ThinkProgress Logo

Stories tagged with “Tom Perriello

Climate Progress

Climate Hawk Tom Perriello To Head Center For American Progress Action Fund

Perriello Cap

Climate Progress is a project Center For American Progress Action Fund.  So I’m delighted to report that Former Rep. Tom Perriello (D-VA) will be taking over as President of CAPAF.

At the same time, my terrific CAPAF colleague, Tara McGuinness, will be both Senior Vice President of the Action Fund and Senior Vice President of Communications at CAP.  As HuffPost puts it:

The announcement caps off a major period of transition for the influential think-tank and advocacy organization. CAP’s founder, John Podesta, recently stepped down from the post of president and was replaced by Neera Tanden, a former top adviser to Presidents Clinton and Obama. Jennifer Palmieri, who headed CAP’s Action Fund, recently left to take on a communications position inside the Obama White House. Her former job, which included the title of Senior Vice President of Communications at CAP, will be split between Perriello and McGuinness.

Climate Progress readers will remember that Perriello emerged is a true climate hawk during the  congressional debate over the climate bill.  He famously said, “The Republicans may win some seats because of this vote, but they can’t regain their souls for demagoguing the issue.”

Here’s more from Perriello in February 2010 telling the “spineless Senate” to get “its head out of its rear end” and confront climate crisis:

Read more

Politics

Break-in, Tampering Reported At Rep. Tom Perriello’s Campaign Office

Last night, someone broke into a campaign office of Rep. Tom Perriello (D-VA) in Charlottesville, VA. According to a report the campaign filed with the Charlottesville police, someone entered the unoccupied office between 2 and 5:30 a.m. by busting in a window screen. The perpetrator then took information on polling place locations and deliberately distributed it in the wrong neighborhood, Perriello’s campaign says:

[Campaign spokesperson Jessica] Barba said they noticed the stolen materials had been distributed to the wrong voters today, when canvassers out in the area around the University of Virginia began seeing students who had the door hangers with the incorrect polling place. Perriello said it was clearly meant to “confuse student voters,” and the campaign has sent canvassers out today to clear up any confusion.

A sign for Hurt’s campaign was also left in front of Perriello’s office. “The only thing that leads us to believe that they are Hurt supporters is that it appears to be an attempt to suppress our vote, but also when our staffers arrived at 5:00 in the morning in the office, there was a Hurt sign planted outside of the office building, which definitely wasn’t there when they left before,” Barba told the Huffington Post.

Hurt’s campaign, meanwhile, has explicitly accused Perriello supporters of staging the break-in. “Apparently, Perriello supporters are so desperate for sympathy that they staged a mock break in by drama students from UVA looking for extra credit,” Chris LaCivita, a Hurt campaign strategist, told Politico in an e-mailed statement.

Perriello is in his first term in Congress, but is locked in a tight and very high-profile race; President Obama held a campaign event for Perriello on Friday, saying he was “one of the best congressmen Virginia has ever had.” This weekend, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and House Minority Whip Eric Cantor held an event for Hurt.

This isn’t the first time Perriello has been targeted — earlier this year, a gas line at the home of Perriello’s brother was severed after Tea Party activists posted the address online.

Update

A prior version of this story, based on an erroneous local news report, said that the incorrect voter information was distributed by the Perriello campaign. In fact it was distributed by the perpetrators. We apologize for the confusion.

Yglesias

The Party of Medicare

George Zornick’s post on the “US” Chamber of Commerce’s ads bashing Tom Perriello focus on Chamber-centric issues, but there’s a broader point to be made:

In Virginia’s fifth Congressional district, Democratic incumbent Tom Perriello has faced an onslaught of attack ads funded by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. One such ad implored voters: “Government run health care. Medicare cuts. Have you had enough? Tell Congressman Perriello, stop hurting Virginia families.” As ThinkProgress reported, it’s possible that the Chamber’s attack ads are being funded by foreign money; the Chamber has yet to disclose who, exactly, funds its attack ads.

All’s fair in politics, so if the party of small government wants to win a midterm election by bashing Democrats for cutting Medicare they’re welcome to do so. But insofar as the issue at hand is ideology rather than partisan politics, one is going to be hard-pressed to see a campaign won in this manner as a thundering endorsement of a libertarian approach to health care or spending. Indeed, it mostly serves as an indication of how difficult it will be to ever repeal the Affordable Care Act once its benefits are locked into place.

