<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Think Progress &#187; Palin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/tag/palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:00:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Beck&#8217;s Sexist Reason For Ruling Out Palin-Beck Ticket: She&#8217;d Always Be &#8216;Yapping&#8217; Like We&#8217;re &#8216;In The Kitchen&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/26/beck-palin-kitchen/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/26/beck-palin-kitchen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Seitz-Wald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=71168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In recent days, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has indicated that she may be open to a conservative presidential dream ticket in 2012: Palin-Beck (or Beck-Palin). “I can envision a couple of different combinations, if ever I were to be in a position to really even seriously consider running for anything in the future, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/30beck01-6001.jpg" alt="Glenn Beck" title="Glenn Beck" width="209" height="184" class="imgright"/> In recent days, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has indicated that she may be open to a conservative presidential dream ticket in 2012: Palin-Beck (or Beck-Palin). “I can envision a couple of different combinations, if ever I were to be in a position to really even seriously consider running for anything in the future, and I’m not there yet,” Palin told Newsmax. “<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-beck-2012/">But Glenn Beck I have great respect for.</a> He’s a hoot.&#8221; Fox and Friends <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911250002">plugged the idea yesterday</a> morning and asked Palin whether she would run with Beck. She kept the door open, saying, &#8220;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911250004">I don&#8217;t know. We&#8217;ll see, we&#8217;ll see</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>But just a few hours later on his radio show, Beck shot down the idea, saying he was &#8220;absolutely&#8221; ruling out a Palin-Beck ticket. He explained that if he had the number two job, Palin would always be &#8220;yapping&#8221; like they were in &#8220;the kitchen&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>BECK: I don&#8217;t think things are hoots. I don&#8217;t. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a hoot. I would never use the word hoot, and <strong>I respectfully ask that every time my name is brought up she would stop using the word &#8220;hoot.&#8221;</strong> [...]</p>
<p>No, no I&#8217;m just saying &#8212; Beck-Palin, I&#8217;ll consider. <strong>But Palin-Beck &#8212; can you imagine, can you imagine what an administration with the two of us would be like? What? Come on! She&#8217;d be yapping or something, and I&#8217;d say, &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry, why am I hearing your voice? I&#8217;m not in the kitchen.&#8221;</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Listen here: </p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="60"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pn9MbQscz1w&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pn9MbQscz1w&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="60"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>A woman&#8217;s appropriate place on a presidential ticket, according to Beck, is in the number two spot. Otherwise, she should just &#8220;yap&#8221; away in a kitchen somewhere. Apparently, being a vice presidential running mate behind a woman is a serious challenge to Beck&#8217;s manhood.</p>
<p>When Newsweek <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/21/palin-dennis-miller-sexist/">ran a picture</a> of Palin in a running outfit on its cover this month, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20091117/pl_ynews/ynews_pl984">Palin</a> and <a href="http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2009/11/16/newsweek-photo-of-palin-shows-media-bias-and-sexism.aspx">many others</a> criticized the magazine for being sexist. Beck joined the outrage, saying the &#8220;<a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/18051/">attack</a>&#8221; on Palin was &#8220;dizzying&#8221; and &#8220;devastating.&#8221; He said Newsweek had reached &#8220;the highest of the lows&#8221; and added that the magazine now &#8220;sucks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Transcript: <span id="more-71168"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>BECK: Now Sarah Palin, is &#8212; she&#8217;s down in Florida, and Fox asked her this morning a couple of questions. Do you have both questions or just the one?</p>
<p>PAT: I have just the one.</p>
<p>BECK: Oh just the one, okay. Alright.</p>
<p>(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)</p>
<p>CARLSON: Chances you&#8217;ll run on a ticket with Fox&#8217;s own Glenn Beck, as was reported earlier this week?</p>
<p>PALIN: I saw that, I saw that. I got a kick out of it, and he probably thought that was just a hoot too to hear such a thing.</p>
<p>(END VIDEO CLIP)</p>
<p>BECK: Okay, stop stop stop. I don&#8217;t think things are hoots. I don&#8217;t. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a hoot. I would never use the word hoot and I respectfully ask that every time my name is brought up she would stop using the word &#8220;hoot.&#8221; (LAUGHTER)</p>
<p>COHOST: I think that&#8217;s a good safety tip.</p>
<p>BECK: I mean it&#8217;s a laugh, its funny, it&#8217;s ridiculous. You would say it&#8217;s ridiculous, because it is. It&#8217;s ridiculous. But I don&#8217;t think &#8212; please stop using the word hoot. [...]</p>
<p>BECK: Play the whole thing again.</p>
<p>(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)</p>
<p>CARLSON: Chances you&#8217;ll run on a ticket with Fox&#8217;s own Glenn Beck, as was reported earlier this week?</p>
<p>PALIN: I saw that, I saw that. I got a kick out of it, and he probably thought that was just a hoot too to hear such a thing. Um, I don&#8217;t know. We&#8217;ll see, we&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>(END VIDEO CLIP)</p>
<p>BECK: We&#8217;ll see, we&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>CO-HOST: He probably thought it was a hoot, though, she was &#8212; she was talking about you.</p>
<p>BECK: Yeah, let me just put this rumor to rest cause she&#8217;s obviously &#8212; she hasn&#8217;t ruled &#8212; she obviously hasn&#8217;t ruled it out. </p>
<p>(CROSSTALK)</p>
<p>BECK: Did she not say, and I quote, &#8220;We&#8217;ll see, we&#8217;ll see.&#8221; So she clearly hasn&#8217;t ruled it out. </p>
<p>CO-HOST: She said it twice, she reiterated it.</p>
<p>BECK: So while she&#8217;s considering it, I just want make it very &#8212; You&#8217;re such a jerk.</p>
<p>CO-HOST: What?</p>
<p>BECK: I&#8217;m sure she finds this a hoot. So while she&#8217;s still considering it &#8212; &#8220;we&#8217;ll see, we&#8217;ll see&#8221; &#8212; I just want her to know, I&#8217;m ruling it out.</p>
<p>CO-HOST: Really?</p>
<p>BECK: A Palin-Beck ticket &#8212; I&#8217;m absolutely ruling out.</p>
<p>CO-HOST: Oh God, not this again. Please can we not?</p>
<p>BECK: Please can we not? (CROSSTALK) No, no I&#8217;m just saying &#8212; Beck-Palin, I&#8217;ll consider. But Palin-Beck &#8212; can you imagine, can you imagine what an administration with the two of us would be like? What? Come on! She&#8217;d be yapping or something, and I&#8217;d say, &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry, why am I hearing your voice? I&#8217;m not in the kitchen.&#8221;</p>
<p>CO-HOST: You&#8217;d you have to live up to evil conservative stereotypes, you&#8217;d have no choice but to do so.</p>
<p>BECK: I&#8217;d have to.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/26/beck-palin-kitchen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin fuels presidential rumors: ‘I like’ the sound of ‘President Palin.’</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/25/palin-president-florida/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/25/palin-president-florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faiz Shakir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=71229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Sarah Palin was greeted by a throng of supporters in The Villages, Florida &#8212; a retirement community northwest of Orlando. (Glenn Beck visited the same town this past weekend.) There were shouts of &#8220;We love you Sarah!” and “We want you to be president!&#8221; from the crowd. And Palin did plenty to stoke their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Sarah Palin was greeted by <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/to-florida-fans-palin-still-the-one/1054217">a throng of supporters</a> in The Villages, Florida &#8212; a retirement community northwest of Orlando. (Glenn Beck visited <a href="http://www.ocala.com/article/20091122/ARTICLES/911221012/1402/NEWS?Title=Beck-visits-The-Villages-announces-conventions">the same town</a> this past weekend.) There were shouts of &#8220;We love you Sarah!” and “<a href="http://www.theledger.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911255010/1003/NEWS00?Title=Enthusiastic-Crowd-Greets-Palin">We want you to be president!</a>&#8221; from the crowd. And Palin <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-palin-booksign-20091124,0,6847018,full.story">did plenty to stoke their hopes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/palinsmile.gif" alt="palinsmile" title="palinsmile" width="170" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-71232" /><strong>&#8220;I addressed her as &#8216;President Palin,&#8217; &#8221; said Debbie McMillan of Orlando. &#8220;She said, &#8216;I like that very much — I could live with that.&#8217;&#8221;</strong> […]</p>
