ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Super PACs

NEWS FLASH

Romney’s Oil Adviser Contributes $1 Million To Pro-Romney Super PAC | One month after oil shale billionaire Harold Hamm became Mitt Romney’s oil energy adviser, he contributed nearly $1 million to the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future, for the second-largest contribution it received last month. Hamm has already has already maxed out his $2,500 contributions to Romney’s campaign, and contributed another $61,600 to the Republican National Committee. Campaigns and super PACs are not legally allowed to coordinate, but in reality many of Romney’s donors have turned to super PACs to escape contribution ceilings. Hamm’s donations, accounting for one-fifth of the super PAC’s April fundraising, only further blurs the line between his dual role advising energy policy and financing Romney’s super PAC machine.

Politics

Meet Joe Ricketts: Billionaire Has Millions To Smear Obama, Demands Massive Taxpayer Subsidy For Baseball Stadium

TD Ameritrade Founder Joe Ricketts

TD Ameritrade Founder Joe Ricketts

This week, the New York Times reported that Joe Ricketts, a right-wing billionaire and founder of TD Ameritrade, is soliciting multi-million dollar ad proposals to attack President Obama. One such proposal, leaked to the paper, was a $10 million, racially-charged campaign entitled “The Defeat of Barack Hussein Obama: The Ricketts Plan to End his Spending for Good.” The proposal, which center on Rev. Jeremiah Wright, suggests hiring an “extremely literate conservative African-American” to break down Obama’s image as a “metrosexual, black Abe Lincoln.”

Ricketts moved quickly to publicly reject the plan after it leaked. His spokesman said it “reflects an approach to politics that Mr. Ricketts rejects and it was never a plan to be accepted but only a suggestion.” (The statement seems somewhat disingenuous as the Ricketts had already given “preliminary approval” for the $10 million concept after seeing a separate ad about Jeremiah Wright.) Nevertheless, Ricketts’ spokesman confirmed his intention spend money attacking Obama through an organization he controls called “Ending Spending Political Action Fund.”

There is one area, however, where Ricketts is much more open to government spending. He’s seeking a massive government subsidy for the Chicago Cubs, which he owns with his family, to renovate Wrigley Field. Here is the deal the Ricketts family is seeking, via Crain’s Chicago Business:

That means $300 million is needed for the ballpark proper.

Half would come from the team, presumably in increased revenue from more signage inside Wrigley and retail and other entertainment in what amounts to a game-day carnival on Waveland Avenue on Wrigley’s north side and Sheffield Avenue to the east.

And half would come from $150 million or so in bonds to be retired with increased revenue from the existing city and Cook County amusement taxes on ticket sales. Specifically, debt service would get the first 6 percent in growth above a base level of around $15 million a year now.

But it’s a little more complicated than that.

The team also wants a 50 percent cut of any increase in amusement tax revenue growth above 6 percent. And unlike the bonds, which would be retired in 30 or 35 years, that would be forever.

So Joe Ricketts and his family not only want a $150 million subsidy directly from taxpayers but also a large chunk of tax revenue from the city in perpetuity. In other words, taxes from the City of Chicago would no longer go to roads, schools and police officers but also into Joe Ricketts pocket. Without this taxpayer welfare, the family will presumably let Cubs, which they acquired in a highly competitive bidding process in 2009, play in a stadium that is falling into disrepair.

Ricketts negotiating position seems completely at odds with his public stated political views. In a video posted by another organization he controls, Taxpayers Against Earmarks, Ricketts says “I think it’s a crime for our elected officials to borrow money today, to spend money today and push the repayment of that loan out into the future on people who are not even born yet.” Of course, that’s what he is attempting force the taxpayers of Chicago to do for the benefit of his team and his family.

At the same time, Joe Ricketts has plenty of disposable income available to attack Obama. A Ricketts spokesperson said future attacks on Obama would “be focused entirely on questions of fiscal policy.” Joe Ricketts, however, may want to focus on the fiscal policy of his baseball team. In 2011, the Cubs were “one of nine franchises in violation of MLB’s debt service rules.”

NEWS FLASH

Outside Groups Spend Almost $4 Million For Texas GOP Senate Primary | In the past two days a Super PAC called the Texas Conservatives Fund — which acknowledges that it was created expressly to boost the Senate candidacy of Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst (R-TX) — has reported spending over $1.25 million on independent expenditures attacking one of his primary opponents, former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz (R). In total, outside groups have already spent at least $3,961,331 advocating for and against candidates in the May 29 Republican Senate primary — with two weeks left until Election Day.

Election

The Slurpee Senator: Dick Lugar Gets Last Minute Boost From 7-Eleven

As well-funded super PACs — including the Club for Growth Action, FreedomWorks for America, and the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund — poured millions of dollars into independent expenditures encouraging Indiana voters to support for State Treasurer Richard Mourdock (R) and against incumbent Sen. Dick Lugar (R) in tomorrow’s Republican primary, one pro-Lugar super PAC cried foul. But their ads decrying out-of-state influence are the height of hypocrisy as they were largely funded also by out-of-state donors.

