they can’t answer that question — and they can’t, Candy — What this is about is the ability of the gun industry to sell as many guns to as many people as possible even if they’re deranged, even if they’re mentally ill, evening if they have a criminal background, they don’t care. They want to sell guns.

Watch it:

Malloy then went on to say that there is “precious little” he can agree on with the NRA, and that the organization is coming “pretty darn close” to recommending that every single American carry a gun. He also pointed to a recent report by the Center For American Progress that shows states with weaker gun laws also have the highest rates of gun violence.

Justice

What You Should Know About Connecticut’s Historic New Gun Law

On a hillside in Newtown, Conn., art teacher Eric Mueller sets up wooden angels in memory of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting

At 2:26 a.m. on Thursday, after more than 13 hours of debate, the General Assembly of the state of Connecticut — home of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre — passed what’s being called the “toughest” and most “far-reaching” gun legislation in the country. Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) plans to sign the bill into law at noon on Thursday.

Here’s what you need to know about the law:

1. It has bipartisan support. Certainly more Democrats than Republicans supported the bill, but the vote in the state House was 105 to 44, with 40 percent of Republicans and 87 percent of Democrats voting for it. Earlier, the Senate voted with only 2 of the 22 Democrats opposing the law. Nearly half of Connecticut Senate Republicans voted for the measure.

2. It expands the state’s assault weapons ban. Connecticut already has an Assault Weapons Ban in place, but the new law will add over 100 new types of guns to the banned list. Among these is the Bushmaster AR-15 gun, which is what the Sandy Hook gunman used in his horrific killing spree. People who already own such weapons will be permitted to keep them, but must comply with new registration standards.

3. Magazine clips will be limited to 10 rounds. Connecticut’s new law will immediately ban the sale of any large-capacity magazine clips that hold more than 10 rounds. Gun owners who’ve already purchased high-capacity clips will be grandfathered in, but they register any extended clips they have, if they plan to keep them. And they can’t bring those bigger clips around with them; the new law requires that any extended magazines still on the market be used only in a private home or at a shooting range.

4. All gun and ammunition sales will require a background check. Effective immediately, every single sale of a gun or of bullets in the state of Connecticut must include a background check. Universal background checks are probably the most widely supported measure in Connecticut’s new gun law; nationally, background checks have 92 percent support.

5. Mental health isn’t left out of the equation. Not every measure in the new law intends to regulate firearms; the bill also includes expanded funding for mental health research, and allows for greater training on mental health issues for Connecticut’s teachers. The bill also creates a council in the state with the express purpose of determining how schools can be more safe, and when mental health records should block someone from being able to purchase a firearm.

As was the case when both New York and Colorado passed new gun legislation, gun manufacturers are flexing their lobbying muscles by threatening to leave the state, and some firearm owners are mobbing stores to load up on magazines and weapons before the bans go into effect. But these two actions are not symbolic of widespread opposition. In fact, there’s a lot of support for stronger gun laws. Even hunting organizations are in favor of taking legislative action to prevent gun violence. And the benefit of tightening gun laws is clear; on Wednesday, a report released by the Center for American Progress found a link between weak gun laws and high gun violence.

Justice

What The Newly Released Newtown Massacre Documents Tell Us About Adam Lanza

Thursday morning, local police released previously embargoed police records about the Newtown, Connecticut shooter, Adam Lanza. The records disclosed that, in five minutes, Lanza was able to fire 155 shots, partly as a consequence of the numerous 30 round high-capacity magazines he was carrying.

Most of the released documents were search warrants for Lanza’s car and home, which he shared with his gun-collecting mother (the weapons used at Newtown were taken from his mother’s stockpile). Put together, the findings in these warrants paint a disturbing picture of the arsenal available to Lanza:

1 NRA certificate for Adam Lanza and 1 NRA training book. Police investigators found a National Rifle Association certificate in Adam Lanza’s name, though the nature of the certificate was unspecified. Police also found a book titled “NRA Guide to the Basics of Pistol Shooting,” a book that’s commonly given out as part of NRA pistol training courses. Graduates of these courses are given certificates.

