As if it weren’t already clear enough that the U.S. Supreme Court’s next money in politics decision is about money in Republican politics, the plaintiffs are spelling it out for you, giving Sen. Mitch McConnell argument time before the justices.
The letter opened with the claim that Mitch McConnell "does not politicize issues of national security" but went on to argue that the senator's opposition to the authorization for use of force is "a ringing example of why we need to keep Mitch fighting for us in the United States Senate."
A press release distributed by Sen. Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) campaign at a "Women for Team Mitch" event brags about the Senate Minority Leader's support for VAWA, even though McConnell voted against the measure in 1994, 2012, and 2013.
Want daily updates on important issues? Subscribe to