ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Richard Lugar

Election

Former Republican Senator Warned Conservatives Challenging Lugar Would Mean GOP ‘Beyond Redemption’

Dick Lugar and Ronald Reagan

Two years ago, former Missouri Republican Senator John Danforth, who also served as George W. Bush’s ambassador the U.N., told the New York Times that he worried about his party’s swerve to the hard-right.

Specifically, he said, “If Dick Lugar, having served five terms in the U.S. Senate and being the most respected person in the Senate and the leading authority on foreign policy, is seriously challenged by anybody in the Republican Party, we have gone so far overboard that we are beyond redemption.”

That day, it seems, has come. Today, as early voting begins in Indiana’s GOP Senate primary, two mainstream conservative organizations are opening fire on Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN) and backing his opponent, State Treasurer Richard Mourdock (R).

The Wall Street-backed Club for Growth Action is airing a 30-second TV ad and two 60-second radio ads tomorrow going after Lugar for being too willing to compromise with Democrats. “Dick Lugar might be a statesman, but he’s not a conservative,” one ad warns. “Indiana conservaties deserve better than Obama’s favorite Republican.”

Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association (NRA) is opening up on Lugar with a six-figure buy of TV, radio, and online ads, along with a direct mail campaign.

Mourdock has already been endorsed by a host of prominent conservative groups.

A new poll shows Lugar is still clinging to lead over Mourdock, but barely. The incumbent leads 42 percent to 35 percent, with pollster Christine Matthews warning the result should “be of significant concern.”

The fact that the man who literally wrote the book on the beneficence of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and helped foment support for Bill Clinton’s impeachment, is warning that his party has drifted too far to the right should give pause to Indiana Republican voters.

Climate Progress

Senators Take Emergency Oil Reserve Hostage to Force Keystone Approval

In a desperate attempt to force Keystone XL, three Senators are threatening access to a vital economic and national security safeguard, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve

by Daniel J. Weiss

Republican Congressional leaders have failed to force President Obama to approve the Keystone XL pipeline. But that’s not stopping them from trying over and over again, taking hostages in the process.

First they used the payroll tax cut extension as a vehicle to force a decision on the pipeline in sixty days, even before the final route was identified. President Obama was forced to disapprove the permit because there was no time to assess its potential pollution.

This week, several senators took a different hostage: our emergency oil supply.  On February 13, Senators David Vitter (R-LA), John Hoevan (R-ND), and Richard Lugar (R-IN) introduced the Strategic Petroleum Supplies Act, S. 2100 that would prevent President Obama from selling oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve unless Keystone is approved:

“the Administration shall not authorize a sale of petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve… until the date on which all permits necessary … for the Keystone XL pipeline project application filed on September 19, 2008 (including amendments) have been issued.”

In other words, unless the president approves Keystone, he cannot sell our emergency oil — even if Iran causes an oil supply disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, a hurricane or other disaster disables oil production or refining facilities, or any other type of event causes gasoline prices to soar above $4 per gallon.  If any of these events happen, middle class Americans would pay significantly higher gasoline pump prices, giving billions of dollars more to big oil companies that made record profits last year.

Read more

Economy

Indiana Senate Candidate: Obama Deserves All Blame For Bad Economy, No Credit For Its Improvement

WASHINGTON, DC — Since President Obama took office in January 2009, Republicans have been quick to heap blame on him for every bit of poor economic news, no matter how large or small. In recent months, however, with jobs numbers improving and signs that the economy is rebounding becoming more evident, the same Republicans haven’t been as quick to praise the president.

Richard Mourdock, the insurgent Republican Senate candidate in Indiana who is locking in a primay contest against Sen. Richard Lugar (R), took a similar tack this week at the Conservative Political Action Conference, telling ThinkProgress that while Obama’s policies were responsible for making the economy worse early in his term, the recent improvement has occurred in spite of Obama’s policies:

KEYES: If the economy does continue to improve over the next few months, is that something you’d be willing to give President Obama credit for, or not?

MOURDOCK: The American economy is incredibly resilient because Americans are incredibly resilient. It won’t be because of President Obama when we see recovery, it will be in spite of President Obama. He wants to add more and more layers of government, more and more government sector unions. Those are killing our economy. And while it’s possible we might see some recovery, it would be doing a whole lot more if we were rolling back the size of government.

