ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Scott Walker

Health

Why Scott Walker’s Alternative To Expanding Medicaid Is A Bad Deal For Wisconsin’s Poor

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) has decided to reject Obamacare’s optional Medicaid expansion, opting instead for an alternative — and risky — plan for providing low-income Americans with private health coverage that will prevent many of them from accessing the types of services that they can get under Medicaid.

As Politico reports, Walker’s plan “would take thousands of people currently on Wisconsin’s relatively generous Medicaid program — people who are above the federal poverty level — and move them into the Obamacare exchange instead, where they can get federally subsidized private insurance.” The plan would actually cut Wisconsin’s Medicaid program in the aggregate, shifting low-income Wisconsinites above the federal poverty level away from the public insurance program and into the state’s Obamacare-funded private insurance marketplace. It is also estimated to cut the state’s uninsurance rate in half, and Walker claims that the move is intended to “preserve an essential safety net for our neediest, while protecting our state’s taxpayers from uncertainty” over whether or not the federal government will follow through on its promise to fund the lion’s share of states’ Medicaid expansions.

While it’s an interesting proposal from a GOP governor who is not known for compromising with political opponents, it’s still a raw deal for low-income Americans, as it will restrict the number of specialty medical services that poor Wisconsinites have access to. That’s because Medicaid provides a range of benefits that lower-tier private health plans — which are the only kind that poor Americans will be able to afford under Walker’s plan — don’t cover. As Harold Pollack wrote for The Incidental Economist, “There is no genuine private-sector equivalent for many Medicaid services provided to disabled individuals with special needs.” Those services include specialized benefits such as home care and social worker visits to assist impoverished first-time moms — benefits that might not be necessary for well-positioned Americans who may opt for a lower-cost health plan, but make an enormous difference to low-income populations with unique needs.

Physical disabilities, mental health issues, and a whole host of other socially and financially costly medical conditions disproportionately plague low-income Americans. To illustrate exactly how Walker’s alternative to expanding Medicaid will tangibly affect Wisconsin residents, consider a low-income pregnant woman who suffers from depression. Medicaid currently covers mental health services for “medically needy” pregnant women up until six months after they give birth — but states that expand Medicaid under Obamacare will be able to provide moms these mental services for long after that cutoff. Granted, private plans sold on Obamacare marketplaces must meet federal benchmarks and provide an array of “essential health benefits,” including mental services. But the rules governing the scope and quality of these services are much less stringent for private plans than they are for Medicaid. That’s pretty significant considering the fact that 82 percent of infants living in households with depressed mothers were enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP programs.

Read more

Justice

Gov. Walker Expresses ‘Real Concern’ About Electoral Rigging Plan In Wisconsin

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) is tempering his previous support for a proposed plan to rig the Electoral College in favor of Republicans, saying that he has “real concern” about the idea.

The proposal would entail shifting the state’s electoral votes from a winner-takes-all system, as 48 states use, to a per-congressional district apportionment. The result would be that a blue state like Wisconsin, which gave its 10 electoral votes to President Obama in 2012, would instead split its votes evenly between both candidates.

Though Walker had previously said the idea was “interesting” and “plausible”, Walker seemingly backed off those comments in an interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. His major concern was that the shift would make Wisconsin far less relevant in future presidential campaigns.

“You concede it would have a dramatic impact on the targeting of the state?” Walker was asked.

“Right. Exactly right … That’s why I qualified (my earlier statements) … I just said I hadn’t ruled it out. I’m not embracing it,” said Walker.

“The most important thing to me long-term as governor on that is what makes your voters be in play,” said Walker, voicing the concern that ending “winner-take all” would make the state “irrelevant” in presidential campaigns.

“You would agree it would have that effect?” he was asked.

“Yeah. I think that’s a real concern,” he said.

Even if Walker ultimately backs off the electoral rigging plan, another prominent Wisconsin Republican, RNC Chair Reince Priebus, still supports it.

