When egalitarian liberals object to things like surrogate motherhood, I understand where they’re coming from even as I disagree. But what is one to make of something like Ramesh Ponnuru’s apparent egalitarian objections? Differential financial power is objectionable enough that it provides a grounds for banning certain kinds of consensual transactions, but it’s not sufficiently objectionable that we should actually do anything to try to eliminate or ameliorate it?
Previous in TP Yglesias
Get ThinkProgress email alerts
Most Popular Posts
- Fox Pundit Says Women In The Military Should ‘Expect’ To Be Raped
- Gov. Scott Walker To Use Foreclosure Settlement Money To Balance His Budget, Not Help Homeowners
- Santorum: Obama Has Put America On ‘The Path’ Of Executing Religious People By Decapitation
- GOP Ups The Ante, Introduces Legislation To Allow Any Employer To Deny Any Preventive Health Service
- Santorum: Birth Control Is Not Something ‘You Need Insurance For’ Because It Costs ‘Just A Few Dollars’
- Fox Pundit Says Women In The Military Should ‘Expect’ To Be Raped
- JC Penney CEO: ‘Ellen Represents The Values Of Our Company’
- Gov. Scott Walker To Use Foreclosure Settlement Money To Balance His Budget, Not Help Homeowners
- REPORT: By A Nearly 2 To 1 Margin, Cable Networks Call On Men Over Women To Comment On Birth Control
- Republican Women Senators Breaking Ranks With Party, Come Out In Favor Of Obama Contraception Rule
Got a Hot Tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
Think Progress Archives
About Think Progress | Contact Us | Donate
By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.