ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Morgan Stanley

Economy

Morgan Stanley Settles Price-Fixing Scandal That Cost Consumers $300 Million For Just $4.8 Million

Morgan Stanley will pay $4.8 million and admit no wrongdoing as part of a settlement with the federal government over allegations that it helped KeySpan, an electricity generating company, fix prices against New York consumers. A federal judge “begrudgingly” approved the deal Tuesday, overruling claims from consumer advocacy groups that the government was letting Morgan Stanley off the hook too easily.

The $4.8 million settlement pales in comparison to the $300 million the price fixing reportedly cost New York consumers, and it even falls far short of the $21.6 million in revenue the deal generated for Morgan Stanley, Reuters reported:

The government said the arrangement allowed KeySpan to withhold substantial electricity generating capacity from the market, driving prices higher for consumers, and generated $21.6 million of net revenue for Morgan Stanley.

New York state officials and the AARP both opposed the settlement on grounds that it was too small, and U.S. District Judge William Pauley seemingly agreed. But he approved the settlement anyway, saying that “despite this court’s misgivings, the government’s decision to settle for less than full damages is entitled to judicial deference.” AARP wanted Morgan Stanley to relinquish the $21.6 million in revenue and also wanted the $4.8 million redistributed to consumers. Pauley rejected that claim; the money will instead go to a U.S. Treasury fund to serve the public interest.

Morgan Stanley isn’t the only bank to get off easily. Multiple Wall Street banks have reached settlements that amount to a pittance compared to their profits, and as Pauley noted, these slaps on the wrist carry the substantial risk that a “large financial services firm like Morgan Stanley could view such a modest penalty as merely a cost of doing business.”

Special Topic

The One Percent Revolt: Princeton Students Protest JP Morgan And Goldman Sachs Recruitment

Princeton students protested JP Morgan Chase's business practices.

On Wednesday, JP Morgan Chase held an informational session at Princeton University, seeking to recruit students to its Treasury Services division. Yet while they probably imagined to see a receptive audience at one of the nation’s most elite universities and producers of the 1 percent, they instead met outraged students who protested the policies of the megabank. Students from Occupy Princeton stood up during the session and noted that Princeton’s motto is based around serving the nation and world, and that JP MorganChase is not serving this purpose. They then read off grievances against the bank, including its predatory lending practices and bankrolling of mountaintop removal, finally concluding with saying they don’t want to be a university for the one percent:

OCCUPY PRINCETON: Princeton’s motto is: In the nation’s service and service of all nations. JP Morgan Chase, your actions violate our motto. Your predatory lending practices helped crash our economy. We’ve bailed out your executives’ bonuses You’ve evicted struggling homeowners while taking their tax money. You support mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia, which destroys our ecological future. In light of these actions, we protest the campus culture that whitewashes the crooked dealings of Wall Street as a prestigious career path. We are here today as a voice for the 99%, shut out by a system that punishes them just for being born without privilege. What we need is not a university for the 1%, but a university “In the Nation’s Service, and in the Service of All Nations.”

Watch it:

When Goldman Sachs held a similar recruitment session on Thursday, Occupy Princeton was there once again. “Our talents will be wasted if we send all our best and brightest to Wall Street,” said the protesters, ending their remarks by inviting the students attending to their next General Assembly. Watch it:

JP Morgan can’t catch a break at the nation’s major universities. Last month, five students were arrested at Indiana University Bloomington during a demonstration against JP Morgan’s recruitment.

Climate Progress

JP Morgan, Koch, Other Oil Traders May Buy Discounted Strategic Petroleum Reserve Oil And Simply Store It

To stem supply disruptions from Libya and to disrupt the grip of nonconsumer oil speculators, the U.S. Department of Energy announced the sale of 30 million barrels of crude as part of the International Energy Agency’s effort to release 60 million barrels into the global oil market. The sale of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, as well as the suggestion from the Obama administration that more sales could be announced in the future, has already lowered the price of crude. As the Baker Institute’s Amy Myers Jaffe has noted, the release sends a “signal that should keep rampant speculation at bay.”

However, as Bloomberg reported last week, “some of the oil being released from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve to bring down prices may be held by traders for later sale rather than sent directly to refiners for processing into gasoline or other fuels.” Some of the purchasers have claimed that they will immediately refine the SPR crude. But many banks and large oil speculators looking to purchase the oil may intend to simply hoard it:

Representatives of trading companies including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley (MS), Hess Trading Company and Koch Supply & Trading LP joined Valero Energy Corp. (VLO) and Statoil ASA in questioning Energy Department officials June 28 about shipping options and requests for waivers of the Jones Act.

The Jones Act “restricts the shipment of goods between U.S. ports to American-flagged vessels.” Because most oil tankers are foreign-flagged ships, the traders looking to store in the oil offshore must request Jones Act waivers.

Argus Media reports that Koch Industries has already shown interest in leasing super tankers for storage of crude in the Gulf of Mexico. The Economist points out that the small rebound in oil prices have already provided an incentive for oil traders to store, rather than refine, the oil: “If a trader was able to purchase West Texas Intermediate—the oil held in America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)—at the spot price on June 24th, they would already be sitting on a tidy profit.”

In December 2008, when oil prices crashed from a record high to $33 a barrel, speculators with the capability to store massive quantities of crude oil bought in bulk and stored the oil for later sale. As Fortune magazine reported, the rush to store oil instead of refining it pushed prices for consumers back up. Now, the contango — a market situation when the spot price is much lower than the future price of oil — is less significant than back in 2008.

Nevertheless, its not clear what oil traders will do. In Europe and Japan, much of the oil released as part of the IEA effort was sent directly to industry. In the U.S., the release was entirely crude with less strings attached. “Our inventories are in good shape and our markets are well supplied here in the United States,” Rayola Dougher, an economic adviser with the American Petroleum Institute, the largest oil lobbying group, told Reuters. “It may be that our refiners are buying it to store up.”

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up