ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Rachel Maddow

LGBT

Hate Group Leader Owes Rachel Maddow $24,625.23

Minnesota hate group leader Bradlee Dean sued Rachel Maddow last year after Maddow quoted Dean verbatim seeming to express support for countries that execute gay people. Maddow successfully called for the silly complaint to be dismissed, and a judge agreed, ordering Dean to also cover Maddow’s legal fees. He requested a stay on that punishment, and yesterday it was denied. He now must pay Maddow $24,625.23 before November 13 or he could be held in contempt of court.

Here again is Maddow’s original report about Dean’s rhetoric:

Health

After GOP Gov. Nikki Haley Vetoes HPV Vaccine Bill, MSNBC Host Says It’s A ‘Scandal’ For Republican To Oppose Cancer

Last week, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) — who made headlines when she claimed that “women don’t care about contraception” — vetoed a bill that would have allowed free HPV vaccinations for girls. The bill passed overwhelmingly with bipartisan support, but Haley blocked it, despite sponsoring a bill to mandate HPV vaccinations for seventh grade girls as a state senator. After her veto, Haley said that her 2007 sponsorship was a “mistake.”

Following Haley’s opposition to the HPV vaccine bill, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow said on her show that “being against cancer in the Republican Party is a scandal now”:

This week, the aversion to preventing cervical cancer — the idea that trying to prevent it is a scandal — that idea seems to be spreading…It is 2012 now, and so Governor Haley vetoed that bill. Because being against cancer in the Republic Party is a scandal now. At least being against cervical cancer is a scandal now. What, because it is a lady cancer, maybe? There is a vaccine for preventing this kind of cancer.

Watch Maddow’s comments:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

The use of HPV vaccinations as a method to prevent cancer has scientific support. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “every year about 12,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer and 4,000 women die from this disease in the U.S.” By stopping the transmission of the disease, the HPV vaccine is a way of preventing cervical cancer.

Haley is not the only republican to backtrack from earlier support for the vaccine. In 2007, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) mandated the vaccine for young girls through an executive order. But when he was running for president, his GOP competitors blasted Perry for supporting the mandate. Perry eventually rescinded his position, and, like Haley, said that his support for the mandate was a mistake.

Nina Liss-Schultz

Politics

Top Republican Strategist Denies Women Are Paid Less Than Men

This morning, during a heated discussion with Rachel Maddow on Meet The Press, GOP consultant Alex Castellanos denied that women make 77 cents for a man’s dollar in the workplace and noted, “there are lots of reasons for that.” Maddow expressed shock at the assertion, but concluded that it explained why Republicans and Mitt Romney are so hesitant to embrace the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, a law that helps women hold accountable employers who discriminate in the pay practices based on gender.

“Now we know, at least from both of your perspectives,” Maddow said, pointing to Castellanos and Romney surrogate Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), “women are not fairing worse than men in the economy that women aren’t getting paid less for equal work.” “It’s about policy and whether or not you want to fix some of the structural discrimination that women really do face that Republicans don’t believe is happening,” she added. Castellanos responded to Maddow’s policy argument by remarking on her passion, to which the MSNBC host took offense:

CASTELLANOS: It is about policy and I love how passionate you are. I wish you were as right about what you’re saying as you are passionate about it. I really do.

MADDOW: That’s really condescending. This is a stylistic issue. My passion on this issue is actually me making a factual argument on it.

Watch it:

In an interview with ABC News’ Diane Sawyer earlier this month, Romney refused to say whether he would sign the Lilly Ledbetter Act, but claimed that he would not change it. Romney’s women surrogates — including McMorris Rodgers — all voted against the legislation. Castellanos himself consulted Romney during the 2008 presidential election.

