ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Duncan Hunter

Immigration

Congressmen Who Oppose Immigration Reform Use Loophole To Keep Select Few In U.S. Without Visas

Rep. Duncan D. Hunter (R-CA)

Rep. Duncan D. Hunter (R-CA)

Some members of Congress are taking advantage of a loophole that allows them to keep a select few in the US, even as they oppose broader efforts to reform immiration.

Here’s how it works: Any U.S. Senator or Representative may file a “private bill,” proposing relief for a person who has been denied asylum, but still wants to live in the United States. The bill gets referred to the Judiciary Committee, which generally does not act on private bills. If the appropriate subcommittee requests a report, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) allows the individual to stay in the country under “deferred action.” At the start of the next Congress, the bill’s sponsor simply re-files the bill, restarting the process.

In the 112th Congress, dozens of such bills were filed by members of both parties and several resulted in requests for reports. While the individual stories are often compelling, this little-noticed loophole allows those who can attract the support of a Member of Congress a great advantage over those will equally compelling stories but no such access.

More curious, though, is that some of the lawmakers who have offered private immigration bills in the past two Congresses have been otherwise staunch opponents of reforms that would provide the same chance for others — even opponents of President Obama’s “deferred action” order for young immigrants brought to the U.S. as small children.

Rep. Duncan D. Hunter (R-CA) has proposed eliminating the constitutional guarantee that all humans born in the United States will be citizens and vocally opposed deferred action for DREAM Act-eligible young people whose parents brought them to the U.S. illegally. But a private bill he filed for the third consecutive Congress would grant immigration visa — to a Colombian family of four who were denied asylum despite their claims that they were being extorted by guerrillas who threatened to kidnap the young son.

Hunter’s father, former Congressman Duncan L. Hunter (R), had initially filed the bill in 2008. After succeeding his dad, the current Rep. Hunter resubmitted in 2009, 2011 and this year.

The proposal, as written, would make each of the four “eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa.” Additionally, the bill would reduce — by four — the number of immigrant visas available to other natives of their home country.

Hunter opposed the DREAM Act and co-sponsored the HALT Act, a bill to halt deferred action in most cases. When the Obama administration announced last year it would stop deporting DREAM-eligible youth, he responded, “The idea that illegal immigrants will be rewarded with a form of legal status, even if it’s on a temporary basis, is an insult to the rule of law and anyone who has ever entered the U.S. through the front door or those who are legally waiting for their opportunity… This policy sends the message that laws are simply a tool of convenience and they are subject to arbitrary enforcement.”
Read more

LGBT

FRC Endorses Duncan Hunter’s ‘Don’t Pressure Me!’ Bill Compromising Military Unit Cohesion

The Family Research Council owned up to its anti-gay hate group credentials yet again this week by encouraging servicemembers in the armed forces to openly condemn gay troops they serve with. Without concern for unit cohesion, the group has endorsed Rep. Duncan Hunter’s (R-CA) absurd “Don’t Pressure Me!” bill, and the animus behind it:

Essentially, the legislation would ensure that “members of the Armed Forces are not pressured to approve of another person’s sexual conduct if that sexual conduct is contrary to the personal principles of that member.” These “conscience protections” would give our troops just as much right to voice their opinions as others have to flaunt their sexuality. With just 13 days to go before the military opens its arms to gays and lesbians, the time to push Hunter’s bill is now. You can help by calling your members and encouraging them to cosponsor the legislation. Our troops promised to obey orders–not surrender principles.

Imagine a bill like this defending some other form of intolerance. What about if troops were legally protected from pressure to approve of a person eating Cajun food? Or speaking Chinese? Or practicing Islam? Or having a menstrual cycle? “Conscience protections” is religious code for “protected prejudice.”

What’s striking is the apparent depths to which conservatives will sink to rig the system so they can claim they were right all along. The biggest objection to the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell was the prediction that it would somehow hurt unit cohesion, because apparently heterosexual men are brave enough to risk their lives for their country but not enough to take a shower next to a gay guy. Though the argument intended to paint gay troops as predatory, it essentially expressed a distrust in the non-gay troops, that they wouldn’t have the fortitude to fight next to someone who wasn’t equally as straight.  Hunter’s bill not-so-subtly encourages that predicted decay in unit cohesion by promoting dissension, urging those who are homophobic to prioritize their “principles” of disapproval over the stability of their unit. Opponents of DADT repeal want to be able to say it was a bad idea by making their own argument comes true.

Of course, the research bears out the opposite conclusion. When troops can serve openly, their own productivity will improve, as will that of their units. Clearly, Rep. Hunter, FRC, and other allies of this bogus legislation think being anti-gay is more important than military effectiveness.

LGBT

Duncan Hunter Discourages Unit Cohesion: Don’t ‘Pressure’ Troops To Accept Gay ‘Conduct’

Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) has been one of the chief opponents of the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, having attempted — and failed — to delay the process by requiring the service chiefs to approve the repeal. He has also said the military “isn’t the YMCA” and that he didn’t trust the president, Secretary of Defense, or Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to make such a decision for the military. His latest effort to obstruct the repeal outdoes all his previous attempts, directly insulting the military’s integrity and contradicting the very “unit cohesion” argument that was used to oppose repeal. Here’s the text of the bill:

To amend Public Law 111-321 (Dont’ Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010) to require that… members of the Armed Forces are not pressured to approve of another person’s sexual conduct if that sexual conduct is contrary to the personal principles of the members.

Hereby dubbed the “Don’t Pressure Me!” bill, Hunter is attempting to defend troops’ right to be homophobic to their fellow servicemembers. It’s unclear if this bill somehow targets the trainings associated with DADT repeal or if it’s merely meant to symbolically enshrine disapproval of gays, lesbians, and bisexuals into United States Code. Either way, such a policy would negatively impact unit cohesion, making it difficult for commanding officers to resolve disputes and putting LGB servicemembers at greater risk for abuse and discrimination. It’s unclear how a policy of “not pressuring” would even be enforced.

Hunter seems willing to go to any length to ensure that people can be homophobic without repercussion. One wonders why he thinks it’s so important to protect such negative viewpoints, particularly when being out actually has positive impacts on teamwork and productivity. If anything, it’s clear that the success of the military is not his top priority — it’s discriminating against gays.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up