ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Jordan

Security

Anti-Government Protests Escalate In Jordan


Protesters in Jordan continued calling for an end to King Abdullah II’s regime for the second straight day on Friday, as 2,000 people gathered in downtown Amman to protest price increases and subsidy cuts. On November 15, nearly 4,000 protesters in Amman adopted the unofficial slogan of uprisings across the Arab world for the first time: “The people want the downfall of the regime.”

Protests turned violent earlier this week, as people opposed to price increases and subsidy cuts clashed with police. Wednesday’s demonstrations resulted in the first protest-related death Jordan has experienced since uprisings began around the Arab world in early 2011.

Jordan’s protests have mostly been driven by economic grievances, rather than political. King Abdullah is generally well-liked, and he has made an effort to accommodate reformers’ requests, though critics say he’s moved too slowly. For example, in August, he accepted constitutional reforms placing some limits on his power. Subsidies are another important tool the regime uses to stop serious protests from breaking out, but a budget shortfall of almost $3 billion is forcing the government to make cuts. Corporate tax rates were expected to increase, businesses’ electricity rates went up, the price of high-octane gasoline climbed 25 percent, and subsidies for cooking oil and other fuels have been cut.

Though the government has fairly strong institutions, which some argue may prevent regime collapse, the demographic makeup of Jordan is similar to that of other Arab countries that have faced serious unrest and should be a cause for concern. Namely, it is a young country — almost 70 percent of the population is less than 30 years old — with a youth unemployment rate approaching 28 percent. In addition, over 14 percent of the population lives below the poverty line, and it is home to almost 3 million Palestinian refugees.

Demographics are not the sole factor to determine whether protesters’ goals shift from reform to revolution, of course, but they play an important role. There is no guarantee Jordan is heading down the path countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen have traveled, but the outbreak of violence is worrying.

Greg Noth

Security

Syrian Refugee Crisis Prompts Turkish Call For Intervention

Syrian refugees in the Oncupinar refugee camp.

Turkey, which has the unique distinction of being Syria’s neighbor and a NATO member, is escalating its call for international involvement in the Syrian crisis. Though it had previously been involved in training and arming the rebels (who use their territory as a base), it today reiterated its call for international intervention inside Syrian borders:

Turkey urged the United Nations on Wednesday to protect displaced Syrians inside their country but President Bashar al-Assad, battling rebels determined to overthrow him, dismissed talk of a buffer zone on Syrian territory.

Ankara fears a mass influx such as the flight of half a million Iraqi Kurds into Turkey after the 1991 Gulf War, and has floated the idea of a “safe zone” under foreign protection within Syria for civilians fleeing intensifying violence.

“We expect the United Nations to engage on the topic of protecting refugees inside Syria and if possible sheltering them in camps there,” Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said.

France has supported Turkey’s call for a safe zone in Syria, and pressure for action increased after the United Nations refugee agency said on Tuesday Syria’s refugee exodus was accelerating. Up to 200,000 people could settle in Turkey alone if the conflict worsens, the UNHCR said.

While Turkey frames the issue as refugee protection, it’s very clear this would be a significant military operation — the notion of “safe zones” inside Syrian territory have been the key policy advocated by supporters of intervention against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Turkey’s principal concern is most likely limiting refugee flows into its own territory, which have escalated significantly in recent months as the conflict has:

The waves of refugees fleeing Dara’a, the Damascus suburbs, Aleppo and the Idlib region near Turkey in recent days have provided a barometer of the escalating violence in the 18-month-old conflict, in which neither the government of President Bashar al-Assad nor the opposition seems capable of striking a decisive blow.

[A U.N. spokesperson] said the number of refugees escaping to Turkey had multiplied to 5,000 a day from 400 or 500 daily several weeks ago. In the past 24 hours, she said, 3,000 people had entered Turkey, with 10,000 more waiting.

In Turkey, which had said it would not accept more than 100,000 refugees, officials said they had revised the number to 120,000, and were preparing contingency plans for more.

Speaking about the conflict, Assad told his state run TV station today that “[the army] definitely needs time to bring it to a decisive end. But I can sum it up in one sentence: we’re heading forward.” Meanwhile, his air force has stepped up strikes against rebel forces without much regard for civilian casualties.

