ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Student Loans

Health

The Government Bans Doctors Who Can’t Repay Their Student Loans From Treating Medicare Patients

Over ten percent of all doctors and nurses on the government’s Medicare and Medicaid blacklist end up on it because they defaulted on government-backed student loans. Medical workers on the blacklist are barred from treating Medicare and Medicaid patients or receiving federal reimbursements for a predesignated time period.

According to a Modern Healthcare analysis of federal records, more than 5,400 of the 51,729 people on the government health entitlement blacklist were placed on it after failing to pay an HHS-backed medical student loan. Given a still-shaky economy, some in the health care sector expect that trend to continue:

[Government data] show that one of the most common reasons for getting barred is failure to repay HHS-backed student loans: 5,417 people are currently kicked out of Medicare for that.

The number of annual exclusions related to student loans has grown steadily in the past decade, peaking at 517 in 2011 before declining again. “That is tied to the economy, and I would expect that to continue to rise,” [said Lynn Gordon, a Chicago-area hospital group partner].

The increasing frequency of default-related blacklisting could prove problematic as the Obama Administration tries to entice more medical students to become primary care and family doctors. Primary care providers and nurse practitioners will be crucial to effective Obamacare implementation, since the health law is expected to drive up demand for medical services as millions of previously uninsured Americans gain coverage.

But the ballooning cost of a medical education could end up being a major barrier to the Administration’s recruitment efforts. According to the Association of American Medical Colleges’ (AAMC) 2012 report on medical school debt, “86 percent of medical school graduates had education debt, with a median amount of $162,000″ in 2011 — a number that has been rising steadily over the years:

AAMC estimates that a borrower with the median $162,000 debt “would have monthly payments ranging from $1,500 to $2,100 after residency.”

That disproportionately affects the very primary care doctors that are integral to health care reform and the U.S. medical system at large. In a 2012 report, consulting firm Merritt Hawkins & Associates found that family practitioners, pediatricians, and psychiatrists are the lowest-paid physician groups in the U.S. with a base pay of $189,000.

While that’s still a lavish salary compared to average U.S. compensation, it pales in comparison to specialist pay — and as the entitlement blacklist numbers underscore, that contributes to a system in which care providers are banned from treating certain patients for purely financial, rather than medical or criminal, reasons.

Read more

Economy

Senator Introduces Bill To Allow Holders Of Student Debt To Refinance

On Sunday, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) announced a new bill that would let holders of student debt refinance their loans for cheaper interest rates, as Shahien Nasiripour reports at the Huffington Post:

The plan sponsored by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) would force the U.S. Secretary of Education to automatically refinance most government loans carrying interest rates above 4 percent into fixed, 4-percent loans. Roughly nine of 10 federally-backed loans would be affected, saving nearly 37 million borrowers billions of dollars in annual interest payments.

“At a time when corporations, homeowners and even local governments are refinancing at historically low interest rates and saving millions of dollars, students and families who take out loans to pay for college are getting left behind,” Gillibrand said. “Ensuring that our graduates are not saddled with unmanageable debt by keeping interest rates low is just common sense.”

Holders of federal student loans haven’t seen a drop in their interest rates even as other borrowing costs have fallen. Many loans have interest rates of 6.8 or 7.9 percent, while the interest rate for the average 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage is 3.5 percent.

And as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) recently pointed out, banks have even lower borrowing costs when they come to the federal government to borrow. They can get an interest rate of 0.75 percent on loans through the Federal Reserve discount window. Warren has also introduced a bill to address high levels of student debt by calling for student loan rates to mirror those that benefit banks.

Others have similarly taken recent action on the issue. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau put forward a set of proposals that include allowing borrowers of federal loans to refinance to lower interest rates and to give them access to income-based repayment plans, as well as allowing the holders of private loans to enter rehabilitation programs. Sens. Jack Reed (D-RI) and Sherrod Brown (D-OH) have also introduced legislation to allow students debt borrowers to refinance.

The Center for American Progress estimated that Gillibrand’s legislation would save borrowers $14.5 billion in the first year, leading to a $21.7 billion boost in economic activity. Student debt is likely having a big impact on the economy, and it’s a big drag on the housing market in particular. Homeownership rates have fallen significantly for young graduates, as many can’t qualify for mortgages or afford down payments. The money they spend paying back their student loans would be enough to buy more than 155,000 homes.

Alyssa

Why Time Magazine Put A Woman On The Cover Of Its Issue Complaining About Millennials

There are many problems with Joel Stein’s cover story about Millennials—people born between 1980 and 2000. The most glaring substantive one is probably that, in his discussion of my generation’s relatively slow start and disappointment in employment, he finds plenty of time to talk about the widespread availability of social technologies, and none whatsoever to talk about the dramatic contraction of economic opportunity that has made it harder for Millennials to find jobs, and more dependent on their parents’ financial help and health insurance as a fallback, rather than as a lifestyle choice. I can believe that Stein would make that omission, but it’s difficult to believe that his editors let the piece into print that way.