3 new guns. In addition the newly-identified shotgun in his parked car outside (it was a Saiga 12), a search of the Lanza home found an Enfield Albian bolt action rifle and a Savage Mark II .22 rifle. The latter contained live ammunition.

4 high capacity magazines, 2 of which were brought loaded to the crime scene. There were two high-capacity shotgun shell magazines for his shotgun at the crime scene, containing a combined 70 extra rounds for the fortunately-unused shotgun. Police also found two 20-round magazines at the Lanza residence.

Over 1700 rounds of ammunition. These covered a variety of different calibers and gun types, and would have stocked 170 standard 10-round magazines or 56 of the 30-round high capacity magazines Lanza used to such deadly effect in the school.

13 types of bladed weapons. The Lanzas didn’t just collect guns; they also had a variety of knives, samurai swords, and one “six foot ten inch wood handled two sided pole with a blade on one side and a spear on the other.”

Though public outcry after the Newtown shooting generated more political momentum for effective gun law regulations than any other time in the past decade, the political effort is in danger of stalling out in the Senate.

Update

The NRA released a statement in response to the findings denying that either Adam Lanza or his mother Nancy were members: “There is no record of a member relationship between Newtown killer Adam Lanza, nor between Nancy Lanza, A. Lanza or N. Lanza with the National Rifle Association. Reporting to the contrary is reckless, false and defamatory.” Individuals who enroll in an NRA Basic Pistol Training are not required to be NRA members in all cases.

Justice

VIDEO: NRA President Defends Lobbyist’s Shocking Newtown Comments, Doesn’t Think He Should Apologize

NRA President David Keene

NATIONAL HARBOR, Maryland — NRA President David Keene defended lobbyist Bob Welch’s statement that the group would continue weakening gun laws as soon as the “Connecticut effect” had subsided, saying that he had no reason to apologize.

Welch’s comments came last month at the NRA’s Wisconsin State Convention and were first reported by ThinkProgress. Both Connecticut senators, as well as the congresswoman representing Newtown, condemned the remarks and called on the NRA to repudiate them.

ThinkProgress ran into Keene at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Thursday and asked whether he would apologize for the lobbyist’s remarks. “You only apologize for the things that you did,” Keene replied. As Keene’s entourage tried to prevent ThinkProgress from questioning further, we asked whether he thought Welch ought to apologize, the NRA President was candid: “no.”

KEYES: I know Sen. Blumenthal and some others had called on the NRA to apologize for the “Connecticut effect” comment made by the Wisconsin lobbyist.

KEENE: You only apologize for the things that you did.

KEYES: Do you think that he ought to apologize?

KEENE: No.

KEYES: No? Do you think it’s insensitive to the families of Newtown?

KEENE: I think uh…

KEYES: Do you think that it’s insensitive, sir? This isn’t a trick question, I’m honestly asking you.

Watch it:

This is the first time the NRA leadership has directly addressed the controversy, though the group had initially claimed no association with Welch, who represents the NRA’s Wisconsin chapter.

Justice

Congresswoman Representing Newtown Blasts NRA For Offensive Comments About Connecticut Shooting

Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-CT)

The freshman congresswoman who represents Newtown, Connecticut condemned the NRA in a statement on Tuesday for the group’s offensive comments about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

Over the weekend, lobbyist Bob Welch dismissed the importance of the Newtown massacre, telling an annual Wisconsin NRA meeting that they will be able to continue weakening the nation’s gun laws as soon as the “Connecticut effect” dissipates.