Hoosiers for Jobs (formerly Hoosiers for Economic Growth & Jobs) has spent at least $175,000 on mailings and television ads in support of Lugar. Two spots by the group attack efforts by outside groups to “buy the election.” One ad, ironically called “Hypocrites,” attacks the Wall Street Club for Growth’s support of Mourdock as a “D.C. special interest bailout of his campaign.” The other, “Not for Sale,” says the Club is “trying to buy our Senate seat by spending millions of dollars of secret Wall Street money” attacking Lugar.

Watch “Hypocrites”:

Watch “Not for Sale”:

But, as the Center for Public Integrity notes, more than two-thirds of the donations reported to date by Hoosiers for Jobs come from outside of Indiana. The group’s filings reveal that through April 18, it received $170,000. Just $55,000 of that came from Hoosiers, whom the group claims to represent.

Who did fund the misnamed “Hoosiers for Jobs?” Former lobbyist Roy Pfautch of St. Louis, Missouri donated $50,000, Swift Boat funder Sam Fox of St. Louis gave $25,000, and the Dallas-based 7-Eleven Inc. kicked in $25,000.

Why is the convenience store franchise helping Lugar? He “understands our issues,” a spokesperson told the CPI. Lugar also supported the Slurpee-seller in a congressional battle against banks, and his daughter-in-law is a lobbyist for a trade association tied to the omnipresent retailer.

As Super PACs spend more and more on statewide and congressional races, voters should take their messages with a shaker of salt. After all, the TV ads calling out out-of-state funding and hypocrisy may well be paid for by out-of-state hypocrites.

NEWS FLASH

Super PACs Spending Big On States Too | In addition to the more than $95 million Super PACs have already spent on independent expenditures aimed at tilting the 2012 presidential election, a new Center for Responsive Politics analysis reveals they are spending big in the states. Super PACs have already spent over $12 million on Congressional races, even though the November elections are six months away. In 24 different races, Super PAC have already spent $100,000 or more. While the well-funded presidential campaigns will likely be able at least be competitive with outside groups, the anything-goes post-Citzens United and SpeechNow.org campaign finance landscape leaves congressional and local races particularly vulnerable to well-funded outside groups sweeping in with a multi-million dollar barrage of attack ads against overwhelmingly less-well funded campaigns.

Justice

New Super PAC Aims To Eliminate All Super PACs

A new Super PAC registered with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) yesterday with a name that conveys its unusual mission: America’s Super PAC For The Permanent Elimination of America’s Super PACs (ASPFTPEASP).

Since the 2010 Citizens United and SpeechNow.org ruling created the independent-expenditure-only “Super PAC,” hundreds of such committees have registered. About a quarter of those Super PACs have reported making any independent expenditures, to date — supporting and/or opposing federal candidates.

But ASPFTPEASP appears to be the first committee formed with the mission of self-annihilation. The group’s website lists a two-pronged mission:

America’s Super PACs For the Permanent Elimination of America’s Super PACs will seek to raise awareness of the usage of Super PACs during elections and advise citizens on how to demand (from their respective representatives) that Super PACs be removed from politics.

America’s Super PAC For The Permanent Elimination of America’s Super PACs seeks to call for a constitutional convention where an amendment will be proposed to ensure that corporations are never considered to be people. Why? They’re not. Plain and simple.

Jonathan Rachowicz, who is listed on the group’s official filings as “High Treasurer,” told ThinkProgress that while his group its taking a comical approach, it intends to be a serious effort:

We’re going to fight fire with fire. If we can create a Super PAC with a ridiculous name that creates ridiculous ads, we can show people just how absurd the idea of a Super PAC really is. Once that happens we can really get some change.

Rachowicz said the group hopes to enlist a “high number of people” to compete with the rich who “have a high number of dollars.” Unlike other Super PACs which principally focus on the election or defeat of federal candidates, he says their top issue is “the way in which federal candidates are supported by unlimited funds, which can lead to corruption.”

With Super PACs already roundly despised — and polling showing more America’s believe in witchcraft than agree with the Citizens United ruling — this may be the one Super PAC with whom the vast majority of Americans can agree.

Election

In Concession Speech, Gingrich Thanks Super PAC Funders: ‘It Would Be Impossible For Me To Be Here’ Without Them

Erstwhile presidential candidate Newt Gingrich officially suspended his campaign today after announcing he would do so last week, and among the handful of people he thanked by name were Sheldon and Miriam Adelson. The couple were by far the largest donors to the super PAC supporting Gingrich’s presidential bid, and their $25 million donations nearly single-handedly kept the Gingrich campaign alive in its last days.

GINGRICH: And of course, while they weren’t directly associated with the campaign, it would be impossible for me to be here and thank everybody without mentioning Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, who single-handedly came pretty close to matching Romney’s super PAC.

Watch it:

Gingrich’s praise of the Adelsons, and admission of their importance in his campaign, underscores how super PACs have fundamentally changed the political landscape, allowing a single household to spend unlimited amounts of money to nearly “single-handedly” fund candidates.

