Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Parliaments, Parties, Apathy, and the Social Market

By Matthew Yglesias  

"Parliaments, Parties, Apathy, and the Social Market"

Share:

google plus icon

Clay Risen has a piece in Democracy: A Journal of Ideas about how a trip to Germany convinced him that liberals are wrong to pine for a parliamentary political system. I had a lot of problems with the piece, but to just render a simple objection he totally runs together the idea of a “parliamentary” system of government with the idea of a political system with more than two large political parties, such that assembling a parliamentary majority typically requires the construction of a multi-party coalition. I wouldn’t go so far as to call these unrelated issues, but they’re definitely different. Certainly the question of where a country falls on the presidentialism-parliamentarism spectrum doesn’t seem to have a clear relationship with how multi-focal its party system is.

I also think it’s weird for a piece that dwells so heavily on how the rise of Die Linke has fractured the left to not even mention that it was just nine years ago that George W Bush beat Al Gore thanks to left-wing defections to Ralph Nader, while Gerhard Schröder and Joschka Fischer were leading a successful red-green coalition government.

‹ War on Christmas Just Got More Fierce

Forecast Calls for Sluggish GDP Growth, Deflation ›

By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.