ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Texas

Immigration

Texas Bill Would Protect Immigrant Victims And Witnesses From Deportation

On Thursday, the House State Affairs Committee in Texas approved a bill that would prohibit law enforcement officers from asking immigrants about their legal status when they report abuse and crime. The bill would prohibit immigration checks, but it does not grant exemptions for criminal involvement.

Advocating undocumented immigrants to come out of the shadows to report crime would not only serve to bring justice to the system quicker, but empower victims to take a stand against their perpetrators. The bill passage could likely deter the ability of abusive partners who use the threat of deportation to undermine their spouses or partners from reporting their crime in a similar way that the Senate immigration bill aims to do.

It could also help improve construction site work conditions wherein one out of every five Texas construction workers require hospitalization due to job-related accidents.

The bill presents a positive shift from previous anti-immigrant House bills, such as the 2011 “no sanctuary city” bill that would give enforcement officers the authority to inquiry about legal status. Once regarded as proxies to ICE officers, Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo would like this bill to help change the public perception that law enforcement officials are there to investigate crime rather than to detain people.

Health

West Virginia Accepts Medicaid Expansion As Time Runs Out For Other Highly-Uninsured States

Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin (D-WV) (Credit: Raw Story)

West Virginia Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin (D) announced in a press conference on Thursday that his state would take part in Obamacare’s optional Medicaid expansion, calling the decision “the best choice for West Virginia.” But many states still remain up in the air with their decisions, either because they haven’t decided yet or because state executives and legislators are at odds with each other on the issue — and time is running out.

Speaking at St. Francis hospital and flanked by nurses, doctors, and hospital administrators, Tomblin laid out the medical and financial case for expanding Medicaid eligibility — a conclusion that he reached after commissioning a study to examine such a move’s effects on West Virginia. “Expansion will allow us to provide insurance coverage to 91,500 West Virginians,” said Tomblin.

Indeed, West Virginia has much to gain and very little to lose by embracing the Obamacare provision. The state has abysmal health demographics, and over half of West Virginia’s uninsured population lives below 138 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). These poor and vulnerable populations would gain access to health coverage under the Medicaid expansion, leading the Kaiser Family Foundation to conclude that expansion will reduce the number of uninsured West Virginians by a staggering 67 percent.

Those numbers likely led Tomblin to his decision. But the moderate Democrat has an advantage that governors of other conservative — and highly uninsured — states don’t: the almost assured support of his legislature. Democrats hold a supermajority in the state Senate and an eight seat edge in the House of Delegates, and both of West Virginia’s U.S. senators also support expanding Medicaid, making intraparty barriers unlikely.

The same cannot be said of Republican Govs. Jan Brewer (AZ) and Rick Scott (FL), who have been lobbying for Medicaid expansion after intense pressure from hospital associations and advocates for the poor. Their Republican-controlled state legislatures have been bending over backwards to stop it from happening. Although there is no hard deadline for expanding Medicaid under Obamacare, many of these states’ legislative sessions are quickly coming to an end — meaning that if no agreement is reached soon, they won’t receive the additional federal funds and won’t be able to extend coverage to low-income residents for at least the first full year of Obamacare implementation.

Texas and Louisiana face similar issues. Although some GOP lawmakers in those states are contemplating Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe’s (D) alternative “private option” — which would take federal money and use it to help an expanded Medicaid pool buy private insurance — those efforts also remain in limbo, as former and current Republican presidential aspirants Govs. Rick Perry (TX) and Bobby Jindal (LA) have oscillated between flat-out rejecting expansion and being coy about their intentions.

Read more

Justice

Meat Processing Plant Ordered To Pay Mentally Disabled Workers $240 Million For Decades Of Abuse

A badly stained mattress at the Henry's Turkey Services bunkhouse (Credit: Justin Hayworth/The Des Moines Register)

A federal jury ruled Wednesday afternoon that Henry’s Turkey Service of Goldwaithe, Texas, must pay 32 mentally disabled workers $240 million for years of abuse and neglect. The now-shuttered company’s violations of the American Disabilities Act range from physically abusing the men to packing them in unsanitary bunkhouses at night.