But his comments may also raise some eyebrows, as super PACs are legally not allowed to coordinate with campaigns and should exist entirely independently of the campaign. Gingrich notes the casino mogul and his wife “weren’t directly associated with the campaign,” but his public gratitude underscore the porous rules governing campaign finance in the post-Citizens United era.

Gingrich did not endorse Romney during his speech, but is expected to sometime in the near future, as the presumed GOP nominee has vowed to help Gingrich retire his campaign debt.

Election

Romney Super PAC Etch-A-Sketches Negative Ads

The deep-pocketed super PAC that helped Mitt Romney bury his Republican primary opponents in negative campaigns is hoping to erase memory of those same ads as the candidate it’s supporting pivots to the general election. Politico reports Restore Our Future has scrubbed its YouTube channel of all but two spots:

The [two ads] that are left are a contrast spot about Romney and President Barack Obama and one about Romney helping a Bain official search for a teenaged daughter who’d disappeared in New York City. That spot, the best of the 2008 cycle for Romney, was made by Larry McCarthy for the campaign back then. McCarthy is now with ROF.

The super PAC removed nasty ads going after former candidates Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, both of whom are expected to endorse Romney soon. Both candidates launched vicious attacks on Romney, with Gingrich explicitly calling Romney “a liar” and Santorum calling the former Massachusetts governor the “ultimate flip-flopper.” Restore our Future returned fire with at least $11 million in negative ads hitting the candidates, playing an essential role in helping Romney secure the nomination.

But now that Romney is the presumed nominee and heading into the general, the super PAC backing him and its former rivals would rather have voters forget what they said about each other during the primary.

Justice

GOP Billionaire Casino Mogul Sheldon Adelson To Keep Future Political Spending Secret

Sheldon Adelson

Sheldon Adelson (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Casino billionaire and right-wing activist Sheldon Adelson has already given at least $10 million to Republican-Allied Super PACs so far this cycle… and he plans to make at least one more Super PAC donation. But, he told Las Vegas Sun political reporter Jon Ralston, after that he plans to keep his massive political spending secret.

Ralston writes:

“I’m going to give one more small donation – you might not think it’s that small – to a SuperPAC and then if I give it will be to a c4,” a reference to 501c4 nonprofits, which are tax-exempt and also exempt from disclosures. I opined that surely meant Crossroads, which would allow him to indirectly help Mitt Romney and Sen. Dean Heller [R-NV], who is running against Rep. Shelley Berkley [D-NV]. Berkley used to work for Adelson, but they had a falling out in the mid-1990s and he surely would love to see her lose.

Do you know how many c4s there are?” Adelson retorted, as if to try to indicate he had more choices than Crossroads. Indeed. But I can’t think of too many that will influence who controls the White House and the U.S. Senate. And did he telegraph where his money is going with the Rove comments? I think so.

Adelson also declined to tell Ralston which Super PAC he intended to support with that final “small donation.”

The casino mogul seemingly conceded that he didn’t want his future political “speech” to be transparent because voters might take that information into consideration when evaluating his message.

Adelson said he believed the media’s inevitable use of the phrase “casino mogul” whenever his donations became public “is not helpful to the person .”

So, thanks to the Supreme Court’s stream of rulings against political spending limits and the unwillingness of the Republicans in Congress and on the Federal Election Commission to even mandate disclosure of independent political ad funders, billionaires like Adelson can simply hide their massive donations through (c)(4)s when they get tired of the media and public scrutiny. And rather than letting the voters decide how much credibility to give an ad bankrolled entirely by an anti-union gambling magnate — he can just choose to keep them in the dark.

While Ralston seems convinced Adelson’s support will go to Karl Rove’s secretive Crossroads GPS, the most famous right-wing (c)(4), the truth is he and we have no idea. Adelson could give the money to former Sen. Norm Coleman’s (R-MN) American Action Network. Or to the Koch Brother’s Americans for Prosperity. Or some totally unknown 501(c)(4)s that could be collecting hundreds of millions of dollars without any footprint, waiting to pounce with a barrage of shady attack ads. Or, given his billions, all of those.

Justice

Eight of the Top Ten 2012 Super PAC Donors Are Republicans

Sheldon Adelson

Casino Mogul and Major Super PAC Donor Sheldon Adelson

Last January, a study found that seventeen of the top twenty political donors are Republicans or conservatives. Last night, USA Today published a similar roundup of Super PAC donors in the 2012 cycle, and they found exactly the same pattern. Eight of the top ten Super PAC donors are Republicans or corporations who donate exclusively to Republicans. One is the Cooperative of American Physicians, a group of physicians focused on mitigating the cost of malpractice liability that supports a single Democrat. The other non-Republican group is a teachers union.

Notably, the top three Super PAC donors are all Republicans, and their more than $45 million in contributions adds up to more than four times the total spending by the remainder of the top ten:

These totals may also understate the total amount of spending by these wealthy right-wing benefactors because donors can keep their identities secret by funneling their money into non-profit arms of political organizations. Sixty-two percent of the $123 million raised by Karl Rove’s “Crossroads” political empire in 2010 and 2011, for example, came from secret donors.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up