ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Democratic Party

Politics

Virginia GOP Nominee Believes Gays Are ‘Very Sick’ And Democrats Are Worse Than The KKK

(Credit: Associated Press)

The Virginia Republican Party this weekend nominated for lieutenant governor a minister who has a history of virulent anti-gay statements, accuses the Democratic Party of enslaving African Americans, and criticized President Obama for having “Muslim sensibilities.” The former Senate candidate, who in 2012 garnered less than 5 percent of the vote in the Republican primary, bested six other candidates during the Virginia GOP convention, and will join conservative Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli on the Republican ticket. He is the first black candidate the state party has endorsed since 1988.

Here are some of the most alarming facts you need to know about E.W. Jackson:

Election

Why Today’s GOP Will Never Win Over Minority Voters

Nothing is more important to the future of American politics than the minority vote.  Here’s a primer on what to expect from these voters for the rest of the decade.

One thing that’s certain about the future of the minority vote is its continued growth, which has averaged about half a percentage point a year or two points over a Presidential cycle.  Given the latest Census population projections, we would expect growth to continue at roughly that level in the future.  If it does, the share of minority voters in the 2016 election should be around 30 percent and, in the 2020 election, around 32 percent.  In the immediate future, maintaining these levels of voter growth will depend on preventing a minority turnout dropoff, particularly among blacks, and continued mobilization of new voters, particularly among Latinos and Asians.

But how certain is it that minority voters will continue to lean so heavily Democratic?  Change is always possible, but at this point those leanings look very solid. Consider black voters: besides their historic ties to the party, they are strong supporters of active government, both to combat discrimination and to provide services and opportunity.  In a mid-2012 Pew analysis, their party identification was overwhelmingly Democratic: 87 percent of black registered voters identified with or leaned toward the Democrats, compared to just 8 percent who identified with or leaned towards the Republicans, a yawning 79 point gap.

Hispanics also have historic ties to the Democrats, if not quite so strong as those among blacks.  But they are as strong or stronger in their support for active government, the safety net and generous provision of services.  And the issue of immigration looms large, with Democrats viewed overwhelmingly as the party most favorable to immigrants.  In the same Pew analysis, party identification among Hispanic registered voters was 61 percent Democratic to 29 percent Republican, a 32 point pro-Democratic gap.

Asians, perhaps surprisingly, are now almost as Democratic-oriented as Hispanics, showing strong support for Democratic stands on active government and immigration.  In a detailed 2012 Pew study of Asian-Americans, Asians’ party identification favored Democrats by 50-28, a 22 point margin.  In addition, self-identified liberals (31 percent) outnumber self-identified conservatives (24 percent) among this group, a gap that’s more significant that it seems given that conservatives typically outweigh liberals by a substantial margin in the general population.

Republicans have tried to argue that today’s GOP has considerable appeal to minorities and that, if they can just get their message out, Democratic support will be substantially eroded over time.  Of course, that’s also what they said after the 2004 election, when Bush received 40 percent of the Hispanic vote.  Bush’s dawn turned out to be false — Democratic dominance today is clear and overwhelming.

Consider the various approaches Republicans have taken to getting their message out, particularly to Hispanics whom they believe (correctly) are a much better target for conversion than blacks.  A longtime favorite has been the idea that Hispanics are socially conservative and can be induced to vote for the GOP by emphasizing “values” issues like abortion or gay marriage.  This has not been effective so far and there are no indications it will succeed in the future.  Hispanics, it turns out, are actually much less likely than whites to vote on the basis of cultural issues.  In addition, Hispanics overall are not nearly as socially conservative as many believe.  On the specific issue of gay marriage, for example, surveys have repeatedly shown that Hispanics are no more conservative on this issue than whites are.  And younger Hispanics are typically more progressive than their older counterparts on social issues, so generational replacement will make the tomorrow’s Hispanic population less socially conservative than today’s.

Another favored approach is to cast GOP economic policy in terms Republicans believe would resonate among minority constituencies. Republicans have argued for years that Latinos should be naturally attracted to their tax and regulatory policies because of the high number of small-business owners among them. They’ve also noted that, while there are differences among various groups, Asians on the whole have the highest average educational level and median household income of any racial or ethnic group in the United States, including whites.

Latino and Asian self-interest and material aspirations, on this approach, suggest that they should hate taxes and despise big government. But most Latinos and Asians do not despise government or desire more libertarian economic policies, as confirmed repeatedly by a wide variety of survey data.

These findings suggest that there is really only one way for the GOP to effectively compete for minority voters: the party must, quite simply, become less conservative.  They will have to jettison their bitter hostility to active government, spending on social services and immigration reform and develop their own approach in these areas that minorities might find appealing. It is a way that, so far, Republicans have rejected. But if they continue down this path, it seems likely that Democrats will continue to get 75-80 percent, leaning toward the high side of that range, of the minority vote.

LGBT

Congressional Democrats To SCOTUS: Times Have Changed Since DOMA Passed

A coalition of 212 Democrats in Congress have submitted an amicus brief of their own calling on the Supreme Court to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act, led by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (NV). In addition to articulating many of the familiar arguments against DOMA, the lawmakers explain that times have changed since Congress — including 25 signatories of this brief who voted for it then — originally voted for the law in 1996. They argue that the increased visibility and understanding now available about the lives of the gay community reveals :

When Congress enacted DOMA, gay and lesbian couples could not marry anywhere in the world. Some States still criminalized same-sex relationships, inviting further discrimination against gay men and lesbians in employment, family relations, and housing. Gay men and lesbians were still often portrayed as mentally unstable, sexually promiscuous, and morally deficient. In short, it was a different world for gay men and lesbians, and many were understandably reluctant to speak openly about themselves or their families. A number of Members, like the constituents we serve, did not personally know many (if any) people who were openly gay, and majority attitudes toward that minority group were often viscerally fearful and negative.

As a result, when the question of same-sex marriage arose in 1996, reflexive beliefs and discomfort about same-sex relationships dominated congressional debate. From our perspective—including those of us who voted for DOMA—debate and passage of the law did not necessarily arise “from malice or hostile animus,” but instead from “insensitivity caused by simple want of careful, rational reflection or from some instinctive mechanism to guard against people who appear to be different in some respects from ourselves.” Bd. of Trs. of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett (Kennedy, J., concurring). While fear and distrust of families different from our own may explain why DOMA passed by comfortable majorities in 1996, it does not obviate the need for a constitutionally permissible justification for the law.

It’s noteworthy that they quote Justice Kennedy here, as he is considered to be the swing vote on the Court. Indeed, Kennedy’s quote speaks to what is more commonly known as privilege, as in white privilege, male privilege, or in this case, heterosexual privilege. There were no doubt many intentionally anti-gay perspectives that motivated the passage of DOMA, but not all who voted for it consciously held animus against the gay community. Many likely dealt with a more subconscious uninformed sense that heterosexuality is “normal,” and thus felt threatened by the perceived abnormality of homosexuality.

In 1913, Justice Louis Brandeis wrote that “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” Indeed, the amount of basic information available about the nature of sexual orientations and the prevalence of LGBT families is now impossible to ignore. Any current Justice who rules against marriage equality will have no grounds to plead ignorance.

Update

Curious which Democrats did not sign the brief? Here’s the list.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up