Freshman Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-CT) was not pleased to hear the NRA’s comments:

Having met with families and members of the Newtown community numerous times since December 14, I’ve witnessed this community’s pain and their strength. To suggest that the loss of 20 precious children – the loss of six talented and courageous teachers and administrators – is an ‘effect’ that will somehow disappear is callous, and it is wrong. The tragedy in Newtown has irrevocably changed the lives of people in that community, and it’s been felt across the country. I welcome all perspectives to a reasoned conversation about making our communities and our families safer while respecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Yet the statement by a NRA lobbyist is a reminder of the arrogance and political cynicism we’ve seen from the NRA’s leadership. They just don’t get it, and their unwillingness to understand that the tragedy has compelled Americans to act makes them less and less relevant to the conversation.

Esty isn’t the only lawmaker condemning the NRA for its distasteful comments. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) reprimanded the NRA during a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing on Tuesday and in a Huffington Post op-ed, calling the remarks “callous and offensive” and demanding that NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre repudiate them.

Justice

NRA Responds To ‘Connecticut Effect’ Controversy, Falsely Claims No Association With Lobbyist

The NRA responded to the “Connecticut effect” controversy on Tuesday by claiming no connection to the lobbyist who represents the NRA’s Wisconsin chapter.

On Monday, ThinkProgress broke the story about how NRA lobbyist Bob Welch said the organization will simply wait for the “Connecticut effect” to subside before resuming its push to weaken the nation’s gun laws. Welch’s comments came at the 2013 NRA Wisconsin State Convention over the weekend.

Now, the NRA is attempting to disavow any association with Welch or its Wisconsin chapter. In an email to TPM on Tuesday, the NRA wrote that “Bob Welch is neither a staff lobbyist nor a contract lobbyist for the National Rifle Association. He does not speak for the NRA.”

The NRA’s attempt to claim no association with Welch and its Wisconsin state chapter is laughable. Welch is a registered lobbyist for the Wisconsin NRA group, known as WI-FORCE (Wisconsin Firearm Owners, Ranges, Clubs & Educators), so any association between WI-FORCE and the NRA is an association between Welch and the NRA.

Let’s briefly review whether or not WI-FORCE is connected with the NRA.

WI-FORCE’s website notes that the group is “An NRA Chartered State Association.” Their annual convention last weekend, where Welch’s comments were made, was billed as the “2013 NRA Wisconsin State Convention.” Among the attendees at the event was NRA President David Keene, who sat right next to Welch before the lobbyist’s speech.

The brochure pictured below, which notes that WI-FORCE is the NRA’s 2011 Association of the Year and a National Rifle Association Chartered State Association, even includes a testimonial from Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R): “As the NRA’s chartered State association, Wisconsin FORCE’s support for Constitutional rights of Wisconsinites was helpful as I signed important legislation into law.”

Given how offensive Welch’s comments were, it’s clear why the NRA is trying to confuse the public about its association with its Wisconsin chapter.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) is fighting back over the controversy. The Connecticut senator condemned the comments in a Senate subcommittee hearing and a Huffington Post op-ed.

Justice

Connecticut Senator Demands NRA Leadership Condemn Shocking Newtown Comments

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)

During a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing on reducing gun violence Tuesday, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) called on NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre to repudiate comments made by the group’s Wisconsin-based lobbyist that they were waiting for the “Connecticut effect” to wear off before pushing more pro-gun laws.

The comments were first reported by ThinkProgress on Monday.

“I want to express my regret at a statement that was made I think within the last 24 or 48 hours by a lobbyist for the National Rifle Association who said that his group was hoping that the ‘Connecticut effect’ would pass so that his group could be more effective in its lobbying,” Blumenthal said during the hearing.

Countering the NRA’s belief that the American public will soon forget about the 26 people who were slaughtered at Sandy Hook Elementary School, Blumenthal cited ThinkProgress’ report and argued that “the ‘Connecticut effect’ will last and it will be a call to action.”

Blumenthal called the NRA’s comment “an insult to all of us in America but most especially to the 26 families in Newtown who directly suffered this loss,” and called on LaPierre to “repudiate and reject it.”

Watch it:

The Wisconsin NRA, which already succeeded in passing concealed-carry in 2011, plans to push for a Stand Your Ground law, made famous after the death of Trayvon Martin, in the Badger State.