Watch it:

The Mourdock stance is common in the GOP — presidential candidate Mitt Romney took a similar view following the January jobs report, as did House Speaker John Boehner.

The facts, however, tell a different story. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, despite Republican claims, has been a success, and since its implementation, the economy has added jobs for 23 consecutive months. The auto bailout, another favorite Republican target, has also worked, saving thousands of jobs and returning American automakers to profitability for the first time in a decade.

If anything, the economy is improving in spite of the best efforts of the Republicans Mourdock is trying to join in Congress. Republicans have targeted positive economic programs that benefit the less fortunate — like food stamps and unemployment insurance — for spending cuts, all while blocking other Obama proposals — like the American Jobs Act — that experts say would have had a positive effect on the nation’s economic recovery.

Politics

GOP Senator Says Tea Party Influence ‘Killed Off’ Republican Chances For Senate Majority

Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN)

After Republicans reclaimed their majority status in the House in the 2010 election, many pundits predicted the party would have an easy time capturing the Senate in 2012. There are, after all, only 10 GOP senators up for reelection, compared to 23 Democrats. And Republicans seemed to be successfully riding a wave of anti-government sentiment to victory against an embattled president.

But as one political showdown after another has illustrated just how beholden congressional Republicans are to extreme right-wing interests, their prospects for retaking both chambers have grown dimmer.

Republican Sen. Dick Lugar (IN) recently reinforced that sentiment in an interview with CNN, explaining that the Tea Pary’s insidious influence has pushed out moderate elements of the party:

LUGAR: Republicans lost the seats for Nevada, and New Jersey, for example, and Colorado. There were people who claimed that they wanted somebody who was more of their Tea Party aspect. But in doing so they killed off the Republican chances for a majority. This is one of the reasons we have a minority in the Senate right now.

Watch it, courtesy of Mediaite:

Lugar is facing his own Tea Party primary challenger. If Republicans lose his seat, their chances of winning a Senate majority become even shakier.

NEWS FLASH

Sen. Lugar Says Country Can’t ‘Afford’ Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy Views | On CNN this morning, Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN) — one of the Republican Party’s leading thinkers on foreign policy issues — rejected GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul’s calls for less U.S. intervention around the world as “uncalled for.” “It’s not a message which, really, a president of the United States could ever afford to extend,” Lugar said. Taking the opposite view of Paul’s isolationism, Lugar argued, “We’re the only country that can afford to go everywhere all over the world.” Watch it:

Security

Lugar: It’s ‘Difficult To Conclude’ That War In Afghanistan Is A ‘Rational Allocation’ Of U.S. Resources

Yesterday during an interview with ThinkProgress, Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) predicted that calls for withdrawing U.S. forces from Afghanistan will increase in the wake of Osama bin Laden’s death. “I think that takes a lot of the pressure away — a lot of the punch away from the argument that ‘oh, it will look like we walked away,’” he said.

And it appears that sentiment is spreading across the aisle. Today at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Afghanistan, Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN) — who has been a growing skeptic of the war in Afghanistan — offered four observations of the war there and based on those observations, concluded that the U.S. presence in Afghanistan doesn’t appear to be “rational”:

LUGAR: First, we are spending enormous resources in a single country. … Second, although threats to the United States national security do emanate from within Afghanistan’s borders, these may not be the most serious threats in the region and Afghanistan may not be the most likely source of a major terrorist attack. … [W]e should know by now that such grand nation-building ambitions in Afghanistan are beyond our powers. … Fourth, although alliance help in Afghanistan is significant and appreciated, the heaviest burden will continue to fall on the United States. [...]

If one accepts these four observations, it’s exceedingly difficult to conclude that our vast expenditures in Afghanistan represent a rational allocation of our military and financial assets.