<p>Sheila Schulte, 54, a resident of The Villages who was wearing a button on a red, white and blue scarf that read &#8220;Sarah Palin for President 2012,&#8221; leaned over and thanked Palin for serving as a great inspiration.</p>
<p><strong>Palin responded, &#8220;You&#8217;re welcome and I like your pin.&#8221;</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>During her brief remarks, Palin encouraged the crowd to buy her new book. &#8220;You can read my story thus far &#8212; <a href="http://www.theledger.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911255010/1003/NEWS00?Title=Enthusiastic-Crowd-Greets-Palin">unfiltered by the media!</a>&#8221; Aside from an interview with Fox News, Palin “<a href="http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2009-11-24/story/palin_visit_to_florida_was_more_people_than_politics">took no questions</a>” from the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/25/palin-president-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>230</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Suggests Reforming Canada&#8217;s Universal Health Care System: &#8216;Let The Private Sector Take Over&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/25/palin-canadian-health-care/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/25/palin-canadian-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthy Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=71191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian comedian Mary Walsh (playing the character of Marg Delahunty) attended a Sarah Palin book signing in the United States last week and asked the &#8220;thrilla from Wasilla, the Alaskan Aphrodite&#8221; if she had &#8220;any words of encouragement for the Canadian conservatives who have worked so hard to try to diminish that kind of socialized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian comedian <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Walsh_(actress)">Mary Walsh</a> (playing the character of Marg Delahunty) attended a Sarah Palin book signing in the United States last week and asked the &#8220;thrilla from Wasilla, the Alaskan Aphrodite&#8221; if she had &#8220;any <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5hfc-xBK6S_JKCRKXLJt8cx8eFPVg">words of encouragement for the Canadian conservatives</a> who have worked so hard to try to diminish that kind of socialized medicine we have up there.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;Keep the faith and that common-sense conservatism,&#8221; Palin said to Walsh, who was being pushed out of the store by bodyguards. &#8220;It needs to be plugged into Canadian policies too. Keep the faith!&#8221; Palin cried out. </p>
<p>After the event, Walsh waited in the loading dock of the Borders bookstore &#8220;close to where Palin&#8217;s bus was parked.&#8221; Palin came over and energetically encouraged Walsh to &#8220;keep the faith&#8221; again and suggested that Canada needs to reform its health care system to &#8220;<a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/11/25/palin-canada/">let the private sector take over</a>”: </p>
<blockquote><p>WALSH: Ms. Palin, I tried to ask you a question inside, but I didn&#8217;t hear your answer! The Canadians! Ms. Palin! </p>
<p>PALIN: Well, my answer was too keep the faith. My answer was to keep the faith. Cause that common sense conservatism can be plugged-in there in Canada too. <strong>In fact Canada needs to reform its health care system and let the private sector take over some of what the government has absorbed. So thank you, keep the faith. </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="240"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DC8w4DE2CwM&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DC8w4DE2CwM&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="240"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>In Canada, &#8220;the private sector&#8221; is already &#8220;<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/healthcare/public_vs_private.html">a crucial part</a>&#8221; of the Canadian health care system. The federal government finances the basic health care plan, (through a &#8220;Medicaid-like arrangement in which Canada’s 10 provinces and 2 territories jointly fund&#8221; the system), but care is independently organized and managed by each province or territory. Canadians <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/healthcare/public_vs_private.html">spend billions on private supplemental coverage</a> and physicians work in private practices. Everyone has access to care, and patients &#8220;can see any doctor they want anywhere in the country with no copays or deductibles.&#8221; </p>
<p>While the system has longer waiting periods for certain elective surgeries, research suggests that Canadians do enjoy better access to care and &#8220;<a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/06/the-not-so-awful-truth-about-canadian-health-outcomes.php">superior</a>&#8221; health outcomes compared to Americans. According to a Commonwealth Fund of deaths that could have been prevented &#8220;with access to quality medical care in the leading 19 industrialized countries,&#8221; the <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/08/11/npr-report-canada/">United States ranked last and Canada came in sixth</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/25/palin-canadian-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox&#8217;s Fuzzy Math: 193 Percent Of The Public Support Palin, Huckabee, And Romney</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fox-pie-chart/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fox-pie-chart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Armbruster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reporting on the latest Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll last night on Fox News&#8217; local Chicago affiliate, anchor Byron Harlan employed some funny math in asserting that Sarah Palin is leading the pack for the GOP nomination in 2012: 
HARLAN: It looks as if the rogue route is helping Sarah Palin. Her book tour has meant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reporting on the latest Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll last night on Fox News&#8217; local Chicago affiliate, anchor <a href="http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/about_us/personalities/Byron_Harlan">Byron Harlan</a> employed some funny math in asserting that Sarah Palin is leading the pack for the GOP nomination in 2012: </p>
<blockquote><p>HARLAN: It looks as if the rogue route is helping Sarah Palin. Her book tour has meant new support. A new Opinion Dynamics poll for 2012 shows her on top when it comes to landing the nomination. <strong>Palin is at 70 percent, about a third higher than this past July. Mike Huckabee stands at 63 percent. Mitt Romney&#8217;s 60</strong>. </p></blockquote>
<p>Those figures add up to 193 percent. An accompanying graphic tried to squeeze the numbers into one pie chart: </p>
<p><center><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/FoxChicagoPoll.jpg" alt="FoxChicagoPoll" title="FoxChicagoPoll" width="300" height="227" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-70865" /></center></p>
<p>In fact, the poll Harlan referred to did not ask Republican respondents to pick their favorite candidate. The numbers he cited merely represent <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/111909_PalinPoll.pdf">favorable ratings</a> among Republicans surveyed for each individual. Watch Harlan&#8217;s report: </p>