Politics

Virginia GOP Candidates Agree To Closed-Door, No-Media-Allowed Meeting With Tea Partiers

On Monday, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) went on MSNBC and hit Democrats for going into “hiding” this summer, implying that they weren’t planning to peak with their constituents during the August recess:

CANTOR: [Y]ou look at the difference now of what we’re about as Republicans and what Democrats are about the course of this August recess. I would venture to say that Democrats have gone into hiding, whereas John Boehner and I and the rest of our conference are out there, taking our message to the people, talking about the specific things that they can expect if we’re a majority. And we’re frankly shocked — we’re listening to people, and I think the Democrats have demonstrated they’re unwilling to do that, and their agenda reflects that.

Today, however, two Virginia newspapers have editorials criticizing two GOP congressional candidates for banning the media from their closed-door events with Tea Party activists. Both state Sen. Robert Hurt (running for Virginia’s 5th district) and incumbent Rep. Bob Goodlatte (Virginia’s 6th district) have agreed to speak to the Lynchburg Tea Party’s Aug. 5 meeting, even though the media will be shut out. Tea Party Chairman Mark Lloyd said that the members wanted to have a “one-on-one type of setting without the lights and microphones” and claimed that at a May meeting — where there were two tv stations and a newspaper reporter — “nobody could see anything because of the cameras and all that.”

Today, two local papers have taken the two men to task for this arrangement. From the News & Advance:

Both [Goodlatte and Hurt] are public servants and both are running for public positions that deserve public scrutiny. Yet, neither candidate objected to excluding the media from the meeting.

What exactly is the tea party’s problem with allowing the media to sit in on the proceedings at the Monte Carlo restaurant? Are there some secrets that Hurt and Goodlatte want to share with the members — or that the members want to share with the Republican candidates? Who knows? [...]

Democracy gets a little messy at times, especially the way it’s conducted in the United States. The media often take seriously their responsibility to report to the public what public officials are saying and doing. And those cameras and lights do create distractions on occasion. Anyone who has attended a presidential campaign event knows all about that.

But do those distractions mean the public should be excluded from proceedings on the campaign trail? Certainly not. It is one of the ways the public learns about where the candidates stand on the various issues that surround the current campaigns for Congress.

By excluding the media from Thursday’s meeting, the Lynchburg Tea Party is serving only itself. But maybe that’s what this third party political movement is all about.

The Danville Register & Bee contrasts what Goodlatte and Hurt are doing with Rep. Tom Periello (R-VA), who “held town hall meetings in every city and county in the Fifth District last year and will do the same again this year. Perriello has no fear of meeting with people who disagree with him and having his answers recorded. Even people who strongly disagree with his votes give Perriello high marks for standing up and taking the heat.”

Ironically, Goodlatte has also stressed that he would like to make Congress more transparent, and earlier this year, he criticized Democrats for not letting the media (C-SPAN) cover the health care negotiations. Hurt’s campaign posted a letter to the editor to its website that praised the state senator for his “transparent voting record.”

Yglesias

Doing it With Hustle

tom-perriello_10small 1

Marin Cogan reports on Tom Perriello’s continuing efforts to stay true to his progressive convictions while representing a not-so-liberal congressional district in Virginia:

While some vulnerable Democrats are lying low after taking a tough vote in favor of health care reform, Perriello is doing the opposite: crisscrossing the district in his white pickup to talk directly with constituents about how his vote will affect them — and to tell them that he’s working hard to revitalize southern Virginia’s depressed economy.

His confrontational approach underlies a stark political reality: As a liberal freshman who won his conservative district by just 727 votes in 2008, he is considered one of the most vulnerable Democrats in the country. A February poll found him tied with state Sen. Robert Hurt in a hypothetical matchup. The National Journal has ranked Perriello’s district as the 14th most likely to switch parties in November.

Perriello’s efforts to win re-election through hard work rather than casting bad votes is worth putting in the context of empirical research on the electoral benefits of a reputation for moderation. The research suggests that being seen as a liberal rather than a moderate could cost Perriello two percentage points worth of support. In a close-fought election, that’s the difference between winning and losing. At the same time, two percentage points is not an insurmountable obstacle. In fact, it indicates that it’s perfectly possible for a principled progressive (or a principled conservative) to win in a moderate district. But you need to come up with some way to make up the lost ground. Tireless campaigning might be the thing that works.