But one thing I think is useful and clarifying about the article, even as I find it frustrating, isn’t in the text at all. It’s the way that it’s being sold to the public: namely, with a picture of a well-dressed young woman, gazing into her iPhone, seemingly taking a picture of herself:

Stein’s piece wisely acknowledges that the condemnation of Millennials that’s a common trope these days, and that makes his piece feel like trolling, is only the latest iteration of a generational cycle. And what might have made the article interesting rather than repetitive is a discussion of the way this cycle is different from the ones that came before.

One avenue the choice of cover suggested is that there might be a gendered component to the irritation with Millennials. Dependence, interiority, and the careful construction of fantasy lives aren’t solely the provenance of girls and women of course, but they’re traits that are coded as feminine. And technology and economics have made those traits much more visible when men and women display them. If a scrapbook was something you kept for yourself to archive your memories, Instagram is that scrapbook, except shared with everyone. If you kept one of those inspiration boards with ribbons sewn into fabric stretched over a board in your dorm room or your childhood bedroom, you’re probably doing the same thing on Pinterest. And where your parents might have paid your first and last month’s rent as a deposit—or if you were spectacularly lucky, bought you an apartment—a version of support that wasn’t necessarily obvious, though it could be deduced by a reasonably intelligent observer, their reduced circumstances and yours might leave you living at home, a much more visible sign of your economic interdependence with your family.

Neither Stein’s article, nor anything else I’ve read about generational research suggests that women are exhibiting the traits he calls out as negative out in greater numbers. If anything, Millennial men and women are coming into alignment in certain ways, whether it’s wanting equal flexibility in work so both men and women can balance their careers and family responsibilities, or using social networking tools (though men and women tend to gravitate to different services). If what irritates non-Millennials about the current generation of young adults, male and female alike, isn’t just that they’re self-absorbed, or entitled, or dependent, but self-absorbed, entitled, and dependent in feminine ways, that’s telling.

And it says a lot about the second half of Stein’s thesis, which is ostensibly about how Millennials could save us all. If what Millennials have to offer is lessons about genuine introspection, more reasonable expectations of work-life balance, and the need for a fair social safety net and reasonable return on the investment of getting a college education, that seems like a genuinely valuable conversation. It’s just too bad that it’s one implied by Time’s cover, rather than discussed in Stein’s article.

Education

Policymakers Take Action To Combat The Student Debt Crisis

Total outstanding student debt has climbed past $1 trillion, more than total credit card debt, and a record number of people carry that debt, with the average load standing at $26,000, double what it was in 1995. Meanwhile, the rates on federal Stafford loans are set to double this summer from 3.4 to 6.8 percent.

On Wednesday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) introduced her first standalone bill to address the interest rate hike. In a speech from the floor introducing the bill, she pointed out that banks get access to loans through the Federal Reserve discount window with interest rates at about 0.75 percent. If the government can afford to lend money at that rate to banks, she argued, it should be able to afford to do so to college students who are getting an education and learning skills, which benefits all of us in the long run:

Warren is not the only one looking to take action on the student debt crisis. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced a set of proposals on Wednesday to ease the repayment of private student loans, which usually have higher interest rates and fewer protections than federal loans. It suggested that borrowers who pay on time be allowed to refinance to lower interest rates and that those who fall behind on payments have access to income-based repayment plans. It also urged policymakers to allow the holders of private loans to enter rehabilitation programs to help borrowers exit default and repair their credit that are available to those who have federal loans.

Help could not come too soon. The first three months of this year saw record numbers of Americans defaulting on their student loans, with 6.8 million federal student loan borrowers in default.

And the debt load that hangs over many young graduates has ramifications for the larger economy: Their homeownership rates have plummeted, as many can’t qualify for mortgages or afford the high down payments. In fact, the money spent on paying back student loans could instead be used to buy 155,413 homes. Without such a burden, graduates might instead be able to help push along the housing recovery.

Economy

Money Spent On Paying Back Student Loans Could Buy 155,000 New Homes

Total outstanding student loan debt has hit record levels, recently topping $1 trillion. This can translate into a heavy financial burden on young graduates, which in turn has a big impact on the economy. The Progressive Policy Institute calculates that people under the age of 30 are spending $43.5 billion every year paying back student loans, which is about 7 percent of their total annual income.

What else could that money go to besides student loans? PPI added up the numbers to find out:

The burden from student debt has been growing: the Federal Reserve found that the number of borrowers and the average amount of debt per borrower has risen by 70 percent since 2004.