<p><center><object width="325" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-rbyhj8uTT8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-rbyhj8uTT8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="325" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>(HT: Twitter user <a href="http://tweetphoto.com/b64lawq7">Kevinthepang</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fox-pie-chart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Like Palin, Fiorina Flip-Flops On Her Support For The Bank Bailout</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fiorina-bailout-flip-flop/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fiorina-bailout-flip-flop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Corley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incompetent  Establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appearing at an American Spectator Newsmaker Breakfast this morning, California Senate candidate and former McCain campaign adviser Carly Fiorina said that she &#8220;probably would have voted for&#8221; Justice Sonia Sotomayor because &#8220;she seemed qualified.” Asked if she thought former Alaska governor Sarah Palin would back her campaign, Fiorina said she had &#8220;no idea,&#8221; but that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/CarlyFiorina.jpg" alt="Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina" title="Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina" width="141" height="202" class="alignright size-full wp-image-70818" />Appearing at an American Spectator Newsmaker Breakfast this morning, California Senate candidate and former McCain campaign adviser Carly Fiorina said that she &#8220;<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/68650/fiorina-i-would-have-voted-for-sotomayor">probably would have voted</a> for&#8221; Justice Sonia Sotomayor because &#8220;she seemed qualified.” Asked if she thought former Alaska governor Sarah Palin would back her campaign, Fiorina said she had &#8220;no idea,&#8221; but that she shares &#8220;<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/68662/fiorina-i-share-sarah-palins-values">Sarah Palin’s values</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Later in her chat, Fiorina demonstrated one of the values that she shares with Palin, which is <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_el_pr/us_palin_book_fact_check">flip-flopping</a> on last fall&#8217;s bank bailout. Fiorina told the reporters at the Spectator breakfast that <a href="http://spectator.org/blog/2009/11/23/fiorina-white-men-cant-beat-bo">she opposed bailouts</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Fiorina said that she was opposed to bailouts and President Obama&#8217;s economic stimulus package.</strong> Instead, she said, she supports low taxes and spending, and described the nation&#8217;s debt as &#8220;unsustainable.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>But in 2008, Fiorina defended the bailout, calling it &#8220;necessary&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8211; FIORINA: And, finally, if you cannot get a loan for anything that you need to do, keep your small business running &#8212; <strong>in other words, the bank bailout was, unfortunately, necessary because credit is tight for hardworking Americans and small businesses.</strong> And John McCain has very specific proposals to help them get through this. [Fox News, 10/14/08]</p>
<p>&#8211; FIORINA: I think there are many people who are uncomfortable with the government bailout. <strong>And I think many people, including Senator McCain, supported that a bailout for the very simple reason, and only one reason, and that is credit was being cut off to small businesses, to companies, and to families in America.</p>
<p>So something had to be done to loosen the credit freeze.</strong> And, in fact, it appears to be working thus far. While the stock market plummeted today on fears of an economic slowdown or recession, fundamentally, we can see the credit is loosening. That is a bit of good news. [Fox News, 10/22/08]</p></blockquote>
<p>Palin and Fiorina aren&#8217;t the only conservatives whose &#8220;values&#8221; have changed regarding the bailout. Both <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/60146/romney-slams-bailouts-that-he-used-to-support">Mitt Romney</a> and <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/21/beck-bailout-bush/">Glenn Beck</a> supported the financial rescue, but now rail against it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fiorina-bailout-flip-flop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fort Bragg sales of Palin&#8217;s book are &#8216;weak&#8217; in advance of her visit.</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/palin-ftbragg-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/palin-ftbragg-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Terkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin is in Fort Bragg, NC today, for another stop on her &#8220;Going Rogue&#8221; book tour. Army officials initially banned the media from covering Palin&#8217;s visit, fearing the event would turn into political grandstanding &#8220;directed against the commander in chief.&#8221; But after objections from the press, the military relented. As a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin is in Fort Bragg, NC today, for another stop on her &#8220;Going Rogue&#8221; book tour. Army officials initially banned the media from covering Palin&#8217;s visit, fearing the event would turn into political grandstanding &#8220;<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34047085/ns/politics-more_politics/">directed against the commander in chief</a>.&#8221; But after objections from the press, the military relented. As a compromise, Palin &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iltfRk8-HXLZliLywAGsDpo1Mt4wD9C59BN00">will not make a speech</a>, pose for photos, or personalize notes in the books she signs.&#8221; Local WTVD-TV reports that bookstores around Fort Bragg were <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&#038;id=7133186">experiencing &#8220;slow sales&#8221;</a> in advance of Palin&#8217;s visit, which is nevertheless supposed to attract &#8220;hundreds&#8221; of people. Watch it: </p>
<p><center><object id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268"><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&#038;station=wtvd&#038;section=&#038;mediaId=7133287&#038;cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&#038;webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&#038;site=" ></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<embed id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true" src="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&#038;station=wtvd&#038;section=&#038;mediaId=7133287&#038;cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&#038;webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&#038;site="></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/palin-ftbragg-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speaking with Palin, Dennis Miller transitions from calling Newsweek cover &#8217;sexist&#8217; to insulting Hillary Clinton.</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/21/palin-dennis-miller-sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/21/palin-dennis-miller-sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Corley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Sarah Palin wrote on her Facebook page that Newsweek&#8217;s choice to use a Runner&#8217;s World photo of her in running shorts for its cover was &#8220;unfortunate&#8221; and &#8220;sexist.&#8221; Palin&#8217;s criticism has since been echoed on both the left and right. Interviewing Palin on his radio show yesterday, Dennis Miller added his voice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, Sarah Palin wrote on her Facebook page that Newsweek&#8217;s choice to use a Runner&#8217;s World photo of her in running shorts for its cover was &#8220;unfortunate&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=24718773587#/note.php?note_id=175955933434">sexist</a>.&#8221; Palin&#8217;s criticism has since been echoed on both the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911170027">left</a> and <a href="http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2009/11/16/newsweek-photo-of-palin-shows-media-bias-and-sexism.aspx">right</a>. Interviewing Palin on his radio show yesterday, Dennis Miller added his voice to those calling the cover &#8220;sexist.&#8221; But he then did something that most of the other critics haven&#8217;t done. He immediately followed it with a joke about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that could also be easily characterized as sexist:</p>
<blockquote><p>MILLER: Listen, Sarah, I have to ask you. <strong>This Newsweek cover. First off, I have two thoughts on this. To me it seems blatantly sexist and secondly I&#8217;m just glad they didn&#8217;t decide to do it with Hillary during the primaries.</strong> But your thoughts on it. You a little POed at this? I mean this was for another magazine, right?</p>
<p>PALIN: Yeah, yeah, it was for a health and fitness profile where I could tout the great outdoors of Alaska in Runner&#8217;s World months ago. And yeah, Newsweek. That was really snarky and cheesy and quite indicative though too, Dennis, of the state of journalism today. I think it stinks.</p></blockquote>