Economy

Corporate Front Group Spreads Nonsense Research Against Paid Sick Days

Connecticut’s paid sick days law — which requires businesses in the service sector with more than 50 employees to allow their workers to accrue at least one hour of paid sick leave for every 40 hours they work — went into effect in January 2012. This week, the Employment Policies Institute released new “research” on the implementation of the law, arguing that it’s hurt the state.

But it is difficult to refer to this as “research” with a straight face, since the group is a shell corporation for big business interests and the report repeatedly asserts that the data is “not representative.” The Employment Policies Institute has released similarly dubious reports arguing against raising the minimum wage, and against the Affordable Care Act. Its founder Rick Berman, was a lobbyist for the food, alcoholic beverage and tobacco industries, and has been publically accused of using his non-profit shell organizations to benefit the for-profit clients for which he lobbies.

Amongst the report’s problems, data collection began in April 2012, four months after the implementation of the law and, due to the requirements of the legislation, before most full-time workers could have used any of the sick days earned. The initial survey was sent to businesses identified as “most likely to be impacted by the law” but nearly half (45 percent) of respondents did not have to change their policies in order to comply with the law — yet they still were included in the results saying negative things about the effects of the legislation.

The report claims that businesses are laying off workers and limiting expansion, but rigorously collected data from the Connecticut Department of Labor shows employment growth in the Leisure and Hospitality and Education and Health Services sectors since the law went into effect — two sectors that had the largest numbers of workers without paid sick days prior to passage of the law.

Read more

Our guest blogger is Sarah Jane Glynn, an economic policy analyst at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Politics

Connecticut Town Collects Violent Video Games For Destruction

A town in Connecticut is offering a $25 gift card for those citizens willing to turn in their violent video games for destruction, as part of the response to the tragic shooting in nearby Newtown in December.

Southington, CT will be rounding up these games, along with violent movies and other media, as part of the Violent Video Game Return Program. Due to take place on Jan. 12, it is not the hope of the organizing group, SouthingtonSOS, that the drive will lead to further censorship. Instead, according to Southington Schools superintendent Joe Erardi the goal is to encourage a conversation between parents and children on their gaming habits:

“If this encourages one courageous conversation with a parent and their child, then it’s a success. We’re suggesting that for parents who have a child or children who play violent video games, to first of all view the games. We’re asking parents to better understand what their child is doing. Have a conversation about next steps. If parents are comfortable [with their child's gaming habits], we’re comfortable.

The initiative, which includes the Chamber of Commerce, YMCA, board of education, fire department, town officials, United Way and local clergy, is similar to one started by a twelve year-old in Newtown who has called for his peers to give up violent games. In Southington, the video games collected will be destroyed and those handing them in will receive a gift card to a local entertainment establishment, most likely a water park.

SouthingtonSOS was quick to point out that they are not acting at the behest of the National Rifle Association in taking action. In the immediate aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary tragedy, the NRA lashed out at various other targets for causing the massacre, intending to draw the blame away from firearms. In spite of the danger the NRA says that violent movies and games pose, the group still curates an exhibit displaying firearms used in motion pictures at their National Firearms Museum.

Likewise, while the drives in Southington and Newtown are voluntary, the NRA and others have pressed for investigating the potential for a ban on video games with heavy violence. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-NV) and former Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) have both called for studying the impact that violent media has on causing violence in the real world. Researchers have found no correlation between playing video games and an upsurge in violent behavior.

NEWS FLASH

Connecticut Governor Nominates State’s First Openly Gay Justice | Last week, Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) nominated former state senate Judiciary Chair Andrew McDonald for a seat on the Connecticut Supreme Court. If confirmed, McDonald will be the first openly gay member of Connecticut’s highest court. As a state lawmaker, McDonald was a leading proponent of marriage equality, and a backer of an earlier law providing for civil unions in Connecticut. McDonald stepped down from his seat in the state senate to become Malloy’s top legal advisor.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up