Even Afghan President Hamid Karzai threw a wrench into one of the original justifications for the U.S. military to be in Afganistan. “Osama was not in Afghanistan: they found him in Pakistan,” Mr. Karzai said. “The war on terror is not in Afghan villages…but in the safe havens of terrorism outside Afghanistan.” And while opposition leader Abdullah Abdullah said that NATO forces should stay in Afghanistan, he agreed with Karzai’s sentiment. “Killing of Osama bin Laden is pleasant news for Afghans, and now it’s proven that al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations are not based in Afghanistan and Pakistan is a haven for them,” he said.

The United States has spent more than $400 billion fighting the war in Afghanistan and more than 1,500 U.S. troops have died. And while the top U.S. commander there Gen. David Petraeus said recently that NATO forces have made gains, stories about Afghan security forces killing Americans and hundreds of insurgents escaping prison through a tunnel dug by the Taliban are not encouraging. (HT: George Zornick)

Update

The National Journal has a run-down of lawmakers expressing their desire to wind down the war in Afghanistan.

Politics

Hatch Panders To Tea Party While Lugar Refuses To ‘Kowtow’ To Them

Sens. Richard Lugar (R-IN) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) are similar in many ways — they are the two most senior Republicans in the Senate, both are well-liked by colleagues of both parties, and both have shown a willingness to work across the aisle, much to the chagrin of conservative purists. Because of their relative moderation, both are also sure to face tea party-driven primary challenges in 2012, yet their reactions to this threat could not be more different.

Hatch, acutely aware of the fate that befell former Utah GOP senator Bob Bennett (he lost his seat to a tea party challenger last year), has jumped head first into the tea party movement in recent weeks in an attempt to pass himself off as one of their own. He even appears to have invited himself to a Tea Party Express town hall last night in Washington featuring right-wing favorites like Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN). At the event, which ThinkProgress attended, Hatch took every opportunity possible to pander to the tea party:

– “I’ve been watching what the Tea Party does. I’m very impressed,” Hatch said.

– “I’m often accused of having been a tea partier before there even was such as term, and I’m okay with that.”

– “It’s time for America to take back America and the Tea Party will play a role in that.”

Lugar, on the other hand, has stood firm by his record and values, defending the need for bipartisanship and making it clear that he won’t be pushed around by the tea party or “kowtow” to their special interests:

Lugar refuses to “kowtow” to the tea party: “A lot of conservatives believe you have to kowtow to the Tea Party. We reject that premise,” Lugar spokesperson Mark Helmke told the New York Times last week.

Lugar told the tea party to “get real”: “I’ve got to say ‘Get real’ [when] I hear Tea Party or other people talking about they were against START,” Lugar told a local TV station.

Lugar said the tea party has few real ideas: “In essence, they are unhappy about life in America and they want to express themselves,” Lugar said. But while they say “we want this or that stopped,” their demands are empty “cliché,” and “they are not able to articulate all the specifics,” Lugar told US News.

At the tea party event last night, ThinkProgress asked Hatch about Lugar’s remark that the tea party needs to “get real.” Hatch, at first skeptical that Lugar would dare say such a thing, replied, “I would never say that. I think they are real.” Watch it:

Hatch’s newfound love of the tea party is especially interesting considering that just one year ago, Hatch sound a lot like Lugar does now. In February of 2010, Hatch blamed the tea party for the loss of Republican lawmaker, saying, “If we fractionalize the Republican Party, we are going to see more liberals elected.” And asked to explain Bennett’s loss in May, Hatch suggested that tea party activists “don’t have an open mind and they won’t listen.”

Politics

GOP Sen. Dick Lugar Chides Tea Party Movement For Offering Only ‘Cliché’ And No ‘Specifics’

Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN) has been one of the few GOP lawmakers willing to make good faith efforts to work with President Obama, especially on foreign policy issues. Most recently, Lugar aggressively lobbied to pass the New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia, and didn’t hesitate to call out members of his own party who spread misinformation about the treaty.

Lugar’s moderate stances and cooperation with the White House have earned him scorn from many conservatives, and tea party activists in Indiana are gearing up to field a primary challenger against Lugar in 2012. The senator has said he is ready for a challenge from his right, and this week, Lugar seemed to increase such a possibility by taking an opening shot at the tea party. As quoted by US News, Lugar said the conservative activists are “unhappy about life in America,” but traffic only in “cliché” and “are not able to articulate all the specifics”:

“I think there are a great number of Americans, not just in Indiana, who are genuinely angry about how things have turned out for them. Sometimes they are unemployed or they have family members who have been unemployed or they are in situations in which they feel a heavy governmental restriction of their activities. In essence, they are unhappy about life in America and they want to express themselves.”

