ThinkProgress Home
ThinkProgress
ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Innovation

Climate Progress

Reviving American Manufacturing with Low-Carbon Innovation

A wind turbine blade is unveiled during the opening of the Vestas blade factory in Colorado.

The United States has historically been a leader in invention and innovation; however, our leadership in manufacturing has fallen dramatically, hurting our ability to compete on the global stage. With the dawn of a new era in the energy sector, America has a unique opportunity to grow its economy and create new jobs while reducing emissions and combating climate change.

A new report on low-carbon innovation written by Bracken Hendricks, Lisbeth Kaufman and Sean Pool of the Center for American Progress outlines how this transition may unfold.

Read more

Education

Comparing Education Priorities In The President’s Budget And The House GOP’s Continuing Resolution

Our guest blogger is Theodora Chang, Education Policy Analyst at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

The Obama administration released its annual budget yesterday, and the proposed $2 billion increase in education funding has generated a sigh of relief for some. No shrieks of joy, though — the President’s budget is for fiscal year 2012. Before we get to 2012, however, we need to straighten out fiscal year 2011 funding, which begins with the House Republicans’ Continuing Resolution (CR) scheduled to go to floor debate today.

Both the President’s budget and the CR include rhetoric about doing what’s best for students and making effective use of government resources, but there are a couple of key differences in the two proposals:


Program President’s Budget House CR
Title I: Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged Increases 2010 funding levels by $300 million to reward high-poverty schools making the most progress in closing the achievement gap. Slashes 2010 funding levels by $693.5 million. This is a brutal mid-year cut to staffed-up districts and would hit high-poverty districts the hardest.
Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Increases 2010 funding levels by $41.7 million to expand and improve state data systems that track student achievement and link it to teachers. Eliminates the program, which is a key source of funding for states to focus on data-driven results, which ensure that other federal investments in education are good ones.
Race to the Top Provides $900 million for competitive grants to districts that implement key structural reforms. Effectively discontinues program by providing $0 in funding, thus discarding momentum for reform in states and districts.
Investing in Innovation (i3) Provides $300 million in competitive ‘seed money’ grants for innovative ideas that address key problems in education. Effectively discontinues program by providing $0 in funding, and ignores massive appetite in private sector for augmenting R & D infrastructure.

The lack of funding for RTT and i3 seems especially contradictory to Republican statements on innovation. House Education and Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-MN) responded to the President’s budget by saying the following:

A recent hearing highlighted a number of innovative solutions underway at the state and local level that are producing real results on behalf of students and parents. It is time we asked why increasing the federal government’s role in education has failed to improve student achievement. I look forward to charting a new course in education that ensures Washington doesn’t stand in the way of meaningful state and local reforms.

RTT has triggered the most dramatic and meaningful state education reforms the country has seen in many years. At least 10 states changed their laws to make themselves more competitive for the competition’s first round before a single dollar was awarded, and 28 states in total reformed their education policies in 2009 and 2010 to prepare for the first two rounds of the competition.

The Investing in Innovation Fund, or the i3 Fund, is a competitive grant program that takes on the challenging mandate of improving achievement at low-performing schools. Instead of throwing dollars at the problem and hoping that something sticks, it adopts a focused plan that encourages schools to develop innovative solutions that, among other things, increase high school graduation rates and close achievement gaps.

Bottom line? While Republicans may be moved to tears when talking about how all kids should have the opportunity to live the American dream, they fall short on action. Education yields a lot of bang for the buck, and meaningful reform requires Republicans to put their money where their mouths are.

Climate Progress

Joe Barton’s Zombie Caucus Attacks Upton’s ‘Light Bulb Ban’

Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), who failed in his bid to take the chairmanship of the House energy committee from Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), has begun the new congress with a new assault on his fellow Republican. In the first day of the 112th Congress, Barton led a pack of 13 anti-innovation Republicans with the introduction of legislation (H.R. 91) to strike down Upton’s 2007 lighting efficiency standard, painted by conservative activists as a “light bulb ban.” In a statement, Barton accused Upton of legislating an assault on “personal freedom” and “manipulating the free market”:

This is about more than just energy consumption, it is about personal freedom. Voters sent us a message in November that it is time for politicians and activists in Washington to stop interfering in their lives and manipulating the free market. The light bulb ban is the perfect symbol of that frustration. People don’t want congress dictating what light fixtures they can use.

“From the health insurance you’re allowed to have, to the car you can drive, to the light bulbs you can buy,” the polluter-funded Barton concluded, “Washington is making too many decisions that are better left to you and your family.”

