According to the Washington Times, “President Bush is poised to change course and announce as early as this week that he wants Congress to pass a bill to combat global warming, and will lay out principles for what that should include.” However, “it is not clear exactly what Mr. Bush will propose.” Although this announcement comes as we head into the Earth Day weekend, Bush spokeswoman Dana Perino claimed it’s just a coincidence.
Stephen Dinan writes that Bush and conservatives are now focusing on the possibility that “runaway” global warming legislation will cause a “disaster” and a “nightmare.” Asked about the Washington Times story, Dana Perino warned today of a “regulatory train wreck with many different laws, such as the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act.” Perino all but admitted this leaked announcement is a “trial balloon” to try out new right-wing talking points — when she was asked when the Bush plan would be released:
It could be never.
Watch it:
In fact, it is not government action that is the potential runaway train wreck, as Bush administration officials have made clear:
Their polluter-funded message of denial having finally been beaten back, the right wing is now attempting to subvert action by any means possible, including pulling the classic polluter claim that solutions are more dangerous than the problem.
But that will only be true if our response to climate change is designed by the polluters themselves.
UPDATE: A Siegel at Energy Smart debunks the Perino press conference.
You must be logged in to post a comment.


Excellent discussion … for me, it is as if Hell might have frozen over or, at least, that Hell has a frost. My main concern: that this is part of a triangulation strategy to make Bush look like the conservative approach, Lieberman-Warner as somehow the aggressive approach, and McFlip, McFlop, McSame McCain the just right approach to Global Warming legislation. Lieberman-Warner is already inadequate, not meeting the basic principles that we should see in legislation. But this effort could make L-W seem good to people who should know better.
April 14th, 2008 at 6:07 pmI remember about 7 years ago on Earth Day, Bush made a speech in which he said all of the right things. In spite of knowing better, I thought that he had figured the situation out and would start at least being environmentally responsible.
He wasn’t, of course.
Well, if Bush ways the right things but doesn’t do them, this makes him into a liar never to be trusted, totally irresponsible and should have been impeached long ago.
If one doesn’t know what is going on, one should at least be curious enough to try to find out.
April 15th, 2008 at 12:37 pmWhy don’t Conservatives want to conserve our Earth?
Oh, yeah. It cuts into profits. Screw the grand children’s need to breathe.
April 17th, 2008 at 10:23 am