ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Nebraska

Health

Republican Dominated Nebraska Legislature Restores Prenatal Care For Undocumented Immigrants

Lawmakers in Nebraska voted 30-16 on Wednesday to override Gov. Dave Heineman’s (R) veto of legislation that would restore prenatal care with state and federal funds to “an estimated 1,162 unborn babies each year.” Heineman had rejected the bill because he claimed — falsely — that it would fund groups like Planned Parenthood, even though the organization does not provide prenatal services at its Nebraska clinics.

He condemned the lawmakers for providing “preferential treatment to illegals”:

“Today, the majority of the Nebraska Legislature decided their priorities are providing taxpayer funded benefits to illegal immigrants and increasing the sales tax rate on the citizens of Nebraska,” he said.

Providing preferential treatment to illegals while increasing taxes on legal Nebraska citizens is misguided, misplaced and inappropriate.”

Interestingly, anti-abortion groups broke ranks with Heineman and pushed for the Senate to override the veto. “People from all different backgrounds came together and said this is about protecting the life and health of unborn children, and did not decide which babies deserve care and which babies don’t,” a spokesperson for Nebraska Right to Life said.

Health

NE Gov Vetoes Prenatal Care For Undocumented Women, Cites Nonexistent Planned Parenthood Connection

Gov. Dave Heineman (R-NE)

Gov. Dave Heineman (R-NE) vetoed a bill on Friday that would have restored prenatal care for pregnant women who are undocumented immigrants because, Heineman explained, some of those funds could wind up at groups like Planned Parenthood. “I oppose providing taxpayer benefits to illegal immigrants,” he said in a press release. “I oppose providing taxpayer funding to vendors that perform or promote abortions.” A Planned Parenthood official said the group does not provide prenatal services at its Nebraska clinics.

But Heineman’s comments angered the bill’s supporters, including an anti-abortion group, and underscores a key debate surrounding the bill:

State Sen. Kathy Campbell of Lincoln, the chief sponsor of the bill, said she was “disturbed” that the comment about Planned Parenthood wasn’t raised until after the measure had progressed through three rounds of debate in the Legislature. [...]

Supporters and opponents of LB 599 agree on one point: It is a difficult issue that pits the protection of unborn babies against the distribution of taxpayer benefits to illegal immigrants.

Heineman on Friday repeated his argument that taxes paid by “hardworking Nebraskans” should not be used for women who violated immigration laws, and that passage of LB 599 would make the state “a sanctuary” for illegal immigrants. [...]

While Heineman said it was not a “pro-life issue,” many supporters of the bill said that is the basis of their support.

“This bill fundamentally respects the life that is created,” said Omaha Sen. Jeremy Nord­quist, regardless of the mother’s immigration status.

The bill’s proponents say the charge is a last-minute attempt to stop the bill that has divided anti-abortion groups and anti-immigration groups. The Nebraska legislature will vote Wednesday to attempt to override the governor’s veto.

NEWS FLASH

Anti-Abortion Group Pushes Senators On Prenatal Care For Undocumented Immigrants | The anti-abortion group Nebraska Right to Life sent a letter to six State Senators yesterday urging them to support a bill restoring prenatal care to babies with undocumented mothers. In the open letter, the group’s executive director, Julie Schmit-Albin, wrote, “It is sad and alarming that we have come to this point where some of the major pro-life leaders in the Legislature are choosing to put the illegal immigration issue and who pays for what, over the life and health of babies in the womb.” According to the Lincoln Journal-Star, all six of the Senators targeted have received the organization’s endorsement in the past. Two have said they are voting against it because of their opposition to illegal immigration. Governor Dave Heineman (R) has said he will veto the bill.

-Zachary Bernstein

LGBT

Omaha Councilman Struggled With ‘Perceived’ Gender Identity

Dr. Franklin Thompson

Nebraska blogger AKSARBENT continues to analyze this week’s decision to advance LGBT non-discrimination protections in Omaha. Councilman Franklin Thompson was one of the most vocal opponents of the measure, and during the final debate on Tuesday, he struggled quite a bit with protecting “perceived” gender identity:

THOMPSON: Perceived sexual identity is bothersome to me. It’s sort of like someone saying “You and I can perceive ourselves to be black this week, but next week we’ll be white.”[...]