LGBT

Maddow Demands Dismissal Of Bradlee Dean’s Anti-Gay Defamation Lawsuit

Last summer, Bradlee Dean of the You Can Run But You Cannot Hide Ministry — which was recently designated an anti-gay hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center — filed a $50 million lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, claiming she had distorted comments he made suggesting Muslims are more moral than Christians for supporting the execution of homosexuals. (It should be noted that though no suit was filed, Dean recently expressed similar legal concern about ThinkProgress’ reporting on the suit, as described in an update on that post.) Now, Maddow has sought a swift dismissal of the claim under anti-SLAPP protections, which ensure that frivolous suits do not stifle free speech with the threat of mounting legal fees. MSNBC’s court response outlines three reasons Dean’s suit should fail:

1. The broadcasts truthfully reported on Dean’s May 15th statements. Those broadcasts re-played original audio of Dean speaking on the May 15th radio show. Dean does not – and cannot – allege that he did not make those controversial statements. The fact that NBCUniversal broadcast the essence but not the entirety of what Dean said during that radio show, as he now protests, does not change this analysis. Dean bears sole responsibility for the consequences of his words, however much he may try to distance himself from the backlash.

2. The commentary or rebuke Maddow offered about Dean’s statements was classic opinion and rhetorical hyperbole, and thus, cannot be actionable as a matter of law. As Dean is entitled to his opinions, however objectionable, so too is Maddow entitled to hers.

3. The fair comment privilege protects Maddow’s commentary. The broadcasts featured Dean’s actual statements and clearly indicated the source of those statements. Viewers were free to make up their own minds as to whether they agreed with Maddow’s remarks.

The response goes on to explain that the judicial process does not permit Dean to use lawsuits as part of his mission to stop the “radical gay agenda.” Though Dean has backed away from the comments and explained he in no way endorses the execution of homosexuals, he has nevertheless repeatedly called for gay people to be persecuted and incarcerated because he believes they are somehow a threat to children. He may not wish to be known for supporting the execution of gays, but he doesn’t seem to have a problem with supporting their life imprisonment.

Update

ThinkProgress’ Alyssa Rosenberg also examines the sense of entitlement conservatives like Bradlee Dean have about their anti-gay rhetoric.

Alyssa

Bradlee Dean, Rachel Maddow and Conservative Entitlement

Last summer, Bradlee Dean, the drummer for rapcore band Junkyard Prophet and a virulently anti-gay advocate whose ministry is based in Rep. Michelle Bachmann district, sued MSNBC host Rachel Maddow for defaming him. Maddow and her lawyers contend that the charges constitute a strategic lawsuit against public participation, an attempt to quash her free speech rights, and filed a motion to have them dismissed. The lawsuit has been roundly and hilariously dismantled. But it’s worth taking a look at Maddow’s petition to dismiss the suit and revisiting Dean’s initial complaint for what it reveals about the conservative sense of entitlement in the public square.

When he initially filed the suit, Dean claimed that one of Maddow’s broadcasts had unfairly misconstrued his words, because “I once made reference to how even Muslims oppose homosexuality under Shariah law. I did not suggest that I condoned the methods that radical Muslims use to enforce Shariah law, but made this analogy to prod Christians to become more concerned about what was going on in our schools with the nation’s youth.” Maddow was commenting on a broadcast in which Dean said:

Muslims are calling for the execution for homosexuals in America, this was just released yesterday and it shows you that they themselves are upholding the laws that are even in the Bible, the Judeo Christian God. They seem to be more moral than even the American Christians do. Because these people are livid about enforcing their laws, they know homosexuality is an abomination.

Maddow’s contention is that it’s reasonable to read that his statement as expressing at least some approval of the murder of homosexuals. “The broadcast truthfully reported on Dean’s May 15 statements. Those broadcasts re-played original audio of Dean speaking on the May 15 radio show. Dean does not—and cannot—allege that he did not make those controversial statements,” her petition to dismiss the case argues. “The fact that NBCUniversal broadcast the essence but not the entirety of what Dean said during that radio show, as he now protests, does not change this analysis. Dean bears sole responsibility for the consequences of his words, however much he may try to distance himself from the backlash…As Dean is entitled to his opinions, however objectionable, so too is Maddow entitled to hers.”