NEWS FLASH

U.N.-Registered Syrian Refugees Triple In Four Months To 112,000 | The United Nations High Commission on Refugees (UNHCR) said the number of registered Syrian refugees in Lebanon and Turkey tripled to 112,000 in the four months since April as the civil war against Bashar al-Assad’s government intensified. Many of the Syrians fled fighting with nothing, leaving behind dead family members. They are now depending on U.N. relief as their status in Turkey becomes seemingly more permanent. Four of five of the 33,400 refugees in neighboring Jordan also registered since April. The total number of refugees is likely higher than UNHCR’s figures because people often don’t register until they run out of resources.

NEWS FLASH

Poll: Syria Neighbors Say Assad Should Go, No Consensus On How | According to the latest poll from the Pew Global Attitudes Project, Syria’s Middle East neighbors think Bashar al-Assad should vacate his office after a brutal crackdown on anti-government protesters but they’re not sure about what pressure to put on Syria to get there. Here’s a chart from Pew showing that, of the five countries polled, only Tunisians favor an Arab military intervention and no country’s respondents favored a Western military solution to the conflict:

(HT: Abu Hatem)

NEWS FLASH

AWOL Syrian Pilot Granted Asylum In Jordan | After reportedly refusing orders to bomb domestic targets, a Syrian air force officer flew his plane to Jordan, where he was granted political asylum, according to the New York Times. The pilot’s escape with the commandeered Soviet-era fighter plane comes after recent weeks where the forces of Bashar al-Assad’s government stepped up their allegedly indiscriminate air assaults on areas controlled or contested by a growing armed rebellion.

NEWS FLASH

Former Jordan Foreign Minister On Syria Uprising: ‘It Is Going To Be Bloody’ | Jordan’s former-foreign minister and -deputy prime minister Marwan Muasher predicted today in Washington that the Bashar al Assad’s reign over Syria would end within the next year. Assad won’t give in because, for his ruling minority Allawite sect, “reform means their own death sentence.” Muasher nonetheless expected more violence atop the current estimated count of 3,000 dead at the hands of a government crackdown: “The protesters are dead men walking right now,” he said. “It is going to be bloody.” Muasher said the problems of the region, however, were for the countries of the region — and not NATO or the U.S. — to solve.

Climate Progress

Jordan’s King Abdullah Wants Renewable Energy to Power Star Trek Theme Park


Jordan’s King Abdullah is a big Star Trek fan (and actually played an extra on the show). He likes the series so much that he’s backing the construction of a $1.5 billion Star-Trek themed park in his country.

That’s good news for fellow Star-Trek geeks who can afford a ticket to Jordan. But there’s good news for clean energy geeks too: The park will integrate renewables, water recycling systems and an educational center on energy issues, reports the Middle East Hotelier.

The themed entertainment destination will also serve as a model for “green energy,” incorporating state-of-the-art renewable technologies throughout the facility, and hosting a “future” pavilion where businesses, students and attendees can learn about alternative energy sources ranging from solar and wind energy to greywater harvesting.

There are no details in the early reports on how much renewable energy will be used. But the key word here is “incorporating,” hopefully meaning that these systems will be on-site and not some gimmick common in the services industry where a resort pretends to be “sustainable” by purchasing renewable energy credits.

And really, Jordan can’t afford to be gimmicky. The country has terrible water resources and relies mostly on imported energy, making the construction of a $1.5 billion energy-intensive theme park in the middle of the desert a particularly challenging task.

As King Abdullah goes about building this 180-acre entertainment complex, we can only hope he follows the words of Captain Picard in Star Trek: Generations: “What we leave behind is as important as how we’ve lived.”

Alyssa

Nerd Values And Jordan’s Star Trek Theme Park

Well, this is kind of nifty. The Star Trek theme park that’s opening up in Jordan is apparently going to incorporate a bunch of renewable technologies. Given Jordan’s reliance on oil imports, this actually makes a great deal of sense on a practical level, and it’s cool that the park’s going to have exhibits about various environmental issues, taking the show’s social messages seriously on both a design and programmatic level.