<p>Listen here:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="60"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t5gRNBcgakk&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t5gRNBcgakk&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="60"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>As ThinkProgress noted yesterday, it is <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/20/fox-pelosi-scrutiny/">conventional wisdom</a> on the right that conservative women get harsher treatment than liberal women. But Miller&#8217;s hypocritical comments and Palin&#8217;s lack of concern with them, give weight to those who argue that Palin and her conservative followers have a <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=07&#038;year=2009&#038;base_name=conservatives_selective_embrac">selective perception of social bias</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/21/palin-dennis-miller-sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>227</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angry supporters boo Palin for leaving in the middle of her book signing: &#8216;Quittin’ on the job!&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/20/palin-angry-book/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/20/palin-angry-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Terkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin was in Indiana yesterday for a book-signing at a Borders store. One thousand lucky fans with wristbands to meet Palin stood in the rain all day waiting for her to arrive. However, Palin quit the event before she had the chance to sign all the books, leaving 100 supporters out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin was in Indiana yesterday for a book-signing at a Borders store. One thousand lucky fans with wristbands to meet Palin stood in the rain all day waiting for her to arrive. However, Palin quit the event before she had the chance to sign all the books, <a href="http://www.theindychannel.com/news/21668893/detail.html">leaving 100 supporters out in the cold</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I&#8217;m very disappointed. I think it was very rude. <strong>She could have at least apologized, and she didn&#8217;t even do that</strong>,&#8221; said Teresa Hedrick. [...]</p>
<p>&#8220;We bought two books from Borders to have our receipt and our wristband to get it signed tonight,&#8221; said one woman. <strong>&#8220;My books are going back to Borders tomorrow.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;We gave up our entire workday, stayed in the cold. My kids were crying,&#8221; said one man.</strong> &#8220;They went home with my wife. She was out here in the freezing cold all day. <strong>I feel like I don&#8217;t want to support Sarah.</strong>&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>People who didn&#8217;t get to meet Palin &#8220;went home only with a piece of paper with Palin&#8217;s signature.&#8221; Video from the event shows angry wristband-holders loudly booing Palin and yelling, <a href="http://www.rumproast.com/index.php/site/comments/video_of_angry_wingnuts_booing_sarah_palin_calling_her_a_quitter_chantin/">&#8220;Sign our books!&#8221; and &#8220;Quittin&#8217; on the job!&#8221;</a> Watch it: </p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A8mAZhOJIfI&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A8mAZhOJIfI&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>(HT: <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1109/Spurned_in_Noblesville.html">Ben Smith</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/20/palin-angry-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carlson: &#8216;You Don&#8217;t Hear As Much About The Scrutiny&#8217; Of Pelosi Because Conservative Women &#8216;Get More Attacks&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/20/fox-pelosi-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/20/fox-pelosi-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Corley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Fox and Friends this morning, the hosts discussed a recently released Fox News poll that measures the favorable opinions that Americans have about former Alaska governor Sarah Palin and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The poll found that 47 percent of respondents had a favorable opinion of Palin while only 28 percent had a favorable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Fox and Friends this morning, the hosts discussed a recently released Fox News poll that measures the favorable opinions that Americans have about <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/111909_PalinPoll.pdf">former Alaska governor Sarah Palin</a> and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/111909_ObamaPoll.pdf">House Speaker Nancy Pelosi</a>. The poll found that 47 percent of respondents had a favorable opinion of Palin while only 28 percent had a favorable opinion of Pelosi.</p>
<p>&#8220;Also, 61 percent of you feel that governor Sarah Palin, former governor, has been treated unfairly by the mainstream media,&#8221; commented Steve Doocy. Co-host Gretchen Carlson suggested that Pelosi&#8217;s numbers are low even though she doesn&#8217;t get much &#8220;scrutiny&#8221; because &#8220;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911200006">if you&#8217;re a conservative woman, you get more attacks</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>CARLSON: It&#8217;s interesting because even though that number shows that Pelosi has a much higher unfavorable rating, you don&#8217;t, you don&#8217;t at least hear as much about the scrutiny of Nancy Pelosi as you did about Sarah Palin. <strong>And that may go back to that whole age old argument that if you&#8217;re a conservative woman, you get more attacks than if you have liberal points of view.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width='320' height='260'><param name='movie' value='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf'></param><param name='flashvars' value='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=200911200006'></param><param name='allowscriptaccess' value='always'></param><param name='allownetworking' value='all'></param><embed src='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' flashvars='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=200911200006' allowscriptaccess='always' allowfullscreen='true' width='320' height='260'></embed></object></center></p>
<p>The contention that the media treats conservative women worse than liberal women is <a href="http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2009/11/16/newsweek-photo-of-palin-shows-media-bias-and-sexism.aspx">conventional</a> <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,575048,00.html">wisdom</a> on the right. But Carlson&#8217;s claim that scrutiny of Nancy Pelosi is under the radar is surprising considering her own network&#8217;s often times downright mean treatment of the first female speaker of the House:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8211; On the November 10 edition of Fox and Friends, for instance, radio host Laura Ingraham said that &#8220;Pelosi basically did <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911100015">everything except sell her own body</a>&#8221; to pass health care reform. </p>
<p>&#8211; On Nov. 4 on the O&#8217;Reilly Factor, Dennis Miller said Pelosi had a &#8220;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911040059">sub-reptilian intellect</a>&#8221; and likened her face to a &#8220;lizard laying on a hot rock.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; On October 30, Fox and Friends laughingly re-enacted protesters calling for Pelosi to &#8220;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/30/fox-pelosi-hell-funny/">burn in hell</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; On October 21, Bill O&#8217;Reilly mocked Pelosi, saying, &#8220;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910210041">If there wan&#8217;t Botox involved</a>, with all due respect, there might have been more expression&#8221; on her face.</p>
<p>&#8211; On August 6, Glenn Beck <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200908060037">joked about putting poison</a> in Pelosi&#8217;s wine.</p>
<p>&#8211; On May 20, Hannity guest Jay Thomas said, &#8220;I think if you waterboarded Nancy Pelosi, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200905200002">she wouldn&#8217;t admit to plastic surgery</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; On May 19, Dennis Miller called her a &#8220;train wreck&#8221; and a &#8220;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200905190035">shrieking harridan magpie</a>.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>On Fox, a progressive woman like Pelosi doesn&#8217;t just get &#8220;scrutiny,&#8221; she gets insults.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/20/fox-pelosi-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbour refuses to say Palin&#8217;s qualified to be president, pauses and stumbles when questioned about it.</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/19/barbour-palin-president/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/19/barbour-palin-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Terkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mississippi Gov. and Repulican Governors Association (RGA) President Haley Barbour (R) attracted attention on Wednesday for praising former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, saying that she&#8217;s &#8220;a heck of a lot smarter than she gets credit for.&#8221; But that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean Barbour thinks she&#8217;s ready to run for president. Today on MSNBC, Chris Matthews repeatedly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mississippi Gov. and Repulican Governors Association (RGA) President Haley Barbour (R) attracted attention on Wednesday for praising former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, saying that she&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5700215.shtml">a heck of a lot smarter</a> than she gets credit for.