NEWS FLASH

Scott Walker Abandons Voter Suppression Plan In Light Of $5.2 Million Price Tag | In a huge victory for voter participation, Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) told reporters Wednesday he would abandon plans to repeal the state’s vaunted same-day voter registration law. A study by the state’s non-partisan Government Accountability Board released Tuesday found that such a plan would likely cost about $5.2 million to implement and would do nothing to reduce the workload for local clerks. Walker announced, in light of the report, “There is no way I’m signing a bill that costs that kind of money,” and that he expected the Republican-controlled state legislature to abandon the effort. Under the current system, Wisconsin has one of the highest voter participation rates in the country.

Justice

Scott Walker’s Voter Suppression Plan Would Cost $5.2 Million, Election Board Finds

Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI)

Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI)

A new study by Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board, the non-partisan board that oversees the state’s elections, suggests a proposal to eliminate the state’s vaunted same-day voter registration system would carry a massive price tag. The plan — proposed by members of the Republican majorities in the state legislature and backed by Gov. Scott Walker (R) — would initially cost approximately $5.2 million and would not reduce the workload for local clerks, the report found.

The Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel notes:

Wisconsin has allowed people to register at the polls since 1976. Because of the state law allowing election-day registration, Wisconsin is exempt from aspects of the federal Motor Voter Act of 1993 and the federal Help America Vote Act of 2002. Eliminating election-day registration would make those provisions kick in and require people to be given voter registration forms at Division of Motor Vehicles offices and public assistance offices.

Even if lawmakers repeal the election-day registration law, those who moved within the same jurisdiction between elections would still be able to update their voter registrations at the polls under federal law. Federal law would also require Wisconsin clerks to keep names on their poll lists for longer periods of time. Removing voters from the list would be a more costly, cumbersome process that would require sending mail to all voters in an effort to weed out those who have moved, died or otherwise should come off the rolls.

Under the current system, Wisconsin has one of the highest voter participation rates in the country. But beyond suppressing voter turnout, elimination of same-day voter registration would mean millions in new costs for a state that, according to Walker, required a massive “budget repair bill” in 2011 to cut $1.25 billion in aid to education and local governments.

Local clerks and citizens groups have strongly opposed the proposed change. Among those who took advantage of the state’s same-day voter registration last month was Walker’s own son, whom Walker personally accompanied to the polls.

Economy

Wisconsin GOP Claims No Interest In Following Michigan’s Union-Busting Lead

Wisconsin Republicans claim they have no interest in following Michigan’s lead by pursuing passage of union-busting “right-to-work” legislation: it appears they have decided table their own version of the same bill. Though famously anti-union Governor Scott Walker (R) won’t say whether or not he’d support a Michigan style bill, incoming State Assembly speaker Robin Vos has said no such legislation will be brought up for consideration in the forthcoming term:

However, a spokeswoman for Assembly Speaker-elect Robin Vos, R-Rochester, said Assembly Republicans don’t have plans to restrict private-sector unions in Wisconsin when the Legislature reconvenes Jan. 7.

Right-to-work legislation is not something that is being pursued this session in the Assembly,” Vos spokeswoman Kit Beyer said. “That folder has been put away.”

It’s important not to give Walker and co. too much credit: Walker’s refusal to comment on right-to-work is a step backwards from his previous pledge to “do everything in my power to make sure [right to work] isn’t there.” Michigan Governor Rick Snyder (R) similarly opposed right-to-work before ramrodding it through the current lame duck session.

Right-to-work legislation prohibits unions from making dues mandatory for all employees, crippling union fundraising and organizing bases. These laws have, in states they’ve been implemented, cost union and non-union workers an average of $1,500 per year in salary. They also hit the middle class particularly hard and don’t appear to improve employment prospects.

Justice

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker Backs Off Support For Arizona-Style Immigration Law

Even though he once supported the idea of having a Wisconsin version of Arizona’s anti-immigrant law, Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) said this week that he hopes state legislators avoid passing a harmful state immigration measure this year:

I think that would be a huge distraction for us in the state,” he said. “There’s our niche and our priorities. I don’t think that falls into one of those priorities, so I would certainly hope that the legislature didn’t spend time focusing on that, instead focused on the economy.”

Walker declined, however, to say whether he would veto an immigration bill.

I’d push to make sure it wouldn’t come up,” he said.

Two years ago as a gubernatorial candidate, Walker said he would sign a version of Arizona’s SB 1070, which aimed to make the state so hostile to undocumented immigrants that they self-deport. “The federal government has failed to secure the border, and states have a right to protect their law-abiding, legal citizens,” Walker said in a May 2010 statement. “The 10th Amendment gives states the right to act as Arizona has with the immigration law.”