Another thing to say in favor of Perriello’s approach is that it’s not totally clear what sort of behavior will win you a reputation as a moderate. If you vote for the Obama budget, and the Obama health care plan, but not for ACES or financial regulatory reform does that win you votes? Or is backing the Affordable Care Act enough for you to be deemed incorrigibly liberal?

Politics

Perriello Blasts GOP Leaders In Washington For Refusing To Completely Denounce Harassment Of Democrats

Democratic lawmakers are increasingly coming out and reporting incidents of harassment in response to their vote for health care reform. In addition to previously reported vandalism in Kansas, New York, Ohio, and Arizona — as well as disturbing threats surrounding Reps. Tom Perriello (D-VA) and Bart Stupak (D-MI) — lawmakers have received images of nooses sent to their offices and had their personal information publicly distributed. At least 10 lawmakers have requested extra security after receiving death threats, and Rep. Phil Hare (D-IL) said that “he knows several Democrats who have told their spouses to move out of the home districts while the lawmakers are in Washington.”

The response from the GOP leadership in Washington has been disappointing. They have continued to incite their base with dangerous rhetoric — such as RNC Chairman Michael Steele this week saying that voters should “start getting Nancy ready for the firing line” — and shied away from outright condemnation of the harassment. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) said the violence and threats were “unacceptable,” but seemed to encourage the “anger” by telling people to put it into political campaigns: “I know there’s anger, but let’s take that anger and go out and register people to vote, go volunteer on a political campaign, and let’s do it the right way.”

Today, Perriello went on CNN and called out the GOP leadership — in particular, Boehner — for his “offensive” and “outrageous” response:

PERRIELLO: I thought it his statement was fairly outrageous. What he was saying was, for those of you who are threatening people’s children, we want you to channel that anger into the campaign. No, we want those people to go to jail. [...]

People doing these things outside of the law, these people need to be prosecuted, not brought into the campaign room. Those who are simply upset about health care and have every right to do so, they need to be part of the political process, in the same way that all of those who support health care do.

Watch it:

Just as disturbing as comments tacitly egging on the anger are ones that blame the Democratic lawmakers themselves for the incidents:

– The spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee said that while his organization doesn’t condone the harassment, it should be pointed out that Perriello and others aren’t the real victims. “Central and Southside Virginians are the ones who are going to have the bear the burden of increased taxes,” he said. “What you’re seeing is a frustration among his constituents who believe he’s not listening to them.”

– Fox News host Greta Van Susteren asked Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) yesterday about his “response” to the news that Stupak and others had been “threatened or intimidated.” Hatch immediately responded, “People are upset and really angry, and they’re tired of people making promises and not living up to them,” and only after additional questioning by Van Susteren, finally replied, “I think people have to quit doing things like that.”

Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) condemned the “inappropriate behavior,” but blamed Democrats for “fanning these flames.” “I’m a bit concerned about how it’s been handled around here in a public way because I think it just tends to fan the flames,” he told The Hill.

As Perriello pointed out in his interview today, both Virginia’s Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell and Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli — a proud Tea Party activist — have issued strong condemnations of the harassment of Perriello and his family.

Transcript: Read more

Yglesias

Tom Perriello Standing Tall

tom-perriello_10small 1

Jake Sherman and Marin Cogan have a good luck at various unhinged attacks on pro-reform members of congress, including a series of incidents in which tea partiers have been vandalizing congressional offices. The Tom Perriello part, however, is the best:

A fellow tea party blogger said he thought it was fine for Troxel to post Perriello’s home address. “They have our home addresses,” said Kurt Feigel, who complained that protesters had little choice but to go to Perriello’s home because Perriello’s office doesn’t “respond to e-mail; they don’t respond to letters; they don’t respond to us showing up at his office. So what am I going to do?”

Perriello said his family doesn’t want him to be afraid. But when asked if he was scared anyway, the Virginia Democrat replied: “Whatever.”