Unless King Abdullah starts inviting his fellow Gulf States monarchs over for all-night debates about the campy awesomeness of Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (I can’t resist the idea that Spock was in Students for a Democratic Society) and the viability of producing dilithium crystals, the impact of the park will probably be more international than regional. Of course, it remains to be seen whether this is a viable tourist attraction at all: folks’ll make pilgrimages to San Diego, but Jordan’s a slightly more expensive plane ticket, even when you book a year in advance.

Yglesias

Wilders Pushes “Jordan is Palestine” Line

File:LocationJordan 1

Something I used to hear when I was a kid is that there’s no need to create a Palestinian state because if Jordan was turned into a democracy, then in effect that would be a Palestinian state and then Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza could go move there. Voluntarily, I guess. Or else maybe they could be “encouraged” to go. That’s not really a position one wants to advance in the context of international diplomacy, but with anti-Muslim sentiment on the rise in Europe, far-right Israeli political positions are suddenly finding a respectful hearing. For example, Geert Wilders, leading of the Netherlands’ Party for Freedom, sees a “Greater Israel” agenda as part of an epochal conflict between the West and Islam:

“Jordan is Palestine,” said Wilders, who heads the third-largest party in Holland. “Changing its name to Palestine will end the conflict in the Middle East and provide the Palestinians with an alternate homeland.”

Wilders added that Israel deserved a special status in the Dutch government because it was fighting for Jerusalem in its name.

“If Jerusalem falls into the hands of the Muslims, Athens and Rome will be next. Thus, Jerusalem is the main front protecting the West. It is not a conflict over territory but rather an ideological battle, between the mentality of the liberated West and the ideology of Islamic barbarism,” he said.

“There has been an independent Palestinian state since 1946, and it is the kingdom of Jordan.” Wilders also called on the Dutch government to refer to Jordan as Palestine and move its embassy to Jerusalem.

In light of the recent election results, there’s actually a fairly plausible scenario in which Wilders could become the main junior partner in a right-wing coalition with the Liberals and the Christian Democrats. That could lead to him becoming Foreign Minister and finally Avigdor Lieberman would have a buddy. For now, though, the Christian Democrats seem to have nixed that idea and the Liberals are exploring the idea of forming a coalition with three left-of-center parties, the largest of which is actually led by a secular Jewish guy named “Job Cohen.”

Yglesias

Bolton in Fantasyland

john_bolton_01_1.jpg

For some reason, major op-ed page editors feel that it’s a good idea to publish op-eds expressing old discredited ideas from discredited figures like John Bolton. For his latest offering, Bolton puts forward what he calls a “three state” approach to the Palestinian problem, in which “Gaza is returned to Egyptian control and the West Bank in some configuration reverts to Jordanian sovereignty.” Matt Duss offers some response. Marc Lynch further observes that this idea is opposed by the government of Egypt, opposed by the government of Jordan, and opposed by the Palestinians. It’s a total non-starter.

It’s also worth appreciating the essentially circular logic behind the suggestion. Behind the “in some configuration” euphemism lies the fact that what Bolton is proposing is that Israel grab whichever choice slices of the West Bank settlers or the IDF want, and Jordan take over administering the rest. But why not just make this offer directly to the Palestinian leadership, rather than to the government of Jordan? Well, because no Palestinian leadership that wanted to stay in power would or could accept it. The idea is deemed too objectionable to the Palestinian population and to Arab sentiment writ large. But this exact same problem arises when you substitute “Jordanian leadership” for “Palestinian leadership.” The underlying problem of the unacceptability of this solution to Palestinian public opinion exists no matter who you put in charge. Putting this idea on the table is just a way of pretending to have an idea to offer while in fact you’re completely unwilling to grapple with the actual situation. If anything, trying to do this would probably make Israel’s security problems much worse by jeopardizing Israel’s peace treaties with Egypt and (especially) Jordan as the existing regimes would be destabilized by the presence of the new populations. The idea here is that the government of Jordan could act on Israel’s behalf as the jailer of the Palestinians in a way that allows Israel to avoid moral and political culpability for them. But the Jordanians aren’t nearly that stupid, and I have some trouble believing that Bolton is actually stupid enough to think they might be.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up