But after a Supreme Court ruling struck down much of Arizona’s law and mass deportation policies have harmed state economies, Walker has backed away from his previous statements.

Walker is also one of several Republicans backing away from anti-immigrant measures after Latino voters, who strongly oppose the laws, overwhelmingly backed President Obama in November’s election. Six percent of Wisconsin’s population is Latino, but that number is growing nationally. Even conservative radio host Sean Hannity said he had “evolved” on immigration after the election. “It’s simple to me to fix it,” Hannity said. “I think you control the border first. You create a pathway for those people that are here — you don’t say you’ve got to go home. And that is a position that I’ve evolved on.”

Justice

Groundswell Of Opposition To Wisconsin Gov. Walker’s Voter Suppression Proposal Grows

Wisconsinites rally against Gov. Walker's plan to eliminate Election Day Registration. (Photo: Robert A. Bell)

Since Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) announced last month that eliminating the ability of residents to register on Election Day would be a top priority for his administration next year, opposition to the plan has sprung up across the state.

Immediately after Walker made public his desire to scrap Election Day Registration, which has been in place in the Badger State since the 1970s, he ran into unexpected opposition from the election clerks he claimed would benefit. “There’s no way we’d be in favor of that,” said Diane Hermann-Brown, communications chairwoman of the Wisconsin Municipal Clerks Association, noting that eliminating Election Day Registration would make their jobs more difficult.

Citizens have also begun to organize and rally against Walker’s plan to suppress the vote, including a large rally in Milwaukee this week featuring election officials, lawmakers, and other community figures. Neil Abrecht, executive director of the City of Milwaukee Election Commission, summed up what is so troubling about the proposal in his speech:

“Same day registration has been occurring in the State of Wisconsin for the last 36 years. The practice of administering this process is tightly woven into our election worker training and our Election Day procedures. A change to this practice would have tremendous ramifications to voters, particularly students, renters, and people in poverty; and would create confusion, frustration, and a disillusionment with the democratic process at our voting sites. There are numerous other opportunities to improve election systems and increase the efficiency of voting sites. I would hope that anyone interested in changing this state’s election laws would look at those opportunities before implementing a change that would reduce voter access to the ballot and actually create, not alleviate, a burden to election workers,” said Neil Albrecht, who is the executive director of the City of Milwaukee Election Commission.

Nearly 1 in 5 Milwaukee voters registered on Election Day this year. Statewide, hundreds of thousands of Wisconsinites were only able to vote because of Election Day Registration, leading to an astronomical 70.1 percent turnout rate. This was the fourth highest level in state history, according to the Government Accountability Board.

Wisconsin Republicans are exploring other avenues to make voting more difficult as well. Incoming Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R) wants to eliminate the Government Accountability Board, which has been lauded as a “model for nonpartisan election administration,” and replace it with political appointees. In addition, House Speaker-elect Robin Vos (R) has professed his desire to alter the constitution to allow voter suppression after a state judge ruled that the state’s voter ID law was an unconstitutional violation of the right to vote.

Update

A progressive group, One Wisconsin Now, has gathered 15,000 signatures from voters demanding Walker back down on his push to end Election Day Registration.

NEWS FLASH

New Republican State Senate Leader Wants To Politicize Wisconsin’s Elections | Though Wisconsin’s non-partisan Government Accountability Board has been called “a model for nonpartisan election administration,” a key Wisconsin Republican legislator wants to scrap it and allow partisan political appointees to oversee the state’s elections. Sen. Scott Fitzgerald (R), who will soon regain his former position as majority leader of the Wisconsin Senate (as his party recaptured the majority in the November elections), said Monday he wants to replace the board’s retired judges with political appointees to “strike more of a balance.” The Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal-Sentinel reports that Fitzgerald thinks the neutral board’s decisions have favored Democrats and that the board is “not working the way it’s supposed to.” A spokesman for Governor Scott Walker (R) declined to say whether he would support such an effort.