What if the individual decides that one week, “I perceive myself to be male,” and then a month later, “I perceive myself to be female,” and then the smaller companies

My point is that the perception can go both ways. Perception is so vague and ambiguous that it’s hard to quantify. You’re asking Omaha businessmen to take a shot in the dark.

Watch Thompson’s arguments:

First of all, it’s obvious that Thompson does not have the most basic understanding of gender identity. Transgender individuals do not haphazardly change their gender from month to month — gender identity is enduring and consistent, not so different from how individuals experience race. But more importantly, the entire point of including the language of “perceived” identities is to ensure people are protected from discrimination regardless of what their identities actually are. An individual might be mistreated because she is perceived to be a lesbian, even if she actually isn’t, but she deserves to be protected under this law either way. Fortunately, the provision passed despite Thompson’s opposition.

There may be one glimmer of wisdom to be derived from Thompson’s offending confusion. As our society becomes increasingly multiracial, perhaps “perceived race” should be protected too.

NEWS FLASH

Omaha Passes LGBT Non-Discrimination Protections | Today, after weeks of debate, the Omaha City Council passed an ordinance that will protect LGBT individuals from discrimination in employment and public accommodations with a 4-3 vote. Mayor Jim Suttle has promised to sign the changes into law. A poll found last year that 90 percent of U.S. voters believe that such employment protections already exist at the federal level, but as GLAAD points out in a new Delta Sky Magazine ad, individuals can be fired for their sexual orientation in 29 states and gender identity in 34 states. Last night, Equal Omaha ran this advertisement to promote support for the bill:

(Kudos to blogger AKSARBENT for consistent in-depth coverage of the effort to pass this bill.)

NEWS FLASH

Omaha Nondiscrimination Protections Face Proposed Limitations | As the City Council of Omaha, Nebraska, continues to deliberate establishing non-discrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity, one council member is trying to limit the scope of the proposal. Rather than create city-wide employment and public accommodations protections as proposed by council member Ben Gray, council member Garry Gernandt wants to limit the policy only to employment and only to city hiring. Gernandt, who has opposed non-discrimination protections in the past, expressed concern that “blanketing the city with this, I’m just not sure that’s the right thing to do at this moment.”

Meanwhile, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Chancellor Harvey Perlman has clarified that Husker football assistant Ron Brown was not speaking on behalf of the university when he publicly opposed Omaha’s effort to protect LGBT residents.

Update

Watch a round-up of testimony against the bill via aksarbent:

LGBT

Nebraska Churches Buy Full-Page Ad To Oppose LGBT-Friendly Nondiscrimination Protections

Via Aksarbent, a coalition of anti-gay churches took out a full-page ad in the Omaha Word Herald on Sunday titled, Heritage Coalition Proclamation on Sexual Preference, in an effort to defeat a local ordinance extending anti-discrimination protections on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity within the city of Omaha, Nebraska. The ad states, “We do not have the right to change God’s moral law to fit our sexual preferences” and claims that Jesus will forgive gay people and “begins to change us from the inside out to become more like him”:

Councilman Ben Gray reintroduced the bill this week, which failed in 2010 on a 3-3 council vote. Meanwhile, an effort to “nullify any LGBT ordinance in Omaha by banning municipal protected classes not enumerated by the state appears to have stalled in the Unicameral’s Judiciary Committee after a hearing last Wednesday.”

Meanwhile, the paper notes today that “Among the 50 largest cities in the nation, Omaha is one of 15 whose gay residents have no specific legal protection from discrimination.” “In the past two years, at least 35 cities and counties in the United States of all sizes have passed anti-discrimination ordinances based on both sexual orientation and gender identity.”

Economy

Nebraska Gov. Proposes Making His State’s Regressive Tax Code Even Worse For The Poor

The state of Nebraska already has a regressive tax code that asks lower-income families to pay more than the state’s wealthiest residents. According to the Institute of Taxation and Economic Policy, the poorest 20 percent of Nebraskans pay an average of 11.1 percent of their annual income in state and local taxes, while the richest 1 percent pay just 6.1 percent of theirs, thanks to the state’s heavy reliance on regressive property taxes.