Over 40 years, hundreds of men were shipped from Texas to work in Henry’s Iowa plant for 41 cents an hour. They were housed in a century-old, cockroach-infested school building with a broken boiler, denied access to disability services, and battered with constant physical and verbal abuse by their so-called caretakers. The complaint details how injuries and requests for medical aid were ignored, restroom breaks were prohibited, while caretakers mocked the men as “retarded” “dumbass” and “stupid.”

Meanwhile, the state of Iowa and the U.S. Labor Department turned a blind eye to the labor camp’s myriad violations, as the Des Moines Register explains:

Evidence produced during the trial indicates bunkhouse supervisor Randy Neubauer had one of the bunkhouse residents handcuffed to his bed at night — an allegation Neubauer denied when testifying.

Also, an Iowa Department of Human Services social worker testified that evidence showed some of the men were punished for violating company rules by being taken to a garage next to the bunkhouse, where they were forced to walk around a pole while they were hit, kicked and screamed at by their caretakers.

Although federal officials have said Henry’s violated the state fire code, committed abuse and ran the bunkhouse as an unlicensed care facility, the state of Iowa never filed criminal charges in the case.
[...]
Henry’s decades-long practice of paying the men less than the minimum wage was well-known to the U.S. Department of Labor, which over 15 years repeatedly cited the company for wage violations but imposed no penalties.

Even Kenneth Henry, the owner of Henry’s Turkey Service, struck an employee, or one of the “boys,” as Henry called the mostly middle-aged men. Henry denied it in court, also claiming he had no knowledge of the appalling conditions in his labor camp.

After a Des Moines Register investigation helped shut down the plant in 2009, the company was ordered to pay millions in penalties to the workers, the U.S. Labor Department, and Iowa Workforce Development for wage violations. However, months later, Henry’s has not yet paid up. On top of these outstanding penalties, Henry’s will now have to pay for the abuses and neglect suffered by the workers.

The $240 million penalty was welcomed as a “powerful statement” by advocates and family members of the abused workers. Still, one expert witness wondered, “How do you put a value on decades of lost opportunity? You can’t recapture those years…These men were hidden away for decades, and for others’ personal gain.”

LGBT

Dallas Mayor: Publicly Supporting Marriage Equality Is A Waste Of Time

Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings

The City Council of Dallas, Texas is set to approve a resolution supporting the right of same-sex couples to marry, but Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings (D) thinks the resolution is a waste of time. Rawlings is actually “an unequivocal supporter of marriage equality,” but he told The Dallas Morning News that he doesn’t understand why the Council is bothering to discuss it since they have no power to change the law:

“I don’t want to be talking about late-term abortions, or gun control, or Gitmo,” he said.

To do so is “a misuse of City Council time.”

As the Dallas Voice points out, the Council “can certainly exert some influence,” because “symbols do matter” when it comes to public opinion. Certainly, when President Obama came out for marriage equality, many other political leaders followed his lead, and last month many Democratic Senators continued to change their positions as the media focused on the Supreme Court’s oral arguments.

Rawlings similarly avoided joining the over 300 Mayors for the Freedom To Marry, claiming to be “pledge-phobic” because the campaign is “simplistic and not substantive.” There is a difference, however, between simple and simplistic, just as there is a difference between talking the talk and walking the walk. Rawlings may say he supports marriage equality, but he seems quine keen on avoiding opportunities to prove it through his leadership.

LGBT

Texas Attorney General: Domestic Partnerships Are Unconstitutional

Texas AG Greg Abbott advocating for the public display of The Ten Commandments.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott (R) has issued new guidance stating that domestic partnerships are unconstitutional under the Texas state Constitution’s amendment banning marriage for same-sex couples. However, his decision does contain a certain nuance that would still allow for same-sex couples to receive their partners’ health benefits. Abbott points out that recognizing relationships “similar” to marriage — like domestic partnerships — is unconstitutional, but, citing a lawmaker’s remarks when Texas passed its marriage amendment, he explains that the health benefits themselves are:

Representative Chisum’s statement simply explains that article I, section 32 does not, in his view, address whether a political subdivision may provide health benefits to the unmarried partner of an employee. The constitutional provision does, however, explicitly prohibit a political subdivision from creating or recognizing a legal status identical or similar to marriage. The political subdivisions you ask about have not simply provided health benefits to the partners of their employees. Instead, they have elected to create a domestic partnership status that is similar to marriage. Further, they have recognized that status by making it the sole basis on which health benefits may be conferred on the domestic partners of employees.