Lugar says most just want to be heard, but really can’t focus on what’s bugging them. “We want this or that stopped or there is spending, big government—these are all, we would say, sort of large cliché titles, but they are not able to articulate all the specifics,” he says.

Lugar’s comments are a significant break from the typical Republican approach to the tea party, which is to embrace the movement with open arms and defend it vigorously against any and all criticism.

A group of over 70 Indiana tea party groups are planning to meet soon to choose a consensus candidate to challenge Lugar, and have already narrowed it down to two names. “After thirty years or so many years is it a sense of duty to the country or oneself?” tea party organizer Greg Fettig said of Lugar. “He’s outside what the mainstream conservative wing wants him to do,” Fettig added.

In November, former Missouri GOP senator John Danforth warned, “If Dick Lugar, having served five terms in the U.S. Senate and being the most respected person in the Senate and the leading authority on foreign policy, is seriously challenged by anybody in the Republican Party, we have gone so far overboard that we are beyond redemption.”

LGBT

Dick Lugar Says He’s ‘Sympathetic’ To New DADT Repeal Effort

Advocates of repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t tell have long targeted Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN) as a possible swing vote on overturning the policy and Lugar’s office had been telling me that the Senator was “leaning” towards supporting the measure if it came up for a vote under a fair process and after the New START treaty. But on Thursday, the Senator joined 38 other Republicans in voting against a motion to proceed to the measure.

Now, with the stand-alone repeal measure reaching 40 co-sponsors in the Senate, Lugar’s office has confirmed to me that the Senator is “sympathetic” to the new DADT repeal legislation and may be willing to vote for the measure if it is brought up under a “fair” process and voted on after START.

Lugar first announced his qualified endorsement Sunday night, after a speech at Marian University in Indianapolis, Indiana, in response to a student’s question about the policy. This afternoon, Lugar spokesperson Mark Helmke reiterated that the Senator’s vote would still depend on how the measure is brought up. Helmke also said that Lugar was willing to stay past Christmas to end the policy before the end of the year.

Politics

Republican Sen. Lugar: GOP ‘Must Never Be The Party Of No’

Throughout the 111th Congress, Republicans have pulled every stunt not only to obstruct the Democrat’s agenda, but also to prevent progress on any issue — including ones that have traditionally attracted bipartisan support. The lame duck session is proving to be no exception.

However, there is one Republican Senator who does appear willing to reach across the aisle. Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN) is a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act and has been leading the push to take up the New START arms control agreement. This morning, on CNN’s State of the Union with Candy Crowley, Lugar explained the logic behind his positions, stating the GOP must “never be the party of no”:

LUGAR: Many would say, and have said, “why do anything President Obama wants — something that gives him a victory?” Therefore, we’re the party of no. I think some of us said, “No, we are not the party of no. We must never be the party of no.”

CROWLEY: Are you winning or losing that side?

LUGAR: Oh, I think that remains to be seen. [...] The American people — angry as they are with Democrats with the tsunami that came in the election — are finally going to say to the Republicans, “Okay, now what are you guys going to do? What is your program?”

“Our program is to stop Obama,” some would say. “Our program is to defeat Obama. It’s a two-staged process. You defeat the Democrats first of all in the Congress and then you defeat Obama. Then, then we’ll come out and we’ll tell you.”

Well that’s not going to work. At some point there really has to be constructive Republican programs.

Watch it:

Lugar is up for reelection next year and the Tea Party has already warned that his positions may cost him his seat. Former GOP Sen. John Danforth is more worried about what the backlash against Lugar says about his own party. “We have gone so far overboard that we are beyond redemption,” stated Danforth about the Republican Party’s attack on Lugar. Nonetheless, Lugar is sticking to his guns, daring the Tea Party to challenge him in the 2012 Senate primary.

During his interview, Lugar also credited Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) with standing up to an obstructive, “rebellious” faction of the Republican Party. However, McConnell himself has indicated that “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up