ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Raul Labrador

Immigration

How The GOP Would Make Undocumented Immigrants America’s Next Permanent Underclass

Conservatives in the House of Representatives are rejecting the growing bipartisan consensus for permitting undocumented immigrants to earn citizenship. Instead, one prominent negotiatior, Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-ID), suggested a legal status “compromise” that would keep 11 million immigrants in a probationary grey area for an indefinite period of time, unable to participate in the full rights of citizenship. As the Washington Post warned, this so-called compromise would establish “a permanent underclass of workers.”

Creating a second class of Americans is not only unsustainable, but also damages the so-called American dream of equality and justice for all — a point proven each time the US has used the law to exclude a group in its history.

Slavery and Reconstruction


After the founding of the nation, lawmakers stipulated that citizenship excluded free and enslaved Africans, who comprised roughly 20 percent of the entire American population in 1776. The Supreme Court reaffirmed in the infamous Dred Scott decision that slaves could not claim citizenship, as they were considered property by the law. After the abolition of slavery, the law’s silence left African Americans in a legal limbo that denied them the right to vote and set the foundation for widespread segregation and economic exploitation. Even after the 14th and 15th Amendments nominally granted them full citizenship rights, state laws instituting poll taxes and literacy tests, as well as segregation and anti-miscegenation laws, immobilized African Americans in a second class of citizenship.

The Mexican-American War


The Mexican-American War ended in 1848 with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, in which Mexico ceded the land that is now the American Southwest. In return, all Mexicans living on that land were to be granted full US citizenship. However, Congress and the Supreme Court denied American citizenship to Pueblo Indians and black Mexicans, though both groups had previously enjoyed Mexican citizenship. Pueblo Indians’ right to vote was revoked until 1924. Black Mexicans in Texas were given the choice to either stay in Texas and become slaves or be deported back to Mexico, where slavery was outlawed. Meanwhile, the courts chipped away at the property protections entitled to Mexican landowners as US citizens. Many new Mexican Americans lost their family land to white American settlers, throwing them into poverty for generations. Of course, Pueblos and black Mexicans’ property rights were immediately nullified.

The Chinese Exclusion Act


After initially encouraging Chinese migrant workers to come to the US and work on the Transcontinental Railroad, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 to halt all immigration from China. At that point, large communities of Chinese immigrants, mainly in California, were permanently excluded from US citizenship. The law also threw families in limbo, as Chinese men could neither bring their families to the US nor leave the country, as they would be barred from re-entry to the US. Amendments to the law extended the law blocking entry to all Asians regardless of their country of origin — even those born in the US. American-born Chinese who traveled abroad were blocked from returning to their homes in the US. These restrictions pulled families apart and ensured that Chinese American communities already established would stagnate for four decades.

Japanese Internment


Japanese Americans were singled out as enemies during World War II and ordered to relocate to internment camps for the duration of the war. Japanese immigrants were already blocked from becoming full citizens, as naturalization laws banned citizenship for non-white people. American citizens of Japanese descent, however, were not spared from the internment camps, where they endured abysmal, overcrowded conditions for 3 years. When they returned, most found their homes looted or sold and their jobs long gone.
Read more

Economy

Key GOP Congressman’s Immigration Idea Would Create Permanent Underclass Of Workers

Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-ID), a key player in the ongoing House negotiations to advance comprehensive immigration reform, has come out against providing a pathway to citizenship for the nation’s 11 million undocumented immigrants, echoing a growing consensus among conservative members. The position is in stark contrast to the framework put forward by a bipartisan group of Senators and President Obama — which would allow the unauthorized to earn citizenship.

“The people that came here illegally knowingly – I don’t think they should have a path to citizenship,” Labrador said during an interview with NPR on Thursday morning. “If you knowingly violated our law, you violated our sovereignty, I think we should normalize your status but we should not give you a pathway to citizenship.”

During Tuesday’s hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, multiple House Republicans panned citizenship as “extreme” and advanced a so-called “compromise” between inaction and permanent legalization: providing individuals and families who entered the country unlawfully with visas that allow them to live and work in the country but bar them from attaining citizenship. “I think we should treat them with dignity, but we should also be fair to millions of people that are waiting in line, that are trying to do it the right way,” Labrador added.

Comprehensive immigration reform, however, can respect the immigrants who are currently awaiting their green cards while also advancing policies that are in the best economic and social interests of the nation as a whole.

First, the bipartisan immigration principles put forward by the Senate and President Obama envision a long path to citizenship that would require immigrants to learn English, pay taxes, and undergo numerous background checks. As Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) explains, immigrants who register with the government and receive probationary status “will not be allowed to apply for a green card for a substantial period of time,” waiting “in line behind everyone who has applied before them.”

They would truly have to earn the status and once they did, the economic benefits of naturalization for the nation will be far more substantial than any work visa Labrador will propose. A naturalized immigrant will earn “between 5.6 percent and 7.2 percent more within two years of becoming a citizen,” boosting consumer spending and overall economic growth. Researchers “found that even if only half of those eligible to become citizens do so, it would add $21 billion to $45 billion to the U.S. economy over 10 years.”
Read more

Justice

Republican Congressman Claims Obama Has Not ‘Lifted A Finger’ To Support Immigration Reform

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT)

President Obama has made it clear that comprehensive immigration reform — including a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. — is a priority for his administration. And despite suggestions from Republicans like Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) that Congress needs to consider several smaller bills instead of one large piece of legislation, the president is not backing down from his push for a holistic approach.

But a few House Republicans say they’re unconvinced that Obama is serious about tackling immigration reform this year. GOP Reps. Raul Labrador (ID) and Jason Chaffetz (UT) both doubted that the president is “acting in good faith” on the issue during a Politico Live panel about immigration reform with Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA):

LABRADOR: I’m working with Zoe. I’m working with [Democratic Congressman] Luis Gutierrez. I’m working with other Democrats in the House, and I believe they’re working in good faith, that they really want to get something done. But I’m not sure yet that that’s what the president wants to get done.

MODERATOR: I want to turn it back to you, Congressman Chaffetz. Do you believe that the White House is acting in good faith on the immigration debate so far?

CHAFFETZ: I don’t see them as any help in any way, shape, or form. [...] I’m left wondering where in the world is the presidential leadership. I don’t see it, and there’s nothing in the evidence that would suggest the president has actually done or lifted a finger to help make this thing happen.

Watch the exchange here:

“A speech is not a bill,” Labrador added, saying that he is still waiting on the president’s immigration bill.

But following the November election, in which Latino voters overwhelmingly voted for Obama, the president set January as the point when his administration will start “an all-out drive for comprehensive immigration reform.” Even before Congress begins debating what should be included in the overhaul of the immigration system, Obama announced a deferred action policy last summer to grant qualified young undocumented immigrants temporary legal status. His administration issued a new rule earlier this month to ease the family reunification process for up to 1 million undocumented immigrants by allowing immigrants who can prove that time away from a parent, spouse or child will cause “extreme hardship” to return to the United States while they apply for legal status. And the Department of Homeland Security announced it would no longer issue a “detainer” request to local police to hold someone identified as potentially undocumented unless that person has been charged with a serious crime or convicted of multiple misdemeanors, limiting who would be detained under federal law.

These are important steps the Obama administration has taken that help keep immigrant families together, but there is much more to be done. Instead of blaming the president for not doing enough, Congress also needs to step up and pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill to fix the laws on the books.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up