Justice

Following Obama’s Victory, Wisconsin Governor Proposes New Limits On Voter Registration

Two weeks after Barack Obama and Sen.-elect Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) carried the state of Wisconsin with the support of minorities and young voters, Gov. Scott Walker (R) announced one of his major policy proposals for the upcoming session: ending the state’s 40-year old law that allows citizens to register to vote on Election Day.

And with Republicans now back in control of the Wisconsin state legislature, Walker may well get his way next year.

In 2008, Wisconsin enjoyed the second highest turnout of any state in the nation (72.4 percent of eligible voters cast a ballot), due largely to the fact the Badger State law allows residents who aren’t registered or have recently moved to register at the polls. That year, approximately 460,000 people used Election Day Registration, 15 percent of all Wisconsinites who cast a ballot.

Walker pressed his case for ending same-day registration during a speech at the Ronald Reagan Library in California on Friday:

“States across the country that have same-day registration have real problems because the vast majority of their states have poll workers who are wonderful volunteers, who work 13 hour days and who in most cases are retirees,” Walker said. “It’s difficult for them to handle the volume of people who come at the last minute. It’d be much better if registration was done in advance of election day. It’d be easier for our clerks to handle that. All that needs to be done.

Wisconsin was the first state to enact Election Day Registration in 1971, followed soon by states like Minnesota and Maine. Today, eleven states have laws allowing citizens to register at the polls. These states enjoy the highest turnout in the nation not by chance, but because Election Day Registration boosts turnout by 7 to 14 percentage points. In addition, studies show that minorities, poorer voters, and students benefit the most from being permitted to register on Election Day.

Republican legislators in Maine attempted a similar move last year, repealing the state’s 40-year-old Election Day Registration law. However, a citizen backlash erupted, sending the matter to a statewide referendum where voters rebuked the legislature and restored the law by a 2-to-1 margin.

The last time Walker and his Republican allies won complete control of the legislature in 2010, they immediately passed a discriminatory voter ID law that would have disenfranchised people like 84-year-old Ruthelle Frank had it not been blocked by a state judge.

Now, with Wisconsin State Republicans riding high, they appear to again be setting their sights on chipping away at voting rights.

Election

Republican Governors Condemn Romney’s Claim That Obama Won By Giving Minorities ‘Gifts’


Republican governors Bobby Jindal (LA) and Scott Walker (WI) spoke out against Mitt Romney’s claim that Obama won because he gave minorities and young people “big gifts” in the form of Obamacare, his DREAM directive, and partial college loan forgiveness. At the Republican Governors Association meeting in Las Vegas on Wednesday, Jindal called the statement “absolutely wrong,” saying, “I absolutely reject that notion.” Walker, who was on a panel with Jindal when he denounced Romney, agreed that the GOP isn’t “just for people who are currently not dependent on the government. It’s for all Americans.”

Both governors, who were Romney surrogates, stayed quiet during Romney’s earlier iteration of this idea, when he told donors that 47 percent of Americans “believe they are victims” and will never “take personal responsibility.” Walker ducked the controversy at the time, saying “That’s a statement he has to take on, not myself.” Jindal also deferred judgment, refusing to “be one of these political pundits.”

But after a definitive loss down the ticket on Election Night, Republicans are doing some “brutally honest” soul-searching about the future of their party. Jindal was especially outspoken, imploring the GOP to “stop being the stupid party.” He was blunt in his newfound criticism for Romney in an interview with Politico:

The Republican Party is going to fight for every single vote. That means the 47 percent and the 53 percent…We’ve got to make sure that we are not the party of big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes, big anything. We cannot be, we must not be, the party that simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys.

Other top Republicans lavished blame on Romney at the conference and complained that the campaign did not offer enough specifics to combat Obama.

Romney told donors in a call on Wednesday that Obama won because he “focused on giving targeted groups a big gift,” before going on to explain how several of the presidents’ policies have directly helped these Americans.

Update

Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) also dismissed Romney on MSNBC, pointedly saying, “I don’t agree with the comments. I think the campaign is over.”

Update

On Thursday afternoon, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) cautiously weighed in on Romney’s “gifts” comment: “our mission should not be to deny government benefits to people who need them…I don’t want to rebut him point by point. I would just say to you, I don’t believe that we have millions and millions of people in this country that don’t want to work. I’m not saying that’s what he said.”

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up