Photo: AP

Chuck Hagel has opposed the possibility of military action against Iran, called for a sovereign Palestinian state, called the United States “the world’s bully,” and called for the Pentagon to be “pared down.”

These are not the actions of a man who cares about preserving our national security, and they undeniably disqualify Chuck Hagel from holding the most consequential position in the President’s cabinet.

His confirmation would be a direct threat to our national security, and that’s why Patriot Voices has taken the lead in making sure it doesn’t happen!

So Santorum’s group doesn’t want Hagel confirmed because he supports a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But President Obama supports a two-state solution (as did his GOP opponent in last year’s presidential campaign), and so do a majority of Israelis and so does Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

And Hagel has also said he supports all options, including military force if necessary, to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon and indeed, Hagel has said that the U.S. should reduce military spending, a position that experts and the American public agree with.

And did Hagel call the U.S. “the world’s bully”? Nope. Santorum’s group got that from Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) dishonest and out of context line of questioning last week during Hagel’s confirmation hearing.

But the fact that Hagel is getting attacked for believing that the Palestinians are entitled to their own state tells you something about the points of view from which most of the Hagel criticism is coming from.

Former Republican senator Rick Santorum launched a campaign on Thursday to try to derail Chuck Hagel’s bid to become the next Secretary of Defense. Santorum — like many of his neocon allies — has problems with Hagel’s views on Iran and Israel. “[H]is confirmation would send a dangerous signal to Iran,” a fundraising letter from Santorum’s group Patriot Voices reads, adding that Hagel “disrespects” Israel.

The well-worn Hagel-hates-Israel-and-loves-Iran charges the neocons have been floating for a month now have been thoroughly discredited, so in the case of Santorum’s anti-Hagel campaign, it’s perhaps more beneficial to note the baseline point of view from where Santorum’s Hagel attacks are rooted. It’s Santorum who is out of the mainstream on these issues. Take a look:

The bomb Iran “plan.” One year ago on NBC’s Meet the Press, Santorum said that if he became president, he’d demand that the Iranians open up all of their suspected nuclear program facilities or face “air strikes.” “You would order air strikes…?” host David Gregory asked. “Yes, that’s the plan,” Santorum replied.

Starting a war is preventing a war. This is how the Pennsylvania Republican justified his “plan” to attack Iran: “We’re trying to prevent a war.” He later said that bombing Iran won’t “start a war.”

Iran will use nuclear weapons. Santorum advanced the popular “martyr state myth” that Iran is incapable of engaging in diplomacy and hell-bent on acquiring nuclear weapons so it can actually use them. “They’re a theocracy that has deeply embedded beliefs that — that the afterlife is better than this life” he said. “It is, in fact, an encouragement for them to use their nuclear weapon.”

Kill Iranian nuclear scientists? “[N]uclear scientists who work on that program…are enemy combatants similar to the Taliban and al-Qaeda,” Santorum said on the campaign trail in November, 2011.

Obama wants Iran to get nukes? Santorum floated a conspiracy theory that President Obama wanted allow Iran to get nuclear weapons in exchange for access to Iran’s oil.

One state solution? In November, 2011, Sanotrum said, “all the people who live in the West Bank are Israelis, they’re not Palestinians,” a position that effectively negates the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a plan that the mainstream in both the United States and Israel support.

Recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. Santorum attacked both Obama and Mitt Romney for refusing to call Jerusalem the capital of Israel. The U.S. does not recognize Jerusalem as the capital, a policy “that dates back to pre-1948, and has been followed by every U.S. Administration since, regardless of the President or party in the White House.” Officially doing so, as one top expert noted, “would be following Israel into abject isolation, and the United States into an weakened and marginal regional and global role.”

Americans don’t agree with Santorum’s positions on Iran and the Israeli-Palestinain conflict and as such, there’s no reason why they should give any credibility to his attacks on Hagel regarding these issues.

“Americans are broadly supportive of diplomacy as the most important tool in the U.S. national security toolbox, and exceedingly wary of more costly and unnecessary military interventions,” CAP’s Matt Duss wrote this week, adding, “The fact of the matter is, here in the future of 2013, it’s Hagel’s hawkish critics who are out of the mainstream.”

NBC host David Gregory allowed former Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) to get away with making false and misleading claims about Sharia law and President Obama’s stance on radical Islam. Speaking on Meet The Press’ web supplement Press Pass, Santorum claimed that the President has never condemned “radical Islam,” an assertion that Gregory simply lets stand without challenge:

Sharia law means women have to have head coverings, have no rights — and you don’t hear the President say a word about Sharia. You haven’t heard him condemn Sharia law or radical Islam.

Watch it:

The notion that Obama hasn’t condemned radical Islam is absurd: the President told a Muslim audience in Cairo that “the first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all of its forms” and that “among some Muslims, there’s a disturbing tendency to measure one’s own faith by the rejection of somebody else’s faith,” among many other instances. He also has a particularly aggressive record of taking military action against Islamic extremists.

Obama hasn’t aggressively attacked “Sharia law” because, in the most basic sense, Sharia is the code of conduct that defines how Muslims ought to live, somethign reasonably similar to the same religious ethical codes that people of all faiths hold to. It doesn’t say that women “have no rights.” Hyperbolic rhetoric about the dangers of Sharia law is commonly employed by an Islamophobic activist network that has pushed through discriminatory anti-Sharia legislation in several states.