This presents a challenging space for employers who wish to recognize same-sex couples. The primary criterion that Abbott explains is problematic to domestic partnerships is that the requirement for their recognition is too similar to marriage, including that applicants must attest that they are not married and have no undissolved relational conflicts. Hypothetically, municipalities could offer employees the opportunity to designate a single beneficiary without requiring such qualifications for recognition and thus not violate the constitution at all.

Of course, Abbott’s opinion is nonbinding, and thus nothing is preventing domestic partnerships from continuing — only a court responding to a legal challenge could invalidate them. Currently, Dallas County and the cities of Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, and San Antonio, as well as Pflugerville School District, all offer domestic partnerships. Pflugerville was undoubtedly the specific target for the request for Abbott’s guidance, but district officials say the December decision to offer the benefits was simply a business decision by the insurance committee that does not cost the district or the taxpayers.

Security

Texas Attorney General: Democrats Pose Greater Threat To Texas Than North Korea

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott on Monday warned an audience of a threat to the Lone Star state far greater than those from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un: Democrats.

Abbott made his comments at a McLennan County Republican Club lunchtime event in Waco, TX, using the venue to repeatedly slam the Obama administration’s policies. In doing so, Abbott took the time to warn his fellow Republicans of the encroaching threat that Democrats pose to their very way of life. Pointing to the group Battleground Texas, composed of veterans of the Obama presidential campaigns, the Abbott argued that the Democratic Party is a far greater concern to the state than North Korea:

“One thing that requires ongoing vigilance is the reality that the state of Texas is coming under a new 
assault, an assault far more dangerous than what the leader of North Korea threatened when he said he was going to add Austin, Texas, as one of the recipients of his nuclear weapons,” Abbott said. “The threat that we’re getting is the threat from the Obama administration and his political machine.”

Austin was one of the cities seen on a North Korean map, supposedly comprising the targets should North Korea carry out nuclear strikes in the United States. North Korea’s vast supply of missiles, however, are unable to reach that far, whether or not they are able to be nuclear-armed.

Meanwhile, Battleground Texas is seeking to convince Texans to vote for Democrats in national elections. Speaking to the Waco Tribune after the speech, Abbott said “he made the comparison to North Korea partly because he doesn’t think the country is a serious threat to the U.S.” and to highlight that “complacency kills” in politics.
Read more

Health

Texas Restaurant Sign Makes Light Of Abuse: ‘Beer Should Be Like Violence — Domestic’

An organic restaurant in Houston, Texas stirred public outcry this past weekend with a marquee sign making light of domestic violence:

The Houston Press reported that the sign was quickly brought to the restaurant’s attention and taken down within “10 minutes,” according to its manager, who identified himself as Kenneth. “Everyone makes mistakes. We completely deserved the backlash, and I can’t be mad at anyone but myself,” Kenneth told the Press.

However, the followup sign posted on the marquee didn’t reflect much remorse on the part of Roots Bistro. “Seriously, focus your energy on equal rights,” the sign proclaimed. Some have interpreted that to be an attack on those who were offended by the sign, and a call to “lighten up” over what was meant to be a joke.

But the outrage over the sign that spread on the Internet and throughout the Houston community reflects the growing public discontent over rape culture, as stories about violence against women become increasingly commonplace. According to the Texas Council on Family Violence, 74 percent of all Texans “have either themselves, a family member and/or a friend experienced some form of domestic violence,” and 47 percent have experienced at least one form of domestic violence personally. In the U.S. as a whole, one in four women will experience domestic violence at some point in her life.

(HT: Salon)

LGBT

Texas A&M Student Body President Vetoes Bill To Defund LGBT Center

Student Body President John Claybrook

John Claybrook, Student Body President at Texas A&M University, has vetoed a bill passed by the student senate that would allow students to opt out of funding campus services if they have religious objections. Until it was revised at Wednesday night’s meeting, the bill specifically targeted the university’s GLBT Resource Center. Claybrook explained his veto in an open letter:

After much research and deliberation, I have confidently decided to veto S.B. 65-70, The Religious Funding Exemption bill. Even without the wording that specified particular groups that would be affected in the final version of this bill, the sentiment towards the bill has not changed and has caused great harm to our reputation as a student body and to the students feeling disenfranchised by the bill. [...]

