"Grover Norquist Is The Most Powerful Force Blocking Spending Cuts And Tax Reform"
Lori Montgomery’s reporting in the Washington Post makes clear, though it doesn’t explicitly come out and say, that if you oppose reductions in federal spending in the United States then today you have no more influential friend than Grover Norquist. Right now you have a debate on Capitol Hill in which the pivotal players, moderate Democratic Party legislators and the Obama White House, want to reduce spending. But the deal’s not getting done since conservative Republicans aren’t taking yes for an answer.
And it’s Norquist who’s playing the biggest part in feeding rejectionism:
On Capitol Hill, Norquist has admonished Coburn (Okla.), Crapo (Idaho) and Chambliss (Ga.) for suggesting a tax option for tackling the debt: reducing credits and deductions worth an estimated $1 trillion a year. Although most of the cash would be used to lower tax rates for everyone, a portion would be dedicated to restoring national solvency.
No good, says Norquist’s group, Americans for Tax Reform. Under the pledge, raising revenue in any way requires an equal tax cut elsewhere to avoid expanding the size of government. And, yes, that sometimes means protecting tax breaks that Republicans view as bad public policy, Norquist and his supporters say.
Follow the logic here. According to the Norquistian theology, a good small-government conservative can’t agree to close a tax loophole that’s bad public policy in order to entice Democrats into agreeing to spending cuts. You can’t achieve efficiency enhancing reforms to the tax code by using the prospect of enhanced revenue as a sweetener, and you can’t broaden the coalition for spending cuts by using enhanced revenue as a sweetener. So the tax code stays inefficient and the spending level stays high, all so the members of the True Faith can be unsullied in the purity of their complaints about the inefficiency of the tax code and the high level of spending.