&#8221; But that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean Barbour thinks she&#8217;s ready to run for president. Today on MSNBC, Chris Matthews repeatedly asked Barbour if he thought Palin was qualified to be president. In response, Barbour would stop, stumble, and muster out weak statements like, &#8220;Constitutionally, she sure is&#8221; or &#8220;I don&#8217;t know anything that disqualifies her from being president&#8221; (perhaps subtle winks to the birther community that believes Obama is unconstitutionally unqualified?). Watch it: </p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qhhqYcQKg8Y&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qhhqYcQKg8Y&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>While governor, Palin was <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/14/palin-rga-leadership/">not accepted into the inner circle</a> of the RGA&#8217;s leadership, and Barbour <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/01/barbour-on-palin/">never seemed very impressed</a> with her self-proclaimed foreign policy expertise. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/19/barbour-palin-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox issues on-air apology for misleading footage of Palin crowds.</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/19/fox-correction-on-air/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/19/fox-correction-on-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faiz Shakir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following ThinkProgress&#8217; report yesterday that Fox News had recycled old file footage of Sarah Palin rallies to assert that she is currently getting huge turnouts on her book tour, the network issued an on-air apology this afternoon. Fox&#8217;s Happening Now co-host Jane Skinner said it was mistake, but didn&#8217;t explain how it happened:
In the tease [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/fox-crowd-shot-palin/">ThinkProgress&#8217; report yesterday</a> that Fox News had recycled old file footage of Sarah Palin rallies to assert that she is currently getting huge turnouts on her book tour, the network issued an on-air apology this afternoon. Fox&#8217;s <em>Happening Now</em> co-host Jane Skinner said it was mistake, but didn&#8217;t explain how it happened:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the tease before the segment &#8212; the tease to commercial &#8212; we told you how those people were already lining up to meet Palin. The problem is, we didn&#8217;t actually show you the video we were referencing. Instead, we mistakenly aired what&#8217;s called file tape of Sarah Palin. We didn&#8217;t mean to mislead anybody in that tease. It was a mistake. And for that, we apologize.</p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YiDN4x9O0io&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YiDN4x9O0io&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>The Swamp reported earlier that Fox News may take &#8220;<a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/11/fox_rolls_wrong_tape_heads_may.html">serious disciplinary action</a>&#8221; against control room staffers over the incident. The on-air apology made no reference to such action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/19/fox-correction-on-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News displays old campaign footage to claim Palin is getting &#8216;huge crowds&#8217; at her book signings. (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/fox-crowd-shot-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/fox-crowd-shot-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faiz Shakir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This afternoon, Fox News host Gregg Jarrett proudly announced that Sarah Palin is “continuing to draw huge crowds while she’s promoting her brand new book. Take a look at &#8212; these are some of the pictures just coming into us.” But the pictures that the network chose to display on-air appeared to be old file [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This afternoon, Fox News host Gregg Jarrett proudly announced that Sarah Palin is “continuing to draw <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjovbveUgtc">huge crowds</a> while she’s promoting her brand new book. Take a look at &#8212; these are some of the pictures just coming into us.” But the pictures that the network chose to display on-air appeared to be old file footage of Palin rallies from the 2008 presidential campaign. Individuals in the crowd are seen holding McCain/Palin signs, and others are holding pom-poms and cheering wildly. &#8220;There&#8217;s a crowd of folks,&#8221; an enthused Jarrett observed, referring to the old footage. Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/luNheD4DGr8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/luNheD4DGr8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart recently caught Fox News’ Sean Hannity <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/hannity-tea-party-footage-daily-show/">displaying crowd shots from a rally earlier this year</a> to claim that a recent GOP health care protest drew a larger audience than it actually did. Hannity later acknowledged that he “<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/12/hannity-screwed-up/">screwed up</a>.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/fox-crowd-shot-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin: &#8216;Jewish Settlements Should Expand,&#8217; Even In Palestinian Areas</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-israel-settlements/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-israel-settlements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Duss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global and Domestic Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=70076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with ABC&#8217;s Barbara Walters, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin separated herself from decades of U.S. policy &#8212; which has held that Israel&#8217;s settlements in the Occupied Territories are illegitimate and an impediment to peace &#8212; saying that she thinks &#8220;Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expand”:
WALTERS: The Obama administration does not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/palinisrael.gif"><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/palinisrael.gif" alt="palinisrael" title="palinisrael" width="200" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-70108" /></a>In an <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Palin/sarah-palin-talks-barbara-walters-afghanistan-policy-economy/story?id=9109226">interview </a>with ABC&#8217;s Barbara Walters, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin separated herself from decades of U.S. policy &#8212; which has held that Israel&#8217;s settlements in the Occupied Territories are illegitimate and an impediment to peace &#8212; saying that she thinks &#8220;<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Palin/sarah-palin-talks-barbara-walters-afghanistan-policy-economy/story?id=9109226">Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expand</a>”:</p>
<blockquote><p>WALTERS: The Obama administration does not want Israel to build any more settlements on what they consider Palestinian territory. What is your view on this?</p>
<p>PALIN: <strong>I disagree with the Obama administration on that. I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expanded upon</strong>, because that population of Israel is, is going to grow. More and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead. And I don&#8217;t think that the Obama administration has any right to tell Israel that the Jewish settlements cannot expand.</p>
<p>WALTERS: Even if it&#8217;s [in] Palestinian areas?</p>
<p>PALIN: <strong>I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expand</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not only does Palin disagree with the Obama administration on that, she also disagrees with the Bush administration, whose 2002 &#8220;<a href="http://www.un.org/media/main/roadmap122002.html">roadmap for peace</a>&#8221; called for a <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/30/misrepresenting-basic-facts-on-settlements/">settlement freeze</a>. In fact, every U.S. administration since Israel&#8217;s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza began in 1967 has opposed Israel&#8217;s building of settlements, which are held to be <a href="http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/6756482d86146898c125641e004aa3c5">illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Article 49. The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.</p></blockquote>