That last sentence, in particular, highlights the difference between Dean’s worldview and the one I assume most of us share with Maddow. Dean thinks that he’s entitled to the most generous reading of his words, one that leaches the malice out of his language even when the collected weight of his statements would mitigate against such gentling. (Maddow, as she makes clear in the motion, made clear that Dean wasn’t advocating the actual murder of homosexuals.) And he thinks, because he believes he’s right, that Maddow isn’t entitled to her own opinions of him, much less a generous interpretation of her broadcasts. Dean said in his announcement of the lawsuit that, as he’d started his ministry, “In the course of doing high school assemblies, I was shocked to learn that there were those that were offended at my message to teach our nation’s youth that homosexuality is not a preferred lifestyle.”

There’s something totalitarian—and privileged—about that kind of thinking. Gay people like Rachel Maddow don’t particularly have the luxury of being unaware that there are people who think they’re unnatural and their lives are abominable and ought to be outlawed. And despite the rise of GLAAD, which uses societal pressure to try to marginalize anti-gay speech, there’s a difference between that kind of positioning and Dean’s attempts to “stop ‘the radical gay agenda,’…to use the judicial process in this fashion.” Dean and his fellow travelers want a legal regime that will protect them against the fact that their argument is doomed to failure. They’re not likely to get it.

Update

Dean’s ministry sent us a letter complaining, in part, that we did not fully excerpt the relevant quote. The letter is similar to one provided in an update here. We stand by our reporting

LGBT

Maddow Covers The Demise Of The Ex-Gay Movement

Robert Spitzer

Rachel Maddow traced the mainstreaming of the ex-gay movement on her MSNBC show last night — from its rise in 1973 in defiance of the American Psychiatric Association’s decision to declassify homosexuality as a mental illness, to the influential 2001 study by Robert Spitzer, who found that some gay people could change their sexual orientation. Spitzer’s findings bolstered the ex-gay movement, since he had led the charge to rewrite the definition of homosexuality in 1973, and helped advocates find acceptance in the heart of conservative anti-gay politics.

But last week, the 80-year-old scientist dealt a devastating blow to his loudest proponents. In an interview with The American Prospect, Spitzer retracted his own ex-gay study, noting that “The findings can be considered evidence for what those who have undergone ex-gay therapy say about it, but nothing more.” Watch Maddow explain the history of reparative therapy and her interview with Gabriel Arana, the reporter who broke the story:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Climate Progress

Inhofe On The 97% Of Scientists Who Agree Global Warming Is Real: ‘That Doesn’t Mean Anything’

Faced with global warming facts on the Rachel Maddow show last night, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) countered, “It’s not true.” Maddow asked him to react to the 97 percent of scientists who agree that global warming is real. Although Inhofe was eager to point to anecdotal evidence for his conspiracy theories, he simply replied:

That isn’t true Rachel. You say something over and over again and your audience, particularly your liberal audience, they want to believe it [...] This 97 percent, that doesn’t mean anything. I’ve named literally thousands of scientists on the floor.

As a prominent climate denier and Big Oil favorite, Inhofe’s ignored the scientific evidence throughout the interview. But he’s not known for relying on scientific research — recently, he quoted the Bible as proof.

One of his points was that environmentalists aren’t “winning” despite outspending the energy industry 2-1. But environmentalists are the ones vastly outspent by dirty energy, 8 to 1 in lobbying and contributions during the climate bill debate. Inhofe’s evidence was a discredited Climate Shift report where even the leading expert on the report withdrew his name.

During the interview, Inhofe denied Big Oil’s mere existence, saying “because we hear things about big oil but what you hear is not all that big of oil.” Inhofe said the $4 billion in tax breaks to oil doesn’t count as a subsidy, even though he admitted the industry is “actually doing really well right now.” The top five oil companies alone made $137 billion in profits, while spending $146 million lobbying Congress to maintain those same tax breaks.

As Maddow herself pointed out, Inhofe benefits from polluters doing well — he’s taken almost $500,000 from oil and gas, and unsurprisingly Koch Industries is his No. 1.