The number of new homes that graduates could buy instead of paying back their loans is particularly striking given that homeownership rates have cratered for Americans under 40. This is partly due to the fact that their income has to go to paying down debt and therefore can’t be spent on buying a new house. It also means that they often have a high debt-to-income ratio and lack the money for a large down payment, excluding them from taking out many mortgages.

LGBT

FAFSA Form Will Now Recognize College Students’ Same-Sex Parents

Today the U.S. Department of Education announced a small but significant change to the FAFSA, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, that will make the application a more fair, effective, and efficient tool for students seeking financial aid to finance their college education.

The FAFSA currently uses the terms “mother/stepmother” and “father/stepfather” when requesting information about an applicant’s parents. Applicants with same-sex parents then must either arbitrarily designate one parent as “mother” and the other as “father,” or omit one parent from the form entirely. In other words, the current FAFSA puts these applicants in a lose-lose scenario forcing them to complete and submit an application that is inaccurate and not reflective of their family structure.

Today’s proposal will help change that. For the 2014-2015 FAFSA, the Department will amend the terms “Mother/Stepmother” and “Father/Stepfather” to instead read “Parent 1” and “Parent 2.” This change also means that for the first time the Department will collect same-sex parents’ financial information in the same way that it does for different-sex parents. In addition to accurately reflecting LGBT families, these changes will capture the economic situation of these families so that students applying for aid can access financial aid based on their true financial need — without any bearing on their parents’ sexual orientation.

This change mimics similar changes made at other federal agencies. In 2011, for example, the State Department initiated reforms to give passport forms a more gender-neutral parental designation. Doing so required minimal changes to federal forms while significantly enhancing the accuracy, fairness, effectiveness, and efficiency of government operations.

At its core, this much-needed change achieves two important policy objectives.

Read more

Crosby Burns is a Policy Analyst for LGBT Progress.

Economy

How Student Debt Is Holding Back The Housing Market

College grads should be getting ready to live the American Dream and buy a house of their own. But they’re being held back by their crushing debt loads, meaning that fewer single family homes are being built. Students got caught in a housing market spiral: many parents who had once used home equity to help finance college costs had to pull back when the market tanked, leaving students to take on more debt, which is now getting in their way of owning their own homes. According to Bloomberg News, at the height of the housing boom, about $7 billion of equity was cashed out to pay for education.

Bloomberg News also reports that young people hold the majority of student loan debt, but their rates of homeownership have cratered:

Two- thirds of student loans are held by people under the age of 40, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, blocking millions of them from taking advantage of the most affordable housing market on record. The number of people in that age group who own homes fell by 4.6 percent in the fourth quarter from the third, the biggest drop in records dating to 1982. […]

The issue is being exacerbated by an explosion in the $150 billion private market for student debt with interest rates for some existing loans surpassing 12 percent. Unlike mortgage holders, borrowers have little hope of refinancing at lower rates.

While a survey found that nine out of ten people want to own their own home, rental demand is at a ten-year high. So while housing construction is starting to rebound, the type that these young people would be building, single family homes, fell 4.8 percent in March. Rather than buying, many are renting – or crashing on their parents’ couch. That’s bad news for the housing market and the economic recovery.

This is all happening at a time when total student debt has inched past $1 trillion. The problem isn’t just that recent grads may be wary of taking on mortgage debt when they already carry such huge burdens. The debt itself likely hampers their ability to get a mortgage in the first place, since due to a high debt-to-income ratio.

Congress could do something small to ease this situation: keep interest rates on federal loans from doubling, as it did last year. But even that won’t be enough to deal with such high amounts of debt that are taking a big toll on the economic recovery.

Education

Interest Rates On Student Loans Set To Double Even As Students Fall Deeper Into Debt

Student loan interest rates are scheduled to double on July 1, from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent. Congress extended the lower rate on federal student loans for a year in an effort to control the nation’s formidable student debt crisis, but will now have to decide whether or not to cancel the interest rate hike once again.

The interest rate is a rare instance of bipartisan agreement; last year, both President Obama and GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney promised to hold down interest rates on subsidized Stafford loans. Student loan rates have not been changed since they were set in 2001, even though student debt has exploded in the past decade. The average student is now grappling with more than $27,000 in debt, and the national student debt has reached $1 trillion. Meanwhile, the federal government is making a profit on these interest rates, according to a brief by student advocacy groups:

The brief, citing a February report from the Congressional Budget Office, said the federal government makes 36 cents in profit on every student-loan dollar it puts out, and estimates that over all, student loans will bring in $34 billion next year.

“Higher education loans are meant to subsidize the cost of higher education, not profit from them, especially at a time when students are facing record debt,” said Ethan Senack, the higher education advocate at the United States Public Interest Research Group, which is issuing the brief with the United States Student Association and Young Invincibles, an organization for people 18 to 34.

