ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Intersex

NEWS FLASH

Today Is Intersex Awareness Day | Today marks Intersex Awareness Day, which first started in 1996 when activists protested the American Academy of Pediatrics for advocating infant genital surgery on intersex babies to make them “normal.” For those unfamiliar, intersex — the “I” often now included, especially internationally, in LGBTI or LGBTQI — is when people are born with intermediate or atypical physical features that would normally distinguish male from female. Traditional medical practice used to be for doctors to “correct” infants born with ambiguous genitalia by surgically mutilating that genitalia and encouraging the parents to raise the child in the arbitrarily assigned gender role. Intersex people and awareness about their identities are an important reminder that humanity exists on a complex spectrum of sex and gender that does not fit into the social binaries reinforced by society. Learn more at the Intersex Society of North America.

NEWS FLASH

Nepal Invites LGBTI Community To Identify As ‘Others’ | In Nepal, individuals who do not conform to gender norms because of their sexual orientation, gender identity, or intersex identity have often faced harassment and discrimination because they would constantly be challenged as to whether they are men or women. The nation’s Home Ministry announced yesterday that it will now offer citizenship under the gender category of “others” to accommodate members of the LGBTI community. By opting into this “third gender” designation, individuals will no longer have to fear unfair treatment because their appearance does not match their identification.

Alyssa

Is ‘Mad Men’ Making Sexism More Acceptable?

That outfit's a little chilly for Russia, even in summer.

I think Kay Steiger is absolutely right that if you’re going to have sexist characters, language, and storylines in pop culture, it’s probably best if they is some purpose, be it characterization, plot, or political commentary:

The critically acclaimed Mad Men series certainly includes moments of sexism. But what’s different about how the AMC series portrays this perspective is that the very point of inserting such comments is intended to make a point about how far we’ve come (or haven’t come) with women in the workplace. Mad Men, like earlier films 9 to 5 and Working Girl included sexist joke to make a point about sexism, mainly how awful it is for women to be on the receiving end of it.

That said, I think she’s wrong about X-Men: First Class specifically. In First Class, Sebastian Shaw’s treatment of Emma Frost is meant to signal that he’s a creepy jerk, even beyond the whole Nazi affiliation, just as Xavier’s preference for very normatively attractive women shows his shallowness, and the limits of his focus on mutant integration. And more broadly, Moira MacTaggert’s different perspective makes her brave enough to sneak into the Hellfire Club, open-minded enough to accept the possibility that mutants exist, and smart enough to see their strategic value. Her CIA colleagues’ dismissal of not just those insights but her as a woman are clearly presented as a disadvantage they’re bringing on themselves through their narrow sexism.

And I think there’s a larger challenge here. I think it’s important to criticize purposeless and blatant sexism in media, but I also think it’s important not to jump the gun. I’d bet money that most of the folks who got really upset over sexism in Game of Thrones never returned to the show, even though without the grinding, painful moments of horrible treatment of women, far worse than anything Mad Men ever dishes out, the show wouldn’t have the emotional power and the arcs that make George R. R. Martin’s books powerful, and that could make the series a real landmark for women on HBO. Obviously, viewers have their tolerance levels, and I’d never tell anyone to watch something that makes them viscerally uncomfortable even if I think it pays off. But for the most part, as a critic, I try to be sure of what I’m seeing before I pull the trigger.

LGBT

‘Transgender’ Widow Actually Intersex, Court Decision Ignores Nuance Of Sex, Gender, And Identity

LGBT blogs and news outlets (including this one yesterday morning) have offered coverage of the case of Nikki Araguz of Texas. She is the widow of a deceased firefighter whose ex-wife sued after his passing, demanding that Araguz not receive any death benefits because she was born male. The ex-wife successfully convinced a judge that the marriage was thus a same-sex marriage, prohibited under Texas law. However, Araguz has now shared on her blog that she was actually born intersex and she is not transgender as has been reported:

While I appreciate all of the support, I am setting the record straight: I am a heterosexual woman, who happened to have born intersex, and yes, I did have a transsexual medical condition, yet that has been treated and corrected. I urgently ask the gay and transgender communities to stop inaccurately identifying me as “transgender” because this falsehood is continuing to make my battle even more difficult. The media has picked up on this mislabeling, and it may lead to the assassination of transsexual and intersex marriage and rights in Texas. The clueless appropriating of my situation is dishonest and hurtful. My birth defect is a medical condition, and has nothing to do with “gender and lifestyles”.

Araguz is referring to a disorder of sex development (DSD), which presumably means that at birth, she did not present as typically XX-female or XY-male and was misclassified as male. The Intersex Society of North America estimates that about 1 in 1500 are classified as intersex at birth, but because of the different ways intersexuality presents at different points in life, the number of people who are intersex is likely much higher.

While the identities of intersex and transgender face a lot of similar challenges in society, they are not the same. Intersexuality refers to an ambiguity of biological sex, whereas people who are transgender are struggling with a gender identity that does not match their sex. It is easy to confuse the two because individuals with either identity may pursue surgical options — as Araguz did — to achieve identity cohesion.

The judge’s decision to void her marriage because of her identity reveals the way the law’s oversimplification of identity hurts individuals. The construction of “one man, one woman” marriage that equality opponents champion makes no room for people like Nikki Araguz who have unique sex and gender identities. Essentially, the judge ruled that she is male only because a doctor checked that box on a form when she was born. No one should be able to dictate who Nikki Araguz is except Nikki Araguz, and no one should ever have to.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up