<p>In addition to violating Israel&#8217;s obligations under international law, the settlements are a major source of anger and frustration for Palestinians, and one of the main drivers of extremism and violence among both Palestinians and Israelis. By further entrenching Israel within the Palestinian territories, the settlements also make a two-state solution &#8212; which both Presidents <a href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/gwbushtwostatesolution.htm">Bush</a> and <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Cairo-University-6-04-09/">Obama</a> have recognized as a central U.S. national security interest &#8212; far more difficult to achieve. </p>
<p>Palin&#8217;s wild views on Jewish settlements might help her steal some radical right-wing religious support from <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=will_huckabee_pay_a_price_for_rejecting_the_two_state_solution">Mike Huckabee</a>, but they have disastrous implications both for U.S. and Israeli security, as well as for Palestinian national and human rights. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-israel-settlements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin-Beck 2012?</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-beck-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-beck-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Terkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radical Right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=69960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In a new interview with Newsmax, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin hinted that a &#8220;dream ticket&#8221; of Palin and Fox News host Glenn Beck is not out of the question: 
&#8220;I can envision a couple of different combinations, if ever I were to be in a position to really even seriously consider running for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/palinbeckp.jpg" alt="Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin" title="Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin" width="197" height="132" class="imgright"/> In a new interview with Newsmax, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin hinted that a &#8220;dream ticket&#8221; of Palin and Fox News host Glenn Beck is <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/palin_beck_2012_ticket/2009/11/17/287568.html">not out of the question</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong>I can envision a couple of different combinations</strong>, if ever I were to be in a position to really even seriously consider running for anything in the future, and I&#8217;m not there yet,&#8221; Palin tells Newsmax. &#8220;<strong>But Glenn Beck I have great respect for. He&#8217;s a hoot. He gets his message across in such a clever way. And he&#8217;s so bold – I have to respect that.</strong> He calls it like he sees it, and he&#8217;s very, very, very effective.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Palin is a big Beck fan. In August, she wrote on her Facebook page, &#8220;<a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=123152423434">FOX News&#8217; Glenn Beck is doing an extraordinary job</a> this week walking America behind the scenes of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and outlining who is actually running the White House. Monday night he asked us to invite one friend to watch; tonight I invite all my friends to watch.&#8221; Maybe they could go up against <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/21/bachmann-king-president/">Michele Bachmann</a> and <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/02/steve-king-president/">Steve King</a>? (HT: <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1109/PalinBeck_2012.html?showall">Ben Smith</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-beck-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>223</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin to Rush Limbaugh: &#8216;Are we warming or are we cooling?&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-global-warming-limbaugh/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-global-warming-limbaugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=69982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, former Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) reminded hate radio host Rush Limbaugh that she doesn&#8217;t believe in man-made global warming. Palin, on a nationwide tour to promote her new book, Going Rogue, questioned the &#8220;snake oil science involved&#8221; and complained about the &#8220;shady science right now.&#8221; Palin said that she thinks any changes are &#8220;in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, former Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) reminded hate radio host Rush Limbaugh that <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/29/palin-globalwarming-manmade/">she doesn&#8217;t believe</a> in man-made global warming. Palin, on a nationwide tour to promote her new book, <i>Going Rogue</i>, questioned the &#8220;snake oil science involved&#8221; and complained about the &#8220;shady science right now.&#8221; Palin said that she thinks any changes are &#8220;in a lot of respects, <a href=" http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111709/content/01125120.guest.html">cyclical</a>”:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s kind of tough to figure out with the shady science right now, what are we supposed to be doing right now with our climate. <strong>Are we warming or are we cooling</strong>? I don&#8217;t think Americans are even told anymore if it&#8217;s global warming or just climate change. And I don&#8217;t attribute all the changes to man&#8217;s activities.<strong> I think that this is, in a lot of respects, cyclical</strong> and the earth does cool and it warms.</p></blockquote>
<p>Listen here:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="60"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iQ3cYN2dXSU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iQ3cYN2dXSU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="60"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Palin, of course, lives in the state that is at the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/2006-05-29-alaska-globalwarming_x.htm">epicenter of man-made global warming</a>. Global warming has caused Alaska&#8217;s average temperature to <a href="http://alaska.fws.gov/climate/inak.htm">rise by 3.4&deg;F</a>, causing once-frozen land to collapse, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE57603W20090807">glaciers to disappear</a>, <a href="http://community.adn.com/adn/node/126614">outbreaks</a> of <a href='http://www.cgc.uaf.edu/newsletter/gg6_1/beetles.html'>beetles</a> and <a href="http://www.uaf.edu/accap/wild_fires.html">wildfires</a> to spread, and forcing Todd Palin&#8217;s <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/09/01/global-boiling-palin/">Iron Dog race</a> to move hundreds of miles north. And yes, the <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/11/16/superfreaks-charlie-rose/">science is clear</a> that it&#8217;s because of all the fossil fuels Palin loves to &#8220;<a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/10/30/palin-would-tap-that/">tap into</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-global-warming-limbaugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>165</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin On Muslims In The Military After Fort Hood: &#8216;I Say, Profile Away&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-profile-away/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-profile-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Corley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Right-Wing Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radical Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=69959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the tragic shooting at Fort Hood by Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who reports now indicate had some contact with a radical Islamic cleric, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey expressed concern over &#8220;a backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers.” Predictably, some conservatives have called for a crackdown on the American Muslim community, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the tragic shooting at Fort Hood by Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who reports now indicate had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/us/15hasan.html">some contact with a radical Islamic cleric</a>, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey expressed concern over &#8220;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/08/casey-muslim-backlash/">a backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers</a>.” Predictably, some conservatives have <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/10/robertson-muslim-fascist/">called for a crackdown</a> on the American Muslim community, including those <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/06/fox-muslim-screenings/">serving in the military</a>. Now, in an interview with her <a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/11/oh_sarah_we_hardly_had_the_time_to_rethink_you_1.php">hagiographer</a>, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has called for <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/11/palin_on_nidal_hasan_profile_a_1.asp">increased profiling of Muslims in the military</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>She commented on the trail of evidence linking the alleged Ft. Hood shooter, Maj. Nidal Hasan, to militant Islam. &#8220;There were such clear, obvious, massive warning signs that were missed,&#8221; she said. &#8220;This terrorist, even having business cards&#8221; that identified him as an &#8220;SoA&#8221; or soldier of Allah. <strong>Palin blamed a culture of political correctness and other decisions that &#8220;prevented &#8212; I&#8217;m going to say it &#8212; profiling&#8221; of someone with Hasan&#8217;s extremist ideology. &#8220;I say, profile away,&#8221; Palin said. Such political correctness, she continued, &#8220;could be our downfall.&#8221;</strong> If the upcoming investigations into the attack reveal bad decision-making on the part of senior officials, Palin continued, those officials ought to be fired.</p></blockquote>
