ThinkProgress Home
ThinkProgress
ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Mark Pryor

Economy

Mark Pryor Touts Need For Education And First Responder Funding, But Then Votes Against Obama’s Plan To Provide It

Last night, the Senate voted on one piece of President Obama’s jobs bill — $35 billion in funding for states to protect the jobs of teachers and first responders who might be laid off due to budget constraints. The measure failed to overcome a filibuster by a 50-50 vote. Sens. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who voted against Obama’s entire jobs bill when it was put up for a vote earlier this month, voted against this more targeted measure. Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) also broke ranks to join Nelson and Lieberman in voting against the bill last night.

It’s rather difficult to understand Pryor’s position. On his Senate website, the Arkansas senator touts his own “Six point solution to job creation” — a nine-page PDF document which touts the need for education funding. In a section titled “Preparing tomorrow’s job-generators to compete (and win),” Pryor’s jobs plan claims that it ensures “that Arkansans have the right education and training…because a competitive workforce is vital to growing the economy.” That appears to be empty rhetoric from Pryor, given that he just voted against a bill that would have provided over $275 million to support over 4,000 jobs for Arkansas’ educators.

The bill last night also would have provided funding for “the creation of additional jobs for, law enforcement officers and other first responders.” Again, Pryor has a very recent history of promoting the need for funding first responders because, as he said, “firefighters put their lives on the line to protect their communities” and therefore need federal funds to “do their jobs efficiently and effectively.”

So why did Pryor vote to defeat funding for education and first responders that he purportedly supports? It might have something to do with the fact that bill imposes a surtax on millionaires. In the past, Pryor has voted against such efforts. And yet, just last month, his office expressed this concern: “It is maddening that hundreds of millionaires pay virtually no federal income taxes, and this should change.”

What is truly maddening is trying to understand why Pryor can’t vote in a way that is consistent with his rhetoric.

LGBT

Pryor Announces Support For Repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: ‘I Accept The Pentagon’s Recommendations’

This morning, Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) — who told a local newspaper last month that he considered homosexuality a “sin”released a statement saying that he accepted the military’s recommendations on repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and would move to vote to the measure in the lame duck session of the Senate. From his statement:

On many previous occasions, I have said that I would oppose repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell until I had heard from our servicemen and women regarding this policy. I have now carefully reviewed all of the findings, reports, and testimony from our armed forces on this matter and I accept the Pentagon’s recommendations to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. I also accept the Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs’ commitment that this policy can be implemented in a manner that does not harm our military’s readiness, recruitment, or retention. We have the strongest military in the world and we will continue to do so by ensuring our troops have the resources necessary to carry out their missions. Therefore, I support the 2011 Defense Authorization Act that passed the Senate Armed Services Committee and will support procedural measures to bring it to a vote this year.

With Pryor’s commitment, the only Democratic vote that’s still in contention is that of Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) who has expressed concern about overturning the policy during a time of war and, as of this writing, remains “undecided” on how to vote. If he is ultimately willing to vote on cloture, Democrats would need just two Republicans to proceed to the measure. With Sens. Brown’s, Collins’ and possibly Lugar’s support, it’s very likely that they will have more than 60 votes for the NDAA.

But it remains to be seen if Democrats will have enough time to debate the measure and if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is willing to keep the Senate in session past Christmas to ensure a “fair” process that will bring more Republicans on board. Earlier this morning, Reid took to the floor to announce that he’s “likely” to bring up the NDAA “this evening”:

REID: And I’m likely going to move to my motion to reconsider on the defense authorization act this evening. Allowing, as I will indicate at that time, time for amendments to that piece of legislation.

Watch it:

At this point, it’s unclear if those Republicans who support DADT repeal are willing to vote for cloture before considering taxes and other priorities.

Update

Politico’s Josh Gerstein points out that many advocates don’t think there are enough votes to move to the measure this evening:

However, a Senate aide working on the repeal effort and prominent gay rights advocate expressed strong concerns Wednesday morning that “don’t ask” repeal will die if called up Wednesday because Republicans supportive of repeal have publicly pledged that they will insist that the Senate act first on taxes.

“This it the bottom line: premature consideration will have the net effect of killing the repeal. This could happen today,” said the Senate aide, who asked not to be named because of the sensitive internal discussions about timing of the defense bill. “We are very, very concerned at the moment that if it is considered today it will merely fail and that will be the end of the repeal.”

“The way that this is being brought up is a bit [messed] up and may be a recipe for failure. Reid’s office is rationalizing that having the rubber hit the road will force the moderate Republicans to make a decision,” said the gay rights advocate, who also asked not to be further identified. “It’s a high stakes gamble.”

Asked why Reid, a repeal supporter, would move the bill in a way that might lead to its failure, the Senate aide said: “He wants to clear the decks. He’s got a bunch of bills and my sense is he wants to dispose of them and the clock is ticking and he has to consider both the tax cut bill and a CR.”

LGBT

Pryor Says Homosexuality Is A ‘Sin,’ Echoes Hate Group In Explaining Opposition To DADT Repeal

As the Pentagon prepares to release its 10-month review of the consequences of repealing the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, AmericaBlog’s Joe Sudbay flags this quote from Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR), one of only two Democrats to support a Republican filibuster of the measure in September:

In an interview, Sen. Mark Pryor said he will vote against any bill that includes a repeal of the policy.

