Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Ryan Budget Strangling Transportation Funding

Posted on  

"Ryan Budget Strangling Transportation Funding"

Share:

google plus icon

A great Ben Adler piece reveals how even Republicans who want to vote for more transportation spending can’t due so thanks to the Paul Ryan budget they all voted for earlier in the year:

Smart-growth advocates, unions, and environmentalists had been excited by President Barack Obama’s $556 billion proposal for the six-year transportation bill, but [Committee Chairman John] Mica’s plan offers a mere $230 billion because Republicans are unwilling to raise the gasoline tax, which pays for federal transportation spending. They are also unwilling to create new sources of funding such as a tax on vehicle miles traveled (this would be achieved using GPS monitoring). But gasoline-tax revenues are actually declining, not just holding steady, because of lower usage during the recession and increasing vehicle efficiency. Whereas President George W. Bush was happy to cover the shortfall between gas-tax revenues and authorized transportation spending by taking money from general funds, these newly principled Republicans won’t do that. So per-year spending on transportation would decline from $52 billion to $35 billion per year when it should be going up to meet our growing needs.

The commitment to squeezing domestic discretionary spending, however, is more important to House Republicans. Mica actually supports raising funds for transportation—he co-sponsored a much larger proposal with former Chair Jim Oberstar last year—but he cannot get Republican support for it in the current environment. “He’s collared by the fact that the Ryan budget only allows this much money for [transportation],” says David Burwell, author of a recently released comprehensive report on surface transportation reauthorization from the Carnegie Endowment.

Obviously Mica has nobody but himself to blame for this. Republican members of Congress who didn’t like the consequences of Ryan’s budget could and should have refused to vote for it. Instead, we’ve got this.

« »

By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.