Watch part 1 and part 2 of the interview:
Read more

Climate Progress

Inhofe’s Stunning Admission To Maddow on Global Warming: ‘I Thought It Must Be True Until I Found Out What It Cost”

Senate’s top denier pushes myth enviros far outspent industry in climate fight

Did you see the big smack down last night between MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and Senator James Inhofe (R-OK)? The dean of disinformation mostly just repeated his well-worn falseshoods about global warming, which Maddow shot down.

But there was one remarkable admission from the former Chair of the Senate Environment Committee:

I was actually on your side of this issue when I was chairing that committee and I first heard about this. I thought it must be true until I found out what it cost.”

In short, learning about the (supposed) high cost of the solution is what turned him from a believer in climate science to a denier.

Yes, you always have to take what Inhofe says with a grain of (smelling) salt, but this admission confirms what many of us have been saying for years (see Krauthammer (6/08): ”The real reason conservatives don’t believe in climate science”). As the NY Times explained about a 2008 denial conference, “The one thing all the attendees seem to share is a deep dislike for mandatory restrictions on greenhouse gases.” If you can’t abide the cure, you’re much more likely to deny the disease.

The journalist Michael Kinsley famously said, “A gaffe is when a politician tells the truth.”

Watch it (4 minutes in):

[Apologies for that absurd ExxonMobil Keystone tar sands ad.]

It’s long been clear that it’s far more costly not to act (see Scientists find “net present value of climate change impacts” of $1240 TRILLION on current emissions path). And the International Energy Agency explained last year, ”Delaying action is a false economy: for every $1 of investment in cleaner technology that is avoided in the power sector before 2020, an additional $4.30 would need to be spent after 2020 to compensate for the increased emissions.”

Ironically, the kind of denial and delay Inhofe is promoting guarantees much bigger and more intrusive government in the coming decades, for two reasons:

Read more

LGBT

Fox Pundit Tells CPAC Crowd That Rachel Maddow Is ‘The Best Argument In Favor Of Her Parents Using Contraception’

In the “closed circuit world on the right,” MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow is often the subject of ugly denigrations. Whether it’s being mocked for her sexual orientation, her name, or even her education, right-wingers can’t get enough of slamming her.

During a political discussion at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) today, Fox News pundit and conservative columnist Cal Thomas continued the ugliness. After the Heritage’s Genevieve Wood played a quote of Maddow eloquently debunking the conservative argument on contraception, Thomas said:

I’m glad that you played the Rachel Maddow clip because I think she is the best argument in favor of her parents using contraception. I would be all for that. And all of the rest of the crowd at MSNBC, too, for that matter.

No one on the panel condemned the comment. Watch it:

Update

Politico reports Maddow’s response:

A few hours later, Maddow responded to Thomas’s remarks on her show.

“Mr. Fox News person speaking there — I’m sorry that you feel that way about me, that you wish I had never been born,” she said. “Personally, I’m glad that you were born. Otherwise, how would Republicans get the special Fox News bat signal that it’s time to be outraged now about what used to be Republicans’ own policy idea?”

When Maddow introduced her next guest, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), the Democratic congresswoman greeted the MSNBC host with, “Thank you, and I’m awfully glad you were born, Rachel.”

Maddow responded, “Thank you. I sort of feel that should become a generic greeting in America now: ‘Nice to see you, I’m glad you were born.’”

NEWS FLASH

Rachel Maddow Is ‘Flattered’ By NRCC’s Keystone XL Parody Of Her | On her show last night, Rachel Maddow mocked the National Republican Campaign Committee’s attempt to use her to promote the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. In an online ad, the NRCC parodied a Maddow spot praising the public Hoover Dam with the argument that the private foreign pipeline was equivalent. “I am very flattered that I have been chosen for the rare and special honor of being the new face of the National Republican Campaign Committee,” Maddow said. “You guys nailed me. You got me exactly right!”

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up