In the waning days of the current Congress, he said, lawmakers should focus on legislation that aims to produce jobs, not on contentious issues that have stymied them before.

Although the report reportedly says that “don’t ask, don’t tell” can be repealed without undermining military readiness, Pryor said the armed services should deliberate a bit longer before making any policy changes, adding, “I want to give the military the time to do what they’re doing.”

But the status quo won’t last, Pryor said.

“Society has changed a lot,” he said, “and over time, this policy will change.”

While he said he considers homosexuality a sin and is concerned about where gay troops would be housed, “we live in a society where we accept other people’s lifestyles, so I don’t want to be judgmental,” Pryor said.

Still, he voiced concerns that a repeal of “don’t ask” might make life harder for the troops’ anti-homosexual spiritual leaders.

“If the policy is changed, what impact does that have on chaplains?” Pryor asked. “Does it impede a chaplain from doing what he thinks is his duty to God and country?

Interestingly, Pryor, who has previously said that Congress should “let the military professionals work through their process” “before we start making policy here on ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,’” is announcing his position before even reading the study and is doing so using talking points from the Family Research Council, an organization recently classified as a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Given his characterization of homosexuality as “sin”, the implicit reference seems fitting, even if the attack isn’t. First, military leaders have repeatedly argued that the Pentagon’s review will provide it with sufficient information and guidance into the consequences of repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has actually called on Congress to pass repeal in the lame duck session, so as to preempt a court-mandated change. Second, the FRC’s and Pryor’s concerns about the freedom of military chaplains are just fictitious. As Rt. Rev. V. Gene Robinson — the first openly gay priest elected bishop in the worldwide Anglican Communion — has pointed out, policies “designed to preserve and protect the free exercise of religion in the military and would remain in effect after the repeal” of the policy. “No Roman Catholic, fundamentalist Christian or Orthodox Jewish chaplain would have to change her or his beliefs about homosexuality. If any gay or lesbian servicemembers went to one of these chaplains, they would still receive the counseling against homosexuality they have always received. What they wouldn’t receive is a discharge from their military service for being gay and speaking about it,” he writes.

Repeated attempts to contact Pryor’s office via email and phone for a clarification of the Senator’s remarks went unanswered.

Politics

Pryor Says Homosexuality Is A ‘Sin,’ Echoes Hate Group In Explaining Opposition To DADT Repeal

As the Pentagon prepares to release its 10-month review of the consequences of repealing the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, AmericaBlog’s Joe Sudbay flags this quote from Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR), one of only two Democrats to support a Republican filibuster of the measure in September:

In an interview, Sen. Mark Pryor said he will vote against any bill that includes a repeal of the policy.

In the waning days of the current Congress, he said, lawmakers should focus on legislation that aims to produce jobs, not on contentious issues that have stymied them before.

Although the report reportedly says that “don’t ask, don’t tell” can be repealed without undermining military readiness, Pryor said the armed services should deliberate a bit longer before making any policy changes, adding, “I want to give the military the time to do what they’re doing.”

But the status quo won’t last, Pryor said.

“Society has changed a lot,” he said, “and over time, this policy will change.”

While he said he considers homosexuality a sin and is concerned about where gay troops would be housed, “we live in a society where we accept other people’s lifestyles, so I don’t want to be judgmental,” Pryor said.

Still, he voiced concerns that a repeal of “don’t ask” might make life harder for the troops’ anti-homosexual spiritual leaders.

“If the policy is changed, what impact does that have on chaplains?” Pryor asked. “Does it impede a chaplain from doing what he thinks is his duty to God and country?

Interestingly, Pryor, who has previously said that Congress should “let the military professionals work through their process…before we start making policy here on ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,’” is announcing his position before even reading the study and is doing so using talking points from the Family Research Council, an organization recently classified as a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Wonk Room has more.

Climate Progress

Democratic Senators Make Pollution Lobbyist Demands

Ten Senators letterTen Senators letter

The ten Democratic signatories: Debbie Stabenow & Carl Levin (MI), Mark Pryor & Blanche Lincoln (AR), Evan Bayh (IN), Sherrod Brown (OH), Jay Rockefeller (WV), Jim Webb (VA), Claire McCaskill (MO), and Ben Nelson (NE). Download the letter.

As the New York Times noted today, ten Democratic senators echoed polluters in a letter sent to Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) about her filibustered climate change legislation last Friday. The senators, nine of whom supported cloture to end debate and vote on amendments, wrote, “We commend your leadership in attempting to address one of the most significant threats to this and future generations; however, we cannot support final passage of the Boxer Substitute in its final form.” Their letter continues:

To that point we have laid out the following principles and concerns that must be considered and fully addressed in any final legislation.

The senators’ letter uses practically the same talking points and specific policy demands as the industry polluters who fought to kill the legislation, in particular the industry lobbying groups American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) and the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM). A review of the letter reveals the Boxer substitute (S. Amdt. 4825 to the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, S. 3036) already made concessions to these parochial and fossil-industry demands:

Polluter Talking Point #1: “Contain Costs and Prevent Harm to the U.S. Economy.” Read more

Switch to Mobile