“I’ve lived in Sierra Leone for two years, where the life expectancy is 34 years old. If the worst thing that happens is that special-interest groups spend millions of dollars against me and my most ardent opponents organize against me, it’s hardly a ‘cry me a river’ moment — as long as people act civil and within the law.”

Members of Congress who are able to put their own careers in proper perspective are exactly the kind of members of Congress that we need the most.

Yglesias

VA-5 Congressional Candidate: Obama Election Was “Political Correctness Gone Awry”

verga_headshot_edit2

As everyone knows, racism and conservative politics have nothing to do with one another. Indeed, there’s not a single whiff of racism anywhere near anyone involved in conservative politics in the United States. It’s just that conservatives don’t care at all about the problem of racial discrimination of non-whites and do care—very deeply—about their commitment to anti-anti-racism and very zealous in defending the interests of white people against the dread forces of political correctness.

That’s how you wind up with things like Lawrence Verga, one of the GOP challengers to Tom Perriello in Virginia’s 5th Congressional DIstrict, providing the following answer to the question what’s the biggest national security threat facing the United States:

Verga said the biggest threat is the Americans who voted the Obama administration into office. “That was political correctness gone awry,” Verga said.

Of course to offer Verga any criticism on this point would only feed the sense of persecution upon which this kind of mindset thrives.

Climate Progress

Rep. Tom Perriello Tells ‘Spineless’ Senate To Get ‘Its Head Out Of Its Rear End’ And Confront Climate Crisis

Tom PerrielloRep. Tom Perriello (D-VA) is “sick” of the “insider baseball crap” dominating the Senate debate over global warming and energy reform. In an interview with Grist, the first-term congressman stated in no uncertain terms that the country is at risk from global warming and our economy is at risk of losing the clean energy race. Like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Perriello has not one lick of sympathy for those in the Senate who deny these threats:

That’s more insider baseball crap. I don’t really care. I’m sick of starting with what can we get through the Senate; let’s start with what solves the damn problem. Until the Senate gets its head out of its rear end and starts to see the crisis we’re in, our country is literally at risk. Our economy is at risk, because these jobs are being created overseas. It should have the same urgency with this problem that it had bailing out Wall Street. We are swearing an oath to do what’s necessary to protect this country, not do what’s necessary to get a bill through the Senate.

Perriello repeatedly expressed his belief that Congressional inaction on jobs, national security, and scientific “challenge of our era” is due to a lack of courage and responsibility:

This is the challenge of our time—the jobs opportunity, the national security challenge, the scientific challenge of our era. Any plan that uses market forces to signal a carbon-constrained environment is going to move us in the right direction. People who don’t support this kind of aggressive energy independence are just selling Americans short.

– We’re so far behind China, Europe, and other areas in the energy jobs of the future because neither party has had the guts to take this on. There are so many spineless people in D.C.

– Every week the Senate doesn’t act, it either freezes that investment and innovation or it sends it overseas. We’re giving up jobs. The Senate—the ridiculous tactics of the Republicans and the timidity of the Democrats—is standing in the way of the kind of job creation we need.

– Unfortunately, good ideas, ideas that could save our country, sometimes take 30 minutes to explain and only 30 seconds to demagogue. In between those two things is leadership, and we haven’t had the moral courage to take this on.

Perriello’s support for cap-and-trade legislation has made him a target of Republicans and polluters, who have mocked him with ads about snowstorms and flooded his office with forged letters of opposition.

Yglesias

Tom Perriello Explains What It’s All About

tom-perriello_10small 1

A member of congress with the right attitude about his job:

Perriello said there is a difference between being targeted and being vulnerable, and he said his support for health-care and energy reform are not as out of touch with his constituents as his opponents say. But even he seemed to acknowledge the challenge of winning next year as he described how he has sought to govern since taking office in January.

“My ultimate goal is not to get reelected,” he said. “It’s to know that I did the best damn job I could representing the people of the 5th District and making a difference. That’s just a different litmus test than some of the powers that be are used to working with.”

That’s right on. It does the world no good for members in marginal seats to put districts at risk over unimportant things, or lost causes, but casting tough votes on the big issues is what members of congress come to Washington to do. After all, it’s not as if the nation’s homeless shelters are filled with former members of congress. We’re heading into what’s likely to be a tough election cycle, and it’s important that people focus their resources on helping the really good members of congress. Keep articles like this in mind.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up