Gov. Dave Heinemen (R), however, seems to believe that the poor aren’t doing their part in his state. Despite saying his “highest priority” was “tax relief for Nebraska’s hard-working, middle class taxpayer,” Heinemen used his State of the State speech to unveil a tax proposal that would do next to nothing to help Nebraska’s poorest residents while providing sizable tax breaks to the rich, Citizens for Tax Justice found:

In his recent State of the State speech, Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman unveiled his three-pronged tax reduction proposal: income tax rate reductions and broadening of income tax brackets, a reduction in the corporate income tax rate, and complete elimination of the inheritance tax. [...]

Nebraska’s tax structure is already regressive and asks more of lower income families than better off families…The Governor’s proposal does nothing to reduce property taxes, does little to assist the lowest income Nebraskans, and would actually make this disparity worse.

As CTJ notes, Heinemen’s proposal wouldn’t replace the $40 million generated by the inheritance tax, just a year after his last budget eliminated state aid to local governments. In Omaha, the county board passed a resolution opposing Heinemen’s plan because it would “force” them to raise property taxes, thereby increasing the tax burden on lower- and middle-class Nebraskans.

Reducing the income tax rate, meanwhile, would have a similar effect, forcing the state to rely even more heavily on regressive property taxes instead of the more progressive income tax structure.

LGBT

Nebraska Senator Seeks To Ban All Municipal LGBT Protections

Nebraska Sen. Beau McCoy

Nebraska state Sen. Beau McCoy (NP) has introduced a bill (LB 912) that would prevent municipalities across the state from creating any nondiscrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity:

MCCOY: It just merely says that if we’re going to change the protected classes … we need to come to the Capitol to do it so that it’s consistent across the state. If it’s the right thing to do, it ought to be the right thing to do border-to-border, not just in one city or municipality. Nebraskans want uniformity. If it’s discrimination in Omaha, why wouldn’t it be the same in Scottsbluff, Gering, Kearney, Grand Island, you name it?

McCoy’s duplicitous interest in “uniformity” ignores that his bill mirrors a Tennessee law passed last year that specifically targeted the LGBT community for discrimination. In fact, the anti-LGBT Family Action Council of Tennessee (FACT) scripted the debate on that bill by cloaking its biased impact with economic rhetoric. The law’s passage invalidated LGBT protections that had recently been passed in Nashville.

If McCoy truly wanted consistent nondiscrimination policies across the state of Nebraska, he would propose a bill that protected sexual orientation and gender identity for the entire state. That he’s seeking to prevent such protections demonstrates his commitment to making sure LGBT people’s identities are enough to disqualify them from employment. (HT: Aksarbent.)

Climate Progress

Keystone Rider Delays Process For Rerouting The Controversial Pipeline

When Congress finally approved the payroll tax cut extension in December, it had a policy rider attached requiring President Obama to make a decision on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline within 60 days. But the requirement is now causing confusion that could slow the review process because the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) said it will take at least six months to choose and approve a new route — much more than Obama’s 60-day window. State officials will work with TransCanada, the Canadian company that wants to build the pipeline, to find an alternate route for the pipeline to avoid a major water source in the state, the Ogalala aquifer.

But Inside Climate News reports that before a new route can be set, DEQ and TransCanada need a memorandum from the State Department that outlines the agency’s involvement in the process, which could slow the process while they wait on it:

TransCanada spokesman Shawn Howard said the company conducted some aerial flyovers in early December, along with on-the-ground surveys on public roads. “[But] we’re not really in the full-blown field stage yet,” he said. “We have to have that memorandum of understanding … there’s just been too many surprises. We don’t want to look at potential routes if we don’t understand the process.”

DEQ spokesman Brian McManus said the State Department is working with the DEQ to draft the memorandum, but he does not know when it will be finalized. [...]

McManus said his agency will proceed with the reroute regardless of what happens in Washington, D.C.

“We’re just carrying out the role that was described to us by the Nebraska legislature,” he said. “We’ll deal with the federal [implications] in late February, depending on what decisions are made.”

Before Republicans attached the Keystone rider to the payroll tax cut, Obama had pushed back making a decision on the pipeline so that the State Department could consider alternate routes and other impacts. The pipeline would carry 830,000 gallons of heavy crude oil from the Canadian tar sands to the Gulf Coast, and despite lofty claims about the jobs the pipeline will create, the Keystone XL project is unlikely to be a job creator.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up