Today’s new census numbers confirm the disproportionality of President Bush’s economic expansion. Unfortunately, the president’s economic policies — which were supposed to serve as “a rising tide that raised all boats” — have redistributed wealth to the richest Americans and left the middle and lower classes behind.
And while the new data “did show an uptick for 2007,” years of declining income and earnings outweigh this most recent growth.
Taking the new census numbers into account, most Americans lost money during the Bush expansion:
- Median household incomes down: 0.6% lower in 2007 than in 2000
- Men’s earnings down: 0.38% less in 2007 than in 1999
- Women’s earnings can’t keep up: continued upward swing but were unable to “overcome other drags on household income”
- More Americans in poverty: 5.7 million more people lived in poverty in 2007 than did in 2000
The Center for Policy and Budget Priorities notes, “never before on record has poverty been higher and median income for working-age households lower at the end of a multi-year economic expansion than at the beginning. The new data add to the mounting evidence that the gains from the 2001-2007 expansion were concentrated among high-income Americans.”
A new Center for American Progress report graphically presents the severity of the income redistribution:
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Imagine that! Are you surprised? McCain and all HIS friends are doing fine, so things must be “fundamentally sound”..this from the man that admitted he knows practically NOTHING about economics.Women…if you’re reading this, McCain said we don’t need equal pay for equal work…we just need more on the job training!That’s an insult if I ever heard one…next thing you know he’ll say we would all be better off barefoot and in the kitchen..(The one WE have, because he’s a POW, and never had a kitchen)Now he’s got at least 7 kitchens, but doesn’t know what house he’s in…OH, the STRESS..
August 26th, 2008 at 6:56 pmNow which American leadership guru taught the importance of reducing variation? Hint: the Japanese have a quality prize named after him…
Yes, this applies to income. The average CEO compensation is 300 times the workers. Private equity and hedge fund managers gross 19,000 times that amount. Guess who gets preferred tax rates? The PEU boys…
““If I had to reduce my message for management to just a few words, I’d say it all had to do with reducing variation.”-Dr. W. Edwards Deming
August 26th, 2008 at 7:59 pm