Barton’s attack on the tyranny of energy-efficient light bulbs is consponsored by Reps. Marsha Blackburn (TN), Michael Burgess (TX), Rob Bishop (UT), Tom McClintock (CA), Howard Coble (NC), Ron Paul (TX), Todd Akin (MO), Ann-Marie Buerkle (NY), Cynthia Lummis (WY), Steve Scalise, Paul Broun (GA), Dan Burton (IN), and Cliff Stearns (FL). Of these 14 representatives, only Rep. Coble admits that global warming pollution is a real threat.

Upton has already reneged his position on light-bulb efficiency, which was supported by former speaker Rep. Denny Hastert (R-IL), Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), and the light bulb industry itself. In December, Upton told Politico “he’s not afraid to go back after an issue he once supported but that has come under withering assault on the conservative airwaves, including on Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck’s talk shows.”

There was, in fact, no bill to ban incandescent light bulbs. Because of the advanced light-bulb standards Upton helped pass in 2007, “the incandescent bulb is turning into a case study of the way government mandates can spur innovation,” the New York Times reported last year. “There have been more incandescent innovations in the last three years than in the last two decades.”

Climate Progress

Chu Criticizes Anti-Innovation Conservatives: ‘We Have To Press Forward’

While the Obama administration is working to restore American innovation, particularly through Secretary Steven Chu’s Department of Energy, the Tea Party movement is increasingly attacking 21st-century jobs on all fronts. Rush Limbaugh is leading the charge against the breakthrough Chevy Volt, Republican governors are killing high-speed rail, Glenn Beck is cooking up conspiracy theories about smart grid technology, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) is trying to kill the wind industry, and the entire right-wing movement is convinced green jobs are going to destroy the United States economy.

At a National Press Club speech today, Secretary Chu warned that China is outpacing the United States in innovating clean technology, and pointed to a new report from the Presidential Council of Advisors on Science and Technology that recommended an integrated federal energy policy to spur domestic progress. “I believe innovation adds to the wealth of society,” he said. “Science and technology are at the heart of innovation.”

In a blogger call following the speech, the Wonk Room asked Secretary Chu about the right wing’s opposition to clean technology innovation. Chu derided this desire to turn back the clock, saying that the “United States is still the greatest innovation machine in the world”:

You know, what can I say? I disagree.

The people who are saying we don’t want to change are holding a view that when a new technology comes along it’s going to displace an old technology. The people whose business depends on old technology might get nervous. They can adapt and innovate or fight the change. That used to work when we weren’t so interconnected. In this new very flat world of multinational corporations, virtually all of western Europe, Japan, Korea, China are saying, “This is our future.” If we don’t go in this direction, we will be importing many of the technologies we could be exporting. I just installed an on-demand water heater and there were no American manufacturers. There were Korean, Japanese, European manufacturers. Kind of scary.

The American people need to be convinced. Or I should say: Does everyone else know something we don’t know or do we know something everyone else doesn’t know?

I believe the right direction is to develop these technologies. The United States is still the greatest innovation machine in the world. There will always be people who don’t want to go in a new direction, but you can’t go back to 1950 when we were exporting oil. We have to press forward. It’s very important to get that message out. This is how we have always achieved. Not by clutching to the past but by seizing the future.

“We are no longer the leaders in manufacturing, but more startlingly, we are no longer the leaders in high-tech manufacturing,” Chu said in his Press Club speech. However, he saw room for hope. “The good news is that if I look across the country, young people are seeing the energy and climate challenge and going into science and technology.”

Economy

U.S. Ranks Last In Progress Toward ‘Knowledge-Based Innovation Economy’ Over Last Decade

innovateii.jpgToday, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) released a study examining six areas — human capital, innovation capacity, entrepreneurship, IT infrastructure, economic policy factors and economic performance — to assess the extent to which nations are able to compete globally on the basis of innovation.

The ITIF found that the U.S.’s overall position in terms of innovation-based competitiveness is slipping, and that America “ranks last in progress toward the new knowledge-based innovation economy over the last decade”:

[T]he prevailing view among many Washington policymakers is that the United States has been number 1 for so long it will continue to be number 1. Given this situation, the thinking goes, there is no real need for the United States to develop and implement a national economic development or competitiveness strategy. But this report finds that not only is the U.S. not number 1, but that its position is slipping rapidly. Absent a coherent national innovation strategy, the U.S. position will likely continue to slip, and with it, relative U.S. living standards.

According to the ITIF, “it’s time for U.S. federal policymakers to realize that the U.S. economy now competes with other nations, and like states after World War II did, it too needs to put in place a robust economic development policy.” The U.S. is one of only three industrialized nations that lacks a national innovation policy.

Switch to Mobile