<p>In an interview with Fox News&#8217; Sean Hannity, which is set to air in full tonight, Palin predicted the backlash that would come from her embrace of profiling. &#8220;Because I use the word profile, I&#8217;m going to get clobbered tomorrow morning,&#8221; said Palin. &#8220;The liberals, their heads are just going to be spinning, they&#8217;re going to say, &#8217;she is radical, she is extreme.&#8217;&#8221; Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mhEi3ON_fZw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mhEi3ON_fZw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>&#8220;I say profiling in the context of doing whatever we can to save innocent American lives, I&#8217;m all for it then,&#8221; concluded Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/18/palin-profile-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>381</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dobbs: Sarah Palin Has &#8216;Left A Lot To Be Desired&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/17/dobbs-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/17/dobbs-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Right-Wing Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=69672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview on NBC&#8217;s Today Show this morning, host Matt Lauer sought former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs&#8217; opinion of Sarah Palin and her presidential prospects. Dobbs &#8212; whose rumored next step is said to be a run for political office &#8212; provided a critical assessment of Palin as a potential presidential candidate. Dobbs stated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an interview on NBC&#8217;s Today Show this morning, host Matt Lauer sought former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs&#8217; opinion of Sarah Palin and her presidential prospects. Dobbs &#8212; whose <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/dobbs-menendez-match-in-nj/">rumored next step</a> is said to be a run for political office &#8212; provided a critical assessment of Palin as a potential presidential candidate. Dobbs stated that Palin is certainly &#8220;staking out her territory,&#8221; but he refused to endorse her:</p>
<blockquote><p>LAUER: Is she [Palin] staking out an early claim for the Republican nomination in 2012?</p>
<p>DOBBS: Well she&#8217;s certainly the front-runner in terms of her popularity in the Republican party and therefore, de facto, it seems to me Matt she&#8217;s staking out her territory. </p>
<p>LAUER: Is she someone if the election were held today Lou, would you consider voting for her?</p>
<p>DOBBS: <strong>Would I consider voting her?  Frankly based on what I have seen, personally no.</strong> &#8230; I think the woman had a brilliant address at the Republican convention last year. <strong>I think uh, since then, she&#8217;s left a lot to be &#8212; uh, I&#8217;ll put it this way &#8212; desired as a person who&#8217;s seeking votes.</strong>  </p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/INXEQPvkH5s&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/INXEQPvkH5s&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Ironically, Daily Show host Jon Stewart <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/13/jon-stewart-discusses-lou_n_357019.html">joked</a> last week that Dobbs is &#8220;going Palin, going rogue&#8221; by abruptly leaving his job at CNN to supposedly &#8220;engage in constructive problem solving.&#8221;  </p>
<p>In an interview with Fox News&#8217; Bill O&#8217;Reilly last night, Dobbs indicated that his <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/2009/11/17/2009-11-17_lou_dobbs_my_downfall_at_cnn_started_when_barack_obama_became_president.html">downfall at CNN curiously started</a> when Barack Obama became president. Dobbs <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/16/lou-dobbs-tells-oreilly-i_n_359876.html">confirmed</a> that he will remain an active figure in the public arena. O&#8217;Reilly in turn invited Dobbs to make &#8220;<a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/bill_oreilly_offers_lou_dobbs_a_semiregular_contributor_role_143357.asp">semi-regular</a>&#8221; appearances as a contributor on The Factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/17/dobbs-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin Lies To Oprah</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/17/palin-lies-oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/17/palin-lies-oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Corley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incompetent  Establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=69645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the afternoon of Oct. 2, 2008 &#8212; the day of the vice presidential debate last year &#8212; Politico&#8217;s Jonathan Martin broke the news that Sen. John McCain&#8217;s (R-AZ) presidential campaign was &#8220;pulling out of Michigan.&#8221; The next day, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin told Fox News&#8217; Carl Cameron that she disagreed with the decision. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the afternoon of Oct. 2, 2008 &#8212; the day of the vice presidential debate last year &#8212; Politico&#8217;s Jonathan Martin broke the news that Sen. John McCain&#8217;s (R-AZ) presidential campaign was &#8220;<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/1008/McCain_pulling_out_of_Michigan.html">pulling out of Michigan</a>.&#8221; The next day, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin told Fox News&#8217; Carl Cameron that she disagreed with the decision. &#8220;I fired a quick e-mail and said, oh, come on. Do we have to call it there?&#8221; said Palin. &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/sarah_palin_reads_the_new_york.html">I want to get back to Michigan and I want to try</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>But in her interview with Oprah Winfrey, which aired yesterday, Palin claimed that she only &#8220;went rogue&#8221; on the Michigan message because she &#8220;didn&#8217;t know we pulled out of Michigan&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>WINFREY: Didn&#8217;t several times they say to you when actually you mentioned, when you were talking about pulling out of Michigan and you said I wished we&#8217;d stayed in Michigan. Weren&#8217;t you told then, Sarah just stay on script?</p>
<p>PALIN: Right, told after wards and that, that was always puzzling to me because if I were to respond to a reporter&#8217;s questions very candidly, honestly, for instance, they say, &#8220;what do you think about the campaign pulling out of Michigan&#8221; and I think, &#8220;darn I wish we weren&#8217;t. Every vote matters, I can&#8217;t wait to get back to Michigan&#8221; and then told afterwards that, &#8220;oh, you screwed up. You went rogue on us Sarah, you&#8217;re not supposed to be.&#8221; <strong>And my reminder to the campaign was, I didn&#8217;t know we pulled out of Michigan. My entire VP team, we didn&#8217;t know that we had pulled out. I&#8217;m sorry, I apologize, but speaking candidly to a reporter.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PPSpMavc6mg&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PPSpMavc6mg&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Clearly, if Palin told Cameron that she had sent an e-mail to the McCain high command disagreeing with the move, she knew that the decision had been made. Additionally, in their reported book on Sarah Palin, former Fox News embed Shushannah Walshe and CBS News digital journalist Scott Conroy reveal that <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/02/politics/main5501457_page3.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody">Palin knew she had made a mistake in her interview with Cameron</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The e-mail that Palin sent was, in fact, essentially how she described it to Cameron. <strong>She wrote to her traveling staff and top McCain advisers, &#8220;If there&#8217;s any time, Todd and I would love a quick return to Michigan-we&#8217;d tour the plants, etc. . . . If it does McC any good. I know you have a plan, but I hate to see us leave Michigan.</strong> We&#8217;ll do whatever we had [sic] to do there to give it a 2nd effort.&#8221;</p>
