ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Mark Udall

LGBT

Looking Back And Looking Forward On The Anniversary Of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Repeal

(Photo Credit: Brian Clark, The Virginian-Pilot)

One year ago today, lesbian, gay, and bisexual members of the military were first able to openly identify their orientations and their partners without fearing that they would lose their job as a result. The implementation of the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” marked an important threshold for the dignity of the gay community and the respect granted them by society.

In the past year, there have been a number of firsts for the military as a result of the repeal, including the first reinstatement of someone who had been discharged under the policy, the first same-sex homecoming kiss, and the Pentagon’s first recognition of Pride month.

Still, many questions linger for the LGBT community. As Chris Geidner noted this week, the Defense Department has yet to address same-sex partner benefits for servicemembers. Republicans continue to try to overextend the Defense of Marriage Act’s limitations on the religious liberty of soldiers and chaplains. And despite DADT repeal, people who are transgender are still prohibited from serving their country because the military still deems such identities to be mental disorders. Though a big hurdle was conquered, LGBT people still experience disenfranchisement in the military.

To mark today’s occasion, here’s a look back at ThinkProgress’ exclusive interviews conducted live at last year’s repeal day celebration hosted by the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. Among everybody present, hope for a better tomorrow was in the air:

Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)

BALDWIN: Once we see openly gay servicemen and women serving proudly in uniform, risking their lives for their country that they love and believe in, I think that just changes the dynamic forever.

Col. Grethe Cammermeyer

CAMMERMEYER: It’s probably the best day that I can think of for the American military as well as for American in general. What I said some months ago when it was first overturned… Until the repeal, we in the service represented the flag. Now, the flag represents us.

Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE)

COONS: I frankly think [conservatives] profoundly misread the young people of America, who are far more open and tolerant, welcoming, and inclusive than generations before them, particularly around LGBT issues. I think they miss what is a basic cultural shift in the direction of tolerance.

Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI)

LEVIN: “Change” has kind of been our middle name here in America. It’s another milestone on a road to a better county and a greater country, but it’s also proof that we can deal with our mistakes and correct them and pull together and be a better country when we do pull together.

Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO)

UDALL: If Americans of all backgrounds, all regions speak up and draw attention to those discriminatory thoughts and policies, they’re going to fall through their own weight. They’re not going to last. They never do.

John Berry, White House Director of the Office of Personnel Management

BERRY: My dad was in the 1st Marine Division at Guadalcanal. And before he passed away at 86, he was talking to me one night about this issue, and he said, “You know, I don’t know what all this fuss about gays in the military is all about.” He says, “You know, back then, we didn’t call them ‘gays,’ but they were there and they served and died as bravely as anybody else.”

For those of you who are serving, thank you. For those of you who have served, thank you. For those of you who will serve, God bless you. God bless each of you for your service. God bless all who serve our country. God bless our President, and God bless the United States of America.

LGBT

Sen. Mark Udall: Republicans ‘Will Be Proven Wrong’ On Their ‘Disturbing’ Anti-Gay Rhetoric

Thanks to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network for inviting ThinkProgress to report live from its Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Day Celebration.

Sen. Udall with Air Force 1st Lt. Josh Seefried (aka "J.D. Smith") during yesterday's DADT Repeal news conference.

Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) joined in last night’s celebration of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal, calling it a “monumental day in our country’s history” and a matter of “fundamental fairness.” He expressed his eagerness to get back to work fighting for LGBT equality and encouraged the LGBT community to keep standing up and advocating, because “the American people get it.”

Udall also commented on the anti-gay rhetoric prevalent in the Republican presidential primary, suggesting it has a negative effect on youth. But, he said, “it’s going to get better” and they will be “proven wrong”:

UDALL: It can’t but have an effect, but look, it’s going to get better. We’ve got campaigns across the board making the case that every American deserves to have the promise of the Declaration of Independence made real. We’re created equal. We have an equal opportunity — equal rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Republican party candidates are going to be proven wrong, I think not only in the long run, but also in the short run, because these are backwards policies. These are policies that don’t fit in the 21st Century. It’s disturbing, but again, the voters are going to weigh in and they’re going to weigh in for a progressive 21st Century approach to sexual orientation. [...]

If Americans of all backgrounds, all regions speak up and draw attention to those discriminatory thoughts and policies, they’re going to fall through their own weight. They’re not going to last. They never do.

Watch it:

Justice

Sen. Mark Udall Proposes Somewhat Less Awful Balanced Budget Amendment

As Pat Garofalo explained earlier today, ratifying a Balanced Budget Amendment is a terrible idea that would “mandate perverse actions in the face of recessions.” And congressional Republicans took this terrible idea and made it even worse by demanding that Congress not only approve such an amendment, but that the amendment also include provisions that make it impossible to raise taxes and that require spending cuts so steep that it would have made Ronald Reagan’s fiscal policy unconstitutional.

Perhaps in response to the congressional GOP’s Balance The Budget On The Backs of Seniors And The Middle-Class While Protecting Millionaires From Taxes Amendment, Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) recently introduced an amendment of his own. Unfortunately, the Udall amendment includes a balanced budget provision which would prohibit stimulative deficit spending during a recession unless three-fifths of the Congress agrees to allow such spending. Nevertheless, the proposed amendment also includes an encouraging provision that would prohibit Congress from prioritizing tax cuts to millionaires over fiscal responsibility:

SECTION 6. Congress shall not pass any bill that provides a net reduction in individual income taxes for those with incomes over $1,000,000 (as may be adjusted by Congress to account for inflation) if, after enactment, total outlays would exceed total receipts in any fiscal year affected by the bill.

Had this provision been in effect in 2001, George W. Bush’s disastrous tax cut packages would have been unconstitutional, and the single largest contributor to our present deficits would never have become law:

There are very good reasons why it is not a good idea to write any kind of budgeting amendment into the Constitution. Such amendments force the courts to supervise the federal budgeting process — and courts are not exactly equipped to make these kinds of judgments.

Nevertheless, if Congress insists upon writing measures into the Constitution that help balance the budget, Section 6 of the Udall Amendment could be a good model to consider. If enacted as a standalone amendment, it would restrict the George W. Bushes of the future from blowing up the budget with reckless and unnecessary tax giveaways to the super-rich while still allowing Congress to enact essential financial stimulus in the event of a recession.

Climate Progress

Mark Udall And Gabby Giffords Introduce Plan To Get Military Off Risky Oil

Yesterday, Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) unveiled a bill he is cosponsoring with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) that would “require the military to step up efforts to find alternatives to oil.” Their bill, the Department of Defense Energy Security Act, will add a $3 billion provision to the Senate’s military spending plan encouraging efficiency, biofuels, and other alternative energy. “It’s what we owe ourselves and our children and their children,” Udall told reporters. “It’s what we owe to the men and women who have been serving so valiantly in Iraq and Afghanistan.” By using “energy smarter and more efficiently,” the Udall-Giffords bill will save lives of troops and protect the planet for future generations:

Osama bin Laden reportedly called our fuel convoys the military’s “umbilical cord.” We risk the lives of thousands of troops each year because of our dependence on fossil fuel in theater and at home. We owe it to our troops and the American people to find ways to use energy smarter and more efficiently.

Watch it:

The military now spends $20 billion a year on energy, consuming 135 million barrels of oil and 30 million megawatt-hours of electricity.

“The goal of the bill is straightforward,” Gavi Begtrup, policy advisor to Giffords explained. “It will enhance our energy security and make our armed forces more agile and more lethal.”

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up