Although much adjusted in its final form, the good accomplished through this bill pales in comparison to the damage done. The damage must stop today. Texas A&M students represent our core value of respect exceptionally and I’m very proud of the family at this university. Now, more than ever, is the time to show great resolve and come together, treating each other like the family that we are.

Claybrook pointed out that in addition to the bill’s negative sentiment, students do not currently have the ability to opt-out of student fees, so clarifying a process to do so “serves no purpose.”

The bill’s sponsor, Chris Woolsey, conceded, “it’s just how the democratic process works.” The senate may consider a veto override when it meets again on April 17, but the bill did not garner the two-thirds votes that would require.

LGBT

Texas Lawmaker Withdraws Amendment To Punish Universities For Offering LGBT Support

University LGBT resource centers in Texas may be safe for now. Thursday night, state Rep. Bill Zedler (R) withdrew his amendment to the appropriations bill that would have cut funding for any public universities that provided support service for LGBT students. Zedler did not explain his decision to withdraw, but his actions mirror those of Rep. Wayne Christian (R) who proposed then withdrew a similar measure in 2011.

Zedler’s bill not-so-subtly suggested that homosexuality directly causes disease:

An institution of higher education may not use money appropriated to the institution under this Act, or any property or facility of the institution funded by appropriations under this Act, to support, promote, or encourage any behavior that would lead to high risk behavior for AIDS, HIV, Hepatitis B, or any sexually transmitted disease.

Though Zedler’s amendment is not advancing, efforts are still underway to undermine the support for LGBT students, particularly at Texas A&M University, where students are attempting to opt-out of funding the campus’s center on religious grounds.

LGBT

Texas Students And Lawmakers Target University LGBT Centers

Universities across the country have LGBT Resource Centers to provide support services and programming that help create a safer and more inclusive learning environment for LGBT students, but Texas conservatives are taking aim at these facilities. Wednesday night, the Texas A&M University Student Senate voted 35-28 to pass what was renamed the “Religious Funding Exemption Bill,” which allows students to  opt-out of paying the portion of their student fees that goes toward the campus GLBT Resource Center — about $2 — if they have religious objections.

Apparently, the bill was expanded at the last minute so that it didn’t simply target the GLBT Resource Center, but the impracticality remains. After all, as an editorial in the student newspaper The Battalion points out today, a student could make an argument to “morally oppose” any campus service. University officials, who have final approval over any budget changes, explained that students are disallowed from paying the University Advancement Fee. Moreover, Student Body President John Claybrook has not decided if he might veto the bill, though he did win his position running against the bill’s sponsor, Thomas McNutt. Given that it passed with a narrower vote than was expected, it may not have the support to override such a veto.

Though it’s unclear this student-led attack on LGBT Aggies is enforceable, the state legislature is considering a broader change that very well could. Texas Rep. Bill Zedler (R) has filed an amendment to the state’s appropriations bill to cut funding for public universities that have “Gender and Sexuality Centers and Related Student Centers.” The amendment offensively claims that the centers promote behaviors that have a high risk for disease:

An institution of higher education may not use money appropriated to the institution under this Act, or any property or facility of the institution funded by appropriations under this Act, to support, promote, or encourage any behavior that would lead to high risk behavior for AIDS, HIV, Hepatitis B, or any sexually transmitted disease.

Many LGBT resource centers work directly with campus health services to promote safe sex practices and overall sexual health for all students — even those who aren’t LGBT. Zedler is simply implying that anything gay is therefore unhealthy, a stigmatizing stereotype not based on reality. Rep. Wayne Christian (R) attempted a similar measure blocking support for LGBT services in 2011, but Democratic opposition forced him to withdraw it. Texas lawmakers are considering several other bills this term that target schools for supporting LGBT students and employees.

There is one glimmer of good news for LGBT students in Texas. While A&M’s student government was busy voting for a religious right to discriminate, the University of Houston’s student government unanimously passed a resolution opposing Zedler’s amendment.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up