<p>A senior aide replied, &#8220;Michigan is out of reach unless something drastic happens. We must win oh and hopefully pa.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Palin replied that she &#8220;got it,&#8221; but her subsequent interview with Cameron had shown that she hadn&#8217;t. She acknowledged as much in a post-interview e-mail to senior staff, writing, &#8220;Oops-I mentioned something about that to Carl Cameron and it&#8217;s now recorded that I&#8217;d love to give Michigan the ol&#8217; college try.&#8221;</strong> Later in the day, she tried once more. &#8220;It&#8217;s a cheap 4hr drive from WI. I&#8217;ll pay for the gas,&#8221; she wrote.</p></blockquote>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first claim that Palin has made in her book and during her promotional tour that has been contradicted by campaign e-mails. In her book, Palin wrote that &#8220;from the beginning&#8221; she liked the idea of appearing on Saturday Night Live. But in an e-mail thread from the campaign that was provided to the Huffington Post, Palin said she was &#8220;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/14/mccain-campaign-emails-co_n_358124.html">not thrilled</a>&#8221; about the idea of going on the show because &#8220;these folks are whack.&#8221;</p>
<p>In an interview  with Walshe and Conroy, The Atlantic&#8217;s Marc Ambinder noted that their book chronicles &#8220;fairly persuasively, <a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/11/sarah_from_alaska_the_truth_and_2012.php">a large number of what seem to be fairly egregious distortions</a>&#8221; by Palin.  &#8220;Sarah Palin is quick to cast aside people who cross her in even minor ways, and her unwillingness to tolerate much dissent often leads to an infallibility syndrome,&#8221; replied the authors, who later added that she has a &#8220;tendency to wildly exaggerate the truth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/17/palin-lies-oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>426</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin Rejects GOP Senate Candidate Mark Kirk&#8217;s Plea For An Endorsement</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/16/kirk-palin-snub/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/16/kirk-palin-snub/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Fang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=69467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month, the Washington Post reported that Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL), a candidate for Senate in 2010, wrote a memo to Sarah Palin requesting that she endorse him during her visit to Chicago for the Oprah Winfrey Show. The Post noted that &#8220;Palin&#8217;s endorsement [of Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman] helped force state Assemblywoman [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, the Washington Post <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/eye-on-2012/il-sen-kirk-seeks-palin-endors.html">reported</a> that Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL), a candidate for Senate in 2010, wrote a memo to Sarah Palin requesting that she endorse him during her visit to Chicago for the Oprah Winfrey Show. The Post noted that &#8220;Palin&#8217;s endorsement [of Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman] helped force state Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava (R) from the race&#8221; in the NY-23 special election, and that Kirk&#8217;s memo is &#8220;<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/eye-on-2012/il-sen-kirk-seeks-palin-endors.html">tangible evidence</a> of the power of Palin&#8217;s endorsement in a Republican primary.&#8221; </p>
<p>The memo is also tangible evidence of Kirk&#8217;s willingness to dramatically switch positions in order to gain political power. Last year, Kirk panned Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) selection of Palin as his running mate, telling the Chicago Tribune, &#8220;I would have picked <a href="http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/oct/01/local/chi-10th-district-race-01oct01">someone different</a>.&#8221; Asked about Palin&#8217;s qualifications for office, Kirk said, &#8220;Quite frankly, <a href="http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/oct/01/local/chi-10th-district-race-01oct01">I don&#8217;t know</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, it appears that Palin has rejected Kirk&#8217;s request for an endorsement. Recently, Kirk <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/06/kirk-palin-beck/">told ThinkProgress</a> that he had been expecting her endorsement once she visited Chicago: </p>
<blockquote><p>TP: How about Sarah Palin? How close are you to getting her endorsement?</p>
<p>KIRK: <strong>We sent a memo detailing the race, and she&#8217;ll be coming in to Chicago shortly.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OnRtHZtDktw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OnRtHZtDktw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>However, Palin visited Chicago <a href="http://www.kwch.com/Global/story.asp?S=11510148">last week</a> to tape an interview with Winfrey and made no mention of Kirk. Indeed, the Wall Street Journal noted that Kirk was &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125798895092944509.html">unsuccessful</a>&#8221; in his bid for an endorsement, despite his detailed memo.</p>
<p>Facing a competitive challenge from businessman Patrick Hughes in the Republican primary, Kirk is attempting to veer to the right. After voting <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll477.xml">in favor</a> of cap-and-trade clean energy legislation during the summer, Kirk quickly changed his mind and told tea party activists that he would <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/mark-kirk-i-voted-for-cap-and-trade-in-the-house-would-vote-no-in-the-senate-and-crowd-cheers.php">vote against</a> the same bill in the Senate. Speaking to another assembly of conservative supporters in April, Kirk suggested that people <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/04/16/kirk-shoot-taxes/">should shoot</a> Gov. Pat Quinn (D-IL) for raising taxes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/16/kirk-palin-snub/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>127</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: In her memoir, Palin says she doesn&#8217;t believe in evolution.</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/15/palin-book-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/15/palin-book-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Corley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radical Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=69364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has been cagey about her views on creationism and evolution, saying that she believes &#8220;we have a creator&#8221; but she didn&#8217;t want &#8220;to pretend I know how all this came to be.&#8221; But in her new memoir, Going Rogue, Palin apparently writes that she doesn&#8217;t believe in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has been cagey about her views on creationism and evolution, saying that she believes &#8220;we have a creator&#8221; but she didn&#8217;t want &#8220;to <a href="http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/background/v-printer/story/217111.html">pretend I know how all this came to be</a>.&#8221; But in her new memoir, Going Rogue, Palin apparently writes that she doesn&#8217;t believe in evolution. New York Times reviewer Michiko Kakutani <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/books/15book.html?pagewanted=2&#038;ref=books">writes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Elsewhere in this volume, she talks about creationism, saying she “didn’t believe in the theory that human beings — thinking, loving beings — originated from fish that sprouted legs and crawled out of the sea” or from “monkeys who eventually swung down from the trees.”</strong> In everything that happens to her, from meeting Todd to her selection by Mr. McCain for the Republican ticket, she sees the hand of God: “My life is in His hands. I encourage readers to do what I did many years ago, invite Him in to take over.”</p></blockquote>
<p>While running for governor in 2006, Palin said that she was &#8220;<a href="http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/background/v-printer/story/217111.html">a proponent of teaching both</a>&#8221; evolution and creationism in Alaska&#8217;s schools. &#8221; In September 2008, she told Fox News&#8217; Sean Hannity that because she grew up &#8220;in a school teacher&#8217;s house with a science teacher as a dad,&#8221; she has &#8220;great respect for science being taught in our science classes and <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/02/lincoln_obama_darwin_sarah_pal.html">evolution to be taught in our science classes</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/15/palin-book-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>477</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