According to the C.B.O. report, the government will get 12.5 cents in revenue next year for every dollar lent through subsidized Staffords, 33.3 cents per dollar in unsubsidized Staffords, 54.8 cents on each dollar of graduate school loans, and 49 cents per dollar of parent loans, for a total of $34 billion a year.

Borrowers of subsidized Stafford loans make up more than a third of those using federal student aid. More than two-thirds of those borrowers are from families with an annual income under $50,000.

The Senate’s recent budget resolution extended the lower rate indefinitely, and the House will soon have legislation to extend it for 2 more years. However, postponing the rate hike will not be enough to mitigate the ever-worsening student debt crisis. In the first three months of 2013, borrowers defaulted on their student loans in record numbers. According to the Department of Education, 6.8 million federal student loan borrowers have now defaulted on $85 billion in debt. Sequestration has only worsened the problem, driving up fees for some federal loans.

Students are relying more heavily on federal loans to pay for education as states have uniformly gutted higher education funding, pushing tuition costs to new heights. If states were willing to raise taxes rather than slash education funding, tuition costs could be stabilized. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is also working on an initiative to help students pay off their debt and find alternative refinance options. Campus Progress and other groups have also pushed for reductions in the interest rate on federal student loans.

But students aren’t the only ones suffering from this crisis. Student debt is directly responsible for the feebleness of the housing recovery. College graduates saddled with debt and unable to find suitable wages have avoided buying houses and taking on mortgages, while others aren’t able to qualify for loans because of their excessive student debt.

Education

First Three Months Of 2013 Were Worst On Record For Student Loan Defaults

Student loan debt is already reaching crisis levels in the United States, as borrowers are struggling to pay back the money they used to obtain higher educations. Borrowers were already defaulting on their debts in record numbers heading into this year, and the first three months of 2013 were the worst on record for loans going bad, CNBC reports:

Credit-rating firm Equifax said $3.5 billion in government and private student loans went bad in the first three months of 2013, the most since the company began keeping track. The U.S. Department of Education said 6.8 million federal student loan borrowers are now in default, representing $85 billion in debt. And the department’s systems for collecting the bad loans are struggling to keep up.

The cost of college has sextupled in the last 30 years, pushing more and more students toward both government and private loan programs to finance education. But student loans are one of the only forms of debt that can’t be discharged in bankruptcy court, meaning that many borrowers will never have a way out from under their education debt.

The burden of student debt is having far-reaching effects on the broader economy. The debt is being securitized much in the way mortgages were before the housing crisis, leaving analysts wondering if the country is inflating another debt bubble that could threaten the economy. It is also preventing young graduates from purchasing homes and other goods, lengthening the downturn in housing and the pain of the slow economic recovery. And student loans are increasingly becoming a problem for older Americans too, as those who haven’t yet paid off their own debt or took on loans to finance their children’s education are also being crushed.

Education

Senate Republicans Unanimously Support Repeal of Student Loan Reform Law

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)

All 45 Senate Republicans voted Friday for a budget amendment that endorsed the repeal of both Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. While Congressional Republicans attempting to repeal Obamacare is nothing new — this marks the 39th repeal attempt — this proposal also aimed to repeal the student loan reform and Pell Grant expansions that were enacted at the same time.

All 54 Senate Democrats present successfully voted to defeat the amendment, offered by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX). If passed, it would have put the Senate on record in support of a repeal of
provisions that moved student loans from commercial banks to direct lending from the U.S. Education Department and:

  • Used half of the the estimated $61 billion in savings to increase the maximum annual Pell Grant scholarship to $5,550 in 2010 and to $5,975 by 2017, while indexing the grants to inflation.
  • Lowered monthly payments on federal student loans and shortened the debt forgiveness timeline. For new loans after 2014, this will mean graduates will have to pay 10 percent of disposable income, instead of 15.
  • Provided $2.55 billion to support historically black colleges and universities and minority-serving institutions; $2 billion for community colleges; and $750 million for a college access and completion program for students.

Such a repeal would have meant a return to larger payments, smaller Pell Grants, and reduced support colleges and universities while putting billions of dollars back in the coffers of Wall Street banks. But in his floor speech explaining the amendment, Cruz told his colleagues only that his proposal was about defunding and repealing Obamacare, making no mention of the billions of dollars he would take from higher education to give back to for-profit banks.

Though every Congressional Republican voted against the health care and student loan reforms, House Republicans specifically exempted the student loan reform provisions from previous repeal attempts, though they have repeatedly slammed the reform as a “Washington takeover” of the student loan industry.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Cruz received more than $180,000 in PAC contributions from the financial sector in his 2012 campaign.

Update

The Senate passed the budget in a vote of 50-49 early on Saturday morning.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up